I have no further news of the persecuted satirical singer-songwriter Alison Chabloz, currently in prison after having been sentenced to 18 weeks’ imprisonment for contravention of the notoriously bad law, the Communications Act 2003, s.127.
The imprisonment was the result of years of plotting by the malicious Jew-Zionist cabal known as the “Campaign Against Antisemitism” [“CAA”].
The sentence of 18 weeks is in fact about 7-8 weeks after taking into account normal and particular discounts and reductions. Alison has so far done about 2 weeks actually in prison (as of Wednesday 14 April 2021), and will in any event be released sometime late next month. In the meantime, her trial Counsel is thought to be applying for bail on her behalf (pending appeal). The progress of that application and that of her appeal lodgment is at present unknown to me.
Should anyone wish to send Alison a card, letter, or book, the address is:
Please note that any books should be *paperback, *new, and *sent direct from Amazon or other online seller. Please remember always to include the prisoner number (A6478EK).
Tweets seen
Jewish officials in Marine Le Pen's National Rally party are writing a blacklist of party candidates with neo-Nazi ties: https://t.co/NjvQ2YlfjM
“Jewish officials” in the (renamed) Front National?! Non, non! Very disappointing (though not surprising).
Perhas, @annehoo77837961 Yet far less radical ways of making life quieter, such as better trains, more trams, more bicycling and walking, are not popular and have tiny political support. And millions love, play loudly (and make) hideous noise which they call 'music'. https://t.co/V9jBxkS6Ef
A 'Sunday Times' survey finds that more than 40% of those surveyed actually *enjoyed* house arrest, strangulation of the economy, travel bans etc. Yes, I know it;s an unreliable sample, but even so, I never knew bondage was so popular. https://t.co/uqHwbl9VTJ
I think that many did “enjoy” aspects of the initially-strict “lockdown”. Several reasons. Life was simpler overnight, in a world and a UK which seemed, and now again seems, often too noisy, complicated, stressed.
The iniquitous “British” so-called “long hours culture” (that in fact started to appear in the early 1980s) is part of that “society under stress”.
Then there is the fact that the now-ubiquitous “pleb”/”chavscum” element (both poor and not so poor) was stopped from driving around, crowding into places, beaches and country areas and, indeed, shopping areas. Same applies to the blacks and others in the larger urban concentrations.
Less road traffic meant that Nature could come back in a way many (including me) liked: birds, animals. Where I live is a semi-rural part of England anyway, but the effect was still noticeable.
Also, many people suddenly did not have to attend boring jobs in offices, factories, hospitals (yes, many NHS people too worked from home), pubs, restaurants. Many “worked from home”, which especially for those with comfortable detached houses, maybe with pleasant gardens, swimming pools etc, was a welcome change from the daily commuter grind.
Most of those unable to work from home were chucked furlough monies amounting to —again in many cases— 80% of their net pay, which taking into account commuting costs etc, meant that quite a few were better off than they had been when actually working!
Even those forced to rely on State benefits were better off, inasmuch as the post-2005 and then post-2010 bullying and harassment regime instituted by such as Alastair Darling (“Labour”), Iain Duncan Dunce Smith, and the Jew “lord” Freud was put on hold for the duration.
Of course, I was impelled to oppose “lockdown”, because of the enormous damage that it has caused to the UK’s society and economy, as well as to any notion of properly passed and applied law and civil rights (and because it had little effect on the spread, over time, of the dreaded virus), but there is no doubt that some aspects of it, on the ground, were welcome to many.
The challenge, of course, is to create a society with the positive aspects but without, as far as possible, the negative.
More tweets
Look how smart everyone looks. And the streets are so clean.
“Pointless” from the point of view of “keeping the public safe” but certainly not pointless from the point of view of the secret cabals hiding within and behind the State.
A “vaccine passport”, “track and trace” etc are very very useful tools in the armoury of State snoopers. The old Stasi, in the DDR (East Germany), would have fallen over itself to get hold of such tools and technology. Every citizen to be registered, tracked, identified in all locations visited, followed everywhere by electronic impulse (in the near future?). A microchip under the skin? Don’t say, “no, that would never be done” or “people would never stand for that!”… The mass psychological experiment of the past year or so has put paid to such complacent certainties.
More tweets
@lf_group France has many admirable features. But it is only under the Magna Carta/Bill of Rights tradition that freedom is the default position, rather than the conditional gift of the state. This is precisely the advantage that we have been busily trashing in the past year. https://t.co/JXdd9GI5lC
@lf_group France has many admirable features. But it is only under the Magna Carta/Bill of Rights tradition that freedom is the default position, rather than the conditional gift of the state. This is precisely the advantage that we have been busily trashing in the past year. https://t.co/JXdd9GI5lC
Hitchens may be right in some Oxford Union, theoretical, newspaper scribbler way, but is wrong in practical terms.
Workhouses, appalling prisons, low pay and no employment rights etc have all been features of British life in recent centuries, as has been detention for political purposes without trial (in both the First and Second World Wars). The Bill of Rights and Magna Carta did not much help those who were directly affected by the foregoing.
Latest news from reliable sources is that Alison Chabloz remains in Bronzefield Prison near Heathrow Airport. Her trial Counsel has spoken with her via a holographic system (dystopian UK…), and is applying for bail on her behalf.
The word is that Alison is in good heart, is managing well, and has received a good number of letters and cards from well-wishers.
Should anyone wish to send Alison a card, letter, or book, the address is:
Please note that any books should be *paperback, *new, and *sent direct from Amazon or other online seller. Please remember always to include the prisoner number (A6478EK).
Alison has both television and radio in her cell, and is reportedly occupying herself with reading, drawing, painting, listening to the radio and watching Antiques Roadshow on television.
Alison has also been told the good news that, in addition to time spent, to date, in custody (police custody, court custody —including all days, including preliminary hearings spent in court—, and time spent in prison) being taken off her total of actual time to be served, the 4 days she spent in prison (HMP New Hall, in Yorkshire) in 2020, prior to her successful appeal (another defeat for both “Campaign Against Antisemitism” and the suborned police and CPS), will be credited to her, and taken off the time she is presently serving.
In other words, having been sentenced to 18 weeks, Alison will have to serve (unless she gets bail pending appeal) 9 weeks, minus quite a number of days in police, court or other custody, and now minus also those 4 days from 2020.
The upshot is that, even if Alison cannot get bail pending appeal, she would only do a total of about 7 weeks actually in prison. She has already done nearly 2 weeks, so will be out, at latest, by some date in the latter half of May.
