There is no British nation now, just a host of compliant, virtue-signalling serfs, with occasional valiant resisters here and there, among no more than a quarter of the population, those who have seen through the scam.
…and there never was any WW2 German plan to use gasas a weapon. Historical fact. The gasmasks were, like the facemask nonsense today, a tactic by the UK government, used to create fear and to enforce social and political obedience, at a time (1939-40) when a large minority, possibly majority, of the British population wanted peace with the German Reich.
As for that photo, it may be genuine, from the time between September 1939 and mid-1940 when the people were bombarded by fear propaganda, but it is probably itself part of that propaganda effort. People generally never actually wore the gasmasks issued.
I was just yesterday blogging about pathetic little would-be dictator, Nicola Sturgeon. She still talks about “travel across the border“, as though Scotland were really an independent country…
Exactly. When will the transnational conspiracy release the real pandemic, the “Omega” variant? That’s the one that will kill billions of people…and few will have any natural immunity to fight it.
If I say so myself, who shouldn’t, that blog post has, like most of mine, worn rather well.
More music
The world may be approaching a crisis, but not because of “Covid” (which has only killed, even on faked or flawed statistics, about one individual in every four thousand in the whole world population).
How many people, how many billions, can the Earth sustain before that burden becomes too much for the Earth, which will then shrug and remove vast numbers of humans?
The facemask nonsense is a social-control mechanism and public relations move by an incompetent government which is, nonetheless, part of a transnational conspiracy.
Yes, a real social-national party could achieve great support, but the (((controlled))) System would probably crush it at a fairly early stage one way or the other. It may be that there is no “electoral road” available to us, and so we need to take other action. Still, “all roads lead to Rome”…
Idly perusing Wikipedia, I saw that the Danish Army now consists of about 25,000 men (and women), 63,000 reserves, and about 600 tracked and wheeled armoured vehicles.
Modest on the world scale, of course, but I now see that the British Army, once mighty, now has only 82,000 active personnel, little more than three times the Danish equivalent, and only 30,000 reserves.
In fact, proportionately, Denmark has far more troops than does the UK, because the population of Denmark is less than a tenth of that of the UK.
Of course, mere numbers are only part of the story in the contemporary era, where technology plays such a big part. All the same, numbers are still part of the story.
At the end of the Second World War, the total strength of the British Army was over 3 million, and even in 1980, just before the Falklands campaign, 159,000 active and 63,000 reserves.
The notional 82,000 active troops in 2021 would be the lowest muster since 1780. Of course the population was then a fraction of what it now is: even in 1801, when the first British census was taken, England and Wales had only 10.5 million inhabitants (and Ireland about 5 million, interestingly).
As said, numbers are only one factor. As said, technology is also key. So, however, are factors such as morale, motivation etc. Those, at least, have not changed since the time of Napoleon, and indeed of Clausewitz. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_von_Clausewitz.
One hears of and sees, in the cheaper newspapers, stories of how drug abuse is rife in the British armed forces, not to mention drunkenness (that, of course, is scarcely a new problem!).
The British armed forces overall have about 10% of their numbers women. How effective they are is a question for others to answer.
As to the Army generally, one sees reports that of the 82,000 active soldiers claimed, only about 50,000 are actually fit for duty. In any case, very many are what the Americans call “rear echelon” forces, not frontline fighting men. Not that that means that those rear forces are useless. Napoleon himself pointed out that “an army marches on its stomach“, and in the modern era a fighting spearhead needs a very broad rear support, everything from supply and logistics to pensions and banking.
Still, at a time when the clownish political leadership of the UK seems intent on provoking Russia, I wonder how our forces would, if push came to shove, stack up against at least the more elite Russian contingents.
[members of the elite Air Descent Contingent march in Red Square]
Britain and all Europe should be standing with Russia at this time. Contra Zionism. Contra Islamism. Spiritual Eurasia, contra mundum, if necessary.
Sadly misguided. The places where the “hundreds of thousands” need to go, suitably prepared, are not the beaches of Kent and Sussex, but the TV studios, radio stations, the “newspaper” propaganda offices, the Westminster monkeyhouse, and other System installations of importance.
The ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian people through the eyes of a child. This was their Jerusalem home.
I’ll ask you again @Keir_Starmer – what is the Labour Party position on ethnic cleansing and the actions of the apartheid state of Israel? pic.twitter.com/G4KD5yX5Jz
Wherever Jews have power, non-Jews eventually become victims or slaves. Look at history. The ridiculous thing is that, in the UK, many of those who oppose Jewish supremacism in Israel or occupied Palestine, effectively support the Jewish lobby in Europe, eg in the UK itself; they pay lip-service to the “holocaust” farrago, in particular, and applaud the Zionist efforts to destroy free speech.
Controlled-opposition kingpin Farage. Was he paid millions, or tens of millions, offshore, as a reward for stabbing his own Brexit Party in the back in 2019, thus ensuring a Boris-idiot “Conservative” government (and ensuring, also, the binning of Corbyn, so that the Jewish lobby could retake control over the Labour Party)? Maybe (I do not know). Will he get a “peerage” (absurd and almost valueless though they now are)? Maybe (I do not know). Farage’s crony, Claire Fox, is already elevated to the Lords…
So if you still need a booster after been fully vaccinated, testing after been fully vaccinated, and hospitalisation after been fully vaccinated, and masks, social distancing and lockdowns all after been fully vaccinated?
Then it’s time to admit that you’ve been FULLY CONNED.
Griffin is right. He must be— he is in agreement with me!
Good to see resistance in Rotterdam and Vienna.
Wien! Not a government window in Vienna should remain intact until the Covid police state is stood down! Kristalltag jetzt!
Keep our beautiful culture alive, listen to and enjoy classical music and especially teach your children to love it. Arthur Sullivan : Victoria and Merrie England, Suite No. 1 from the ball… https://t.co/Sid3cIfrHx via @YouTube
I have not been to the Imperial War Museum since the mid-1980s when I was frequently in the vicinity. Since then, the IWM has, I believe, given over a large area to a permanent “holocaust” propaganda display. Once you start purveying that kind of ahistorical fakery, there is no going back, and you end up inviting a taxpayer-funded (why?) bunch of cretins to shout out “anti-racist” (in reality, anti-White and anti-British) black “rap”-crap on Remembrance Day.
The Daily Mail, of course, completely tied in with the Jewish lobby, would never make the connection…
In fact, the nonsense reported on is but part of the frenzied racemixing and anti-European agenda now being promoted everywhere— in TV drama, TV ads, across all msm platforms. The very significant year 2022 is fast approaching, the next key year in the 33-year cycle, and with it the agenda of the transnational conspiracy usually abbreviated to NWO/ZOG.
Not that I favour Churchill’s misconceived and evil war against the German Reich, of course, but I doubt that the rap-crap mentioned that.
Incidentally, imagine the (much greater) furore if a “rap” or other group had launched, at that museum, a satirical or other attack on the baleful influence of Jews or, indeed, blacks, at some point in history. That’s right, neither of those would happen. Then ask yourself why…
Ehrentempel
[“Feierlichkeiten zum 9. November in München. Ehrentempel auf dem Königsplatz”]
I cannot read the names on the U.S. military document below, but some persons without military rank are suggesting destruction of the structure. Probably Jews; who else, arguably, would make such a vandalistic suggestion? “…most offensive” and “dangerous“? Typical language, also arguably. We see the same terms used by the Zionists in 2021 Britain.
In the UK, Jews are at the forefront of the free speech battle, constantly trying to use “lawfare” and undue influence to shut down free speech, in particular any mention of Jews that is not laudatory, as well as any critical examination of their history and behaviour.
