Tag Archives: robotics

Diary Blog, 22 March 2026

Morning music

Talking point

Applies particularly to the Jewish lobby.

Tweets seen

I am far less worried about an attack on London (from anywhere) than I should have been had I thought much about it years ago. Mainly because, as time goes by, I like London (where I lived for many years) less and less.

Incidentally, how far can the Israeli missiles reach? Don’t imagine that they would never attack the UK; they have done so in the past, and they already have a large, mainly Jewish, “fifth column” here…

Incidentally, I now see the msm ramping up the fear-factor, as seen prior to the invasion of Iraq nearly 25 years ago. Today, “Iran has the means to attack the UK” etc. All those years ago, many people believed that Saddam Hussein’s Iraq also not only had the means to attack the UK with “weapons of mass destruction”, but could do so in less than 40 minutes. Both untrue. Propaganda.

The Israeli pathology and the American are similar in that sense. Both think themselves entitled to bomb others, while they themselves remain immune from attack. However, when they themselves do suffer attacks, they scream, and take on a “victim” persona, as we saw when New York was attacked in 2001.

Gaza is one big war crime, committed by the Israeli state, supported by the Israeli Jews (most of them), and supported by the Jewish/Israeli lobby in the USA, UK, Australia, France etc.

The other messages would have been even more incriminating, the ones about how Israel and the Jewish lobby have been and still are contaminating UK politics and the UK legal system.

That spokesman for the Iranian side in the present war wears the rank insignia of a Lieutenant-Colonel (Sarhang Dovom) of the IRGC Air Force.

More music

More tweets

[the cat in the Kremlin]

The Murdoch enterprises own and control some of the most pro-Israel and pro-Jewish lobby media outlets in the UK too, such as the pathetic online “Talk TV”.

That is exactly what “they” do.

[cf. the scams and attempted scams of the same sort by washed-up and incompetent/dishonest Jew-Zionist lawyer Mark Lewis, his wife/carer Mandy Blumenthal, Jewish scribbler Sabrina Miller, and the malicious Jew-Zionist cabal known as the “Campaign Against Antisemitism” (use the search box on the blog).]

Incidentally, unpleasant Jewish scribbler Zoe Strimpel writes that she just happened to “pop into” that art exhibition. Really? Well, I suppose that that may be true, but she lives in a heavily-Jewish area of North London, according to Wikipedia, and that would be 90-100 miles from Margate.

The usual Jewish-Zionist contrived scandal and noise, in short.

As a matter of fact, I also dislike what I have seen (online) of that exhibition, but only because it is “art” on, at best, a primary school level. Unlike the repressive activist Jews, though, I would not want to ban the exhibition (though neither would I, had I the political power, subsidize it).

They are a horrible tribe.

I was previously unaware of that. Also may explain why American feminists are so pro-abortion; most of the famous 20thC “pioneers” of feminism in the USA were Jewish.

Very evil. After all, babies born prematurely, whether naturally or via surgical intervention and for medical reasons, and even if born months prematurely, are usually able to live entirely normal lives.

The Jewish/Israel lobby has a stranglehold on the mass media, almost all politicians, and most lawyers and legal institutions (including the police, the courts, and the majority of judges) in the USA and UK and some other countries.

Spectacular, but most of the “space” stuff internationally, both public and private, is just a colossal waste of resources, time, and effort.

[“An extract from the book they don’t want you to read – Suicide of a Nation

There are moments in the life of a nation when everything changes − not with a bang, not even with a conscious decision, but with a quiet, creeping loss of confidence so profound that a people start to forget who they are.

Britain, I believe, is living through such a moment.

The institutions that once embodied our nation − Parliament, the civil ­service, the courts, the police, the BBC, ­universities, schools, corporate executives, the Church, museums − have drifted away from the public they exist to serve.

Our country is now in the grip of a new ruling class which sees itself not as ­custodians of a ­living nation but as supervisors of a global ­project that has no borders, no limits and no loyalty to the people whose taxes fund their salaries.

It is a belief that moral worth is measured not by defending your country but by demonstrating infinite generosity to the rest of the world, even when this threatens the survival of your own nation.

Within just one generation, because of the trends I set out in this book, Britain will no longer be Britain. England will no longer be England.

The country that our ancestors built will be replaced by something else.

Britain is not being conquered or invaded.

Worse: it is being abandoned by the leaders who were meant to protect it.

As the historian and philosopher Arnold J. Toynbee once said: ‘Civilisations die from suicide, not by murder.’