The fanatical Jew-Zionists of the “CAA” are hoping that their latest malicious complaint against Alison Chabloz (her next appearance re. that is on 28 April 2021) will result in a heavier sentence yet if any trial results in her conviction. From what little I have seen so far, I am hopeful that that will never be put to the test.
'Keeping Julian Assange in Belmarsh, unconvicted of any crime, looks like spite. While the US government appeals – and who knows how long that will take in our clogged courts – couldn’t Mr Assange at least be sent to a less severe prison?' https://t.co/CiNUIAkSsD
…and why is Alison Chabloz in a top-security prison, having (allegedly) “offended” a tiny proportion (about 50, and possibly only half a dozen) of the 250,000+ Jews in the UK by singing a few satirical songs?
[Update, same day: having received a query from a reader of the blog as to why I, a former barrister, needs to ask such a question, perhaps I should point out that the above question was meant to be read as rhetorical…]
"Here is a puzzle for you. Almost every part of the NHS allows some exemptions from mask-wearing. The one bit of the NHS which absolutely does not is the Blood Service. Why? Blood donors are healthy by definition…" https://t.co/DSF6wQRJFi@clarkemicah
…and that is even on on assumption that, for example, the one single death yesterday was “from Covid”…
This whole panicdemic scare in the UK has become ludicrous. In fact, despite the rabbits wearing facemasks everywhere, even in places where no “rule” (let alone law) mandates that, I do not feel that the fear of early 2020 is still abroad at all. People are just wearing their muzzles because they have been forced to (in shops etc) and also because it has become infra dig not to, rather like going into shops away from the beach wearing only swimming trunks. Not the done thing.
I notice that people stopped doing that “stay 6/8/10 feet away from other shoppers” thing some time ago. The population does not really, seriously, believe that it is in any great peril from “the virus”. Not any more.
In order to maintain whatever is left of its credibility, the Government will only slowly wind down the dictatorial nonsenses of lockdown, facemasks etc. It cannot admit that, in 2020, it made an appallingly bad series of decisions, so it will claim that only those measures have made it possible now to resume semi-normal life.
🔴 Professors and lecturers at Hull University have been advised against insisting on good written English in all circumstance as part of efforts to “decolonise” the curriculum and ensure “equity of opportunity” https://t.co/S0DrmuDJts
#BLM leader shows typical Communist leadership hypocrisy when it comes to spending donors' dollars and Soros' shekels on a new home…. https://t.co/SW6Z1AIJoq
And here are more arguments against marijuana legalisation. The claims of the legalisers have all been shown to be false in practice. Yet they do not give up, because their real argument was always a combination of greed for money, and selfish pleasure https://t.co/2PAaVinuLihttps://t.co/q4voI3Bk8r
Key claim of marijuana legalisers was that legalisation would put illegal gangs out of business. That (like everything else they say) turned out to be bilge, as I warned it would: 'Stoners cheered when Canada legalised cannabis. How did it go so wrong?' https://t.co/KwRZ5MvCyY
My own view of cannabis (and other illegal drugs) and the law is that, while the clarity of complete decriminalization appeals, I despise drug abusers, and would prefer either drug abuse to cease to exist, or drug abusers to cease to exist (or be eliminated).
On the other hand, the present system is not working.
I am also cognizant of the fact that societies where cannabis use is prevalent tend to fall to pieces, as Hafiz, the Persian poet, saw happening in his own country many centuries ago, and as one can see in the areas of the world where cannabis use is prevalent; Jamaica, for one.
All the —mainly British— people I knew when younger (1970s, 1980s), those who regularly smoked marijuana, dropped out of society to a greater or lesser extent.
Please understand that every time you hear the media or academics blaming white people for 'systemic racism', talking about 'white privilege' or 'racial injustice' caused by whites, they are building an antiwhite narrative that has deadly real-world consequences. pic.twitter.com/HVFO5walbt
That anti-white narrative or stream of constant msm propaganda particularly affects the blacks, who as a group tend to lack logical-critical thinking skills.
Fantastic article about the systematic abuse of English girls and the complicity of the f… government, the media and the police. White people, you are under attack! Wake up! Please, pass it on!https://t.co/3VjPSDakz0
Great News! Don't fall for the BS. The only thing the COVID passport issue will succeed at doing, is to wake up more people to the NWO plan, to turn the UK into a communist bio-security driven tyrannical police state. The great awakening is inevitable. https://t.co/a7aSHcRxje
Top Twitter tip: if you're "disappointed" by someone you follow giving their opinion on something, maybe this social media platform isn't for you. You can unfollow, mute or block that person, but don't tell them what they can and can't say. This isn't North Korea quite yet…
Radio loudmouth Julia Hartley-Brewer (who blocked me years ago on Twitter when I exposed her ignorance on a point or two of law and procedure) seems to be turning a blind eye to the abuses carried out by the Jew-Zionist lobby. She has never said a word in support of the free speech of those attacked, and even prosecuted, at the instigation of packs of Zionist Jews such as the “Campaign Against Antisemitism”. I wonder why?
Yes, Laurence Fox and his “Reclaim Party” can be put in the same bin as all the rest of the controlled opposition: Reform UK, Brexit Party, UKIP, “anti-immigration” “Conservatives”, Katie Hopkins, “Tommy Robinson”, Breitbart, “Prison Planet” Watson, “Sargon of Akkad”, Delingpole, Toby Young and his fake “Free Speech Union” etc etc.
Don't be complacent. This isn't going to end anytime soon. Remove them all from office & replace with our own people. Only then can we put OUR agenda in place. ⚔️ ⚖️
…meanwhile, in England, the people amuse themselves with football, rugby, tennis or cricket matches on TV, the latest meaningless msm gossip, the latest “celebrities” one has never heard of, and they worry about their booking of controlled, mask-wearing, machine-holidays of the upcoming summer.
And why, when all of the books show that modern nations are astronomically in debt to that banking consortium, do they seem to get away with continually increasing their 'borrowing' and deferring 'repayment'?
… the committee becomes a wake. The world is now being run by calculating miscreants who have understood this from the beginning. https://t.co/OkRKeZj4JM
When did you realize humanity is being slowly assimilated into an AI hive mind cloud consciousness by satanic occultists who worship lower astral beings that are trying to escape entropy by creating their own universe by synthetic means?
