Well, this week I again beat political journalist John Rentoul, scoring 9/10 to his 6/10.
I did not know the answer to question 7.
Not for the first time, the accuracy of the questions was not exact, in that Western Union (question 9) was founded in 1851, not 1852.
Tweets seen
I’ve seen a confidential document from Lynton Crosby’s lobbying firm which advises Boris Johnson to ride roughshod over every convention and standard of propriety to pack the House of Lords. [Thread]https://t.co/iB23JdHqpJ
I had missed that. Seems that, in a sense, the apple fell not far from the tree…
“Largan has campaigned strongly against antisemitism and has pushed for organisations to adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism.[18]
Largan is also a parliamentary officer of the Conservative Friends of Israel (CFoI). In 2019, CFoI paid for Largan to visit Israel and the West Bank on a fact finding political delegation.”
[Wikipedia].
More music
Late tweets seen
The current levels of inflation and taxation are down to government panic. War will soon make it worse, but not yet.I’m surprised you comment on the article without reading it, @challiscj https://t.co/l49qo1zZ9D
Indeed @challiscj Nor will I say ‘Maskvah’, Russian equivalent of the affected ‘Kyiv’. Nor will I say ‘Baile Atha Cliath’ instead of Dublin, ‘Yerushalyim’ instead of Jerusalem, ‘Wien’ instead of Vienna or ‘Roma’ instead of Rome. You? https://t.co/UdH2pbLmjG
'But may I put in a plea to our leaders, whoever they may be, to stop making a crisis into a catastrophe? It is time to end the Ukraine War before it sets the whole world on fire and wrecks what is left of our civilisation.' https://t.co/KdsLI2HXAJ via @mailplus
' As we sit in our freezing houses eating bread and potatoes, while Ukrainians pick through the ruins of their ‘victorious’ country, wondering how to rebuild & where all the young men are , will we comfort ourselves by saying that it was all worth it?' https://t.co/KdsLI2HXAJ
I was sent some interesting quotations from Hitler. I do not at present have the citations (probably from Mein Kampf, possibly from the WW2 transcripts published in the 1950s as, in English editions, Hitler’s Table Talk), but will add them as and when. The quotations certainly read as if authentic. I believe them to be authentic.
“The ignorance of the broad masses about the inner nature of the Jew, the lack of instinct and narrow-mindedness of our upper classes, make the people an easy victim for this Jewish campaign of lies.”
“While from innate cowardice the upper classes turn away from a man whom the Jew attacks with lies and slander, the broad masses from stupidity or simplicity believe everything. The state authorities either cloak themselves in silence or, what usually happens, in order to put an end to the Jewish press campaign, they persecute the unjustly attacked.”
That sounds just like that which happened to me when I was wrongfully and unlawfully disbarred in October 2016.
“Culturally, the Jew contaminates art, literature, the theatre, makes a mockery of natural feeling, overthrows all concepts of beauty and sublimity, of the noble and the good, and instead drags men down into the sphere of his own base nature. Religion is ridiculed, ethics and morality represented as outmoded until the last props of a nation in its struggle for existence in this world have fallen.“
Exactly what has gone on for decades in “British” television and publishing (etc).
I despised Blair I despised Brown. I despised Cameron. I despised Clegg. I despised May. I despised Johnson. I despise Sunak. I despise Truss.#Democracypic.twitter.com/utHX7BkTEa
🔴The drop in living standards is bigger than during the financial crisis, the slump of the early 1990s or the stagflationary turmoil of the 1970s, even taking into account government help with energy bills
Were there a social-national party and/or movement worth anything, this would be, probably, the moment of lift-off (once the majority of the public start to suffer). As it is, as social-national people we look upon what is happening as mere observers, not active players.
Twitter is rotten. I myself was expelled (“suspended“, in Twitter’s weasel vocabulary) in 2018, after a pack of Jews finally managed, after years of trying, to get Twitter to remove my “account” (“@ianrmillard“).
As I predicted many months ago, Elon Musk turned out to be too intelligent to buy Twitter, once the results of his due diligence enquiries came in. It’s simply a dishonest organization (and one which is basically unprofitable, as most of its history shows).
How about not letting 1000s of foreigners in to GB every week? Nah! Let's just cover our (not his) beautiful country in concrete.
The “Conservative” Party leadership contest (“leadership“? Those cretins?) amounts to “which do you want, the Indian puppet on a stick, or the white woman puppet on a stick?“.
Just some salty rhetoric to grab the headlines during the leadership contest. In reality they're ALL singing from the same globalist hymn-sheet. https://t.co/Ns8UFO51gb
Did Russia impose sanctions resulting in driving up the price of energy? Did Russia lockdown our economy for two years destroying supply lines in the process? Did Russia print 4 Trillion dollars globally and hand it to their friends in the banking system??
I really dislike tattoos, especially —though not exclusively— on women.
Perhaps the only thing the SS and orthodox Jews had in common was a prohibition on tattoos, though some (not all) SS officers and men, mainly Waffen-SS, had their blood group tattooed under the arm in case of requiring a transfusion in or immediately after battle. As for Jews, if detained, they were tattooed compulsorily, with a prisoner number.
The market for private rentals typically heats up in late summer, with students, professionals and families looking for schools battling it out, but the pandemic has taken the temperature beyond boiling point https://t.co/sxBWMmXEvS
— The Times and The Sunday Times (@thetimes) July 25, 2022
The 25-year-old master’s student works for an insurance company in the week, in a café at weekends and studies for her degree at night to afford the shared three-bedroom rental where mould covers the walls and bugs crawl out from behind radiators
— The Times and The Sunday Times (@thetimes) July 25, 2022
She suspects she is being evicted for complaining about the conditions and is hoping to move into her boyfriend’s parents’ house to avoid re-entering the rental rat race
— The Times and The Sunday Times (@thetimes) July 25, 2022
Analysis from the property portal finds that over the past two years both first-time buyer asking prices and average rents for equivalent properties have risen three times quicker than they did before the pandemic
— The Times and The Sunday Times (@thetimes) July 25, 2022
More than 11,000 private renters were evicted from their homes so landlords could put up the rent, according to the government’s rental reform white paper published in June, but this number is likely to have risen considerably since
— The Times and The Sunday Times (@thetimes) July 25, 2022
To add further insult to injury, rising rents are disproportionately hitting the young. The average age of a private renter is 41, the upper limit of millennialdom, but one in three are aged 25 to 34, according to the English Housing Survey pic.twitter.com/wbmWffvAFp
— The Times and The Sunday Times (@thetimes) July 25, 2022
Yet one in six baby boomers — aged 58 to 76 — report owning more than one property, according to the Intergenerational Foundation, a think tank.
