Tag Archives: Winston Churchill

Diary Blog, 27 February 2026, including views about the result of the Gorton and Denton by-election

Morning music

Dry cold air, a frozen pond, skates, winter sun, and a pretty girl. Life could be worse…

Gorton and Denton by-election result

Well, there it is. It seems that a considerable proportion of the Green votes may have been tainted by coercive “family voting” by Pakistanis (12% at polling stations, and an unknown number via postal voting), but even that might not have changed the result.

Social media is already alive with idiotic white “me-too” type anti-Reform tweeters etc, all saying what a humiliation this has been for Reform and for Matt Goodwin personally. Really? Reform doubled its percentage share of the vote since 2024, less than 2 years ago. True, the Greens tripled their 2024 vote, but Labour halved their share.

The real story here is that the traditional “mainstream” parties have all been rejected by the voters, both white and non-white.

Labour lost a seat, and in an area, which has been a Labour stronghold throughout living memory. Labour’s vote-share fell from 50.8% in 2024 to exactly half of that, 25.4%, at the by-election.

The Conservative Party scored 7.9% in 2024, but now only 1.9%.

The LibDems scored 3.8% in 2024, but only 1.8% this time.

Contrary to what the pseudo-“Green” supporters on social media are saying, the big loser at Gorton and Denton was not Reform but the Labour Party.

Gorton and Denton was only 440th on the Reform UK target list, and/but was considered a very safe Labour seat.

Fairly disastrous for Labour. If Labour cannot win, or even come second, in a place like that, where can it win?

As for Reform, well…had it been social-national, rather than “libertarian” fake “conservative”-nationalist (if “nationalist” at all), if it were not so pro-finance capitalist, not so very pro-Jew, pro-Israel, not so hostile (Tice and Farage) to employed persons and to people cheated out of property-ownership (and so having to rent from the likes of Tice), it might have won handsomely in this by-election.

The new Green Party MP, Hannah Spencer, looks to me like both a fake and a freak.

I think that head-counting “democracy” of this sort really is washed-up in the UK. It just does not work in a so-called “multicultural society”.

As for Starmer-stein, and as blogged previously, I doubt he will resign. He likes the status and money and the rest too much. He loves to parade, albeit comically, on the world stage, and play the “world statesman”, however implausibly. He will cling on until people stamp on his fingers.

The other big loser out of the by-election might be the pathetic Corbyn/Sultana “Your Party”, which did not contest the seat, but has now been totally overshadowed and made irrelevant by the Green triumph.

More about the Jew Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Andrew Windsor etc

Well, I have just watched a Netflix documentary (4 or 5 hour-long episodes) about the case of the Jew Epstein etc. It ends with the indictment of the half-Jewish Ghislaine Maxwell, after the supposed suicide of Epstein, so misses out her conviction and sentence, and the fall of “The Andrew Formerly Known As Prince”.

Fairly good as a documentary, and it kept the interest, but it completely failed to investigate the Israeli intelligence and espionage connections. Not one word…

No mention of MOSSAD, Aman, the Trilateral Commission, or the Council on Foreign Relations.

In fact, despite almost all the main characters on the “guilty” and/or allegedly guilty side (Epstein, Maxwell, Dershowitz, many many others) having been Jews or (in Ghislaine Maxwell’s case) half-Jews, the word “Jew” was, I think, not uttered even once. Of course, not all of the alleged abusers were Jews (Andrew Windsor, Bill Clinton etc) but many were, and most if not all of those connected in other ways to Epstein were Jews, even those who were not American (e.g. “lord” Mandelson).

Still, it was good to reflect, while watching the high life of Epstein, on the fact that the Jew has gone up the chimney, and that Ghislaine Maxwell remains in a U.S. prison, albeit now in a “Club Fed” soft one, and may remain there for much of the rest of her life.

See also:

Tweets seen

In the unlikely event of those figures being the outcome of a general election, the House of Commons would consist of about 467 Reform UK MPs (massive massive majority), Greens 82 (official Opposition but very weak), 40 SNP, 27 LibDems, and 12 Lab. Oh, and zero Cons…

It is quite funny to see the usual Labour/Green idiots getting it wrong again. Yes, Reform failed to win the Gorton and Denton by-election, but Greens standing elsewhere will mostly benefit Reform by knocking out Labour without themselves being able to win.