Seems that the hysterical hate-filled Left Waffen SS have now *cancelled* David Jason as well as the Queen. It's easy to laugh at them, but it's actually quite dangerous. Our post-modernist infatuated academic system is pumping out generations of kids who are mentally ill.
— Sozzinski (Person without a cervix) (@Sozzinski) April 10, 2021
Four Scotland opinon polls this week put pro-independence parties on 52% & pro-union parties on 48% in total constituency votes https://t.co/Q3Lw9V0PjD
Is that so? If the new Alba Party challenges the SNP in most Scottish constituencies, and effectively enough so that other parties come through the middle (Conservative, LibDem, Labour), then yes. It may well be, though (and I never claim great knowledge of Scottish politics) that many voters “up there” will choose between Alba Party and SNP, and simply dump the others.
Voters who are pro-Independence but anti-SNP. I do not know whether that is so, and whether there are even any pro-Independence but anti-SNP voters.
I am guessing, but it may be that Salmond’s quite recent sex crime trial has mortally wounded him politically, even if he was formally acquitted.
Either way, it does seem that “Independence”, however nebulous a concept that is in the Scottish context where a new Scotland might still be tied into EU, IMF, World Bank, NATO etc, is gaining ground with Scottish voters. That might have big geopolitical implications.
Well, I see that John Rentoul has again been defeated by me, this week scoring only 3/10. My own score was 6/10 (I did not know the answers to questions 4, 6, 9 and 10).
Scotland got the UK govt it wanted 1945-70, 1974-79, 1997-2010; for 43 of 70 years (61% of the time) 1945-2015, when Scotland voted SNP & could not by definition get UK govt it wanted https://t.co/YWydPnMK5p
In 2015, the SNP captured 56 out of the 59 Scottish seats in the Commons; in 2017, 35 out of 59, and in 2019, 48 out of 59. “Scotland” therefore, supposedly “voted SNP”.
In reality though, meaning in terms of the popular vote, the SNP only scored 50%, 36.9% and 45% in those years.
Four Scotland opinon polls this week put pro-independence parties on 52% & pro-union parties on 48% in total constituency votes https://t.co/Q3Lw9V0PjD
Usually, when there is a successful popular movement for a country to leave a larger country or empire, there is a large popular majority for that: 90% in favour, perhaps; certainly 80%. In Scotland, any majority at all is likely to be small, maybe 55% for and 45% against.
I have heard nothing as yet about what I apprehend will be Alison’s appeal to the Crown Court from the verdict and sentence handed down by a single magistrate —aka District Judge (Criminal)— on 31 March 2021. Her solicitors and trial Counsel will also, as I believe, be applying for bail pending hearing of such appeal.
In the meantime, Alison has now served over a week of what is effectively an 8-week sentence (18 weeks, of which 9 weeks would normally be spent incarcerated, but minus time spent in court at trial and in preliminary hearings, and also minus time spent in police custody, with part-days counted as full days).
Anyone wishing to send letters, cards, books etc to Alison Chabloz should write or send to:
— Traditional Western Architecture (@Trad_West_Arch) November 19, 2020
HAPPY INTERNATIONAL BEAVER DAY💚
We love the beaver. Nature’s busy aquatic architect is a formidable tree feller, river changer and wetland creator. But how does it shape the landscape? Get up close to this rewilding superstar. https://t.co/D7OpEHwnys#InternationalBeaverDay
— Wildlife and Countryside Link (@WCL_News) April 7, 2021
I don't understand the function of these strips of grass. They are everywhere on our estate. They could be wildflowers, or scrub, or trees and bushes… f it's a playing field I understand it, and we need green spaces in urban areas, but why settle for this monoculture? pic.twitter.com/pBRE0OQb6K
Following on from the earlier #rewilding cities tweet – just look at this example. Amanda Sturgeon's architectural goal "to have buildings that are intimately connected to the living systems that have evolved with us"
Slightly underwhelming, but it is a start, anyway…when I was at school, and about 14 years old, I sketched out buildings and developments rather like that, in fact more radical and green than the one shown. That was around 1971. Still, Rome was not built in a day…
"Our cities could be rewilded and become habitats for native species everywhere, even in the densest of city centre environments, while also creating engaging community spaces for people" – how great would this be? 🐝🦇🌿https://t.co/40sXFu1YbH
Green Sod Ireland works to protect land and its #biodiversity for the sake of nature and people, with a focus on community empowerment and #EcologicalEducation.
Please note that Alison’s Prisoner Number, which should form part of the address when writing to her or sending any gifts such as books, is slightly different to that previously given by some people, and is A6478EK.
What is the point in having laws for animal protection when a cruel and nasty individual such as the defendant in the above report gets let off so lightly?
Note: The correct prisoner number for Alison Chabloz is in fact slightly different: A6478EK.
Does anyone fully understand new rules on 'Track and Trace' aka surveillance on pretext of health and safety? Appears to me that pubs, when they reopen, will be under *stricter* regulations than before, requring registration of every individual (not just one in each party).
This professional complainant has ensured that every MSM platform in UK knows her name, Chabloz could only dream of such publicity. Something tells me this isn’t about hurt feelings …otherwise why allow CAA’s ‘BedlamJones’ a free rein to stalk women online for so many years?
Well done, BBC— only a full week late! The sentence was pronounced on the second and last day of Alison’s trial, which was 31 March 2021. Last Wednesday…
What a bunch of clowns (and monkeys on a stick) the BBC is! Defund the BBC!
Who but an 'evil racist' would object to such manifest justice? So keep paying your taxes, because things like this in the US invariably spread. Or, just quit the System that discriminates against people like us. Rear your own children, not other people's! pic.twitter.com/jmlSTBQ6Y2
Seems that, at least in Marin County (California…Marin County is the area the other side of the Golden Gate Bridge from San Francisco), “universal” means “universal…unless you are white (no matter how poor you may be)”…
“Universal”, like “diversity”, seems sometimes to mean the opposite of the proper meaning…
Still more craziness from Blood Services (this time in Scotland) over masks. Donors must wear them but 'be aware that for monitoring purposes, they will need to be removed for health check and while donating'. https://t.co/Q25oq9m9N9 So why no exemptions?
Masks are of little use in preventing infection (and, no, the masks people are forced to wear now in shops are not the same as those used in operating theatres where, in any case, they are just a conventional habit from the past as much as anything).
Until halfway through last year, the UK government agreed with what I have just written, but then decided to force the cowed and compliant masses into wearing masks. There is, as with the whole “Coronavirus” thing, an agenda behind it all, and one that has nothing much to do with health.