— The Times and The Sunday Times (@thetimes) July 25, 2022
Serious problem. So many people having to work purely to pay rent to some parasite for (often) a wholly-unsatisfactory dwelling. Not a new problem, but now getting even worse.
The cost of rentals devalues the more basic kinds of work, unjustly rewards rentier parasites, and damages society in a number of ways.
There is another point, looking at that Times report: the sheer pointlessness (from the purely practical perspective) of bothering to get a “degree”, a “master’s degree”, even a “doctorate”, when every other idiot also has one.
The political implications are stark. The average age of outright owners of real property in the UK is now 68. Not so long ago, say 20-40 years, it would have been 50 or even 45.
Those property owners in their sixties, seventies, eighties often own two or more properties (second homes, holiday homes, rented-out homes— sometimes all three in one).
The tiny proportion of people (about 1 in every 200 citizens) about to choose the next Conservative Party leader and so, by default, Prime Minister, are mostly persons over 50, usually over 60, who are (again, not always but often) outright property-owners and, not infrequently buy-to-let or other rentier parasites.
This has real results: last time, that tiny electorate chose Boris-idiot as Prime Minister. This time, either Liz Truss or Rishi Sunak.
Talking of Liz Truss, I have seen the clip of her filmed as the TV debate presenter collapsed. A panicked reaction at first. Is this the person to be in command, overall, of Britain’s nuclear deterrent? Is this the person to decide whether Britain gets into a war with Russia? I hope not, though I don’t want a non-European as Prime Minister either.
The [NWO/ZOG] System is getting desperate to advance their latest 33-year cycle agenda, 2022-2055, therefore we see the “blacks with everything” agenda, the “I stand with Ukraine” silliness, facemask nonsense (and all the other Covid-related stuff), the “trans” nonsense, and much of the “climate change” reportage. All part of an agenda of evil.
Another example:
Controversy and a dramatic clash of cultures as Nike place a billboard over the famous and beautiful Opera Garnier building, in Paris.
Mr Justice Choudhury gave permission today for this case to proceed to a full hearing.
The case raises a key free speech qn: do regulatory bodies that seek to discipline their members’ speech need to do so with disciplinary tribunals that are *independent* of themselves? https://t.co/TeIZkISzS7
— Expelled & exonerated barrister Jon Holbrook (@JonHolb) July 26, 2022
With our help, Simon Isherwood has won his Employment Tribunal case against West Midlands Trains! The rail conductor was dismissed for gross misconduct after asking whether indigenous populations enjoy 'black privilege' in African countries during a diversity training course. pic.twitter.com/TYnGVU1vTy
— The Free Speech Union (@SpeechUnion) July 26, 2022
The judgement stated that: "Freedom of expression, including a qualified right to offend when expressing views and beliefs (in this case on social issues), is a fundamental right in a democratic society." pic.twitter.com/KW9NkK52Kb
— The Free Speech Union (@SpeechUnion) July 26, 2022
Free Speech Union General Secretary Toby Young said: "I'm delighted we were able to help Simon win a landmark victory for free speech.
— The Free Speech Union (@SpeechUnion) July 26, 2022
"As the judge said, 'It simply cannot be right that employees are not allowed to have views that they privately express about courses they attend, however odious or objectionable others might consider them to be if they come to know of those views.'" pic.twitter.com/UyuJPNtGz2
— The Free Speech Union (@SpeechUnion) July 26, 2022
All well and good, but Toby Young and the Free Speech Union have never said a word in defence of my free speech rights, nor those of Alison Chabloz and those of Jez Turner (Jeremy Bedford Turner) etc. All attacked by the same pack of (Zionist) Jews.
Leaving aside the rights and wrongs of the rail industry dispute, what we see here is an example of what I have been blogging about for years around the Labour Party, that being that, if you like, the Labour Party has lost its former overall constituency, and has not found a credible role.
The industrial proletariat —the massed ranks of miners, dockers, railwaymen, steelworkers, factory workers, later expanded to include shopworkers etc— has pretty much ceased to exist in the UK.
Whole industries were shut down from, especially, 1980-2000, by reason of changing economic and social landscapes, accelerated by withdrawal of government subsidies.
The former “proletarians” either went into other activities where there existed no tradition of “working class” solidarity, or joined the unemployed, existing on State benefits and, in areas such as the South Wales valleys, on top-ups from disability income given out (in the 1980s) almost unchecked.
The former Labour Party stalwarts had become either Marx’s “lumpenproletariat”, or members of a new group, or perhaps a group with a new label, the “precariat”.
The latter implied a group whose lifestyle and very existence was uncertain from week to week, the polar opposite of those comfortably-off smug core Conservative Party members and voters, who had always been (and often their parents as well) well-paid, perhaps with family money, who had properties owned outright or with easily-paid-off mortgages. People whose lives were —unlike those of the “precariat”— not at all precarious.
Increasingly, the Labour Party ditched anything connecting it to “socialism” (in the UK’s more “social-democratic” form): Clause IV of the Labour Party Constitution was removed, opening the way for Tony Blair and his group to make Labour more “electable” in areas normally voting Conservative. Links with trade unions were loosened.
The strategy worked: in 1997, Labour had what many still call a “landslide” victory, though it still garnered only 43.2% of the popular vote (Conservatives 30.7%; LibDems 16.8%).
The absurd First Past The Post system gave Labour its “landslide” in MP numbers, despite the Labour popular vote having risen by only a modest amount. The same effect helped the LibDems, whose MP numbers almost tripled (to 46 from 18), despite the LibDem popular vote having fallen by one point. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1997_United_Kingdom_general_election.
In 1997, the old industrial regions and cities still voted Labour. South Wales, the Midlands and Northern conurbations, the industrial parts of the North-East, much of Scotland (especially the industrialized Central Belt), and some parts of the London area.
Compare the graphic above with that showing the result of the 2019 election, below:
Labour, as an entrenched “one-party” political monopoly (in its core areas), has only remained entrenched in parts of London, parts of South Wales, parts of the North, North-East, North-West, and a few parts of the Birmingham/West Midlands area. Scotland is gone, most of Wales is gone, almost all of southern and central England outside London has gone.