I have already blogged to the effect that only a massive window-breaking event (“Kristalltag“?) in Vienna, and soon, might wake up the Austrian people before the biosecurity police state’s grip tightens yet again.
Do you remember the Wuhan videos of people dropping dead? Same strategy to scare and demoralise. Austria is a psyops.
The System will say anything, and apparently do anything, to get enmeshed in Eastern Europe. Remember 1939 (or at least remember reading about it)? The governments of Britain and France gave the government of Poland a worthless guarantee, that is that Britain and France would come to the aid of Poland were it to be attacked.
Well, we know what happened. Germany did attack, and that triggered declarations of war against Germany by Britain and France, but —crucially— no troops or ships were sent to aid Poland. None.
The British and French governments used Germany’s invasion as an excuse to declare war, but Poland was left to sink or swim. It sank, partly because the Soviet Union also invaded, scarcely opposed, from the East. Britain and France did not declare war against the Soviet Union. Poland had no chance. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_invasion_of_Poland; and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invasion_of_Poland.
The upshot of the above is that Britain did not help Poland and —again crucially— never could have done. Neither Britain nor France could have opposed the massive forces of the German Reich and the Soviet Union, yet it was the worthless joint guarantee which (together with the refusal by Churchill to conclude armistice in 1940, after the Fall of France) condemned much of Europe to years of war.
Surely the “British” government is not about to repeat in some farcical form its mistakes of 1938 and 1939? NATO is becoming aggressive in the East.
War with Russia could trigger a massive conflagration in which, inter alia, the UK might be almost entirely destroyed.
Trading standards in Wales shut down Cinema & Co @cinemacoswansea because they wouldn’t comply with vaccine passports. Meanwhile, here’s First Minister of Wales, Mark Drakeford dancing indoors without a mask. #IStandWithCinemaCoSwansea@cinemacoswansea
The Austrian government on Friday announced that the country will go into its fourth nationwide lockdown and will make Covid-19 vaccines compulsory. The Local is following the press conference announcing the measures and will bring you updates. https://t.co/mkkAvJXlNJ
After a bitter standoff between the outgoing conservatives and the incoming government, Germany has signed off on a reform of infection protection laws which will introduce sweeping measures to combat the Covid fourth wave, such as 3G on public transport… https://t.co/2lb1tDerjQ
Eventually, the problem (and similar problems) will only be solved one way, but that is something that cannot (in the new unfree UK) be expressed publicly.
Yes, and ‘The Last Battle’ as well. Lewis often links evil with the unnecessary murder of trees. https://t.co/E28cqTvDzz
Kyle Rittenhouse, who fatally shot two men and wounded another, was found not guilty of intentional homicide and four other felony charges in a deeply divisive case that fed a national debate over vigilantism, gun rights and the definition of self-defense. https://t.co/5MDh8OyguOpic.twitter.com/8kz9duMhyQ
Kyle Rittenhouse stood before the jury as the verdict was read. He was found not guilty of all charges against him including intentional homicide. https://t.co/tKTlXtpmpdpic.twitter.com/kOSQ2kiRx1
Three very violent assailants attacked Kyle Rittenhouse during the 2020 riots. One was permanently maimed. Two paid for that assault with their lives. Kyle gets to go on with his. #Justice
I have only one problem with the young man who was on trial, which is that he should have shown more of a stiff upper lip at that trial.
As for Paul Mason, and as I have blogged previously, some of his writings on economics have been interesting, but from the political point of view he is a complete idiot.
Incidentally, I often wondered, when Mason was on TV regularly, and when he posted on Twitter, why he is so venomously against social-nationalism. I discovered that he is part-Jew. That may account for it.
I noticed that my early 2019 blog post about civilization and its renewal from the ashes has had a number of hits already today. I therefore repost it below. It covers the all-important or overarching issues that should concern us.
Re-reading it now, I note that I “predicted” (examined as a distinct possibility) a “pandemic”, as well as a possible NATO-Russia war in Europe.
Well, so far no such war, thank God, though there are “rumours of wars”. As to “pandemic”, we have a sort-of pandemic, though not one that, so far, poses an existential threat to civilization (because in the world generally, it has —even on the alarmist statistics— killed only about one in every four thousand people in the world (about one in a thousand in the UK).
What I did not, perhaps could not, predict was the weaponization of that “pandemic” (the Covid-19 virus, as it turned out) as a means for a transnational conspiratorial “Great Reset” of the world’s societies and economies, together with the installation of a biosecurity police state in many countries.
We approach 2022, the most significant year since 1989 (and before 1989, 1956 and 1923). Society will look even more different in 2055 than our present 2021 looks when compared to the Europe of 1956-1989.
Lol Rachel Johnson…reminds me of a story a friend told me where he was having dinner on holiday in France & RJ & friends were there at another table & so loud & obnoxious they cleared the room. Perfect for the Spectator.
There is no real official Opposition, just a pathetic facade of one, fronted by Jewish-lobby puppet Keir Starmer and thick-as-two-short-planks Angela Rayner.
Incidentally, it is good to see that tweeter “@eternalenglish” is back from Twitter prison after a week or two. One of the best Twitter accounts at present, which is why (((they))) make malicious complaints about him, in the attempt to deplatform him.
Those who put out such efforts “deplatforming” English social-national Twitter accounts have obviously never considered what might be the ultimate result of removing even the very limited freedom of expression that now exists in the UK. The end result might be rather unpleasant for the “deplatformers”.
Britain has had poor Cabinet ministers in past history, both recent and not so recent, but has it ever had a Cabinet comprising such a collection of clowns, idiots, and ridiculous little monkeys (few of whom are even English) as over the past decade? I think not.
Idiotic people such as tweeter “@Corazzz” have been so brainwashed that all one can do is laugh at them. As a matter of fact, I saw an old woman filling up her car a couple of days ago, alone in the car yet wearing a disposable facemask (which is not only all but useless but also, having been —probably— used multiple times, must be replete with bacteria of all sorts).
The old woman slowly filled up her car, still wearing that mask, then went into the kiosk to pay! You would think that, if she were that afraid of picking up the dreaded virus, she would have (as was possible) paid at the pump. “Against stupidity, the Gods themselves struggle in vain” [Schiller, die Jungfrau von Orleans].
The old woman then drove away, still alone in her car, and still wearing her miniature security blanket…I mean facemask.
The transnational conspiracy is now hysterically pulling out all the stops to destroy European race and culture, as the year 2022 approaches. Every TV ad in the UK now has blacks and browns and the mixed-race in it, often outnumbering white actors; the same is true of every TV drama.
In fact, I happened to see an ad on TV today for toys. No actors, just animated puppets or cartoons of some kind, and there were more non-whites than whites. This is not “reflecting the diversity of the UK”, as the weasels are wont to claim. The UK is still over 80% white, and even England is about 80% white. No, these ads and dramas are no reflection of reality, but are social engineering aimed at creating a new or different reality… propaganda aimed mainly at young children, so that they accept as normal a UK where the majority will be non-white (black, or brown, or mixed-race). Evil. All part of the Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan.
[Jeremy Lee was born as Jeremy William Dominic Lee. He died on April 28, 2012 in Ravensbourne, Queensland, Australia].
Explanatory word
I should add a word as to why I repost rather many things, mostly from Twitter. The reason is that I post what I can while I can. “One human soul is a big audience”.