Across Britain – in cities, towns, villages and suburbs − many people are now experiencing the same private, unspoken sense of shock.

You walk down a street you once knew but no longer recognise.

You visit the place where you were born yet feel like a stranger.

You hear languages that are not your own.

You see customs and cultures you do not share.

The country of your childhood seems to exist only in old films, documentaries, ­fading books and nostalgia reels on social media.

What is a nation?

It is a community bound by a shared identity, history, culture and way of life.

It is filled with your relatives, ancestors and neighbours, who you know and trust, and whose graves, stories and memories lie around you.

Yet a survey last year by pollsters More In Common found that nearly half of Britons now feel ‘like a stranger in my own country’.

Significantly, many people from minority backgrounds experience this profound sense of loss just as strongly as their white British counterparts.

Yet whenever anyone articulates this creeping sense of dispossession, they are shamed, silenced or mocked by the elites who are imposing these changes on them.

What we are witnessing is not just a small adjustment, a temporary shift, or the gentle evolution of a nation.

It is something far more dramatic and potentially permanent.

It is the deliberate and sustained transformation of our country.

Nations do not remain the same if the people who shaped them, built them and embody them collapse into minority status.

But this is what is happening.

According to my analysis, which I set out in the book, by the year 2100, the share of Britain’s population made up of White Britons (roughly 95 per cent of the country in the 1990s) will collapse to just 33 per cent.

The proportion of people who are foreign-born or the immediate descendants of the foreign-born will rise from 19 per cent to more than 60 per cent.

Muslims will go from representing about one in every 17 people to one in every four – and one in every three among the young.

This will all happen within the lifetime of a child born today – in the next 74 years.

The ethnic and cultural core of a nation is what holds it in place, like an anchor.

It is what provides us with a sense of shared identity, culture, history, collective memory, and way of life.

But once this anchor gives way, there is nothing to hold the nation in place.“]

[Matt Goodwin]

I can agree with all of that, yet Goodwin still refuses to note that the Jewish/Zionist element (and the connected transnational NWO/ZOG cabal) is that which has been prominent in almost all of the matters raised by him in his extract (I have not read the book itself).

Indeed, I myself have been blogging about all of those matters for 9 years (since late 2016) and, before that, tweeting in similar vein (until a pack of Jews in and/or connected to the malicious “Campaign Against Antisemitism” had me expelled from Twitter in 2018 after a long and conspiratorial effort).

I agree.

I have no idea where that disorder is or was (but obviously in the UK, seeing the Tesco sign), or what it is about specifically, and I could not care less.

See also, from the blog in 2017:

Let’s discover what that old Jew was up to on the “Lolita Express” planes, and on the “Lolita Island”, both owned by the Jew Epstein before the latter “went up the chimney”.

Dershowitz claims not to have been involved in Epstein’s sex crimes, and he may not have been (we do not know) but, in that case, what is the connection; what was he doing there? (bearing in mind that the whole Epstein operation, and all or virtually all of Epstein’s wealth, was bankrolled by Israeli Intelligence —MOSSAD, Aman etc— for purposes of political, military, and commercial intelligence).

…and what skills are they supposed to be?

Stupid Trump has really ignited something, and cannot now easily stop it.

Even some of the Jews see what Israel is doing.

Historical note

Spain 1981

Colonel Tejero, who died last month, attempted a putsch in Madrid in 1981, briefly seizing the Cortes (Parliament).

I really enjoy seeing the pseudo-democratic rabble stop squabbling in a second (once a few shots had been fired into the ceiling), then hiding under their desks! Brilliant!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_Tejero

More tweets

Amazing.

Does anyone think that the [Israeli] Jews (and their non-Israeli agents) can go around assassinating their chosen enemies without some sort of equal and opposite reaction happening in Israel (and maybe also in the USA, UK etc)?

The existence of the Israeli state has had a significant coarsening effect on international relations and on the rule of law internationally.

Late tweets seen

[“As a local man, a father, and a husband, Sam simply wanted to raise awareness about the devastating impact of mass immigration and how that threatens the future of our communities.

His vehicle for achieving this would be through a sticker campaign; for years Sam ran this peaceful campaign that would ultimately remove him from his family and put him in prison. Here’s exactly what happened.“]

[“2/ Between 2019 and 2021, Sam ran the Hundred Handers – an online group providing downloadable stickers for people to put up around the country.