Corbyn tried to appeal to the old Labour heartlands, as well as reaching out to the new “identity politics” of, mainly, London— the blacks, the other non-whites, the precariat generally, and the “useful idiots” of white pseudo-intellectual “wokedom”.
Corbyn failed, but not as badly as many have said. What sank Corbyn-Labour was that many voters outside London would not accept his clunky 1970s pseudo-socialism, or his infatuation with the “blacks and browns”.
That perception was intensified by the basically Jewish attacks on Corbyn (since he became leader). In the Press, on TV, on radio. Many Labour MPs were completely in the Jew-Zionist pocket, and made pronouncements against Labour even during the 2017 and 2019 elections.
Keir Starmer, despite his first name and Labour-voting parents, is someone with quite shallow roots in Labour (born in London, brought up in affluent Oxted, Surrey, and attended Reigate Grammar (which became private/independent while he was there); he became a barrister, married a Jewish woman, and their children have been brought up as if full-Jew).
Starmer’s response to Labour’s decreasing relevance has been the opposite of that of Corbyn. Starmer wants to appeal to what is left of the old Labour heartlands, while also making Labour “electable” for the rest of the country. No “socialism” to frighten the horses, just (supposedly) competent managerial semi-social-democracy. Basically, a (less convincing?) Tony Blair/Gordon Brown strategy.
Part of Starmer’s plan is to present Labour as a party which disapproves of industrial action, and which does not want to return to (what is perceived as) the bad old 1970s.
The “workers” of the old type (as in the rail industry) are rather unwanted remote relatives now, unwanted guests at Labour’s party.
Frankly, I doubt that Starmer’s strategy will work much. It may work up to a point, Labour may regain a relatively few seats, enough to prevent whichever then idiot leads the Conservative Party from getting a majority in (as it may be) 2023 or 2024 but, in the end, Labour’s time has come and gone.
Like the Conservative Party (and LibDems), the Labour Party is little more than a name.
Does one turn up the volume and call little Matt Hancock a “traitor” for wanting a non-European individual to pose as Prime Minister of the UK? Does it even matter what words are used?
They cannot create (and never have) a civilization, nor any culture beyond the most primitive; they cannot maintain a decent culture when one is provided for them or bequeathed to them; they cannot even live in a civilized society without trashing it.
Zelensky has dissolved the opposition and arrested more than 600 members of the government for being critical of him, but the Western narrative says he is fighting for democracy
Quite. I have blogged about that, of course, but the masses in the West are completely bamboozled by the NWO/ZOG pro-“Ukraine” (pro-Zelensky’s ZOG/NWO regime) propaganda.
Diary of a spiteful exit: 1/ sack Gove 2/ appoint pointless new cabinet 3/ Campaign against Sunak 4/ Suspend Ellwood. 5/ Resignation honours to come. Not a gentleman but we knew that.
Despite what the presiding judge (a retired Circuit judge) said at my Bar Disciplinary Tribunal in 2016 (that a Jew could be, contrary to my assertion, “an English gentleman“), time and again one sees the truth. The fact that “Boris”-idiot is only part-Jew makes little difference. You can send “Boris” to Eton and Oxford, you can try to inculcate English or classical virtues in him, but they will have shallow roots. In the words of Somerset Maugham, “alien corn“.
Incidentally, I was wondering yesterday why Conservative Party backwoodsman, Sir Bill Wiggin MP, made an asinine speech in which he claimed that Boris-idiot was a PM of “historic” proportions etc. Could it be that deadhead Wiggin has a peerage in mind?
One fewer vote for @PennyMordaunt today then. Is there nothing the party establishment won't do to make sure Liz Truss gets to the final two? https://t.co/5faEXhH7YX
More useful research would be into why the people who believed these injections were necessary, safe and effective also tend to buy into the climate change nonsense. While lacking the ability to describe what a woman is. https://t.co/DpXNgw4qDU
— 🇬🇧 Johannes 🇬🇧 ..#antiWEF (@Johanne31785773) July 18, 2022
How in the name of all that is holy is this a 'dubious claim'?
The dubious claim is from those who say this is all 'due to Brexit', suggesting that the UK changing its trading relationship with the EU somehow caused inflation in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, America etc etc https://t.co/xZq7jdr7ai
Well said, Andrew Marr. Shame on people like @calvinrobinson – a literal Reverend – @bobscartoons and all the conspiracists. Calvin once said to me, by way of undermining the science, that scientists once thought the world was flat. It’s that grim.
Andrew Marr, hugely well-paid for 20 years to be a major NWO/ZOG mouthpiece, spouting all the usual themes— multiculturalism, anti-racism, anti-anti-Semitism, “global warming”, “climate change”, “CO2 emissions”, “Black Lives Matter”, “Ukraine” etc.
Matthew, why did you beg me to unblock you, so you can throw around ad hominems?
Please don’t go around saying “Calvin once said to me”, as if we’re old friends. We’ve worked together twice, and it was hard work at that.
I pray you find the attention you seem to crave. Peace
— Fr Calvin Robinson (@calvinrobinson) July 19, 2022
— Sovereign Darbyshire💙 🌸 🇬🇧 🇷🇺 🇾🇪 🏃♀️✝️ (@ravenschild54) July 19, 2022
You’re a total sell-out Stadlen, a corporate controlled shill, just like Marr. At least @calvinrobinson and @bobscartoons can look themselves in the mirror without shame. It’s called integrity. Look it up? 😡
“Dangerous” views…the use of the word “dangerous” in this sort of context is confined to Jews and/or post-Marxists. In Stadlen’s case, a silver-spoon half-Jew (the latter his own description of himself: see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_Stadlen). Whether his socio-political views are Marxist or post-Marxist (or something else) I have no idea.
500 or 1,000 every day, invading our shores with the help of the very forces meant to exclude them— navy, Border Force, police.
More than 100,000 extra deaths have taken place in private homes in the UK since the Covid-19 pandemic began. Covid accounted for only a minority of the extra deaths in private homes.https://t.co/ODt4ioO7Pa
Even more striking when you see it laid out like that.