As I said today and previously, Starmer will only give up his position and privileges when people start to stamp on his fingers to make him let go…

Starmer-stein is becoming totally pathetic.

Starmer-stein may have to go but not, I think, swiftly. Not if he himself has any say in it.

That is dire, even by the standards of Starmer-stein, a no-ideas, box-ticking, bureaucrat-lawyer. Glib but utterly meaningless phrases: “Our communities“, “laser focused” etc. He did make a couple of good points (about minimum wage and the rights of renters) but this government is 95%+ a farrago of soundbites that mean absolutely nothing. Just a pack of jokers, as were the “Conservative” governments of 2010-2024.

Starmer even ticked the “support Ukraine” box, which is an incredible waste of money, and a potential trigger for a war which would leave the UK a charred and radioactive wasteland.

What is “not fair” about hating Starmer-stein? He poses on the world stage while the country slides into dystopia, he makes lying noises about “smashing the gangs” while migrant-invaders flood into the UK, he has virtually prevented poor British people from getting homes (whether private or social) while placing migrant-invaders (many criminal) into council and housing association houses and flats, and throws money away on support for Israel and “Ukraine” (Kiev regime), while the standard of living of 90% of the UK population is plummeting. Oh, and after the 2024 migrant-hotels and sex crime protests, he interfered with the judicial protests and demanded that protesters be imprisoned, and even held in custody until trial months or years later; some died.

Starmer is evil, and if he merely loses his unmerited status as Prime Minister, a position which he has proven he cannot fulfil properly, he will be lucky indeed.

Ha. Hodges was tweeting only yesterday that he could not see Labour losing the by-election! That aged well! (about 12 hours).

So, according to Hodges, Reform did not come close to winning? Well, they came second, and though their vote was below 29%, that is after all nearly a third of the votes cast, and in a constituency where about a third of the voters are not even (really) English/British (yes, they probably do have British, as well as Pakistani, passports).

It may be that the Reform UK “ceiling” is around 35%, or even the Gorton and Denton figure of 28.7%, but even the latter would ensure that Reform would win a plurality of Commons seats, and perhaps a majority, unless Labour can exceed that figure, and there is no sign of that, at present.

As for the Greens, they can only win seats where there are either huge numbers of freaks, brainless young know-nothings and “wokes” (such as Brighton Pavilion), or seats where there are huge numbers of Muslim voters with no other likely options (as at Gorton and Denton). The Greens may be able to get 20, 50, even 75 seats at a general election, if Labour continues to be hated and despised, but probably no more.

At present, Reform, underwhelming as it is, is stll likely to win a plurality of seats at the next general election.

I think Westminster Bubblers such as Hodges find it hard to understand that both Lab and Con have had their day, and for the same reason— their natural support-bases are eroding, and fast.

For once, I agree with Farage completely.

If you turn large parts of your country into an Indo-Pak ghetto, that is what you get…

On the wider question of Reform v. Green, just look at all the opinion polling from the past year. Reform 25%-35%, Greens 10%-18%. The many anti-Reform (anti-national) tweeters etc cannot seem to grasp that, in 90% of the constituencies, all they will do at the next general election is weaken the Labour vote and so allow Reform to win.

Within about 15 years, the various ethnic factions within the UK will not be voting, they will be arming.

Well, wouldn’t you know…

Every. Single. Time.

Wall. Squad. End.

[“A pharmacy manager in Bradford has been jailed for sexually abusing a child who had also been r-ped by another man.

Shahzad Hussain, 27, contacted the girl on Snapchat, lied about his age and groomed her in 2022. He was found guilty following a trial of six offences relating to sexual activity with a child. Last month, Ahmer Hamid, 29, was jailed for nine years after being found guilty of driving the same girl to a secluded location and r-ping her in a separate incident in 2022. Defence said Hussain, “was a man of previous good character” and “he’s paid the ultimate price” [of losing his job] due to a “weekend of terrible behaviour”. Hussain was jailed for just seven years. He was ordered an SHPO curbing internet use for 15 years and on sex offenders register for life. Sickening.“]

Wall. Squad. End.