It is clear that Twitter and other online fora are being slowly squeezed. First the most influential Twitter accounts (I mean of significance, not those of “One Direction”, or this or that System comedian) are removed (as mine was, in 2018, after the usual pack of Jews cobbled together a faked-up complaint). David Icke, Katie Hopkins, Alison Chabloz, to name only a few, have already been removed. Nick Kollerstrom was removed only last week, after a complaint from the Jewish “CST” strongarm and snooping org.
After the most prominent are removed, any others supporting European race, culture, and values.
How long can blogs such as mine survive? Maybe a year or two. The “usual suspects” are already bearing down on the Online Harms Bill (eg the recent CST demand for, in effect, in reality, anonymity for Jew Zionist trolls but not for anyone else).
I do not expect a blog such as mine to be available for more than a few years. 2023, perhaps 2024. Not much longer.
Once all (meaningful) freedom of expression is shut down, there is effectively a ZOG/NWO police state in existence; in existence and openly at war with us.
Late tweets
JUST IN — Greece announces unvaccinated will be banned from all indoor venues, such as cinemas, theatres, and gyms They will no longer be able to access indoor venues by presenting a negative Covid test result.
A key part of the antiwhite agenda is normalising white women being with black men. Here's a tiny but very creepy sample of the propaganda. pic.twitter.com/CISh6yGKO9
1,000 one day, 700 the next, even 1,200 on one day last week. This is an invasion. The fact that it consists of migrant-invaders in rubber boats, mostly unarmed, is irrelevant.
It will be recalled by some, perhaps older readers, that, when King Hassan of Morocco decided to take over the mineral-rich region of Spanish Sahara (now Western Sahara), he was opposed by Spain, then still ruled by Franco, who however was then at death’s door (d. 20 November 1975).
Hassan cunningly decided that, rather than invade Spanish Sahara in the conventional way, where his troops would be up against the very tough Spanish Foreign Legion [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_Legion] and other military elements, he would use what is now sometimes called “soft power”, a “people’s march”, thus pressuring Spain via the UN.
What we now see in the English Channel, as well as elsewhere, both around the UK and in other parts of Europe, is an invasion, presented otherwise by a transnational political and msm conspiracy.
The UK is the target destination for the migrant-invaders. Part of that is the relatively easy help available as soon as they get here (hotel accommodation, food, pocket money of about £50 a week); part of it is because the UK cities are becoming black/brown and are not fully European any more, thus perhaps seeming more welcoming. There again, unofficial (and untaxed) work is widely available for those that want it; for those that don’t, the social welfare system, though cut back in recent years, still provides plenty for people used to living in backward societies.
Whatever.
21 years ago, I went over to Calais for the day, with car, and on a free ticket, to buy booze and cheese, mainly. It was at about that time that concerns about the illegal immigrants started to become louder.
In early evening, I had a drink in a little bar not far from the hotel de ville. I mentioned the immigrants, who even then were becoming apparent in Calais. The bar owner told me, “we are not troubled so much by them. They stay for a few days, a week, then they move on to England“. Need one say more about the French attitude?
A reminder: that was in the year 2000, 21 years ago. The UK authorities were not effectively barring entry then and, 21 years later, still are not…
The key question is how to stop the migration invasion of the UK. Harsh though it is, I can see no choice left but to use brute force, and if that means sinking the invasion fleet in the Channel, so be it.
“In his 1925 book Practical Idealism, Coudenhove-Kalergi envisioned an all-encompassing race of the future made up of “Eurasian–Negroid[s],” replacing “the diversity of peoples” and “[t]oday’s races and classes” with a “diversity of individuals.”[42]
In an interview in the first Pan-European Congress in 1926, he expressed the support of Jews by the Pan-European movement and the benefits to Jews with the elimination of racial hatred...” [Wikipedia].
Well, there you have it, right from the horse’s mouth. European peoples wiped out, replaced by “Eurasian Negroids”, and real diversity of European peoples replaced by a meaningless “diversity” of individuals, all of which individuals to be, ultimately, mixed-race “Eurasian Negroids”. That, and society ruled by the Jewish element.
You could not describe more succinctly what is now developing in the UK, France, and elsewhere. Not only in Europe, but also in the former offshoots of Europe: Australia, USA, even New Zealand.
I would urge as many readers as can to send this blog post, or the information above, to those unaware of the true situation. Enlightenment as to all of the above is still eluding the broad mass of people in the UK, though the number understanding what is going on is slowly growing.
As for dealing with the conspirators themselves, I hold my peace for now, in view of Britain’s now very repressive curbs on free speech.
Incidentally, the “readers’ comments” appended to that Daily Mail report are telling: many of those commenting plainly despise both/all System parties, and want to vote for a party which does not yet exist.
“The van was found in Park Royal“, according to other reports. I believe that there is a large (so-called) “traveller” encampment or fixed site in that area.
One opinion poll now puts pathetic Starmer-“Labour” ahead of Boris-idiot’s misnamed “Conservatives”, and by several points. Is that an outlier? We shall see. I have blogged for some time that it comes down to whether the sheer ineptitude and lack of ability of “Boris” and his truly absurd Cabinet of clowns, together with their corruption, can outpace the equally unfit for office “Labour” label.
They call it “democratic choice”, but it is nothing more than a scam, really. Oh, and guess which element is embedded in both System parties? Yes, that’s right— “them” (((them))).
A reference both to the present Israeli Ambassador’s spoken and written view that marriage between Jews and non-Jews is “a problem” that should be addressed, and to the fact that Keir Starmer is married to a Jewish woman (and their offspring are being brought up as if full-Jew, complete with Jewish religious holidays etc).
The fact is that the puppets of Jewish and Israeli power, people such as Keir Starmer, Boris Johnson etc, have to take any insults that the Jews throw at them, because they are slaves or curs of that Jewish-Israel lobby. “Boris” did it after Shai Masot, from the Israeli Embassy, called him “an idiot”. “Boris”, in Parliament, later, just laughed off the Jew’s insult, or tried to…
Jonathan Djanogly MP 'is paid nearly £1,000 an hour by firm that benefits from NHS Covid contracts' | Daily Mail https://t.co/bErWWUIqNg
Well, this week I well and truly trounced political journalist John Rentoul. Perhaps, in the popular expression, he should get out more! I scored 10/10, the best I have done in these quizzes (I may have scored 10/10 once or twice before; cannot remember).
Very true. Francis Bacon (the Tudor/Stuart philosopher, not the painter) examined this question in one of his works, I seem to recall. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Bacon.
The number of new daily cases reported in England has been lower than a week earlier for 18 successive days, the longest sequence of week-on-week declines since February when the tight lockdown restrictions contributed to a decline for 42 days in a row https://t.co/puT64Bu3Ilpic.twitter.com/e1su4y0SG2
“If freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.” ― George Washington #FreeSpeechpic.twitter.com/1sdN4AebMA
London. Pre mass immigration, Sadiq Khan, bad architecture, the Ulez zone, congestion charges, terrorism and the complete erosion of National pride. We need to go back. https://t.co/yrTYQe5yGT
“Hampshire Afghan refugees will be offered private rentals and new laptops and smartphones
Southampton City Council said housing stock is drying up.
Hampshire charity Community First is also asking for laptop, smartphone, and tablet donations for evacuated Afghan families….The charity asked for donations to be “new, nearly new, or used devices that are in good condition” (!). [HampshireLive]
Words fail me.
Meanwhile, many British people are homeless, and now more will be, because traitors in central and local government have given away limited housing stock to unwanted and backward invaders.