Ukraine
Kiev-regime forces using elderly and disabled people as human shields:
“The United Nations said Ukraine’s armed forces bore a large, and perhaps equal, share of the blame for an assault at a nursing home in Luhansk,where dozens of elderly and disabled patients were trapped inside without water or electricity. At least 22 of the 71 patients survived, but the exact number killed remains unknown. A few days before the attack, Ukrainian soldiers took up positions inside the nursing home, making the building a target, the UN said.” [MSN News].
Meanwhile, NWO puppet and Jew dictator, Zelensky, has sacked a number of Ukrainian ambassadors, including the one in Berlin.
David Davis
There are rumours that David Davis may offer his candidature for the position of leader of the Conservative Party, and so Prime Minister.
About 14 years ago, in 2008, I opined, in a restricted-circulation study, that David Davis, who had previously lost out to David Cameron-Levita in the Conservative leadership contest, might well still achieve ministerial, or possibly even prime-ministerial, rank.
I was right as to the first, though it took him another 8 years; as to the second, the office of Prime MInister, that is far less likely, but not impossible now.
Davis may be less obviously or, rather, self-publicizingly, intellectual than one or two of the others in the contest, but is no dummy, all the same.
Davis has points which few if any in that contest at present can match.
Second, Davis has proven principles and integrity, unlike all but (arguably) one or two of the presently-declared candidates (Penny Mordaunt being one).
Third, Davis is a staunch supporter of free speech and freedom of expression, unlike most if not all of the presently-declared candidates.
I should say that, comparing Davis to the presently-declared candidates, he is the only one with the mix of attributes that might make him an acceptable Prime Minister (albeit within the System).
I hope that David Davis enters the contest; if he does, he might just win, if only as an acceptable compromise candidate.
The Prime Minister a lying, cheating part-Jew/Levantine, the Chancellor a dodgy Kurd from God knows where, the Home Secretary an East African Asian (Indian) who should be behind the counter of a Kampala grocery store. Am I really an “extremist”, or is there just something very very wrong with this country now?
I read about the vandalism at the time (about three weeks ago), but not the inevitable hypocrisy of the vandals (inevitable, having seen reports of the activities of similar blots), who it seems are one Hannah Hunt (superannuated student, serial long-distance tourist, parents own at least two large houses, have a high income etc) and her apparent boyfriend, one Eben Lazarus (details unavailable but must be a Jew with a name like that).
Some people might say that that pair need a good kicking, but in fact they have so far not even been charged with criminal damage to The Hay Wain. Britain 2022…
Seems that evil pseudo-Communist hypocrite (and heiress) Susan Michie is again pushing for the facemask nonsense etc to resume.
Only a tiny handful of people are (and ever have been) seriously unwell (of “Covid” alone), but the faked “cases” pile up (in the equally-faked statistics).
I recall when all this nonsense started, over two years ago. Panicked reports from Italy and China and, the very same day that it really hit the news agenda, a film (a drama, fictional) on TV about…a virus starting in China that spreads death across the world. A film put into the TV schedules weeks or months in advance. Makes you think…
As to the maniacs like Michie and Ferguson, wanting a return to the unnecessary and hugely damaging “lockdowns” (shutdowns) and facemask nonsense (and other nonsensical measures), see below:
Incidentally…
“Total hospital admissions are climbing, with patient levels nearing the peak reached during the previous wave of infections in spring. However, only a fraction are primarily ill with the virus, suggesting the rise is a reflection of high rates of transmission in the community, rather than severe disease.”
[Daily Mail]
[Daily Mail]
Actually, “Covid” has become the go-to excuse for organizations not functioning properly: banks, local authorities, NHS, all using it as an excuse to cut services and opening hours.
As for people wanting a few days off work, a cold will not cut it, but a supposed positive test for “Covid” will do fine, even though the symptoms are very similar now. Madness, but that is, to a large extent, Britain in 2022— mad.
More around the Boris-idiot Cabinet of clowns
There are those still in, or promoted to, Cabinet, who would surely never have reached Cabinet-ministerial rank under anyone else but Johnson. Take Priti Patel, saved from spending her life behind the counter of an Indian grocery shop in Uganda by her parents having relocated to the UK in the late 1960s.
Would Priti Patel reach Cabinet-level under any other Prime Minister? Well, yes, in the past (before her limitations were so well-known), in that Theresa May first appointed her to Cabinet. However, that was soon seen as a mistake.
Hard to see Priti Patel being even a minister, let alone a Cabinet Minister, after this year. That’s the point, and that is why she will defend Boris-idiot to the end.
Others? Liz Truss, smug and unpleasant Kit Malthouse, Anne-Marie Trevelyan, the Jew Shapps, Therese Coffey, Nadine Dorries (obviously); others yet.
That collection of moneygrubbing deadheads will cling to office whatever it takes. Boots will have to stamp on their fingers to get them to let go.
Were I dictator of the UK, that migrant-invader, crowing about how the blacks and browns are replacing the British in our own homeland, would be on the first boat out (unless suffering a greater penalty).
Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan, aka The Great Replacement.
Ben Wallace was a strange Secretary of State for Defence, one who seems to know almost no Second World War history, or perhaps takes his “knowledge” from Jew film-makers such as Spielberg.
A period, an extended period, of silence from Wallace would now be welcome, especially about Ukraine and Wallace’s drunken wish to go to war with Russia.
My view at present is that Boris-idiot, ever the black rat, is struggling to find a way to survive and thrive.
“Boris” (Alexander Johnson) has resigned, or pledged to resign, as Conservative Party leader, but not (yet, at time of writing) as Prime Minister.
I do not know whether he would be permitted to stand for Conservative Party leader at any MPs’ election this year. That would depend on the rules laid down now or (if different) later on.
I suppose that if he is able to put himself forward again for election, there is a slight chance that he might end up as one of the top two; then the matter would be put to Conservative party members, many of whom are stupid enough to support him, even now.
It says something about the UK in 2022 , not just about the Conservative Party but also about the whole pseudo-democratic process, that the leading contenders to replace “Boris” are idiots such as Liz Truss, nobodies such as Penny Mordaunt, and various “ethnics” such as Sunak, Javid, even corrupt Kurd Zahawi etc.
One is sometimes tempted to echo, with necessary changes, the words of Savinkov in Reilly, Ace of Spies: “Poles, Czechs…where are the RUSSIANS?“, or in this case, “Jews, part-Jews, Kurds, Pakistanis, Indians…where are the ENGLISH?“.