His aim was straightforward: highlight how rapid demographic change through mass immigration is transforming Britain beyond recognition, warning that native Brits could become a minority in our homeland by 2066, as data projected.“]

[“3/ The stickers carried clear messages like:

It’s OK to be White”
“Reject White Guilt”
“We will be a minority in our homeland by 2066”
and “Mass immigration is white genocide”.

Far from an attempt to mobilise a mob through a call to violence; rather, Sam intended to spark conversation on issues politicians outright refused to address.“]

[“4/ But Sam was targeted. Police had monitored him for years because of his nativist politics and work with Patriotic Alternative.

In 2021, he was finally arrested. The authorities weren’t interested in debate – in fact, they wanted to completely shut him down, for his rhetoric was not “state-approved”.]

[“5/ At Leeds Crown Court he faced serious charges: 11 counts under Section 19 of the Public Order Act 1986 for “intending to stir up racial hatred” by distributing written material, plus encouraging racially aggravated criminal damage under the Serious Crime Act 2007.

Even though his messaging was factually based on official projections, which the prosecution also acknowledged, prosecutors focused instead on his political intent.“]

[“6/ The judge overseeing the case, Tom Bayliss KC, made the political nature of the case obvious during sentencing in March 2024.

He branded Sam a “racist and white supremacist”, claimed he held “Nazi sympathies” and was an “antisemite”. The judge called the stickers “corrosive to our society” and warned they risked normalising antisemitism not seen since 1930s Germany.“]

[“7/ For the crime of allowing members of the public to download stickers, Sam was sentenced to two years in prison, missing out on precious time with his family — including not being present at the birth of his second child — serving a total of 10 months inside.

A Leeds man’s life disrupted for years – not for any crime of violence, but for expressing love for his own people on their own land. It makes you wonder how the scales have been skewed against those who promote nativist politics.“]

[“8/ This case shows the real motivation: the criminalisation of nativist patriots who dare speak about demographic replacement and cultural change.

While two-tier justice ignores far worse crimes, like illegal immigrants raping literal children, patriots like Sam are stripped of their freedoms, imprisoned, and labelled fascist monsters.

This is precisely why we need to Restore Britain. Criminal justice must be restored to protect our people, not persecute them. This is a monumental task that is going to require huge repeals and constitutional restoration. Nativist patriots should feel no shame – this is OUR land. Standing up for it is natural and right!

In the words of Vice-Admiral Horatio Nelson as signalled from his ship the HMS Victory before the Battle of Trafalgar, October 21, 1805:

“England expects that every man will do his duty”.]

Worth reproducing in full.

So no “dancing Israelis” now…

I saw a tweet replying that “there is no proof“, but I presume that that idiotic tweeter is not a shipowner (or shipping insurer)…

I did some shipping contract work as a barrister, especially about 21 years ago. Transhipment of crude oil from the Middle East to black Africa. Each ship carried, even then, between USD $50M and USD $100M worth of oil.

“J”-mafia…

Europe really must “clear the decks”…

Late music

[Gorky Park skaters]

Diary Blog, 8 June 2023

Afternoon music

[Lazienki Park, Warsaw]

From the newspapers

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-12169327/Worlds-advanced-humanoid-robot-Ameca-describes-nightmare-AI-scenario.html

Tweets seen

The animals which suffer by reason of human conflict despite having had no part in its instigation or execution.

God knows what it would look like if one or more nuclear missiles were to land. When I was living intermittently in the New York/New Jersey area in the early 1990s, much of New York City already looked in a bad way, to say the least, but a nuclear attack would take everything to a level no-one wants to see.

It was always more likely that the Kiev regime blew the dam, rather than the Russian forces.

Embarrassing, but the avoider cannot be entirely blamed. Serving on the front lines of the Ukrainian Army seems to be tantamount to a death sentence. The Kiev regime is running out of soldiers, and having to use press-gangs.

A reminder about the fund set up to enable “Sven Longshanks” (James Allchurch) to resettle when he is eventually released from prison sometime in 2024.

Well, I disagree with the assumption of the question, but that result must be accurate as far as it goes.

When will the UK (particularly England) be majority non-white? Some say 2066, others 2050. Maybe even 2040. The Great Replacement. The Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan.

Eventually, the sliding standards in all areas (NHS, policing, education) will be scarcely noticed, because the non-whites accept rubbish administration, potholed roads, creaking railway infrastructure etc as normal.