He will be out in about 4.5 years but, when Britain has a real British government, will be tracked down and eliminated with the rest.

Wall. Squad. End; and refer to previous comment.

The vituperative and fanatical Jew-Zionist barrister, Simon Myerson, of Leeds [@scynic1], who was sacked a couple of years ago as a part-time judge (Recorder) for being unable or unwilling to stop intimidating and insulting people on social media, actually set up a “charity” to import more Afghans (to the UK, not Israel, needless to add).

Every. Single. Time.

Incidentally, tweeter Sophie Meaden, as a law student, will be aware that one requirement of the existence of a charity under English law is that it should have “public benefit”. What possible public benefit can there be in importing the racially/culturally inferior into this country?

Psychologically, a win for Goodwin would have been better for Reform, but the swing at Gorton and Denton might indicate that Reform can easily get an overall majority at the next general election, pushing both Labour and Conservative, let alone the fake “Green” freaks into double-digit or even single-digit territory.

The result at Gorton and Denton also tends to destroy any remaining faith of white English/British people in the supposedly “democratic” electoral system (large ethnic minority bloc-voting, coercive “family voting” by Paki-stani Muslims, electoral fraud of various kinds), and that disenchantment may eventually fuel a proper national uprising.

British voters have been pushed to and beyond the limit by the dual incompetence and malice of the Labour and Conservative parties, the main System parties.

Of course, the Greens only triumphed at the by-election by a shameless pandering to the ethnic minorities, especially Pakistani Muslims. That minority voted, one can fairly accurately guess, in numbers around 12,000 of the 37,000 voters who voted. Seems that rather more than half of the Muslim element, maybe even three-quarters, voted Green (the rest voted Labour).

The Greens got just under 15,000 votes altogether, so between ~6,000 and ~9,000+ of the Greens’ votes were Muslim votes. Without those votes, the Greens would have come a poor third with as few as ~6,000 votes.

I note that none of the msm scribblers and talking heads are willing to engage with the realities; all talk or scribble is about parties as though policies and personalities are the only things that matter. Race and culture of the voters is only mentioned, if at all, in passing, yet the Green triumph was mainly an ethnic non-English/British win over the real British in that area, and because the stupid whites —disenchanted with fake Labour, so be it— who voted Green allied themselves with the Muslim Pakistanis. I can only assume that those white Green voters wanted something socialist or at least social, and neither Labour nor Reform suited them.

Late tweets seen

Hard to assess, but seems plausible, looking at the fact that the Labour vote “only” halved, rather than collapsing completely. After all, few white (i.e. English/British) people are now going to vote Labour, wherever they may live.

Turnout at the by-election was slightly below 50% (47.62%), and there are about 80,000 voters of which just under 37,000 voted. Muslims etc (non-whites) who voted probably numbered somewhere between 12,000 and 20,000. It can be seen that, without the non-white (almost all Pakistani Muslim) voters, both the Greens and Labour would have scored around 5,000 votes, maybe fewer than 5,000, and Matt Goodwin/Reform would have won easily.

In parts of England and Wales where the ethnic minorities are “only” 5%, 10%, or even 20%, Reform is still very much on track for an historic overall victory. The upcoming May local elections will be interesting to see.

Having said that, probably around 25,000-30,000+ white voters voted at that by-election. Fewer than 11,000 voted Reform. At least 14,000, maybe more, voted Labour or Green. I suspect that the old and very old voted in the mindless tribal-Labour way one sees in the North of England; the young or very young, e.g. students and dropouts, where they voted at all, may have voted Green.

Reform’s weakness, as often blogged, is that it is not social-national. Its ceiling may not be (as Dan Hodges thinks) 28%, but it may be around 35%. All the same, either figure might yet put Reform into government.

Does Hodges understand just how atypical Gorton and Denton is? The Greens might manage 50 seats at a general election; I doubt more. There are huge areas of “Middle England” where both Labour and Conservatives are almost swear-words now. Those areas are going to go Reform almost en bloc as things stand.