Blood service is *unique* in the whole NHS in refusing to permit exemptions from mask wearing. Yet donors are by definition healthy, and are on NHS premises only to help the sick, not to be treated for illness. So why? https://t.co/7aFu4V6iQ9 via @theconwom
Interesting from the historical-cultural point of view. The red part of that map coincides roughly with the Roman Empire, though not exactly (North African provinces are in green, as is the Dalmatian side of the Adriatic, and other areas (notably Asia Minor).
Again, the green areas are those which experienced greater penetration of Islamic ideas and customs from the 8thC onward. Again, though, not exactly; only in very broad brush terms.
BBC News – Alison Chabloz jailed for being 'offensive'…
As one man's wine is another man's poison… Who gets to decide what's offensive? And why?https://t.co/MjcBtLNGpz
— 🌴mick👀fulcher🏴 esq (@mickbognor) April 7, 2021
The above tweeter reflects what was normal British opinion until a couple of decades or so ago. Free speech etc. However, even at that time, and for decades before that, a certain (((tribe))) was worming its way into influence and power in the UK. Freedom of expression has been one of many casualties.
@clarkpaula. The great majority having accepted that they should live their future lives by government permission, will now learn in slow, intricate detail what that acceptance means. So, alas, will the rest of us. https://t.co/Kp945h3qvr
Blair was one of the most fervent members of Labour Friends of Israel when he was an MP. Corbyn, though weak, was relatively anti-Zionist. Starmer is another Labour “Friend of Israel”, and is married to a Jewish woman who is a lawyer; their children are being brought up as Jewish; Starmer and his wife celebrate Jewish tribal holidays.
The Jewish lobby wanted to regain control of the Labour Party. They have. Corbyn is now an “unperson”, but Starmer seems to be doing worse, as Labour leader, even than Corbyn (a result which I predicted in these blog pages).
Philip Proudfoot should report Lewis to the SRA for harassment and breaching their code of conduct. The threat of doing this to solicitors/barristers usually makes them stop because they don't want their professional career to be negatively affected. More people need to do this.
Aaron Bastani and Jew-Zionist solicitor Mark Lewis are “discussing”, in the tweets above, the new Northern Independence Party, which is standing a candidate —a former Labour MP— at the Hartlepool by-election. As to Lewis himself, I have blogged quite extensively about him in the past: https://ianrobertmillard.org/2019/01/11/update-re-mark-lewis-lawyer-questions-are-raised/.
Morning music
More tweets
More evidence that the police are just making this up on the hoof. How do you define ‘gender’ Derbyshire? Is denying that gender should have anything to do with policing ‘hate’? https://t.co/4x5Z3yzxhE
I have seen and heard nothing as to whether Alison Chabloz’s trial Counsel (who, on her behalf, will be appealing her conviction and sentence), has as yet lodged that appeal and/or applied for bail pending that appeal. I apprehend that such application(s) will be lodged and made as soon as possible, possibly today.
[Update, 7 April 2021: It now appears that Alison Chabloz’s prisoner number is in fact slightly different from that quoted in the above tweet, and is A6478EK]
Johnson the alleged 'libertarian' flounders as he evades questions about 'vaccine passports'. Fraser Nelson writes: https://t.co/v3PrfwwaIQ via @spectator
I'm sick of our governments not protecting us from these savages. Open borders has always meant open season on white people. pic.twitter.com/heL34t1H1k
Because both Government and Opposition are pro-“The Great Reset” and “the Great Replacement”, both are riddled with agents of the Jewish lobby, both are pro-ZOG [Zionist Occupation Government], pro-NWO [New World Order] and in favour of the Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan, and therefore both following exactly the same agenda. Understand now??
Every day I try my best to report objectively but when the country is run by a bunch of slippery, self serving law breakers with absolutely no respect for the truth & no obvious comprehension of right & wrong it’s not always easy
BBC news now becoming a government mouthpiece for number of covid jabs given out. Ten minutes every night. Barely any coverage of protests and emphasis on pice injuries. Wonder if they are real this time unlike Bristol.#bbcnews
And this year hymns are still forbidden, most wear masks and proper Holy Communion is banned. Still far from satisfactory @alex_komnenos . https://t.co/oX6rcD1bsh
That, @guffynicola, depends on which icons are being clasted. Michael Wharton, writing as 'Peter Simple' in the Daily Telegraph of the early 1960s, was a hugely funny satirist of the emerging age of self-regarding liberalism. Colin Welch did a reasonable job of following him. https://t.co/s2yrUK3vZV
Not sure that I can agree with Hitchens. “Peter Simple”, whose stuff I occasionally saw in the early 1970s, always seemed to me to be a rather unfunny propagandist of a kind of faux-English suburban pseudo-reactionary mindset. Fake. At least, that was my occasional impression, a long time ago.
Gosh, @barbatosalv. Leaving aside the fact that the Christian 'explanation' of the origin of the universe is a parable, not a literal account, Einstein was not an atheist . Why not? Please read : https://t.co/XbQF3HtZYrhttps://t.co/a07Rb3u4qy
'We have made a religion out of politics, have ascribed to government power and state power things which ought to be ascribed elsewhere, and that we are now reaping the reward of that mistake.' https://t.co/2xNPVNmKys
There's now an effort to rewrite history on the Covid frenzy. The government does not want to admit that it once told the inconvenient truth (they're not much use) about masks: https://t.co/j2OyGYNOT7
There are plenty of examples of socio-political madness at present in the Western world, not least the near-worship of the blacks (as in the “BLM” nonsense), and in respect of “the virus”. The former is nonsense partly because much of our present world has been created over the past few thousand years, and especially the past 600 years, by white European people(s). The blacks were and are mere adjuncts, bystanders, spectators, sometimes nuisances and, yes (and as the “BLM” proponents themselves say) sometimes “victims”.
As to the latter of my two examples, i.e. “the virus”, in some respects that seems to be a deeper-embedded sort of madness, perhaps because based on a deeper emotion— fear.
The Coronavirus or Covid-19 virus has (supposedly) so far killed somewhere around 2 million people in the world. That is about one person in every 4,000 people. In the UK, the death toll per unit of population has been far higher (taking the statistics as given, though they are obviously faked or wrong to a great degree). In the UK, there have been well over 60,000 people who have died at least “with” Coronavirus. That is somewhere around one person in every 1,000 people in the UK.