I see that the opinion polls have the Labour Party 10 points ahead now. Maybe so, but once “Boris” is ditched, and assuming that some relatively uncontroversial figure is chosen to replace him, the voting public may look at Labour with more scrutiny.
Do the voters really want Jew-lobby or Israel-lobby puppets such as Starmer, Yvette Cooper, Rachel Reeves, Angela Rayner (for God’s sake!) to be in positions of power? They are less wedded to the Welfare State than Johnson! When or if the public think about it, I think that the answer, for many, will be negative about “Labour”.
Labour is a party without a purpose now, arguably even more than the Conservative Party. What would Labour give, directly, to voters, say “floating voters” (who are now hugely more numerous than in the historical past of the years 1945-1997)? The “Boris” government has almost thrown money at various groups during 2020-2022 and, while it fell down by abandoning, temporarily, the State Pension “triple lock” that is now coming back, thus (?) ensuring the loyalty of many pensioners.
As I have been blogging, recent by-elections, though bad for the Conservative Party, have been even worse for Labour. Even the 2021 by-election at Batley and Spen, won by thick-as-two-short-planks communitarian “Labour” candidate Kim Leadbeater, was only won by one point.
The Labour vote (yes, partly by reason of tactical voting) has collapsed in other recent by-elections.
In any general election this year, I would expect a lot of protest voting, and also quite a lot of abstention, both in former Labour and Conservative voter-ranks.
I doubt that Labour can win a majority in the House of Commons. Whether it could cobble together a “confidence and supply” arrangement with the SNP is an open question. The SNP might demand another “Indyref”, but in a sense, Labour can grant that easily enough, now that sentiment north of the border seems to be moving against (pseudo) Independence.
A hung Parliament seems at present the most likely result.
If you supported lockdowns, endorsed and encouraged the injections, promoted mask wearing and wanted schools closed, you are every bit as morally bankrupt and dangerous as that fat mess of a straw bale who used to be Prime Minister.
Proof that as long as you attempt to renegotiate your relationship with a continental trading bloc, you may go on to commit mass democide and devastate millions of lives but people will still thank you.
Since 2010, the Darren Grimes/Tom Harwood types have exercised almost absurd influence in and around the now-misnamed “Conservative” Party. They really should flounce off. Controlled opposition, completely under the (((usual))) toxic influence.
"Led us out of devastating lockdowns" The ones he implemented to begin with, having no right to do so and without any rational or moral justification. Don't forget the bit where he oversaw the coercive roll out of the most useless and dangerous pharmaceutical product in history.
It strikes me that one person who will regret the departure of Boris-idiot will be the Jew Zelensky, who has been given a great deal by the Downing Street oaf, and promised a great deal more.
Naturally, the NWO will continue to prop up the Kiev regime, but “Boris” made it a major part of his “Poundland Churchill” routine. Zelensky had “Boris” over a barrel and, (((typically))) tried to extract more and more from his victim.
More tweets seen
Beth Rigby is talking absolute bullsh*t, there was not an ounce of dignity, nor humility, nor regret in that speech, it was appalling! https://t.co/5SRIIsyDUk
Beth Rigby is absurd, very poor indeed; about the same low level as Laura Kuenssberg. These mediocrities get paid hundreds of thousands a year. Why?
Incidentally, re. Laura Kuenssberg’s parents and grandparents, I saw this:
“In 1941, [Ekkehard von] Kuenssberg married Constance Hardy, with whom he had been a medical student at Edinburgh. They lived at Canonmills and had two sons and two daughters. They later moved out of the city to Haddington, East Lothian. In retirement, Kuenssberg suffered from Parkinson’s disease and cancer. He died in December 2000.[2]
In 1940, [Ekkehard von] Kuenssberg’s mother was living in Heidelberg and was registered as Jewish.[6] His father died in Germany in 1941, and his mother then lived at Finstergrün Castle until the end of the war. She survived her husband until 1977, reaching the age of 94.[3]
One of [Ekkehard von] Kuenssberg’s sons is Professor Nick Kuenssberg OBE, whose children include the diplomat Joanna Kuenssberg, a former High Commissioner to Mozambique, and Laura Kuenssberg, former political editor of BBC News.[3][7]
So Laura Kuenssberg’s paternal grandmother was Jewish, and was registered in National Socialist Germany as Jewish, yet lived (unmolested, and not arrested, nor detained, nor deported to a camp etc) throughout the Second World War, most of which she spent, as a paying guest, in a castle in Austria: see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finstergr%C3%BCn_Castle.
If you were to believe the usual Jewish/Zionist propaganda, you would assume (wrongly) that all Jews were ruthlessly hunted down by SS or Gestapo, and then deported somewhere. Not so.
[Burg Finstergrün; photo: Arne Müseler]
why do reporters like beth rigby call the liar a talented politician? all he does is lie, cheat, poison all he touches, divides, brexit not done, chaos, economics stagnation, vip lanes, covid, incompetent, shameful, there is still more corruption to come out
Well, given that the UK msm is basically Jew-Zionist-dominated, they could hardly tell the truth, and call “Boris”-idiot “a part-Jew/Levantine public entertainer whose jokes now fall flat“, could they?
Sorry sky but that was terrible commentary today by Beth rigby. Sycophantic at times. His speech was his usual bombast. No sign of sorrow or contrition
Sky's Beth Rigby is describing Johnson as a brilliant politician who failed to reach his potential? No he wasn't anything of the sort. He was a clever snake oil salesman/showman and that's all he was! As a Prime Minister he was bloody useless!
Ha ha. Anyone who has read my blog over the past 5+ years will have received, if I say so myself who shouldn’t, a far better and higher level of analysis than that pumped out by System msm drones such as Laura Kuenssberg and Beth Rigby.
Yes, he had his flaws, but let's also recognise @BorisJohnson's virtues. He was generous, brilliant, spirited, incapable of malice, infectiously optimistic, unable to hold grudges. He ended the constitutional chaos of 2018, defeated Corbyn and delivered Brexit. Not a bad record.
That idiot is from South America (though of English background and schooling). I suppose that one should not assume that he is snorting white powder. A facade of intellect and erudition, yet he comes out with untrue rubbish as seen above…
Incidentally, I have never seen or heard anything in the slightest “brilliant” from Boris-idiot. Au contraire.
I suppose it would be churlish to speculate as to whether the descendant of the one on the left may have, 100+ years on, stabbed or mugged the descendant of the one on the right, or replaced said descendant in his own homeland?