Hodges just wilfully fails to understand that, when you import millions of Pakistanis, Bangladeshis, blacks etc, you become, in proportion, a country with traits like Pakistan, Bangladesh, India, African countries etc.

Fixed. Rigged. Fake “democracy”…

I see on TV news that there are hopes for an agreement between Iran and the USA re. nuclear enrichment etc. It occurs to me that those subtle Iranians might have a strategy— agree to pause uranium enrichment and nuclear weapons research, but at the same time to step up, hugely, their conventional missile production (I read that they presently produce about 100 missiles per month, many hypersonic).

If they can produce 200 a month for 3-4 years, they will have in readiness up to 10,000 missiles, maybe 15,000 if you include their present stock, missiles many of which will be impossible to intercept; by about 2029 or 2030. The missiles will be buried below mountains, ever-deeper, and almost impossible to destroy pre-launch. On that basis, Israel is doomed.

On the other hand, maybe the USA is about to attack, doing Israel’s bidding yet again…

The situation is similar with the UK msm.

[“The Mossad made sure all jews were warned before their terror attack on the American people at 911.
But they were not only warned not to enter the Twin Towers.
One of my bosses (jewish) at Credit Suisse First Boston showed me his boarding pass to one of the hijacked planes.
He told me had was warned not to go on the plane.
He told me he kept the boarding pass in his wallet ever since.
At the time I thought it was a Cohencidence.
Not any more.
We need to end Pax Judaica
and the terror state of Israel
“]

Late music

Diary Blog, 3 December 2025, including a few brief thoughts around the year 1940

Afternoon music

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hannah_Peel]

Tweets seen

Israel-puppet “Tommy” seems unable to distinguish between a definitely-decided-upon plan of invasion and a mere contingency plan. The “plan” to invade the UK, Seelowe (Sealion), was a contingency plan. Under the right circumstances, it might have been actioned, and enough resources put in to make it feasible, but that never happened in or after 1940.

Hitler’s grand strategy, as of 1939-40, was either for the German Reich to join with the then-great British Empire (which Hitler admired) to rule much of the world (Britain as a seaborne empire and the Reich as one ruling northern Eurasia), or for there to be an uninvolved peace between the Reich and Britain (and also between the Reich and defeated France, along with its own widely-scattered colonies), giving the Reich the great possibility of defeating Sovietism and achieving huge Lebensraum (living-space) in the east of Europe and European Russia (especially the rich black-earth agricultural lands of the Ukraine, a country the same size as France).

The “Battle of Britain” arose out of the battle for France, which ended in German victory that same summer of 1940. The Germans were focussed on destroying the RAF airfields both in Northern France and in the southeast of England.

Why could German forces not invade England after the Fall of France? Several reasons.

Firstly, Hitler ideally wanted the British Empire as an ally or, failing that, as a hands-off bystander, not as a defeated enemy.

Secondly, and more practically (and as the British successes of the Battle of Britain proved), the Luftwaffe was simply unable to attain air supremacy, leaving any invasion fleet open to merciless RAF and Royal Navy (Fleet Air Arm) attack from the air.

Thirdly, the German army and navy were unable to source sufficient carrying or ferrying capacity to land an invasion force large enough to be likely to be able to establish and hold a bridgehead in the southeast of England.

In fact, this was known to the British government at the time; Churchill was well aware of it, but it suited him to keep the British population in a state of invasion-fear and panic, as well as spy-mania (the view, popularly held, that German spies were everywhere— yet another war myth only dispelled several decades later).

Seelowe (Sealion), was only a contingency plan, but not a merely “paper” one. It might, under more favourable circumstances, have been upgraded to a genuine operational plan ready to be put into effect. Never happened.

I was unaware that “Tommy Robinson” took an interest in WW2 grand strategy; or are (((those))) behind him the ones who take an interest?

More tweets

For a brief happy moment, I thought that that referred to the UK…

At best parasites, usually criminal or with criminal links, sometimes also terrorists.

Forget prison sentences. Wall. Squad. End.

British people are homeless while hostile and/or useless parasite untermenschen take much of the available social housing. A million more, every year, are arriving. Something will have to give. Society is starting to break apart in this country.