Conclusion as to seriousness: serious but not existentially so.
Conclusion as to measures taken: absolutely mad. Society has been crippled, normal life largely put on hold, civil rights abrogated, and the UK economy facing a very serious hit. A cowed and frightened population have been walking around (even on solitary country walks etc!) in facemasks (despite such masks being of doubtful use), and every kind of busybody and self-appointed guardian of public behaviour given loose rein. That applies also to the police.
Meanwhile, millions of people are all but abandoned by the NHS because their ailments (including the most serious) are priotitized as secondary in importance to the supposed battle against “the virus”.
The public debate, such as there is, is futile, because a huge propaganda campaign has frightened the unthinking mass of the people into imagining that their lives are in danger from this virus, whereas for 999 out of 1,000 people that is simply not so. Reasoned arguments from such as Lord Sumption, the former Law Lord (Supreme Court justice), cut little ice, because emotion almost always trumps reason.
Oh, well. In the phrase of the day, which so well sums up the present apathy and complacency, which applies in almost everything now (apart from the “panicdemic”), “we are where we are”…
Alison Chabloz
On this Easter Sunday, let us not forget brave and persecuted satirist, singer and songwriter, Alison Chabloz, presently sitting in prison because a malicious Jew-Zionist cabal instigated a prosecution under the notoriously flawed Communications Act 2003, s.127.
It is to be hoped that Counsel for Alison Chabloz will soon be able to secure her release on bail pending appeal (to Crown Court) against an egregiously poor verdict and sentence by a magistrate. Unfortunately, that is unlikely to happen (if it does happen) before Tuesday [6 April 2021], at earliest.
Bored by 'University Challenge', I wrote my own quiz, with questions which are interesting even if you don't know the answers. Guaranteed free of African flags, Pacific island statelets, obscure mathematicians or quantum physics: https://t.co/mwMA4HCOs3
That last is interesting as a metaphor. The same view, pretty much, that John Buchan, or Zuleika Dobson, might have seen before the First World War, or that others might have seen between the wars. Oxford now is hugely different (not just in terms of buildings but socially too) from both 1911 and the 1930s world of Evelyn Waugh’s Brideshead Revisited, from that of C.S. Lewis, Tolkien and the Inklings, but that view remains essentially the same.
When I was a (rather belated) law student, in the 1980s, there was being discussed the question of whether barristers would continue to wear wigs and gowns. The wisest answer came from a lecturer who said that the Bar would cast aside everything except the wigs and gowns. The outward forms would remain.
In fact, while the above has proven to be mainly the case (in Crown Courts especially), in County Court the judge has discretion to dispense with the old form of dress, and in High Court and other fora (particularly in commercial cases) the old form of dress is often not in use now (neither is it in family law cases).
Nonetheless, most people do encounter the practising Bar in Crown Courts, and there the old forms remain in force. The substance of the Bar has, however, changed out of all recognition even since I was finally (having spent time in the USA) Called to the Bar in 1991.
Looking at the UK, the same is true in many other ways. Look at, for example, the Monarchy. It looks, at least largely, similar to what it was in, say 1956, the year of my birth. In reality, it has changed to something rather different. As I have blogged on previous occasions, whatever one may think of the Queen and Consort, no-one could mistake them or their lifestyle for that of “ordinary people”.
When you look at Charles, Anne, Andrew, Edward, there is less of the “royal”. You could just about (certainly in the case of the last three) imagine them living in some expensive part of suburbia, as part of (if the term now has any meaning) the rich “middle classes”, or indeed the “nouveaux riches”; or (as indeed is the case) living in Gloucestershire or Surrey, racing around in Range-Rovers, like characters in an “Aga saga”.
What about William and Kate, Harry and the Royal Mulatta? Notionally “royal” (in the case of William and Kate), but only in a “holding on by the fingertips” sense. Certainly there is nothing royal about Harry the “Royal Cuck” and Meghan the “Royal Mulatta” (who, not so many years ago, was actually married to someone else, a Jew businessman in Southern California!).
I do not want to be too hard on Harry. He obviously has emotional or mental problems, and was bagged by the Mulatta easier than the Duke of Edinburgh used to bag grouse, but he is basically now a peripheral nobody, albeit with plenty of money and still holding (so far) a couple of English titles.
William and Kate? At present still lined up to be King and Queen at some point, but I rather doubt that they will reach the finishing post.
Hold fire on the lawnmower and that weed killer. As we hit spring, here are a few alternative steps you can take to allow your back garden, and the wildlife within it, to flourish (with help from Richard Bunting of @LGSpace and @RewildingB). https://t.co/nvEXXw6zSA
I've now been sent an astonishing *64* potential temperate rainforest sites in England, which together with sites I've visited myself, takes us to 77 sites and counting… Keep 'em coming! https://t.co/qKwhJscV8Upic.twitter.com/RNKf6nNs9i
1.⚠️ Stay Alert – any habitat can be a home for wildlife – even grass verges could be hiding skylark or meadow pipit chicks 2.🚶 Watch Your Step – stick to paths and bridleways to give nature the space it needs
Leeds man spends day off cleaning up litter because he loves the city.
Seems its ok to give this gent some praise but not others like patriotic alternative who spend many days and hours cleaning up our countryside and parks. https://t.co/yavOqz9zIG
Perhaps so, but if the idea was to prevent “subversives” from taking over the BBC or heavily infiltrating it, the policy was a signal failure in the wider sense. The BBC, at the head of the UK msm, has been the flagship for the socio-political collapse of Britain, and has supported every rotten cause of the past 50 years.
The most necessary thing in the UK is not even, as a first step, a political purge, but a purge of the mainstream media in general. Not just lying news media and “journalist” scribblers but, inter alia, the whole range of “celebrities”, comedians, show business types etc.
Some readers have assumed that I must have or had a personal dislike of Hendron. Not so. In fact, I had never even heard of him until I read about his Old Bailey trial, very lenient sentence, and his even more lenient treatment by the Bar Disciplinary Tribunal(s) before which he subsequently appeared.
My animus, if such it be (and incredulity), is a result of the incredible difference between the way in which I was treated (for having tweeted 5 tweets, completely true and accurate and [but] hostile to Jews or at least Jewish influence) and Hendron’s treatment for his egregious defaults, as chronicled. Read my blog post.