The police in England, in 2023…

Of course, get accused of saying something about the bad behaviour of some ethnic group (especially Jews) and the police will spend endless hours “investigating” your speech, tweets, blog posts etc…

Mad.

Late tweets

Watch this space. The “bad law” of Communications Act 2003, s.127 and its “grossly offensive” meaningless nonsense definition (frequently abused by Jewish “lawfare” groups such as the “Campaign Against Antisemitism”) is being replaced by the concept of whether actual harm has been done (once the Online Safety Bill currently going through Parliament becomes law).

So the transnational conspiracy found another use for Greta Nut now that her one-trick-pony “I’m an autistic little girl speaking up against climate change” act started to bore people.

I blogged about Macron’s peculiar and largely unexamined (by the msm) background a few years ago: https://ianrobertmillard.org/2019/01/09/on-recent-events-in-france/.

If only the UK had (a) real leaders, and (by) leaders who put the British people first…

Late music

Diary Blog, 24 April 2023

Morning music

[Lazienki Park, Warsaw]

Tweets seen

Not that I ever “supported” Corbyn anyway, but there is no doubt that the so-called “Campaign Against Antisemitism” [“CAA”] and other Zionist-Jew orgs and individuals conspired to remove Corbyn from the Labour Party leadership.

The silly thing is that Corbyn was not what I would call “anti-Semitic” anyway.

As for Diane Abbott, obviously I have no time for her on any basis.

https://twitter.com/falconseed/status/1650309496231841792?s=20

Yes, we live (whether in UK or USA or EU) in a Western society with various rights and mostly fair-seeming laws etc…on the surface. Excavate a little, though, and you come to a very different layer, as Julian Assange discovered.

Penny Mordaunt is yet another of those MPs who have no intellectual or —crucially— financial independence, which means that she is totally dependent on the favour of the System.

As Marx predicted.

AI and robotics will finish the process. Untold millions of British and other workers will fall into unemployment and poverty, because their labour will not be required, having been largely replaced by ever more sophisticated machines. Without pay, and dependent on State benefits, they will be unable to buy the luxury, or even basic, products of the AI/robotics economy.

In those circumstances, “basic income” schemes will be brought in (we already see a crippled version of that with the UK’s “Universal Credit”).

In the end, in the title of the David Icke book, there may be a”robot’s rebellion” by the human beings thrown on the scrapheap, unless the people are too drugged by the opiates of the age, i.e. televized football, pop music, “celebrity” nonsense etc.

What is required is not 1930s National Socialism, as such, but a form of social nationalism which honours 1930s National Socialism and contains within it the essence of National Socialism.

In short, and in the words of the Old Testament, we “honour our father and our mother”…

More tweets seen

…even when self-defence is necessary and unavoidable, or for the good of the future of the peoples of the Earth overall.

Perhaps, but does the ultra-powerful USA really need “allies” to fight a nuclear, or even conventional, war? “Need” militarily, that is, not as a propaganda figleaf.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sievierodonetsk.

Captured by Russian forces 10 months ago. Life goes on…

Late music

[painting by Roman Bozhkov]

Robotics Might Save the Railways

The rail system in the UK is a mess. Start from basics: rail travel, when it started (in England, in the world) in the 19th century, was a fast expanding private enterprise system of competing lines. These lines (companies) solidified into an efficient cartel by the time of the First World War. During the war itself, the railways were under State control (and until 1921). The Railways Act 1923 put the de facto private cartel on a statutory basis, with four large railway companies running virtually all passenger and freight services. Profitability waned with the coming of cars and road freight so that, by the time of nationalization in 1948, losses threatened. This became reality in 1955, when British Rail recorded its first operating loss.

The “modernization” plans adopted from 1955 culminated in the Beeching Report of 1963 and the subsequent and consequent closures of lines, services and stations. More than a third of passenger services were closed down. The closures of railway stations were even more dramatic: out of 7,000 stations, more than 4,000 were shut.

The 1990s privatization was carried out in a manner so poorly-conceived that only free-market ideologues who knew little of the realities of how to run a railroad could ever have decided upon it. I do not propose to delve into the detail here (and I myself am no expert anyway), except to say that there seems to be a good case for re-nationalization, possibly on a low-compensation or even an expropriation basis.