Yes, the Conservative Party (particularly part-Jap sadist Iain Dunce Duncan Smith) made a bad social welfare system far more cruel, but never forget that it was the Labour Party under Blair and (especially) Gordon Brown that introduced lying “assessments”, “sanction” regimes, ATOS etc— and some of those responsible are still “Labour” MPs; Stephen Timms, for one.
Anyone wanting to get rid of the present “Conservative” regime, and thinking that the “Labour” Party is the answer, think again.
🏡 The average U.S. home was 1,700 square feet in 1980, by 2015 it was 2,000 square feet, even though the number of people in the average household shrank https://t.co/mfT9ZI9sgzpic.twitter.com/M1DnsOSDAo
[Churchill, toting an “iconic” Thompson submachinegun with 50-round drum magazine while visiting coastal defences at Hartlepool in 1940]
“Stay behind” units in 1940: an historical note
The Second World War, with its complexities, nuances, twists and turns, and ideological subtleties, is endlessly fascinating. I happened to see a local newspaper story about part of Churchill’s idea of how to “fight on the beaches, fight on the landing-grounds” etc.
Churchill, though a genuinely world-historical figure, unlike Boris Johnson (who tries to ape his style and manner), does have a few characteristics in common with his latter-day copier. One is that he was largely ineffective as head of government when given his head; also, he was a person with, often, very silly ideas. Churchill was no good as a strategist; as for tactics, his ideas were really straight out of boys’ comic books.
The Norway operation in 1940; the British Expeditionary Force in France, also in 1940 (my own grandfather was on the Dunkirk beaches), the idea of invading France via the Cote-d’Azur in 1944, the Fall of France, the Fall of Greece (including Crete), and so on, give some idea of Churchill’s lack of strategic nous.
Stay-behind units were organized, with the idea that they might not last more than 12 days after any German “reverse D-Day”.
It was presumed that German invasion forces would strike initially at the London area:
“Operation Sealion, Hitler’s plan to invade across the Channel, almost saw the German 6th Army land at Lyme Regis in 1940 and push inland to Bristol and Gloucester.
Meanwhile the 9th and 16th Armies were to attack from Portsmouth to Dover, sweeping northwards to capture London and East Anglia, Britain’s breadbasket.” [DorsetLive].
Despite the chilling ruthlessness of their remit, the “Auxiliary Units” had a delightfully Wodehousian aspect:
“Grouped into “operational patrols” of four to eight men, AU members needed excellent local knowledge – making gamekeepers and poachers ideal candidates.
But known members of local patrols include bakers, carpenters, car salesmen, dairy farmers, electricians, fishmongers, miners and train drivers.
“The staff of Charborough Park – a country house estate now belonging to South Dorset MP Richard Drax – were also formed into an AU patrol.
The chauffeurs, foresters, gamekeeper and gardener of Sir Reginald Aylmer Ranfurly Plunkett-Ernle-Erle-Drax, Mr Drax’s grandfather, moonlighted as would-be saboteurs and assassins.” [DorsetLive].
One almost expects Sir Roderick Spode (a parody of Sir Oswald Mosley) to make an appearance, with a slight ideological twist, perhaps. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roderick_Spode.
There were, it seems, about 6,500 volunteers in such “stay behind” units, most of whom were organized around the southern and eastern coasts of England.
As for the conventional forces defending, “The Germans put the British defences at 320,000 men, with machine gun nests positioned 300 yards from the coastline, artillery guns 1,000 yards inland and another line of artillery and machine gun nests 3,000 yards back.
A line of more than 600 armoured cars and tanks were said to have been positioned two miles inland and a reserve of 50,000 men a further two miles back.” [The Argus].
In fact, Operation Sealion was not a ready to roll plan such as had been Fall Gelb, “Case Yellow” (or “Operation Yellow”), the plan for the invasion of France [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manstein_Plan]. Sealion was called Unternehmen Seelöwe, not “Fall Seelöwe“.
My German is poorer than it should be (bearing in mind that I did take German at school, and I did also have a couple of crash courses later, when I was in my twenties), but the difference in designation seems to be that one plan was ready-to-go, while the other was somewhere between that and a contingency plan.
It is known that Hitler wanted Britain, and the British Empire, as an ally against the expansionism of both the Soviet Union and the U.S.A. His preference in 1940 was for an armistice, not for conquest by invasion.
Apart from Hitler’s preference for alliance, there were operational reasons why Sealion never proceeded: lack of total air superiority was one, but another perhaps more important was the lack of carrying capacity by sea of the German navy. There were not enough barges to carry the armies required, and not enough defence for those barges.
If, however, the invasion had happened, “[the Auxiliary Units]…would disappear to their OB, wait for the Germans to go over the top of them and attack the rear...”
“Patrols would attack bridges, convoys, fuel dumps and so on, breaking the supply chain and holding up the advance of the blitzkrieg, giving the regular army time to regroup and counterattack.”
“Equipped with suppressed sniper’s rifles, the fighters would also be expected to assassinate anyone who might expose their underground operations.
“Patrols would take out collaborators as well as local policemen and intelligence officers – innocent men, killed just for knowing their identities…”
“Anyone who stumbled across their OB would also be killed. And if a patrol member was injured and couldn’t get back the OB, they were obligated to shoot him...”
“Their life expectancy was just 12 short days – with orders to kill each other and themselves if capture by the enemy seemed imminent.” [DorsetLive]
There were, then, two underlying assumptions or, better said, hopes, on the part of the Auxiliary Units: the first was that the units would survive for 12-14 days; the second was that the main British forces would be able to mount a successful counterattack.
As to whether the stay-behind fighters could survive for 14 days, my assessment is that they could do so easily if they did nothing or very little; once they started to shoot people and blow things up, it would be a different story.
The Germans might not have been able to do much to repress any stay-behind activity in the first confused days following invasion, but once those early days had passed, the Feldgendarmerie and SS would rather rapidly have started to arrest or kill suspects.
It is remarkable that the British plans included the assassination, on a default basis, of British police and Army personnel, or local residents, who knew of their existence! That might soon have backfired, with other such people helping the Germans to eliminate such ruthless persons hiding in their neighbourhoods. We shall never know. What we can be fairly sure about is that the Auxiliary Units would have had little impact on the eventual result, in big-picture terms.
As for the Auxiliary Units as the basis for a possible “British Resistance”, impossible. Limited stocks of weaponry and ammunition, no help from external sources, and the German security grip tightening steadily.
Could British home forces have defeated a German invasion force, had it landed in the numbers suggested? Doubtful. For one thing, the projected German force was to have been 600,000 after a few days; the defending forces would have numbered under 400,000.
Secondly, the quality of German tanks, light weapons etc outmatched the British; the same was true of the fitness of German troops. Red Cross reports of the period (from France) noted that British soldiers captured were often undernourished, stunted, with poor teeth and poor fitness, a result of the social conditions prevalent in the UK in the 1920s and 1930s. The German prisoners taken by the British were found to be, almost universally, in a good state of health and fitness, the result of, mainly, 7 years of National Socialist government.
Another point is that the German forces will mostly have seen action in Poland or France, whereas the British home forces were mostly without recent battle experience.
It is true that large wargames (a major one took place at Sandhurst in 1974) have generally resulted in German defeat following a 1940 invasion of Britain, but those results were based on destruction of much of the invasion force at sea, and failure to execute the invasion plan with sufficient boldness. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Sea_Lion_(wargame).
History is full of examples of invasions that should have failed, but did not. Alexander’s invasion of the Persian Empire, and William of Normandy’s 1066 invasion of England, are but two. Indeed, Hitler’s own experiences in 1939-41 (Norway, France, Poland, the Soviet Union, Greece, Yugoslavia etc show that boldness can bring victory even in unlikely circumstances. Rommel’s victories in North Africa were usually achieved against the odds.