Labour are going with the “Boris met a former KGB officer” stuff. Well, far be it from me to defend Boris-idiot, but so what if he did? I myself met a “former KGB officer” a few times in the early/mid 1990s; he even lunched with me once or twice at Lincoln’s Inn. “Ed”, like many others, had morphed into a businessman and, as far as I know, was no longer engaged in espionage but was, like most people, just trying to make a living in a more or less ordinary way. Does that mean that I also am suspect? I think not.
The Soviet Union ceased to exist, even formally, over 30 years ago.
Yvette Cooper is another MP-idiot, as well as a fraudster, expenses cheat, “refugees welcome” hypocrite, and mouthpiece for the Jewish lobby and Israel (oh, and a would-be dictator). Another good reason not to vote for fake “Labour”, in fact.
More tweets
Andrea Jenkyns just left Downing Street gates – screaming at public waiting outside
I met John Tyndall several times in 1975, but cannot say that I knew him beyond those brief and brisk meetings. My impressions: Tyndall was a basically honest man, in my view, not a double-dealer (unlike several at the top of the National Front). He had strong views, sometimes right, sometimes not so right.
A quite-good political speaker, in the mould of Oswald Mosley (though nowhere near that level), Tyndall modelled himself quite consciously, I think, on Mosley, even in terms of his manner of speaking (watch the clip in the tweet).
Tyndall’s manner in conversation (at least with me) was brisk, short, rather like a mid-level Army officer of the old school. I detected a slightly narrow intolerance. On the other hand, Tyndall had fairly good organizational talents. He built the NF up to the point where the System, the Jews, Israel (and their “antifascist” useful idiots) had to mount a huge covert operation to bring the NF down in the 1970s.
I feel that, with Tyndall, overall, you got what you saw in front of you.
Quite. Boris-idiot was useless at all previous jobs, and the top job, Prime Minister. Too useless. So useless that not only the System msm but even the manipulated people of the country were starting to notice.
Ukraine
The msm is at pains to say how much damage the Kiev-regime forces have inflicted on Russian forces in recent days and weeks. All the same, Russia has achieved its tactical objectives, and is moving toward achieving its current strategic objective, full control of the whole Donbass region.
More music
[landscape painting by Levitan]
Replacement idiot for Boris-idiot
Mostly pretty poor. Interesting that the top three in the running are actually English/British; also interesting that, of the remaining twelve, no less than seven are at least partly non-European.
Still, what a poor bunch, overall.
It seems that the UK version of “democracy” leads to “the survival of the unfittest”…
After all, in what country and/or what world does a stupidly-ignorant woman such as Nadine Dorries achieve Cabinet rank?!
Late tweets
Multiple reports coming out of the Netherlands of police open firing on farmers… It’s a basic human right to protest… where’s the MSM outrage..?
Even as people demand his resignation and describe him (rightly) as one of the worst leaders our country has ever had, they STILL insist on calling him by his stage name, as if he’s a mate from the pub.
A semi-deracinated Kurd is a good choice for Prime Minister, at least for the ZOG/NWO. Someone with no real roots in this country, or even in Europe. Another perfect puppet ruler.
I myself never use the terms “right” and “left” wing, but never mind.
“#HS2 purchased the house of Stanley Johnson for a sum in excess of £3.5million on ‘compassionate grounds’
Several other residents of the street who now can’t sell their properties at anything like the true market value have appealed to #HS2 to buy their homes but were refused” pic.twitter.com/iGzQzKXaV6
— 🏴Independence is Normal (@jim45cotland) July 6, 2022
Levantine corruption is now at the heart of Britain, and is killing it.
An important point. They all knew when they took their jobs that Johnson was fundamentally unfit to hold any high office (let alone PM), that he lacks any moral compass or empathy, that he is a conscious liar and charlatan, and that he is to his very core a nasty piece of work. https://t.co/6hC9q1BA6w
https://t.co/dym20CiihI Two and 3-year-old kids with seizures is "the new normal". I'm getting multiple reports from my nurse friends about kids 2 and 3 years old having seizures. It is ONLY happening on vaccinated kids, and symptoms start 2 to 5 days after the COVID vaccine.
There are still a lot of rather silly, though not always elderly, people, who have decided to adopt the facemask nonsense as a kind of security blanket.
The “refugees welcome” idiots are yet another group or tribe in the UK, Ireland etc, who prefer a mental security blanket to the truth. This wish for comforting illusions is a cancer of the age.
— The Sirius Report (@thesiriusreport) July 5, 2022
Mass shootings etc
I have seen on Twitter etc, the usual rash of tweets and articles saying that the USA should ban or further restrict weapons available to the public. Without getting into the detail of that, one should note that many of the “ban guns now” tweets come from the UK, which has a very different history, geography, and society to the USA. Many people in the USA live in suburbs or country some distance from immediate police assistance.
Be that as it may, I thought to repost part of a blog post first posted over three years ago, after the Brenton Tarrant attack in Christchurch, New Zealand, having seen that it attracted a few clicks today: see below:
“Firearms“
“There are many mass shootings in the world. The USA alone seems to have one on a weekly if not daily basis (and those are only the ones which are reported heavily). The anti-gun lobby focusses on ease of access in the USA, New Zealand etc. Obviously, if a disturbed (or other) person cannot acquire firearms, then he cannot shoot people; he can, however, stab them, blow them up, drive at them etc.
Firearms events have more victims, usually. Having said that, one could say “ban cars, because some people misuse them”, to which the answer would no doubt come, “people need cars, they don’t need guns”. Well, true, though still arguable. It all depends on where society decides to draw the line. In the UK, since the late 1990s, it has been almost impossible to own lawfully-held firearms (except shotguns and, in some cases, certain types of hunting rifle). That was not always the case.
“Members of the public may own sporting rifles and shotguns, subject to licensing, but handguns were effectively banned after the Dunblane school massacre in 1996 with the exception of Northern Ireland. Dunblane was the UK’s first and only school shooting. There has been one spree killing since Dunblane, the Cumbria shootings in June 2010, which involved a shotgun and a .22 calibre rifle, both legally-held. Prior to Dunblane though, there had only been one mass shooting carried out by a civilian in the entire history of Great Britain, which took place in Hungerford on 19 August 1987.” [Wikipedia]
Note that. In the entire history of Great Britain there have only been three mass shootings, yet the government took the opportunity to ban most firearms (at which time there had only been two such events in British history), and did so with the apparent agreement of a majority, probably high, of the general public, most of whom know nothing about firearms, have never so much as seen one (other than on TV), and who were stampeded by the publicity around the 1996 Dunblane school murders.