What of the future? We see that, all over the world, even in the UK, that driverless train transport, indeed driverless transport generally, is becoming common. Many British people will have travelled on limited forms of automated transport such as the Docklands Light Railway or the monorail at Gatwick Airport which connects the main terminal with another. It would be possible to run many more light rail and ultralight rail services on new branch lines, connecting with existing mainline stations and lines. Indeed, computerized and robotized ultralight narrow-gauge trains could run from towns, villages and suburbs not presently connected to rail, such lines terminating at an existing railway station. A whole huge new web of public transport could come into operation in this manner, eventually becoming more dense even than the railway system that existed before the 1960s. At the extremities, such lines could be narrow-gauge and the trains very small, perhaps single carriage. The expense, though considerable, would be worthwhile, knitting together a country which has become dislocated.

Road transport will be the dominant mode for the foreseeable future, but if an enhanced branch line network can take even 10% of passenger journeys off the roads, the cost of the new system will perhaps have been justified on that basis alone.

THE CASE FOR BASIC INCOME

Jesus Christ said that the poor are always with us (part of society). Whether that be accepted or not in absolute terms, the fact remains that, in practice, there is always the necessity to deal with “the submerged tenth”. In Soviet Russia, the solution was make-work jobs and, if that failed, part of the GULAG system. In finance-capitalist “Western” societies, there is the illusion of “aspiration” and “opportunity”: people need not be without (sufficient) income if they work. This theory or ideology leaves aside those who cannot work, whether because sick, disabled, or unable to find remunerative or sufficiently remunerative employment.

Robotics and computerization are advancing. Some studies say that a third of present jobs in countries such as the UK will disappear by about 2030 (some say “only” 25%). It may well be that other jobs will not appear to take up the slack. Millions may be left unemployed. At present, lack of income means that unemployed people (as well as the sick and disabled) have to jump through hoops in a degrading and largely pointless bureaucratic exercise in order to receive often very modest State-provided benefit payments. The system is not only expensive because of those payments, but because of the huge bureaucratic machinery that is built in to the process. There is a better way. Basic Income.

The Basic Income idea is that all citizens receive a regular payment, regardless of circumstances. In short, the payment is unconditional, meaning not withheld if the recipient does not have a job, look for a job, can do a job. Basic Income replaces all (or, in some versions, some) existing social welfare payments.

Basic Income is being trialled in some areas of Europe: in parts of Switzerland, Finland, the Netherlands. In Alaska, all permanent residents receive a small Basic Income payment annually (at present, about $2,500), monies routed from oil revenues.

Basic Income could be tweaked, so that persons on incomes above a certain level have an equivalent amount taken via the tax system; another idea would be to give a higher-tier Basic Income to the disabled (though that would mean some form of assessment and judgment). Alternatively, Basic Income could be paid only to those without income or capital, topping up income to a certain or decided level. That is, in fact, more or less what happens now in the UK, but without the present system’s bureaucracy, unpleasantness, snooping, harassing etc (made far worse since the Iain Duncan Smith regime of 2010-present).

It is objected that Basic Income would mean that people would just be unwilling to work. Is that so? First of all it might depend on the level of Basic Income. Economic realities would probably limit Basic Income to no more than about £15,000 p.a. It might be as little as £10,000 (either per person or per household). Many will, at that level, find plenty of incentive to work if they can. Also, it is rarely heard that people should not receive inheritances or trust incomes because they might be made lazy thereby. Lottery winners in the UK usually start businesses, carry on working for pay or do charity work.

In fact, in the UK, there are already payments somewhat analogous to Basic Income. State Pensions are already paid to all persons over a decided age, with extra “State Pension Guarantee Credit” money paid to those whose income and capital is below a certain level. Child Benefit was formerly paid to all persons who have children (regardless of income) and still is paid, though now there is an income cutoff point (at a fairly high level).

The cost of Basic Income is lessened by the removal of large numbers of pointless jobs in the (UK) Department of Work and Pensions etc and by the elimination of the need for large numbers of “Jobcentres” and other buildings and their upkeep. Housing Benefit will not exist, so greedy buy-to-let parasites will not be subsidized by taxpayers via taxation revenues). That alone will save billions of pounds.

A person receiving Basic Income who wishes to work will be able to look for work honestly (rather than in order to tick a Jobcentre box) and with confidence, and in the meantime will have money for transport, clothing, food. The disabled will not have to undergo degrading tests in order to receive at least the “basic level” of Basic Income (medical report from GP should be sufficient anyway). The more fortunate, who have income or capital, will (if receiving Basic Income), will be able to spend more (thus stimulating the economy) and/or start their own businesses.

In short, it will become clear in time that Basic Income is the way forward in the UK.