Those who know me know that farmers (eg in the UK) are not my favourite people, as a general group, but it is obvious that fake “Labour” is hitting them for one reason only (apart from grabbing money), which is that the farming community is almost entirely English/British, i.e. white Northern European.

Labour, on the other hand, has become a party dependent on non-white voting blocs: the Muslims, of various sorts, and blacks. I have not seen the opinion polls for a few days, but the last couple I saw had Labour on 15% and 20%. Pretty clear that very few white English people are now going to vote Labour.

Wall. Squad. End.

Quite.

There is little point in Reform doing a deal with the plainly-disappearing Con Party. At present, few Con MPs are likely to survive the next election.

My own use of Electoral Calculus comes to a slightly different result: Reform about 379 seats, Labour 82, LibDems 61, SNP 44, Cons 35, Greens 13 [etc]. A very solid Reform majority.

Who’s afraid of the big bad wolf?” (arguende)

Zelensky’s ricebowl is about to be taken away.

The ludicrous “Your Party” (currently opinion-polling at somewhere below 1%) is, in microcosm, the alliance seen more widely between the more “socialist” white Labourites and the Muslim (not infrequently, Islamist) voting bloc. It could never work. Ideologically, the two main components of “Your Party” have little if anything in common.

Even were the above to be left aside, the fact that “Your Party” has split before even having been fully launched will turn off 99% of voters. I never thought that “Your Party” (which may be renamed something else in the end, maybe “Party McParty Face Party”) would score more than a couple of Westminster seats, but now it looks as though it will just be Corbyn himself sitting there.

Of course, as that scribbler says, the Muslim voting bloc will not be going away, if only because somewhere around 11% of the whole UK population (no-one seems to know the real figure) is now Muslim.

More music

[The Castle, Nuremberg]

More tweets

Disgraceful, but par for the course in the contemporary UK.

I was sorry to see today that that young man has been incarcerated for his tweets (as I understand was the case; I am unfamiliar with the details of the matter, except that it seems to have been instigated by the usual pack of malicious Jew-Zionist fanatics).

A Crown Court case, but Morgan apparently pleaded guilty. Often a mistake. He may well have been better off taking his chances with a British jury (while they still exist).

I remember Morgan’s tweets from a couple of years ago; while I did not agree with all of them, many were worth seeing, and no-one should be imprisoned for socio-political tweeting, particularly when the prosecution is basically a Jewish-Zionist put-up job.

[“Got called a Nazi for being against trans ideology. Got called a Nazi for saying the illegals are a problem. Got called a Nazi for saying that Islam isn’t compatible with the West. Got called a Nazi for saying legals are scamming our visa system and government systems in general. Got called a Nazi for not wanting the English to become a minority in their own country. Got called a Nazi for calling for Remigration. Got called a Nazi for questioning foreign influence in our government and institutions. I really don’t care. Words are meaningless. England for the English. Britain for the British. Europe for Europeans.”]

Brava!

[“The government intends to replace most trials by jury with trial by judge alone. A judge from Leeds dealing with criminal cases, Recorder Simon Myerson KC, repeated on here the claim that I was the scum of the earth who was responsible for someone’s suicide. The claim was entirely false and my view is that Myerson is an obnoxious buffoon. I infer that Myerson was irrationally prejudiced against me, possibly over my views on Israel or because I annoyed his mate Mark Lewis. In what was an essentially secret process between judges, Myerson was investigated by another judge from Leeds, Lady Justice King. Despite the obnoxious and false claim, Myerson was only given a slap on the wrist by the Lady Chief Justice and the Lord Chancellor (a politician). Myerson continued sitting as a judge. Nice work if you can get it. The government intends to take away most decisions on whether someone is guilty of a serious criminal offence from a jury of 12 ordinary people. The plan is to give the decision to a judge alone, perhaps someone like Myerson. No doubt there are other judges like him, each with their own prejudices. Juries of 12 ordinary people play an essential role in ensuring justice is done and seen to be done. Public participation both legitimises the criminal process and functions as an essential check on state power. Abolishing trial by jury will lead to many more miscarriages of justice. No matter what your politics are, what is proposed is genuinely terrifying and cannot be allowed to happen.”]

