Tag Archives: sex crimes by immigrants

Diary Blog, 23 September 2025

Afternoon music

Tweets seen

Looks like Craig Murray (former H.M. Ambassador to Uzbekistan) has come to the same conclusion as me. See:

Wall. Squad. End.

Incidentally, that “12-month” prison sentence really means 6 months (50% of headline term), but may even be only 20 to 21 weeks (40%), because, though a sex crime, the offence in question may be deemed “not serious”.

I do not know whether the untermensch in question has been on bail from time of offence; if he has been held in custody, then all that time will be deducted. In that event, he may be out in a matter of weeks.

[Update, 24 September 2025: I have now read that the criminal, though released from prison, is under immigration detention, pending potential deportation].

Wall. Squad. End.

That poll translates to about 359 Reform UK MPs, i.e. a substantial Commons majority. 124 Lab, 70 LibDems, 34 SNP, 29 Cons.

So no real change in public sentiment. Reform way ahead, Labour as weak official Opposition from 2028 or 2029, and Conservative Party washed up, a rump of 29 MPs from areas, mostly in southern England, where almost all voters are not-poor pensioners.

Blacks, browns, some others, public sector admin people etc still often voting for fake Labour..

[“The question British people will be asked at the next election is this: Do you think we should continue to allow millions of low-skill, low-wage migrants from outside Europe, who often cannot speak English, do not make a net contribution to the economy, and rely on welfare to stay in the UK forever and force British families to pay for it? Or, do you think like many other countries around the world we should sharply reduce immigration and reshape what immigration we have around people who can speak our language properly, have no criminal record, do not rely on welfare, and make a net contribution to the economy while keeping welfare and social housing for British families and forcing firms to invest in British workers? This is the choice. If you want the first, vote for the Uniparty If you want the second, vote Reform.”]

More music

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubert_Parry]
[Ludlow Castle, Shropshire]

More tweets seen

The Conservative Party has been very slow to understand that the real British people, though in some constituencies willing to countenance an MP who is black, brown, Chinese, or whatever, will not stand still for a non-white Prime Minister. It seems that the Sunak debacle of 2024 has not led to greater understanding.

Even were Kemi Badenoch far more intelligent and capable than she is, she would still be basically unelectable.

The lady tweeter above, who was once employed by her (now ex-) husband, a Conservative MP, via his MP expenses, wants the Con Party “to stand up for the disabled“, but the Con Party government she still supports, under David Cameron-Levita, demonized disabled people, and let loose the part-Jap sadist, fraudster and expenses cheat, Iain Dunce Duncan Smith, aided by the Jew “lord”, Freud, to do his worst.

At the same time, that lady, Fiona-Natasha Syms, wants the State Pension “Triple Lock” to be removed, thus making all pensioners (many of whom have medical conditions but not all of whom receive money in respect of those conditions) poorer overnight.

Bearing in mind the electoral power of the “grey vote” (pensioners and those within 5-10 years of State Pension age— currently 66), taking away the Triple Lock would be suicide, whether for Lab or Con. Sunak did it for one year only, reinstalled it the next year, but the trust was gone. The Con Party has not recovered, and I doubt whether it ever will.

The lady in question seems to live in a dream world in which the British people want a government of the so-called “centre ground” (presumably, one similar to that of 2010-2015, which she liked— was that “centre-ground”?). She even pretends that she has an organization for that purpose, which she calls “Moderates”, and which (as far as I can see) does not even exist outside her own mind.

When times become desperate, the people seek more and more radical solutions. New wine cannot be put into old bottles. THAT is why Reform UK is riding high, despite its mostly underwhelming personnel and policies. The voters, especially the real British voters, mostly have binned the old System parties. Reform is the default choice. Behind that, though, you can see the “Overton Window” shifting almost as you look, like those tropical plants that grow so fast that their growth can almost be seen with the naked eye.

I do not believe I know, or have read, how many millions of shekels pounds the Starmer-stein “slush fund” contained.

Petty —or not so petty— corruption is Starmer’s Achilles’ Heel, but the bastard himself seems blissfully unaware that he is heading to electoral near-oblivion (though not so fast as the Con Party, which is now irrelevant).

Late tweets seen

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15126587/Starmer-Chief-Staff-700k-admin-error-Bombshell-leaked-email-Labour-lawyer-Morgan-McSweeney-700-000-donations.html

A top Labour lawyer“…unnamed, and not characterized further. I wonder whether that lawyer is a Jew and/or a Labour Friends of Israel member or donor?

