Tag Archives: Eddy Cantor

Diary Blog, 9 August 2025, including even more on the very questionable activity by “Mark Lewis Lawyer” (fanatical Jew-Zionist solicitor now based in Israel), and Beth Grossman (Jewish barrister, of Doughty Street Chambers, London)

Morning music

[Akademgorodok, Western Siberia]

Saturday quiz

Well, this week a clear victory over political journalist John Rentoul. Rentoul scored a very modest 2/10 as against my 7/10. I did not know the answers to questions 5, 6, and 8.

Tweets seen

See also:

Epstein has gone up the chimney. May all such exploiters go the same way.

Soon, Russia will be able to launch not hundreds but thousands of attack drones daily; huge fleets of drones will take to the air. Unstoppable. Once they have exhausted air defences, missiles will follow.

Why should Russia give up any territory at all? It is winning this ghastly and terrible war, and should take all of Eastern Ukraine (the territories east of the Dnieper).

Israel is doomed.

Zelensky can go to Israel, or to southern Florida, in (((some))) respects not dissimilar.

Even more about incompetent and dishonest solicitor “Mark Lewis Lawyer”, of Israel (and Patron Law, West London), and Beth Grossman, barrister (of Doughty Street Chambers, London)

Regular readers will be aware of the matter to which this refers. Anyone wanting more information can use the search box on the blog. Just type in “Mark Lewis”, “Beth Grossman”, “Patron Law”, “James Wilson” etc.

Both sides of the legal profession run scared of the Jew-Zionist lobby, as I found when I was wrongfully and (it later turned out) unlawfully disbarred in 2016:

In fact, that applies to the UK more generally at present:

Mark Lewis should have been struck off the solicitors’ roll many years ago.

More tweets seen

It is a misuse of the laws permitting proscription of supposedly “terrorist” organizations to label ordinary protesters “terrorist“. In fact, it makes a mockery of the whole thing.

This is what happens when (as with the present pathetic Labour Friends of Israel “government” of utter clowns), politicians act as puppets for the Jewish/Israel lobby.

Meanwhile, real crime continues unimpeded in the swamp that used to be our capital city.

Israeli-Jew war crimes continue.

More about the matter involving James Wilson, “Mark Lewis Lawyer”, Daniel Berke, Beth Grossman etc

Interesting. I knew that barrister and (sacked) part-time judge, Simon Myerson (of Leeds and Manchester) had been a witness in the case, and that the trial judge disbelieved his evidence (or discounted it as having been worthless) but had no idea that he was one of what looks now like a conspiratorial gaggle of Jews who apparently were “advising” the three losing defendants.

Newbon, of course, killed himself when he realized that his family home was on the line for having lost the libel case. He had concealed everything from his wife, too.

Sounds as though Myerson should probably be reported to the Bar Standards Board (not for the first time, I believe).

More tweets seen

Keeps the people off the streets…

Banana republic, but without any bananas. Just as well. Cleverly would probably try to claim for some, for his food supply.

Well, you know who is behind that nonsense…the “you-know-who” element…

…and that is why I am hoping that Reform do well in the next few years; because when they form a government, and it fails because (it will be) too pro-Jewish lobby, too pro-Israel, and not nearly radical or social-national enough, then a real social-national movement can arise and, the “Overton Window” having shifted, take the people with it.

Much of a muchness with other recent polls. Reform with 375-400 MPs and a large Commons majority, Labour with about 122 MPs, and the Con Party left utterly irrelevant with about 27 MPs, making it only the 4th, possibly 5th-largest, party (after Reform, Lab, LibDems, and possibly the SNP).

I suppose some tyrannical leaders might be tempted to covertly eliminate them.

It seems that, not satisfied with having seized, or tricked the Arab Palestinians into giving up, 97% of the land of pre-1947 Palestine, the Jews now want the remaining 3% for Jewish Lebensraum.

Late music

[Levitan, Great Road; Avenue of Birches]

Diary Blog, 8 August 2025, including what happens if the Gulf Stream stops, and James Wilson’s continuing legal battle with Jew-Zionist lawyers and perjurers including the notorious “Mark Lewis Lawyer”

Afternoon music

[Rivendell]

Tweets seen

I can think of one way…

See also:

Who really are the 11% so stupid that they think the migrant-invaders “share the same values” as us? Or are they malicious? I rather think the latter.