Of course, Myerson was sacked in the end, not so long after he was appointed Recorder (p/t criminal judge).

Late music

[Arnold Bocklin, The Surf]

Diary Blog, 19 May 2023, including some discussion of success and failure in politics

Morning music

Reminder

Always remember “the men behind the wire”.

From the newspapers

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12098975/Calls-boycott-Adidas-womens-swimwear-advert.html

All over the world, we see huge enterprises (or their advertising agencies) hitting one “woke” button after another. In this case, two— “trans” nonsense and the “blacks with everything” campaign of fake “diversity”.

One sees calls to boycott the companies involved, or to “hit them in the wallet“. However, those calls miss the point, because the individuals and cabals behind the brainwashing do not care whether the companies concerned lose money or customers over these outrages.

Think of the finance-capitalist companies involved as merely shells, to be used as convenient for the long-term purposes of the real powers behind the System. “Black Lives Matter”, “refugees welcome” “Covid”, “climate change”, “Ukraine” etc are just some of the “causes” used to further wider objectives connected with the world-history 33-year cycle (in this case, 2022-2055).

New World Order, Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan etc.

Time to defend European culture and civilization.

See also: https://ianrobertmillard.org/2018/12/10/tv-ads-and-soaps-are-the-propaganda-preferred-by-the-system-in-the-uk/.

Tweets seen

The world is not without kind people” (Russian saying).

The “presidents” of the Central Asian joke-states —I myself lived in Kazakhstan 1996-1997— may feel themselves big fish in their small ponds (small in most ways except geographically), but a large shark is about to invite them to lunch, and they will be the lunch.

More music

Politics overheard

I happened to be in the local Waitrose not long after it opened. Heard a brief conversation between a cashier (about 60 y o) and a customer (about the same, or older— the area is demographically weighted heavily in favour of middleaged and elderly people).

The first topic (that I heard), after agreeing that “nothing works any more“, was the recent local elections. Both agreed that they had received no literature from “any of the three parties” (the area is almost exclusively Conservative in terms of local and central government; Labour usually comes third or, not infrequently, fourth). Both also complained that no-one had knocked on their doors (for me, that is a very good thing—F.O.!), and that, in any case, “all three parties” were saying the same thing, and none could be trusted to carry out whatever they said anyway.

You would think that all of that boded well for any new social-national party, but the “three main parties” scam is deeply deeply entrenched, ingrained like brainwashing in the minds of the people. Despite the crying need for a new movement, the mental leap required of the mass of the people to vote for one, let alone join one, is enormous. There is the additional fact that no credible social-national party or movement exists in the UK.

Political success and failure

Real political leaders have usually “failed” at more than they have “succeeded”, and of course the biggest cliche about that is that “all political careers end in failure“.

Hitler failed at secondary school, failed to get into art school, failed to get into architecture school, failed to become an independent artist, was not promoted in the WW1 German Army beyond corporal, joined a tiny group of “extremists” in 1919, failed to become much more than a political joke for the 10 years 1919-1929, but then burst onto the national and international stage as destined leader of Germany, achieving huge successes for 6 years of that peaceful rebirth of a nation. After a few more years of success in war, the tragic failures of 1943-45, and a tragic death.

Churchill too. Born with a “silver spoon”, yet a failure at school (Harrow, where his application was nearly rejected). Churchill only gained admittance to Sandhurst at the third attempt, then was allocated a place in one of the least cerebral parts of the Army, the cavalry.

Churchill’s 4-5 years as an officer (mostly spent as journalist rather than soldier, though he saw action in the Sudan and South Africa and, much later, in WW1 Belgium) were crowned with a single promotion, to lieutenant in his younger years, though much later to —temporary— Lt. Col. in 1916, reduced to major when he withdrew from active service after only 4 months.

Churchill’s political life was likewise chequered. He defected, re-defected, lost and won seats. Famously, the lost election of 1945, then a muted victory in 1951.