It can certainly be argued that Hitler should have pressed on in 1940, even in circumstances of high risk. Britain would have quickly folded, and then, under new political leadership, found a new role, with the Empire, as a “dual-rulership” of much of the Earth, in collaboration with the German Reich.
On those premises, huge destruction and misery would have been avoided, both in the 1940s and thereafter. The world would have been a far better place now, had that happened.
As to the results further down the line, had a German invasion succeeded, one has to say that, in some ways, perhaps most ways, Britain itself might have been —80 years on— better for it. There would have been no migration-invasion by blacks and browns, and no Jewish-Zionist exploitation. Services such as the NHS would have been available earlier and better.
Incidentally, a German victory in 1940 would not have meant long-term German occupation, certainly not after a few years, and not necessarily a harsh one. The main aim, for Hitler, would have been disarmament or control of the British Army, navy and air force.
Hitler’s preferred ruler of Britain, we now know, was none other than Lloyd George! The Security Service, MI5, was well aware of this, and monitored him closely.
“Lloyd George was consistently pro-German after 1923,[169] in part due to his growing conviction that Germany had been treated unfairly at Versailles. He supported German demands for territorial concessions and recognition of its “great power” status; he paid much less attention to the security concerns of France, Poland, Czechoslovakia and Belgium.
[170]In a speech in 1933, he warned that if Adolf Hitler were overthrown Communism would replace him in Germany.[171] In August 1934, he insisted Germany could not wage war, and assured European nations that there would be no risk of war during the next ten years.[172]
In September 1936, he visited Germany to talk with Hitler. Hitler said he was pleased to have met “the man who won the war”; Lloyd George was moved, and called Hitler “the greatest living German”.[166]: 247 Lloyd George also visited Germany’s public works programmes and was impressed. On his return to Britain, he wrote an article for the Daily Express praising Hitler and stating: “The Germans have definitely made up their minds never to quarrel with us again.“[166]: 248
He believed Hitler was “the George Washington of Germany”; that he was rearming Germany for defence and not for offensive war; that a war between Germany and the Soviet Union would not happen for at least ten years; that Hitler admired the British and wanted their friendship but that there was no British leadership to exploit this.” [Wikipedia].
Well, in the trite but true expression, “man proposes but God disposes”…
Strange. My memory tells me precisely the reverse, as far as the years up to 2010 are concerned. It is a complex picture, but I recall a country where things were OK (speaking very very generally) until 1997 (I was mostly out of the UK that exact year, though), one where a gradual “communitarian” police statism started to develop under Blair and Brown, and one in which (and here I do agree with the tweeter) there was a catastrophic decline in standards from…well, the tweeter says 2010 (i.e. when Cameron-Levita and his clique became the Government), but I think earlier, maybe from 2005 or so (under Gordon Brown).
I recall returning to the UK from France in 2009, having not been here for a year (I had been spending half my time in France since 2005, and was also in a number of other countries during 2005-2010), and noticing the social darkness that had already descended, a year before David Cameron-Levita became Prime Minister.
The (Pakistani?) tweeter is obviously a simplistic Labour Party partisan, who thinks in unsophisticated ways: Labour government 1997— good, Conservative government 2010— bad. If only life were that simple.
Ah. Just looked him up: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahir_Shah. Not Pakistani, but Indian Muslim (born in the UK), and a comedian. Britain may be short of housing, energy, water, good jobs, a decent and working society generally, and good government, but we shall never, it seems, run out of comedians. Sometimes there seem to be thousands of them, though few I have seen or heard (on TV or radio) are actually very comic.
Other tweets seen
💷 As much as £2.5m of taxpayer money will be used to pay the salaries of MPs’ family members this year.https://t.co/9WZrV4m7QL
£50,000 p.a. for being “office manager” of an office with few if any other employees? Bob Blackman is the Jewish-lobby puppet always acting as mouthpiece for Israel. One of such puppets, anyway.
The journalist, author and social commentator @toadmeister Young, who has championed the importance of freedom of speech has won the 2021 Contrarian Prize #cprizepic.twitter.com/en3cg401kJ
“…championed the importance of freedom of speech“? Not one word from Young about how I was disbarred (wrongfully and actually unlawfully) at the instigation of a certain pack of Jews, some of whom still try (though vainly) to persecute me. Not a word about the persecution and prosecution, by the same pack of Jews, of the singer-satirist Alison Chabloz, who has now actually done time in prison for mocking “holocaust” fakery and hoaxes (fakery almost all done by Jews). Not a word about the fact that Jez Turner, of the now-defunct London Forum, was imprisoned for simply making a speech in Whitehall urging the removal of Jews from the UK.
Now I wonder whether there is a common theme about those cases when Toby Young and the “Free Speech Union” stayed guiltily silent?…
In 2004-2005, for nearly two years, I lived in a farmhouse in the constituency, near Milton Abbot (6 miles NW of Tavistock), having moved out of Polapit Tamar House, 8 miles away across the Tamar in Cornwall (a lovely place then, though since I lived there split up into numerous dwelling units, and currently on sale for £7M).
Geoffrey Cox became MP for Torridge and West Devon in 2005, but at that time I was too busy trying to make a living at the Bar to take any notice of System politics, certainly did not vote, and was unaware, I think, even of the bastard’s name.
We do not have to consider the almost-ubiquitous “holocaust” fakery, hoaxes, or “memories” which simply could not have happened, to understand that human memory often cannot be relied upon. Ignorance of fact can also play a role.
I have just seen a tweet in which the tweeter reminisces about his school trip to the Soviet Union in 1984 or 1985. The trip apparently consisted of a week in Leningrad and a week in Moscow.
Inter alia, the tweeter concerned tweets that he visited the Hermitage (in Leningrad), and walked on the surface of the frozen Volga…
Well, I suppose that the above memory could be accurate, but probably is not. Leningrad (now St. Petersburg) is on the river Neva; Moscow is on the Moscow river or Moskva.
The Volga has a quite convoluted course, and at its nearest to Moscow is only about 85 miles away, at the meeting-place of the Volga with the Moskva-Volga Canal (aka Moscow Canal): https://factsanddetails.com/russia/Places/sub9_9a/entry-7029.html. It goes nowhere very near St. Petersburg.
[Neva river at St. Petersburg (former Leningrad); photo by A. Savin]
[Moscow river in central Moscow]
[Moskva-Volga Canal. Photograph by Ilya Timin]
[river Volga, near Yaroslavl]
[river Oka at Nizhny-Novgorod; photograph by Aleksei Trefilov]
The Moscow river is a tributary of the river Oka, which is in turn a tributary of the river Volga.
The upshot of the above is that the tweet I saw could be accurate but quite likely is not. The tweeter probably walked on the frozen Neva, or perhaps the Moskva, or the Moskva-Volga Canal.
Memory cannot always be relied upon. My own memory is (I have found) better than that of almost anyone else I have ever met, but is still occasionally inaccurate.
Talking of memories of Russia, I saw another tweet today, which contained a picture of the interior of the GUM complex near Red Square. Marble floors, clean, redolent of luxury.
I first saw GUM in 1993, when most of the shop units were empty, the (then white) marble floors containing wide cracks in places, and a snack bar in the area on the ground floor was doing a good trade in open sandwiches (red caviar on buttered white bread); I had one myself, I think.