I also found it incredible, reading his tweets, that Hendron seemed incapable of thinking and writing logically, or of constructing a literate English sentence. However, the Bar is now a dustbin, so what more can I say? If the Bar thinks that it is OK to have, as practising barrister, someone of Hendron’s type, unable to write or argue coherently, and of (in several ways) dubious character, then that is a matter for the Bar dustbin-profession as it now is.
Now I see this: https://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/high-court-overturns-barristers-suspension-due-to-lacuna. It turns out that Hendron had his lenient Bar sanction made even more lenient by reason of the fact that, being already suspended at the time of the proceedings, the Tribunal had no power to notionally suspend him further, or indeed apply ay sanctions to him, because he was not a “regulated person” at the time.
I had an exemplary record as a barrister, received several judicial commendations, was mentioned favourably in the main legal directories, and was never suspended from practice, but when the Jewish lobby (“UK Lawyers for Israel”, nominally) instigated my disbarment (complaint 2014, disbarment late 2016), I had not been in practice since 2008, and had not had a Bar “practice certificate” since that time. The disbarment was a completely politically-motivated msm farce orchestrated by a pack of Zionist Jews (“UK Lawyers for Israel”, many of whom also belong to the malicious “Campaign Against Antisemitism” who have persecuted Alison Chabloz for years).
At the said proceedings (more specifically, in the considerable documentation that preceded the actual hearing), I made the point that I had not been “regulated” since 2008 (a point, I might add, that Hendron, in his own case, missed…the Counsel instructed by the Bar Standards Board —very honestly— raised it against his own interest).
I was (wrongfully) disbarred (on that basis and in any case), but (to give them credit at least for that) the Bar Standards Board actually wrote to me a year or two after my highly-publicized hearing (Google “Ian Millard barrister” and read what the msm said about me at the time). The BSB then gave me the chance to apply to have my disbarment overturned, on a basis akin to that of Hendron. I suppose that must have been somehow connected with the internal Bar fallout from Hendron’s matter.
In other words, I would still be a barrister today, had I applied. However, for me, there would have been little point, I having had no intention to resume Bar practice, though I suppose that it would have denied the Jew-Zionist pack and their “antifascist” “useful idiots” the opportunity to describe me on Twitter, frequently, and with unsurprising lack of originality, as “disgraced and disbarred barrister Ian Millard” or, as at least one mentally-disturbed Jewish woman often does, on Twitter, as “disbarred Barista“! Well, if I say so myself, I do make a rather good cup of coffee, though I have never done so as a paid occupation…
As far as the egregious Hendron is concerned, his travails continue, and he is at present again before a Bar Disciplinary Tribunal. I believe that it presently stands adjourned.
I had thought that Hendron was being given very lenient treatment because either he was (I assumed) from a very privileged background, or that he “knew too much” about illicit activities of senior members of Bar and Bench. Well, I read somewhere that Hendron went to some comprehensive school, so that would only seem to leave the “knows too much” theory…
I actually did not know, until yesterday, that supermarkets are open on Good Friday now. The materialistic 24/7 multikulti society…
@attiscusfinch104. They do not *forget*. They understand that they now serve the state, not the people. That's been the outcome, if not always the purpose, of police reforms for the past 60 years. Mainly this happened because those who should have prevented it, failed to do so. https://t.co/GAoTIdJS6g
…and much of the State and society generally in the UK has now been suborned by the “you-know-whos”…look at the Alison Chabloz saga of the past few years; look at the BBC and other msm output, as well.
Well, there it is— the new multikulti panicdemic UK police state, staffed by toytown police drones. Notionally done “for good reasons”, the police and others no doubt imagine…
1/2 The police invasion (on a Covid pretext) of a Good Friday devotion at an RC Church in Balham (apparently with a Polish congregation) must open everyone's eyes to the fact that this is no longer a Christian country.
2/2 I suspect older worshippers were all too familiar with Utopian state hostility to the worship of a rival authority. The officers seemed unfamiliar with church in general. Poignant that Met Police badge is still surmounted by a cross, on the Crown of St Edward.
I'm blocked by @thealiceroberts ,I think because I once won an argument with her abt schools. I'd just like to say 'Thank you' to her for showing once again that so much (not all, but a lot) of atheism is driven by insecurity and hostility. I should know, I used to be an atheist.
As with Professor Brian Cox, there are two sorts of “famous scientists”, the ones who make new discoveries and undertake research of importance, and those who are basically people making careers and money out of appearing on TV, radio, in print, and on official committees. Incidentally, if anyone knows of any great discoveries made by either Brian Cox or Alice Roberts (the latter of whom I had not heard until 5 minutes ago), please let me know and I shall publish a few lines about it. I should not wish to be unfair. I do not wait with bated breath, however.
Yes, but…Monsieur Rentoul, those other crises were not used as a method of bringing in a police state by stealth. The Great Reset and the Great Replacement (etc). The “panicdemic” is being so used, and not only in the UK.
Well, this week I got 6/10, thus again beating John Rentoul who scored 5/10. I did not know the answers to questions 4, 6, 7, and 9 (and had to rack my brains to get question 10).
When I lived in Kazakhstan, in 1996-97 (a full year), I invited a friend at the Bar (let’s call him “Teddy”), a train buff par excellence, to visit me in Almaty (former Alma-Ata) by train. I found out what that would entail: a Eurostar journey from London to Paris or Brussels, then a train journey to Moscow, where he would have to change trains by going to another of Moscow’s several mainline stations. Then a 77-hour journey across the Russian countryside and then steppe to Almaty.
Like the character in, I think, one of Evelyn Waugh’s novels, Teddy thought that “abroad was bloody”, and told me that, because of his ideological opposition to the Channel Tunnel (I first heard of UKIP from him, maybe a year or two before a lady with whom I lunched told me about it), he would be unable to come. I think that the real reason was that he was nervous about negotiating his way across Moscow alone and with not a word of Russian; that, and the sheer discomfort of 77 hours on a post-Soviet express train. Thus Teddy missed out on seeing a then rather green and pleasant city full of pretty girls.
I quite like trains, though it does help, on a really long journey, if you are lucky enough to have the sort of accommodation used by the Tsars of all the Russias, or that of the Orient Express. When Andrei Sakharov was recruited to Stalin’s hydrogen bomb project, he travelled to the secret town where it was to be made aboard his own train car at the rear of a normal passenger train. The carriage contained a bedroom for Sakharov and his wife, a dining room, a kitchen operated by a cook, a lounge area, and accommodation for his several NKVD bodyguards (or should that just be “guards”?).