As strategist, Churchill was a disaster in both world wars: Gallipoli, Singapore, Norway, Greece, North Africa (at first), the Italian campaign etc. His “success” in WW2 was of course by reason of the participation of the USA and Soviet Union. That had its price(s): the slow dismantling of the British Empire, the gradual subservience of the UK to the USA both in WW2 and after 1945, the condemnation of much of Central and Eastern Europe to live under Soviet or Soviet-influenced socialism for 40-45 years.

Abraham Lincoln too. A litany of failed attempts to be elected to a number of offices, but crowned ultimately with election to the highest office, President of the United States. His assassination while still in office followed on the heels of his victory in the American Civil War.

Those three examples show the difficulty of assessing political success and failure. In the end, all three have gone “beyond success and failure” by becoming world-historic figures who will be remembered as such for as long as, say, Julius Caesar or others will be remembered.

As for Indian money-juggler Sunak, he is not and never will be in the same league as Hitler, Churchill, or Lincoln. Eminently forgettable. In fact, he will leave scarcely more of a ripple on the surface than Liz Truss or Theresa May.

Beth Rigby is easily impressed. So what if Sunak was Head Boy at his bloody school (Winchester)? As for his having made a gigantic amount of money by having worked for the Goldman Sachs vultures, and then having married into a mega-wealthy Indian family, well, such things happen. “Success”?

Meanwhile, Britain is visibly falling to pieces.

More tweets seen

The cabal ruling Britain behind Indian money-juggler Sunak and his crew have no loyalty to the people of the UK, only to the Money Power and its NWO agenda. The British people are expendable, in their eyes. We slide towards a third world war with people little better than “erudite cretins” (so to speak) pretending to be in charge (Sunak, Ben Wallace, James Cleverly etc). Most are not even particularly erudite, come to that…

…and the same idiots will call 1930s Germany (which never thought of doing anything of that sort) “evil”…

Of course, once Germany had a decent and efficient government under Hitler and the NSDAP, there was no homelessness anyway. New houses for German people. Britain in 2023 could learn a lot from 1933 Germany…

Zelensky, waiting for his money…

There it is— USD $4M of US taxpayers’ money, now worth about 50 cents as scrap metal, lying in a Ukrainian gutter…

The police already had powers to clear nuisances off the roads. Try lying down outside fortified Downing Street, and see. Or wherever.

The System is (as the tweeter says) allowing the connected Just Stop Oil and Extinction Rebellion idiocies for its own purposes. Not necessarily, though, (only) the ones claimed in that tweet.

New York City was a zoo (in part, or parts) when I was there (1989-1993, on and off); God knows what it is like now. As a matter of fact, the first time I ever heard it called a “zoo” was in 1989, by an American. Not, incidentally, a rednecked crazie with a rifle-rack in his pick-up truck, but a well-travelled and late-middleaged nuclear scientist.

Not sure why anyone (even anyone wealthy) would really want to live in New York City.

The map shows the countries with the largest projected growth (green) and decline (red) in population by 2100.

According to UN forecasts, by 2100 the population of African countries will grow the most: Niger will add 761% compared to 2020, Zambia – 455%, Tanzania – 380%.

In total, in 25 countries the population will more than triple, and almost all of them (except Iraq – 16th place, + 291% of the current population) – in Africa.

Eastern Europe will be the leader in population decline: the population of Moldova and Bulgaria will decrease by more than half, Bosnia and Herzegovina – by almost half (by 48.9%).

Outside Eastern Europe, significant population declines are expected in China, Japan and South Korea.”

The original thread is well worth reading.

More from the newspapers

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/may/19/new-york-city-sinking-skyscrapers-climate-crisis

Sinking into the mire.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/may/19/mps-london-elites-parliament-building-nation

Also sinking into the mire.

I was unaware until I read that report that about 60 MPs are currently being investigated on a variety of sex charges. Then there are the financial cheats, freeloaders, and outright fraudsters.

Late tweets seen

Religion FOOTBALL (and other televised sport) is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people.” [Marx, as amended for the UK in 2023]…

That is less than half the size of Hyde Park in London.

Despite all the intended and executed actions (by a number of European powers, not just Germany, as the simpleminded like to believe) just before the start of both the First and Second world wars, in the end those wars started almost “by accident” at the same time. The states of Europe blundered into them. Will the Third World War be the same?

Late music