When I returned to Moscow in 2007, all changed. Tan marble, everything clean and tidy, and the shops were all occupied; they included Thomas Pink, Armani etc. Not very busy, perhaps because it was a weekday and early evening, or perhaps because of the high prices. In 1993, it was also not busy, though then because there was rather little to buy. I believe that, in Soviet days, GUM was always packed, as was the toy shop Detsky Mir (“Children’s World”) next door (with access then from GUM as well as from the street). In 1993, I wandered in from GUM, out of curiosity. The few outsized soft toys were charged at extortionate prices. Oddly, or perhaps not, no children and few adults there.
For a moment, I thought that he must have done something really bad, like identifying a Jew as Jewish, but on reflection, that would have required the participation of the “Anti-Terrorist Command”, I suppose…
Huge numbers of people, including many Jews, and even Zionist Jews, oppose the proposed “memorial” (oft-called, “carbuncle”) near the Palace of Westminster, which has been pushed through by hard-core Zionists, and by corrupt political puppets such as Robert Jenrick.
I have now seen a open letter by a Jewish woman about the matter. It is worth publishing in full:
“From Irene Lancaster
High Court Approves Legal Challenge to Government re Holocaust memorial in Victoria Tower Gardens
Late on Friday afternoon the English High Court granted permission to appeal the Government decision to build the Holocaust Memorial in Victoria Tower Gardens, Westminster, London.
I was originally invited by Government to take part in the planning design consultation, so let me just say that the proposers of this idea have behaved all along like bullies.
Moreover, a very large part of the Zoom Planning Enquiry was taken up by counsel for the Government quashing dissent by accusing experts of being anti-Semitic. I myself received an unacceptable letter from the relevant Civil Servant, whom I had earlier been asked to host in my own home to offer expert advice on how to tackle the burgeoning antisemitism in the UK.
So, they don’t mind using our brains and expertise when it suits – and then they discard us like so much flotsam and jetsam (it has been ever so, of course, as far as we Jews are concerned) when we have served our purpose.
As somebody involved at the very start of this disgraceful affair, may I further say that this enterprise was never to do with safeguarding the UK Jewish community (as we were told), or even about properly remembering the Holocaust. This was about a whole load of bullies sacrilegiously using the concept of the Shoah for their own ends.
Instead of taking a stand against this obvious miscarriage of justice at the outset, what did the contemporary Church leadership do?
They disregarded the pleas of their own Area Dean of Westminster, where local school children make use the park’s playground. They ignored the written and verbal warnings of their former Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Lord Rowan Williams. They ignored the Father of the House of Commons. They contemptuously ridiculed distinguished Jewish peers with family links to the Holocaust who have served this country with great devotion. They ignored ordinary people on the ground. They ignored every significant Holocaust historian in the country. They ignored seasoned Holocaust educators. They ignored Sir Richard Evans, expert witness in the David Irving case against Professor Deborah Lipstadt .
The usually voluble British Press stayed silent – I am thinking particularly of the Guardian and the Times – hardly any discussion was permitted in their pages. Where were the Green Parties and leading environmental groups all over the world – and why did that arch anti-Semite, Jeremy Corbyn, support this scheme with alacrity ?
Why at the Zoom Planning Enquiry did the Planning Inspector constantly refer to ‘racism’ rather than ‘antisemitism’, and why did he have an argument on the issue with this country’s longest standing Holocaust educator, yet allow counsel for the Government to accuse dissenters and experts of antisemitism, resulting in these experts having to water down their well-thought out assessments?
Once the facts are all known, it becomes increasingly evident that to have even considered this type of monstrous carbuncle for a tiny heritage space is akin to suggesting a memorial to the Ku Klux Klan on behalf of the black community of North America. It is to spit in the faces of the Jewish community – it is the theology of contempt.
Those in favour of this proposal have a death wish towards the Jewish community. Those brave people who opposed the scheme are the true supporters of Jewish values shockingly destroyed in the Holocaust and which the State of Israel for one is trying to build up again from the ashes. And on this note, I have just this minute heard from one of the 115 Jewish signatories to our letter opposing this memorial, published in the Jewish Chronicle on August 31st. Professor Richard Schwartz has just been recognized by the State of Israel as one of that country’s leading climate crisis experts. Yes, Professor Richard Schwartz, the USA’s foremost Jewish environmental expert, now living in Israel, signed our letter of dissent. Why did others not do so and prefer instead to stay silent, as so many others did during the Holocaust?
https://www.israel21c.org/20-israelis-leading-the-way…/And please note that this press release has been delayed by one day in order to honour the Jewish Shabbat. This is in contrast to the proponents of this scheme who have made it clear that they don’t honour anyone or anything other than themselves.
[Irene Lancaster is a teaching fellow at the Centre for Jewish Studies, University of Manchester].
Tweets seen
I could stomach lectures from the Royal Family on climate change a little more if the didn’t maintain their lands as green deserts for grouse shooting. Reforest the estates. pic.twitter.com/2aXZWsYkLz
When I was younger, it seemed almost unsophisticated, intellectually, to think in terms of international conspiracy; now, I realize that there is such a conspiracy (a linked series of conspiracies), even though it may not control “everything” (as some people tend to think), and even though many of those who are part of it may think of it as a “consensus” rather than as a “conspiracy”.
To add to David Dimbleby’s parting remarks on Referendum Night, “the people have spoken…and we’re out…” (and so, having confounded the System, the people will not be allowed to speak in future…).
1. Did You Know That There Are At Least 2,232 UK Members Of The World Economic Forum In UK Universities And That The Bill And Melinda Gates Foundation Has Donated $1.45 Billion To These Universities
People of the future will wonder and puzzle about how it was that really rather ordinary people such as Bill Gates, Melinda Gates, Jeff Bezos etc were able to accumulate such money and, indeed, power.
I have not watched much of the Budget coverage. Talking heads and/or “journalists” (System propagandists) yapping ignorantly and, all the while, smug MP or ex-MP freeloaders (such as David Gauke) seen on Sky TV or BBC talking about “wasting government money” etc (when Gauke himself —among many many others— claimed for everything he could, including tacky furnishings, TV sets, luxury hotel stays etc).
What a bunch of monkeys!
This Government has, of course “wasted money” (UK’s economic resources): £37 BILLION on the ludicrous “test and trace” nonsense alone, headed by incompetent crony Dido Harding. Something that was not even necessary in the first place. That’s more than the projected cost of even the HS2 vanity-rail white elephant.
Imagine what other could have been done with £37BN. Improving the whole rail infrastructure of the country. New hospitals. Libraries, or education generally (I mean real education, not warehousing children in schools, “taught” by ignorant teachers —very often— while the parents work, or jump through bureaucratic hoops).
£37BN works out at around £1,000 for every working-age adult in the UK. In other words, the Treasury could just have given every person in the UK about £1,000, with better results socially and economically.
To put it another way, the most expensive aircraft carrier ever built, the USS Ford, cost about £9 Billion in pounds sterling, so the UK could have had (disregarding running costs) four like that, instead of the useless, pointless, “test and trace” fiasco. Or might have had built about 37 smaller warships.
When you see that part-Jew, part-Levantine chancer, “Boris”, posing as Prime Minister (forget Indian “clever boy”, Rishi Sunak, and the other clowns), you know that the UK political system is terminally sick.
“Criticized“? Yes, but we have seen in recent years what frightens the corrupt and the conspirators, and it is not being “criticized” in official reports.