My own longest train journey was an involuntary one in the 1980s from Vienna to Ostend, and very uncomfortable it was. On the morning of the second day (departure having been in early evening), I got out at Cologne, wearing only a dressing gown, in order to buy pretzels on the platform. It was then that the train started to move. Had it not briefly stopped about 10 seconds later, giving me time to get aboard (non-central closing doors, thank God), I should have been stuck at Cologne Station with almost no money, no clothes, and no proper shoes; no passport either.
Late music
Update, 22 March 2022
Once again, I look at a fairly old blog post, only to find that many of the embedded tweets have been expunged by Twitter, leaving just blank space. The death of free speech is here, pretty much.
“Know-all” tweeter “@thinkingofanew1” has, like so many would-be or armchair Twitter “legal experts”, made himself (or herself, but probably the former) look stupid here. Alison Chabloz was not recently convicted of incitement (to anything) but of three charges under Communications Act 2003, s.127, a notorious “bad law” that has attracted academic and other legal criticism for over a decade.
Alison Chabloz is facing a possible trial involving “incitement” (at present it is uncertain whether it will happen, because as yet the Attorney-General’s permission has not been given) under the Public Order Act 1986, but that is a separate matter.
The recent conviction under the 2003 Act was grounded on the basis that Alison Chabloz made “grossly offensive” remarks, in the view of the trial judge (a magistrate). Incitement does not form part of the 2003 Act, and there is no need to establish any incitement, nor indeed any “mental element”. All that need be done is to establish that the act was done (in this case, that the remarks were made and broadcast etc), and that, in the view of the court, those remarks were “grossly offensive”.
In fact, tweeter “@thingofanew1” seems to misunderstand the elements of “incitement” in English law anyway. He/she must either be a wannabe lawyer (perhaps a first year law student) or anyway someone (and there are many such) who thinks that he/she understands the law , but plainly does not.
Do you believe Alison Chabloz should be jailed for her opinions on WW2 history?..bare in mind, Labour politicians regularly revise, downplay and deny crimes committed by Communist regimes.
It was with mild satisfaction that I recently noticed the vicious (and often inaccurate) “@GnasherJew” Twitter troll account being “suspended”, reinstated (after an outcry by the usual Jew-Zionist “claque”) and then “suspended” (expelled?) again. My account on Twitter was “suspended” (permanently) in 2018, after a crowd of Jews (including GnasherJew, who —like all demons— is or originally was not one but legion, a group) finally managed, after years of trying, to have my Twitter account closed.
Jews are usually given far more slack by Twitter than professed “antisemites”, but some have been expelled; I expect that more will follow. Some seem to have nothing much more to do with their time than post on Twitter. Like many, they overvalue Twitter, which is, in the end, largely a waste of time and effort.
…and if I am not mistaken, MP Tobias Ellwood [Con, Bournemouth East] is one of the officers of that unit, at least in a “Reserve” (TA, as was) capacity: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tobias_Ellwood.
The anti-lockdown, anti-facemask (etc) case is based mainly on reason. The pro-lockdown, pro-facemask muzzling case is based mainly on emotion (fear, mostly). Lord Sumption v. Piers Morgan, if you like. Emotion trumps thought. “EVERYONE’S GOING TO DIE FROM COVID!“, they cry. In fact, in the world generally, only 1 person in 4,000 has died from (or supposedly with) “the virus”, and even in the misgoverned UK the figure is only 1 in about every 1,000 inhabitants. No matter— emotion still trumps reason…
Excuses @cmp14837624 . If officers 'loved' to patrol on foot among the public, they wouldn't join or stay in an arrogant, car-borne office-based, heavily armed bureaucracy. Police once enforced the laws the public supported. Now they guard the state, and follow its weary dogmas. https://t.co/3rv2rzhXSP
Very true. The pathetic kow-towing of the “British” (resident in UK) population to the ever-mutating diktats of the part-Jew clown Johnson, and his Cabinet of idiots, proves that.
The perfect Zionist witness— saw the expression on the face of the prosecutor despite not having been there! No wonder one of the Ten Commandments is “thou shalt not bear false witness“! 3,300 years on, the sin continues…
I tried that when I first encountered her here in 2015. As you say, it doesn’t work.
You would not easily guess from that reply that “Dr. Dim” had to apologize (via his NHS employers) to Alison Chabloz only very recently, and also had to delete a lying tweet about her and others…
Alison Chabloz— final blog post before she was imprisoned
But I think he’ll fall foul of the new wokester rule that actors can only play parts for which they bring a ‘lived experience’. So only gays can play gays, only 7,000 year old men can play 7,000 year old men. Makes sense to me. https://t.co/QsOBsNWmhh
I wrote in July 2020: 'Britain’s muzzle consumption is now so high that 6 months from now there will be reports of dolphins and whales floundering about… as they choke on congealed clumps of used muzzles.' https://t.co/tAkzNdC11l
Hitchens did predict that terrible by-product of the “panicdemic” facemask nonsense; I recall reading his view about it.
Actually I was almost alone in my dislike for the London Olympic opening ceremony, even in the right-wing press. Foreign observers thought it baffling and weird, though. https://t.co/QGJPmMCbCR
In fact, Hitchens was not alone in disliking the 2012 “Olympischer Schauspiel“. Me too…
The French, whose health service is in many ways better than ours, are especially baffled. Ann-Elisabeth Moutet has written about this. https://t.co/hBhLjLeQeh
Quite. The French health service is, in most respects, better than the NHS. The Frenchwoman mentioned in that tweet by Hitchens wrote about how hospital wards ceased to exist in France in 1979 (they use these things called “hospital rooms”, for one or two people), and about how she was amazed when she realized, living in London about 30 years after that date, that almost all British hospital patients have to endure multibed wards.
The problem is that the NHS, a good idea in principle, varying in quality in practice, has become a sacred cow, something to be venerated and protected in itself. “Protect the NHS” (from Coronavirus), even if that means unnecessary suffering and unnecessary death in care homes, among patients needing consultation, testing, and treatment…and so on.
The trial of persecuted satirist and singer-songwriter Alison Chabloz has entered its second and (probably) last day. I believe that the Defence case is continuing.
I shall give whatever news I have when I have it.
Freedom of expression is on trial.
[Alison Chabloz]
Tweets seen
Grimly fascinating.