Interesting report about the Gulf Stream

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-14982353/Gulf-Stream-weakening-300-YEARS.html

The Gulf Stream has been getting weaker for much longer than we thought – and it could be on the verge of total collapse due to climate change

According to British scientists, the Gulf Stream – which is part of a much wider global system of ocean currents – moved northwards 300 years ago. 

This, they say, is a sign that it started slowing down then – before the Industrial Revolution and about 200 years earlier than previously believed.

And the ‘sensitive’ system could soon ‘cross a tipping point’ prior to its total collapse. 

The Gulf Stream is a major ocean current that moves warm surface water from Mexico northward across the Atlantic towards Europe.

It’s one of the most important natural weather systems, keeping northern and western Europe warm.

When it collapses, it could plummet Europe into a deep freeze reminiscent of the Hollywood film ‘The Day After Tomorrow’. 

In the 2004 movie, the Thames freezes over and the Houses of Parliament are smothered in a deep layer of snow.

[Daily Mail]

See also:

More tweets seen

There is a global…”problem”… of which this is merely part. You could even say “two global problems“.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oreshnik_(missile)

A warning to both Germany and Poland.

[“Vladimir Zelensky hopes to use the West’s help to force Russia to unconditionally stop the SMO, says Viktor Medvedchuk. “Zelensky needs Russia to end the conflict unconditionally, but he himself has no intention of ending it”, Medvedchuk stated. He called Zelensky a political clown who knows how to beg and whine but is completely incapable of solving political issues at any level.“]

Why should Russia freeze the situation, when it is steadily, albeit slowly, taking over the whole of Ukraine east of the Dnieper?

[“The decision about Ukraine is made exclusively by Putin. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky does not even have to come to the negotiations, because the terms of peace will be dictated exclusively by Russia — said American journalist Clayton Morris. “Zelensky decides nothing. He can send a letter or one of his subjects — it doesn’t matter, because all the cards are in Putin’s hands,” he said.“]

Sochi is scarcely a strategic or other military target. Why do the “Western” ((( msm))) not report on these crimes by the Zelensky regime?

Wall. Squad. End.

In the early 1930s, Germany faced problems almost as bad as (in some respects, worse than) the UK in the 2020s. National Socialism solved most of the more obvious challenges to decent ordered life, and was then able to look to the future. That the “you know who”-ridden outside world (finance-capitalist West, Stalinist/socialist East) turned on Germany from 1939 does not take away the immense achievements of 1933-1939, the years of peace.

That tweet refers to the aftermath of the libel case Wilson v. Mendelsohn, Newbon (deceased), and Cantor, which was launched by Northern academic James Wilson after a campaign of harassment by a pack of malicious Zionist Jews.

During the currency of the matter, the defendants’ Jewish solicitors (Daniel Berke of “3D Solicitors” of Manchester, and the notorious Mark Lewis of Patron Law, West London), and Counsel (Beth Grossman, of Doughty Street Chambers, London) appear in various degrees to have been incompetent and/or dishonest. The defendants’ (arguende, perjuring) Jewish/Zionist witnesses (every single one was a Jew) were simply not believed by the trial judge.

James Wilson won his case against the odds (and much dishonest Jewish chicanery) and now is actually trying to save defeated defendant Cantor from losing his house as a result of the negligence and dishonesty of Cantor’s fellow-Jews, and particularly “Mark Lewis Lawyer”.

I have to say that the successful claimant, Wilson, appears to be a great deal more forgiving than I would have been in his place. Wilson is now trying to save one of the Jews who targeted him, which Jew has been thrown to the wolves by his own Jewish lawyers and a number of other prominent Jew-Zionists who urged on the defence case against Wilson. Those other Jews, and the Jewish lawyers involved, have been trying to wash their hands of their default(s).

I have blogged extensively about the aftermath of this case, and about (in general, too) the self-promoting yet incompetent and dishonest Jew-Zionist solicitor, Mark Lewis. Use the search box on this blog for more.