[later, same evening, addendum: I was right in my speculation. The “top Labour lawyer” turns out to have been one Gerald Shamash, of whom I had not heard until today. A Jew whose family came here from Iraq: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_Shamash,_Baron_Shamash]

Shots over the bow, in naval language…

All the same, this whole situation (Russia-NATO) is getting a little serious; unnecessarily so.

Late thoughts about Ed Davey and the LibDem Conference

Only caught a few “highlights”, if such be the bon mot, on TV news.

The age of the LibDem attendees seemed to be, mostly, seventies or thereabouts.

The audience in the hall at Bournemouth appeared (from the few photos seen) to be about 300 people (and that would include many journalists and others).

Ed Davey’s speech, of which I heard/saw a few extracts on TV news, was pretty silly; yapping about the danger of firearms massacres etc. I covered this issue years ago on the blog, pointing out how very few “spree killings” via firearms have ever happened in the UK. Only 3 or 4 over hundreds of years, and one of those was about 15 years after the great restrictions on firearms introduced as a panic measure in the 1990s: see

Overall, I cannot see the LibDems appealing to many people, but their concentration of support in 50-100 constituencies should see them maintain their presently quite high number of MPs, looking at the collapse of the Conservative Party.

Late music

Diary Blog, 16 August 2022

Afternoon music

It seems that there were potentially dangerous teenage sluts even back then…

On this day a year ago

Tweets seen

…and of course also getting them used to the idea of a mixed-race population…

The sinister yet pathetic new Australian biosecurity police state.

Near-cretins, and completely brainwashed. In fact, despite the fact that they are white British, they are all but useless, as they stand, in creating a foundation for any future quantum leap in human evolution. In fact, I would bet that they would all at least pretend to be OK with mixed-race breeding too.

Out in about 6 years. Alternatively, sedation, then helicopter, then Atlantic Ocean…

At the very least, should be doing 20 full years slaving for the British people.

Even more striking when you consider that all of those countries except Taiwan have large black/brown minorities.

Look Who’s Back [or “He’s Back”]

I was sent the above film, which seems to be a black comedy or satire (I am just now watching it). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Look_Who%27s_Back_(film).

[Update, later same day: Funnier than I expected, with a more than slightly serious edge; recommended.]

More tweets

Escalation from the Ukrainian (Kiev regime) side. Either they do not understand that Russia has the power to destroy every last Ukrainian city within minutes, or they (or those behind them) are trying to provoke exactly that. New World Order (NWO) strategy.

Sad news. Paxman will probably be replaced by some black, or an Indian, maybe a black/brown woman. They might even be able to find one who is a lesbian or —surely they could not be that sick?— Eddie Izzard, though of course he is neither black nor brown (nor a woman).

After the BBC has selected a replacement for Paxman, all that they will then have to do is to dumb down University Challenge in the way that has happened to Mastermind. Dumbed down, and with a black/brown (or whatever) presenter, and it will be job done…

[Update, 18 August 2022: I was right: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11123187/Amol-Rajan-revealed-host-University-Challenge.html]

In any case, “diversity” is only a transitional phase, until the white British people (and the same, mutatis mutandis, in other European/white countries) are eliminated, after which there will just be a coffee-coloured and cultureless mass, easily controlled by the (((you know who))). No “diversity” then, just a black/brown monochrome mass or mob. White Genocide. The Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan.

The global population is far too high. Twice the number compared to 1970. For me the key question after the overall number is the proportion of European/white people as a proportion of the whole— shrinking rapidly. A very small minority already.

We need to prepare for a new world with a smaller population, and that population mainly “Aryan” (stricto sensu, post-Aryan or white European), in order to prepare a quantum leap in human evolution.

I blogged about this a few years ago: https://ianrobertmillard.org/2019/01/26/the-tide-is-coming-in-reflections-on-the-possible-end-of-our-present-civilization-and-what-might-follow/.

[prehistoric cave painting, Lascaux, France https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lascaux]

Late tweets seen

Little Matt Hancock was never capable of being a minister, let alone a Cabinet minister. See https://ianrobertmillard.org/2019/09/09/deadhead-mps-an-occasional-series-the-matt-hancock-story/.

There are people to whom a tree is sacred“; I think that it was Chekhov who said that to Gorky (related in the latter’s Literary Portraits).

[RUSSIA – JANUARY 01: Russian writers Anton Pavlovich CHEKHOV and Maxim GORKY at Yalta in 1900. (Photo by Keystone-France/Gamma-Keystone via Getty Images)]

Late music

[Jean Pierson, Mediterranean Light]