Sections of the MSM are letting little rays of truth out. Hedging their bets? Trying not to lose all touch with reality and their readers?#sideeffectshttps://t.co/ZgC2k4eQqf
Yesterday, the hugely ignorant Daily Mirror scribbler, Susie Boniface, aka “the Fleet Street Fox” [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susie_Boniface] suggested, in a Mirror opinion piece, that “anti-vaxx” protesters should be imprisoned, and generally treated as terrorists. From where did that come? At any rate, an interesting straw in the wind as we approach 2022, the most significant year since 1989 (and, previously, 1956 and 1923). 33-year cycle.
How long before anyone questioning the System narrative and System policies is considered to be a “social terrorist” or “enabler”? Anyone who questions the “panicdemic” narrative. Anyone who opposes the cross-Channel or other migration-invasion. Anyone who questions the power or influence of the Jewish lobby. Anyone seeking a better society. Others…
You can see already the outline of what is taking shape. Look at the Online Harms Bill. Even less free speech than now exists. The Jewish (Zionist) lobby is behind much of the repression.
Alarming that the most powerful military-destructive machine in the world is now controlled, at least notionally, by someone who appears to be a confused, semi-demented, and possibly incontinent person, who may or may not be some kind of child abuser. One can only hope that, if Biden tries to reprise Hilary’s idea, and launch a third world war against Russia (or China), that there is some American version of a chekist standing quietly behind him, pistol always ready to administer a quick coup de grace…
As the tweeter says, “wealthy“…perhaps in fact not “beyond the dreams of avarice” (let’s not set the bar too low!) but probably worth a couple of million anyway, including the detached house in a pleasant neighbourhood etc.
“It was not painful; didn’t hurt…” Obviously not sufficiently deterred…
What gives the idiots the right to stop other people moving freely? Some weird idea that their actions will force Government to make more house insulation mandatory, or to pay for that? The protesters’ whole premise is nonsense. There is obviously a hidden agenda here, but protesters such as that retired doctor are merely pawns in someone else’s game.
Too many people are waking up. Bring on the talking heads and scribblers such as Susie Boniface, Fleet Street Fox, to call for the imprisonment of dissidents.
Note the police robots standing behind the “protester” (para-terrorist), not stopping him, not arresting him, nor even talking to him; in fact, looking “as if” they are protecting him…
In fact, the police car in that picture is also blocking the road.
Come to think of it, I have seen nothing from Susie Boniface, “Fleet Street Fox”, about treating “Insulate Britain” or Extinction Rebellion as “terrorists”. She may perhaps have done so (I tend to avoid reading her ignorant drivel), but I have anyway not seen it.
I remember watching this, as a boy of 14-15, in black and white (it was made in colour but I had my own huge and ancient b&w TV, with wooden case, and made, I should think, in the 1950s).
Looking at what little is on YouTube, and what (also not much) I can now recall, it is interesting to see the differences between the 1971 view of the near future (The Guardians was set in the 1980s) and what actually happened in the 1980s and on to 2021, 50 years after the 13 episodes of the series were shown.
There may have been those, in the early 1980s, amid the Miners’ Strike etc, who found parallels (the early paramilitarization of some police, and the use of SAS soldiers dressed as police).
Looking back now, one still finds parallels, but also great differences. The first is the relative quiescence of the public now. No, or very few, violent demonstrations, few big marches (and even fewer violent ones) compared to the 1970s.
Now, we have the Internet, and all its issues. That was not a factor, for the public, until the mid-1990s at earliest. The authorities have far wider powers in practice now, and use them.
In 1971, the “Guardian” force was seen as paramilitary, but in 2021 the forces of repression use plainclothes operatives (mostly), and not decrees (as such) but “laws” nodded through by a rubberstamp Parliament— look at the Online Harms Bill being put through Parliament right now, and with no resistance at all from a useless “Opposition” led by a Jewish-lobby puppet.
Also, 1971 people would not have taken seriously the idea that a virus which (supposedly) kills about 1 in 1,000 of the population would enable the UK Government to impose wide-ranging curbs on the most basic civil liberties (eg freedom to travel —even by car— in 2020); or that the kind of people who were most likely to resist actively in 1971 would become, in 2021, virtue-signalling “we’re good citizens, we are” serfs.
Interesting short documentary about the Afrika Korps in Libya and French Equatorial Africa (now, Chad, in part) in the early 1940s
The quotation has occurred to me a few times since I started writing this blog in late 2016. Yesterday, WordPress sent, not for the first time, an automated message saying “Your stats are booming! Ian Robert Millard is getting lots of traffic“, which was pleasing, but (as on previous occasions) I think it better to proceed as if the blog had but one reader each day, rather than (often) hundreds of individual readers over the course of any 24 hours.
Having said that, it is good to see the increase in readership since I started the blog in November 2016. The first two full years of the blog (calendar years 2017 and 2018) showed a readership about the same in both years, though marginally higher in 2017 compared to 2018. However, there was a 500% increase in 2019, then a further nearly 400% increase in traffic in 2020. At present, it looks as if traffic for 2021 will be at a similar level to that of 2020, in other words, nearly 7x that of 2017.
Reverting to the headline quotation, I should prefer my blog to influence only one reader who then goes out to change the world, than a thousand — or a million— for whom the blog is merely something to read for 5 minutes, and leading to no action.
On the whole, that blog post, shorter than those I now put out, has aged well, though I was too optimistic in hoping that a nascent social-national movement would arise before 2020. In fact, there is still, in 2021, no obvious sign of one (I mean, of course, a credible one). The System’s fake “nationalist” parties headed by, mainly, Nigel Farage, i.e. UKIP and then Brexit Party, and now “Reform Party”, have prevented the birth of a proper social-national party.
We look now to the future. There is still all to play for.
Tweets seen
In response to numerous hostile @NATO actions against @natomission_ru, #Russia suspends activity of #NATO’s military liaison mission and information office in Moscow and recalls accreditation of their staff from November 1, 2021. pic.twitter.com/7mkty6wPrQ
“We have to realize the relationship between NATO, the transatlantic family, and Russia is at the lowest point since the end of the Cold War.”https://t.co/cv5QxfcO69
If only the Second World War (involving the UK) had never started, or had ended (in the West) after Dunkirk (1940), or had ended later in the war, with an honourable armistice between the British Empire and the German Reich. Palestine would then never have fallen to the Jews (and the same or similar could be said of the UK).
In Palestine, there were Jews already living there in the 1930s, almost all of which Jews had arrived in the 20th century. Under British rule (the post-WW1 League of Nations Mandate), the Jews could not exercise supremacy over the Arabs, so they started to conspire against their British rulers, a process that continued even during WW2, and led (after the migration invasion of hundreds of thousands, then millions, of Jews into Palestine), to the establishment of the present State of Israel in 1948. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Israel#Illegal_Jewish_immigration_and_insurgency.
More tweets seen
As MPs line up to tell their own horror stories of abuse, let's not lose sight of the abuse they inflict themselves. Cutting UC, freezing the triple lock, eleven years of needless austerity, attacks on the PIP, are also 'killers' In this time of heightened emotion think of that!
Israeli soldiers kidnapping Palestinian children; its brutal, terroristic child abuse, but it's another thing we're not allowed to broadcast https://t.co/aFS6CXIMEm
Freedom of the Press Foundation: 'After shocking story about CIA illegal acts, Biden admin must drop Assange charges immediately' #FreeAssangeNOWhttps://t.co/EkPhL1doN5
“school kids“? Those untermenschen may be registered at some school or other, but basically are just what the South Africans used to call “skollies“, meaning bad n*****s…
Why are the people of the UK wasting taxpayers’ money trying to “educate” such untermenschen?