As for the other losing defendants in that matter, I know little about Mendelsohn. As to Newbon (a vicious pro-Israel social media troll, whose own university, Northumbria, had to discipline him repeatedly), he killed himself rather than face up to the consequences of his badness.

At one time, Jews were not even allowed to become barristers in England and Wales (until the Jews Relief Act 1858 was passed, by which time the political influence bought by their money had permeated English society in the Victorian age).

Readers of the blog will be able to guess what my views on this subject are.

Incidentally, and while I am very rusty on the current law — I ceased active practice in 2008, and was wrongly and in fact unlawfully disbarred at the instigation of a connected packs of Jews —inc., in the shadows, “Mark Lewis Lawyer”— in 2016, my understanding is that legal professional privilege is not available against a barrister’s own client. Legal professional privilege, which protects confidential communications between a lawyer and client for the purpose of legal advice or litigation, is intended to benefit the client, not to shield the lawyer from disclosure to the client.

In this case, Cantor has (Wilson says) asked his former lawyers to disclose.

A few pertinent quotations, found here and there:

  • Purpose of the Exemption: Legal professional privilege exists to encourage open and honest communication between clients and their legal advisors, ensuring clients can fully disclose information relevant to their case without fear of that information being disclosed to others. 
  • Who Benefits? This privilege is solely for the benefit of the client, not the lawyer. A barrister cannot claim privilege to withhold information from their own client. 
  • Duty of Confidentiality: Barristers have a strict duty of confidentiality to their clients, but this duty is not absolute. It is subject to exceptions, such as where disclosure is required by law or where the client provides informed consent for disclosure. 
  • Client’s Right to Information: Clients have a right to access information held by their barrister relating to their case, including confidential communications, unless specific exemptions apply. 
  • Examples of Disclosure to Client: This includes, but is not limited to, the barrister’s advice, opinions of counsel, experts’ reports, and other documents relevant to the case. 

Incidentally, I have recently found AI (Artificial Intelligence) to be a wonderful resource in various areas of study or research. This, below, is what it has to say about Legal Professional Privilege:

Legal professional privilege

LPP protects confidential communications between a client and their lawyer, including barristers, and is a right held by the client. There are two main types: 

  • Legal advice privilege: Covers confidential communications for the purpose of seeking or giving legal advice.
  • Litigation privilege: Covers confidential communications made for the dominant purpose of obtaining advice or evidence for existing or reasonably contemplated litigation. 

Exceptions where LPP does NOT apply

LPP has limited exceptions where a barrister might be required or permitted to disclose information, even to their own client: 

  • Iniquity Exception: LPP does not apply if the client seeks advice to further a crime, fraud, or similar conduct.
  • Waiver by the client: The client can waive privilege, either expressly or implicitly.
  • Disclosure required or permitted by law: Statutory or regulatory obligations may compel disclosure, such as reporting suspicions of money laundering.
  • Public Interest Immunity (PII): A court may order non-disclosure based on PII, where the public interest in withholding information outweighs the public interest in disclosure. 

In summary, while a barrister generally must protect client confidentiality and uphold LPP, exceptions exist when the client seeks advice to further a crime, or when disclosure is required by law or court order.”

It can be seen that at least one exception (Waiver) might well apply. to the Cantor/Wilson matter. Possibly “Iniquity Exception” and/or “Public Interest” as well.

Looks as though Beth Grossman is on a loser (again).

Beth Grossman and “Mark Lewis Lawyer” must both be squirming.

I think that he should.

If Beth Grossman is going to take an absurdly bad point of the sort mooted by her chambers, Doughty Street Chambers, then it says something about her, arguende

The two surviving Jew defendants may eventually sue “Mark Lewis Lawyer” and the other defence solicitors and Counsel. We shall see.

Lewis has no or significant assets within the jurisdiction (England and Wales), though he is believed to own a flat in Eilat, Israel, a fact which was concealed from the Solicitors’ Disciplinary Tribunal. When Lewis was found guilty by the that Tribunal in 2018, his own (unpaid) Counsel said to the Tribunal that “Lewis has no assets except his own clothes, a used mobility scooter, and a private pension worth £70 a week”…so much for the supposed great defamation lawyer!