“People with advanced degrees were 36 percentage points more likely to want Orthodox Jewish funerals prohibited than BLM protests.. Contrary to conventional wisdom and past research, people with more education appear more unfavorable to Jews.” https://t.co/qnqIu1HWNzpic.twitter.com/9vObboOSeN
Registan Square in Soviet Samarkand. In 1991, this astonishing monument stood in a tatty square where they had forgotten to cover the manholes. Isfahan in Iran is the only remotely comparable site of beauty. pic.twitter.com/ffUdpuFSut
“The glory that was Rome…is of another day“… and that is true of Central Asia as well. De gustibus non est disputandum, I suppose…
Soviet Samarkand in the last spring of Kremlin rule, April 1991, note combination of ancient domes and modern Brezhnev concrete. I *think* the nearest dome is Tamerlane’s tomb. pic.twitter.com/FOQePvGjMd
Winter view into Kremlin fortress from the NW, taken from the old weirdly assymetrical Stalin-era Moskva Hotel ( once depicted on Soviet vodka bottle labels,now rebuilt). pic.twitter.com/1UoXplveqQ
When I visited the Kremlin, in 1993, I was the first person of the day at the public entrance (a kind of pedestrianized walkway akin to the drawbridge over a moat, but in stone and/or brick).
However, having had my early morning swim at the open-air swimming pool “Moskva” in Kropotkinskaya, and having then walked to the Kremlin, I sat on a wall in the sun and fell sleep, to awaken only when a Russian family started to argue with the person in the ticket kiosk about what tickets they needed and the cost of them; as at Disneyland in Southern California (visited by me when aged 12-13 in 1969), you could get tickets for one or more parts, or a “komplet”, i.e. a little book of tickets that allowed you “access all areas” (all areas open to the public, that is; most of the buildings of the Kremlin are still used by officialdom).
[foot entrance to the Kremlin: the Troitskaya, or Trinity, Tower]
The little Kremlin churches were a highlight; I was the only visitor at the time. What surprised me most about the Kremlin was the acreage. Large, with little treed parks also in there. Like the whole of the Whitehall area surrounded by a huge wall. I recall seeing the green Land Rover of the British Ambassador driving slowly inside the Kremlin, its little Union Jack flag flying bravely. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moscow_Kremlin.
Light afternoon music
I think that I once had a vinyl of this, but with a different cover. Some of the songs more Gypsy than “Central Russian”, of course.
More tweets
If you thought the fake Royal Mail excess postage texts were a nasty trick, the financial scammers are mere amateurs compared to Big Pharma & Big Government. C*vid – the gift that just keeps giving! To the elite. From you. pic.twitter.com/9jFYa0zfbl
It seems that the present vaccines, over which there is a huge hullabaloo, will be largely ineffective as new “variants” of Coronavirus are manifested, something already happening. Fortunately, the population is now largely immune anyway.
As for the police state “laws”, “rules”, “guidance” etc, they will stay…oh yes…to be wheeled out again whenever the clowns in charge of the UK decide to do that.
Early reports from reliable sources indicate that Alison Chabloz has been found guilty on three charges under the Communications Act 2003.
I shall add comment later, when details are known. In the meantime, I think that we can say that free speech in the UK is dead, killed by “the usual suspects”.
I do not have full details, but it looks as if Alison Chabloz has been sentenced to a total of 18 weeks’ imprisonment, i.e. 9 weeks minus time (days, and part-days counted as days) spent in court and/or in previous custody (since charge), so somewhere around 8 weeks altogether.
More tweets
New First Law of Politics. State power expands to fill any area surrendered by a formerly free people. Liberty is like a garden . Weed it and tend it, or it will swiftly be choked by thorns and rankness.
The new propaganda is matey rather than menacing. But see how used we are now to being bossed about over matters that used to be our own business. pic.twitter.com/1uoQ7tCgHY
Yes, we must still treat each other as if we were walking plague pits, and behave as if we were seething vessels of infection. But interesting that face coverings have vanished from the latest round of agitprop. pic.twitter.com/x46FC6YcFr
I just saw a Reuters piece of reportage by Mark Hosenball, who was deported from the UK in 1977 (he got deported to the USA after reporting on matters of “national security” in 1976). He’s even older than me! Must be not far off 70; certainly at least 67. I had no idea that he was still around, professionally. Apparently, he spent many years, prior to joining Reuters, working for Newsweek (though Newsweek is, in my view, not a very impressive news magazine, for all its fame).
Late afternoon music A blog reader has requested music from Beethoven or Brahms, so…
Late tweets
The prosecution of Alison Chabloz has helped to show everyone that the West is no longer free. #FreeSpeech is truly dead. pic.twitter.com/UkoQaPS3rh
Very commendable, but where is the “Free Speech Union” when free speech is squashed flat by the State (a state suborned by a vicious tribal cabal), as in the Alison Chabloz trial which finished today? Where is Toby Young? Where is Laurence Fox? Where is Welby? Nowhere. They are all wastes of space and hypocrites. Not even one tweet from the lot of them.
Alison Chabloz trial: further update
I have no more information about the sentence handed down today, or about the present whereabouts of Alison Chabloz.
I should expect that Alison Chabloz will appeal what seems a very odd verdict and a rather harsh sentence. I should expect that her solicitors and Counsel will be applying swiftly for grant of bail pending what I trust will be a successful appeal of (again, I should hope) both sentence and conviction, to the Crown Court.
Some readers may recall that Alison Chabloz was sentenced to a short period of immediate imprisonment last year, but was granted bail pending appeal (she was in prison for about 2-3 days, though, until grant of bail).
In the end, after the Crown Court judge (H.H. Judge Egbuna, at Derby Crown Court) asked for disclosure of documents to establish whether or not Alison Chabloz was being pursued by police and Crown Prosecution Service for political reasons, the CPS abandoned opposition to the appeal, and Alison Chabloz walked free.
The bottom line is that Alison Chabloz will either soon be free on bail again or, in the worst-case scenario, will serve ~8 weeks incarceration, and then be free again, insofar as any of us are now “free” in this country.
Late music
Late-night update about Alison Chabloz
Information from Adrian Davies, Alison Chabloz’s trial defence Counsel: Alison is currently held at HMP Bronzefield, Woodthorpe Rd, Ashford, Middx. TW15 3JZ. https://www.hmpbronzefield.co.uk/home.html
Anyone wishing to send items to Alison should discover first her official prisoner number, either from her solicitors (see here above), or from the prison directly (see above website).
nb: books sent to prisoners in the UK have to be *new, *paperback, and *sent from an online bookseller, preferably Amazon.
Ian Robert Millard 