In the UK, there are elements that hate the British people, our race, our culture, our history— and they want to kill off all of us, one way or the other. The System is now on their side, looking at TV, film, books, and ads; and (((certain types))) support what amounts to “white genocide” against white Northern Europeans by non-whites, including (((those others))).
As to the specific criminals shown in the clip, we all know that, even if identified, they will face no, or no real, sanction. I could suggest a better idea, but in our “free” country (that MPs have been spouting about for several days now), I am not allowed to express it, let alone carry it out.
Ecce the part-Jew, part-Levantine chancer now posing as the “Prime Minister” of this country…
Give all of your wealth and freedom to the globalist state machine and they will make it all better, says the smirking simp with the crap wig. https://t.co/xD3iwfL1lz
and said alleged-wig-wearing “science popularizer” is all in favour of mass immigration to Europe, a fact that is more likely to wipe out decent European civilization than anything else at present…
In any case, Professor Cox is, in my view, wrong when he ascribes “meaning” only to human entities. It’s a theological point which Cox (an atheist) would simply dismiss as obscurantist, no doubt.
In the “Covid” “debate”, as in the “debate” about migration-invasion, those in favour of the “panicdemic” measures (the facemask nonsense, “vaccination” using untried vaccines and potions, “social distancing” etc), just as with those in favour of mass immigration, end up having to eat their own tail, like Chronos (or, if you like, have to go up their own ****), in the end.
🚨 Since last Thursday, 861 illegal immigrants have been helped into the UK by the UK's Channel "taxi service"
📈 2,460 have now arrived this month—over 5 times as many as all of October 2020
The Jewish scribbler, Nick Cohen, tries to understand why the voters prefer “an obvious phoney” like “Boris” to anything Labour can come up with. He points to the latest opinion poll on Westminster voting intention (Con 41%, Lab 31%, LibDem 9%, Green 8%, Reform UK 4%.
You can forget “Reform UK”, the latest Farage/Tice vehicle. Controlled opposition in the UKIP/Brexit Party mould.
As for Greens, they are largely for disaffected otherwise Labour voters.
The LibDems reprise their longstanding role as “third choice”/dustbin for protest votes not radical enough to go Green or somewhere else.
Nick Cohen ends, lamely, by writing “All of this pushes all of us in the anti-Johnsonian counter-culture back to asking the same, old question: how can this country be so stupid?“
In fact, the answer is simple. “Boris”, the part-Jew chancer, and his misnamed “Conservatives”, are not very popular. Their vote in 2019 was only marginally up on 2017. The absurd UK electoral system simply came up with three cherries, and an 80-seat majority.
What has happened, as I have blogged repeatedly for years, is not that the Conservatives are popular, but that Labour is unpopular. Its 8-point slide from 2017 to 2019 made the point, surely?
Labour was a party of the “working man”. Now, well look at their recent conference! A little monkey aged (?) 17 and three quarters, dressed in the kind of dungaree favoured by some feminist mothers, bleated about climate change…
Basically, Labour’s house, once built on granite foundations (the organized, unionized, British working classes) now rests on the shifting sands of a “precariat”, which precariat is a multi-ethnic, multikulti, almost cultureless mass of “gig workers”, unemployed or “furloughed” people, either not unionized or belonging to unions which have promotion of “anti-racism”, “anti-sexism” and LGBTXYZ as their main interests.
In other words, the British people have been squeezed out of Labour. Labour is now, as I have said for years, the party of the ethnic minorities and some public service people.
When British people look at Jewish-lobby puppet Keir Starmer, and his thick and unpleasant deputy Angela Rayner, down on their knees to the “Black Lives Matter” nonsense, and wearing facemasks to boot, does it make British people want to vote Labour? I think not.
When British people look at the frighteningly uncultured, dim, MPs of Labour, particularly the black women such as Diane Abbott, Fiona Onasanya (now removed), Claudia Webbe (about to be removed), Dawn Butler etc, does it make them want to vote Labour? I think not.
So in the end, what remains of “Labour” offers almost the same as “Boris”-Conservatism: migration-invasion, poor pay, benefits, and pensions, the multikulti society writ larger even than under “Boris”, and…nothing much else.
Now that Israel-tool Starmer is leader, there is not even the idea that a vote for Labour might be a vote against Jewish Zionism.
The result is that Labour is a vote for almost no change, except even worse immigration invasion, and even stricter rules for both the workers and the (various types of) non-worker.
I think there’s a pandemic of studden deaths I see thousands every day strange not one media source has figured this out. 🤡🤡🤡🤡 you all know why 💉 pic.twitter.com/2M6jpO9627
— NinnyD 🇬🇧❤️🇺🇸 Waiting~4~the Revolution (@ninnyd101) October 19, 2021
The endless “lockdowns” are a way of disguising what is really happening, i.e. the shutdown of large parts of the Western world for other reasons. It has to do with the promotion of the Pacific Rim (especially China) and North America (regardless of surface hostility). It is also connected with the next 33-year cycle starting in 2022. NWO/ZOG.
In the same way, if the NHS and care system for the elderly is wound down and underfunded, the excuse is now “it’s because of Covid”. Of course it is…
As before, I am amazed at the sheer forbearance of the British public. None of those malicious bastards is getting hit, or stamped upon, or kicked, or simply run over.
In a sense, I am glad that the public are so well-behaved, but being so nice seems to be taken advantage of by the ridiculous “protesters”. I wonder how long before the “protesters” outstay their welcome?
Brave words, but I am afraid that I have, over decades, heard too many “brave” (boastful) words from Americans who are armed to the teeth but actually do nothing.
“Having further considered that the said Company of Jesus can no longer produce those abundant fruits, … in the present case, we are determining upon the fate of a society classed among the mendicant orders, both by its institute and by its privileges; after a mature deliberation, we do, out of our certain knowledge, and the fulness of our apostolical power, suppress and abolish the said company: we deprive it of all activity whatever. …And to this end a member of the regular clergy, recommendable for his prudence and sound morals, shall be chosen to preside over and govern the said houses; so that the name of the Company shall be, and is, for ever extinguished and suppressed.” [Pope Clement IV, in 1773].
“The period following the Restoration of the Jesuits in 1814 was marked by tremendous growth, as evidenced by the large number of Jesuit colleges and universities established during the 19th century. During this time in the United States, 22 of the society’s 28 universities were founded or taken over by the Jesuits. It has been suggested that the experience of suppression had served to heighten orthodoxy among the Jesuits. While this claim is debatable, Jesuits were generally supportive of papal authority within the church, and some members became associated with the Ultramontanist movement and the declaration of Papal Infallibility in 1870.” [Wikipedia]
All the same, reverting to the tweet above, with the nun, it is true that the population of the world is too high, by far. However, while numbers should be reduced, what is equally important is that the proportion of white Northern Europeans be far far higher than it presently is.
Russia is ready to deliver all of the natural gas Europe needs, said President Putin, blaming the continent’s energy crisis on flawed policies rather than a lack of supply https://t.co/l3Ew22VhDbpic.twitter.com/83sWGOLeYM
Who cited these "issues"? Bullshit. Peter Jackson's Lord of the rings series was perfect, even by today's stupidly sensitive standards. It didn't lack diversity neither did it lack strong female characters. Y'all don't have to tear it down to hype this one up https://t.co/QUSQbm3bKK
All part of the transnational propaganda campaign being waged by the conspirators of evil. All part of the “comms” for the Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan. Look at pretty much any TV show, TV ad, poster ad…whatever. This is a massive international campaign to destroy the white race by mixing it heavily with the blacks and browns. Not race alone; culture, our European culture, will also not survive, unless we start to fight for it.
Ian Robert Millard 