At one time, there was little regulation of firearms in the UK:
“Following the assassination of William of Orange in 1584 with a concealed wheellock pistol, Queen Elizabeth I, fearing assassination by Roman Catholics, banned possession of wheellock pistols in England near a royal palace in 1594.[73] There were growing concerns in the 16th century over the use of guns and crossbows. Four acts were imposed to restrict their use in England and Wales.[74]
The Bill of Rights restated the ancient rights of the people to bear arms by reinstating the right of Protestants to have arms after they had been illegally disarmed by James II. It follows closely the Declaration of Rights made in Parliament in February 1689.[75] The Bill of Rights text declares that “That the Subjects which are Protestants may have Arms for their Defence suitable to their Conditions and as allowed by Law”.” [Wikipedia]
“British common law applied to the UK and Australia, and until 1791 to the colonies in North America that became the United States. The right to keep and bear arms had originated in England during the reign of Henry II with the 1181 Assize of Arms, and developed as part of common law.”
Starting in 1903, there were restrictions placed on purchase of certain firearms (mainly pistols), subsequent Acts of 1920, 1937, 1968 and 1988 tightening the law in other respects too.
It is worth noting that, following the two 1997 Acts, which effectively banned private possession of handguns (pistols and revolvers) and required surrender of thus-affected weapons, 57,000 people (0.1% of the population) handed in 162,000 weapons and 700 tons of ammunition! In other words, one maniac with a few weapons became the trigger (so to speak) for a law which affected at least 57,000 people all of whom had held and used their weapons peacefully until then!
I personally was not affected by the ban, though I was at one time (mid 1970s/mid 1980s) a member of the Kensington Rifle and Pistol Club in London. In the UK and/or other countries, I have fired a variety of weapons, including the 7.62 R-1 automatic/semi-auto rifle (there was a switch on the side), semi-automatic pistols including the 9mm Browning Hi-Power and numerous others in .32 and .22 calibre, and also revolvers such as the Colt .32, .38 and .357 Magnum, and have handled (overseas and mostly long ago, again in the 1970s and 1980s) others, such as the famous Uzi submachinegun and some Warsaw Pact automatic weapons. Despite that, I am not in fact particularly interested in firearms (or any weapons) and, even in the unlikely event of the 1997 Acts being repealed, would probably not bother to join a gun club. As far as shotguns are concerned, I have used them in Ireland and in England (in England only for clay pigeon, because I disapprove of shooting birds and animals for sport or “fun”). I myself have never privately owned any firearm.
I doubt that many people now even know that there used to be public ranges in England, where for a small fee, people could take their own weapons and fire them. I went once (in 1976) to the one at Dartford (Kent), quite near what was then a (disused?) mental hospital. Now the area is probably either a housing development or perhaps might be the present Dartford Clay Shooting Club, which (I just saw on Google) seems to be at or near the same location (it is not an area that I know, though).
Most British people have never fired nor even seen a firearm and that does tend to colour their reaction.
In the USA, things are of course very different. The old English Common Law right to bear arms is written into the U.S. Constitution, though muddied by the famous words about “a well-regulated militia” etc. Leaving aside the legal and quasi-theological arguments revolving around that Amendment, it always seemed to me when I lived there (in New Jersey) that it was odd for many American states to require people to have a licence to own or at least drive a car, but not a pistol, shotgun or something even more dangerous.
In the UK, people tend to say, “look at the USA: easy ownership of guns and a massacre every week!”, but that has to be set against the fact that tens and probably hundreds of millions of Americans own firearms. Probably the vast majority have never received even the most basic training. True, there are huge numbers of crimes committed with firearms in the USA, but simply banning guns (as in some other countries) is a simplistic solution which might leave American citizens helpless. Societies differ. I met an American lady, a blonde with startlingly blue eyes, in the Caribbean. She said that she had a large silver-plated automatic pistol (I forget the marque), which she kept under her pillow. I never got to see it, by the way!
As far as New Zealand is concerned, its gun ownership laws were lax compared to the UK or even Australia, but huge numbers of New Zealanders (about 5% of the population, 250,000 out of 5 million) own at least one weapon. New Zealand is a country about 10% larger than the UK but with only about 5 million inhabitants. Much of the country is rural. There had never been a massacre there such as the one recently perpetrated in Christchurch by Brenton Tarrant.“
This is absolutely it. Sums everything up. The demented twerp reads out all the comments, every one of them correct, every one referring to real experiences just like the one he's had, then he turns around and says, "They're all wrong because science." https://t.co/ios0beIjTZ
I have already said, on previous blog posts, what I think of that twerp, Vine. The cretinous interjection of the bimbo at the end of the clip really said it all, though. Brainwashed on the one hand, getting no doubt very well paid for spouting the approved propaganda line on the other.
This is one of maddest, most morally dissonant things I’ve ever seen.
“You were engaging in human sacrifice, ripping away our rights and murdering children – which we fully supported – but then you had some wine so now we’re really cross.” https://t.co/yHSgBfavXo
Pretty damning, though nothing I have not seen previously. In fact there exists far more information, and greatly more detail.
As I have blogged repeatedly since 2019 or 2018, Johnson has weaponized his own lack of integrity, decency and —yes— ability. People do not actually expect Boris-idiot to behave honestly, or even with basic decency, let alone to know how to be a real Prime Minister of this country.
That lack of expectation in respect of the clown “Boris”, on the part of the voters (and the very aged and blinkered Conservative Party “grass roots”), is like a suit of armour for Johnson; they actually do not expect the clown to fulfil his office and role properly.
Any further or worse scandal which may turn up will have little impact, for the reasons stated above.
There is another aspect: the sheer dullness and lack of edge to the Labour Party now, the supposed Opposition.
Under Corbyn, whatever his lack of education and/or ability, Labour offered an alternative in many respects. Not everyone wanted or liked the alternative offered, but it was offered. Now? No alternative.
Starmer is, as I said from the beginning of his tenure, as dull as ditchwater, but the Jewish lobby wanted to get rid of supposedly “anti-Semitic” Corbyn (who is certainly not anti-Semitic by my standards anyway), and have Corbyn replaced by “Labour Friends of Israel” member Starmer, with his Jewish wife and half-Jewish children.
Starmer is not, in my opinion, particularly “electable” anyway, but what (again, in my opinion) scuppers him, and Labour, is the same factor that weakened Corbyn, the fact that so many Labour MPs now are black, and often black women with little education, culture, or even sense. Not the only factor, but it is a big one.
Now we hear that Starmer may be replaced by another “Labour Friends of Israel” member, the expenses cheat, moneygrubber, “refugees welcome” hypocrite and would-be dictator, Yvette Cooper. Good grief…
Labour has been on a downward trajectory for a long time, well over a decade. The result can be seen in both General Election and by-election results over the past 5+ years. It will be interesting to see what happens in the two (or is it three?) upcoming by-elections.
The System political landscape now seems to be resolving into a contest between unpopular and not-respected Labour, and not-popular and not-respected Conservative, with a side issue of former Conservative voters either (brainlessly) voting LibDem or abstaining; also, former Labour voters abstaining but not going elsewhere .
The British people, most of them, need and unconsciously want a form of social nationalism, but no organization exists to collect and channel that.
Someone whose name was unknown to me until today. Almost along the lines of Where Eagles Dare.
” In 1944 he was appointed to the OSS and was an espionage agent in Austria in support of the Austrian Resistance against the Nazis, working with the Tyrolean group under the leadership of Dr. Karl Gruber. He infiltrated the country in the uniform of a German Wehrmacht sergeant of the Reichssicherheitshauptamt. In late April 1945, after being arrested by the Gestapo, imprisoned at Reichenau, tortured and sentenced to death, he was able to escape and assist in the liberation of Innsbruck by the Americans in May 1945.“
[Wikipedia]
USA— which way?
It has seemed to me for some time that the USA cannot indefinitely continue on its present path without some form of muted civil war occurring. Not an American Civil War mark 2, with states opposed to each other, but a gradual and decentralized collapse of unity, and opposed groups and individuals fighting, including literally fighting, within states, within cities.
The outcome may eventually be victory for one or another side, leading to a form of dictatorship; at least equally likely, a gradual withdrawal of communities, cities, maybe whole states or regions, from common goals, institutions, political organizations etc.
The racial aspects, though not the only factors of importance, are key: at the end of the First World War, America was composed of 90% white Europeans (by origin); now about 45%.
More music
More tweets
Japan took serious notice of its declining births in 1989.
Almost every country in Europe lies below the 2.1 total fertility rate level needed to maintain the population, with countries including Croatia, Portugal and Greece all set to lose similar levels to Japan over the next three decades https://t.co/5tJj48zZhI
I have little interest in football, and so rarely comment about it, but the “legalized fraud” at Manchester United has been incredible. An American Jew family took over the club years ago (as a purely moneymaking enterprise— they knew even less than me about the game) and have bled it dry, just as “Robert Maxwell” did at the Daily Mirror etc. Do I detect a pattern here?
Even leaving the Jew and legal quasi-fraud aspects aside, there is a systemic problem here.
In the Threefold Social Order concept, developed originally by Rudolf Steiner, something such as sport or games would come under the “spiritual/cultural/educational” sphere, not the sphere of “economy/business” etc, or that of “politics/rights/government” etc.
Taking football as an example of a rule applicable across the field of sports, football clubs should be (as they once were to a large extent) social-cultural associations run for the benefit of the supporters and, after that or consequent upon that, the players, not business enterprises; nor (as in pre-1989 socialist Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union, and elsewhere) flag-bearers run by local or central government.
The Manchester United situation is not a consequence purely of Jewish economic exploitation but also, and arguably primarily, a symptom of a malaise and mis-organization in the way society as a whole operates.
[they cannot believe that life has dealt them such a lucky hand— look at her face. That of a lottery-winner. Holding hands at the official airport reception; rather vulgar]
Staff at BT's North Tyneside call centre can pick up oats, instant noodles, dried pasta, cereal and even baby food when it's “those last few days before pay day and you need something for tea” pic.twitter.com/pJUPgDvtAL
Australia… young mother refused a kidney transplant due to the fact she is unvaccinated… left to slowly die for her own safety pic.twitter.com/PZjr6XUpkb
Eventually, Russian forces will prevail in southeast Ukraine, and perhaps all of Eastern Ukraine (Ukraine east of the Dnieper).
This gentleman is James from North Wales made homeless from his flat after his mother passed away he was evicted by local authority. Unable to work sleeps rough on street how can we house illegals and leave our own suffering😡😡 pic.twitter.com/4hR22txbQo
Absolutely disgusting. Housing for “Ukrainian” “refugees” (often not Ukrainian, indeed often just disguised economic migrants using the situation as cover), housing for cross-Channel migrant-invaders, while British people without money are treated worse than dogs.
“All bridges to the embattled Ukrainian city of Severodonetsk have now been destroyed, the local governor says.
With the city effectively cut off, Serhiy Haidai says delivering supplies and evacuating civilians are now impossible.
“Reports suggest that about 70% of the city is now under Russian control.“
[BBC News].
The Russians will eventually control at least a third, maybe a half, of that part of Ukraine that lies east of the Dnieper river. If so, it will have been a victory bought at a tremendous cost in human and animal suffering and death. Few if any (on any side of the conflict) will be untroubled by what has happened. It could have been accomplished quicker, and in a far less brutal way. Too late now. The Russians have no choice but to continue to the bitter end.
On the above premises, it may be possible for Russian forces to take (or besiege, until surrender) Kharkov, Zaporozhye, and Dnipro. That would leave the Kiev regime ruling over only Kiev itself, Odessa, and Lvov, together with mainly rural western Ukraine.
More music
Tweets seen
Four people injured by shelling in a Russian town in the Bryansk region on the border with Ukraine, a regional official says
What happens when a part-Jew clown and poseur lies and cheats and blags his unmerited way into the office of Prime Minister? What do you get? That’s right— a circus.
Britain 2022: imprisoned for a joke (in this case about a black who was never even in the UK), or for speaking in Whitehall to the effect that Britain should be cleansed of Jews (Jez Turner), or for lampooning Jewish behaviour in funny songs and animations (Alison Chabloz).
Meanwhile, serious real crimes are commonly dealt with by way of non-custodial sentences, or even by formal police caution.
Ian Robert Millard 