So Lewis can only be (effectively) sued jointly and severally with others, notably his fellow partners in the Patron Law firm. Presumably, he has professional indemnity insurance, though.

When I was a practising barrister, I had indemnity insurance, as all barristers are expected to carry. I was never sued anyway, but when I was instructed or “briefed” by a London law firm to draft contracts for the transhipment and sale of oil, my insurance had to be very radically increased, because even one shipment was worth tens of millions of U.S. dollars.

Late tweets seen

[“Pakistani Tariq Islam kidnapped a 12-year-old British schoolgirl on the pretext of playing. He forced her to take drugs and alcohol. He r*ped her several times and invited three more Pakistani friends. The 12-year-old girl was tortured and overdosed on drugs, leaving her with permanent brain and body damage. The perverts who appeared in court said they had no regrets. This happened in Leeds, UK. We urgently need mass deportations.“]

In this case, though, not deportation but a wall, a squad, and an end (to the untermenschen).

Parasites, as well as traitors.

Refer to previous comment.

Landlordism is parasitism. That is not, as such, a political statement, but one that is simply an expression of reality.

[“Zelensky admitted that Ukraine cannot retake the territories occupied by the Russian army by military means, and it is necessary to resort to diplomatic options This was reported by the British The Telegraph, claiming that Ukraine is ready for a ceasefire without recognizing Russia’s control over the new Russian territories, referring to the constitution of Ukraine. At the same time, the British publication does not report Ukraine’s readiness to withdraw the Armed Forces of Ukraine from the Donetsk People’s Republic and the Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions.“]

Late music

Diary Blog, 6 August 2025

Afternoon music

[Northern Lynx]

Tweets seen

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14975233/Millionaire-US-big-game-hunter-gored-death-buffalo-stalking.html

Shuffled off by a buffalo, if you like…

Once Israel is gone, the centre of a worldwide web will also have gone. Then we’ll see…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lavon_Affair

[“I see many virtue-signalling liberal centrists on here are playing the same game they used to downplay the rape gangs for 30 years They tell you “most sex offenders are British”. Yes, this is true. Because we live in Britain. But then ask them to show you the per capita rates for foreign nationals and sex crimes Such as Afghans. 22 times more likely than Brits to sexually abuse Or Eritreans. 20 times. Namibians. 18 times. Albanians. 11 times. Somalis. 9 times. Bangladeshis. 4 times. Pakistanis 3 times. Much like Pakistani Muslims are also far more likely to belong to a rape gang, which you’d never know were you to play the liberal elite game of looking only at absolute numbers Ironically, it is the very same people who lecture you about respecting the “expert class” and avoiding “misinformation” who are the most likely to use experts and skew information to mislead and gaslight you These people don’t want you to dwell on what is really happening in this country They don’t want you to know the truth Because it blows apart their new Diversity Religion, which is now central to their sense of moral righteousness and social status But we are now winning the argument —not them And everybody out there is starting to see that. And if you genuinely do not care about what they call you —“racist”, “Islamophobe”, “hateful”, etc—then you have all the more power Keep telling the people the truth Because it’s what they deserve.“]

That is so obvious, yet many people are still being fooled by System socio-political/msm propaganda. Especially those who choose to be fooled.

Wall. Squad. End. (if convicted; if not, deportation, or refer to first idea).

The Rwanda “plan” was no good anyway; a “bum steer”, in the argot of the American West. The rest is correct, though. This ridiculous but dangerous government is all about appearance or semblance; it will not or cannot face the realities.

Aux armes, citoyens!

[“It is, to me, utterly frustrating, that despite continued polls showing distress about foreign imigrants into our nation, since the 1950’s and beyond, that EVERY single government chose to IGNORE the feelings of our people. You can blame the tories, you can blame labour…for they WERE the government’s throughout since Clement Attlee became PM. Would that men, politicians, had stomach for the fight ahead. Would that a government would fight for British people!!“]

Late tweets

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rushanara_Ali

Only weeks ago, she was whining that MPs faced too much “harassment”… See: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/jul/12/mps-political-candidates-intimidation-harassment-abuse-rushanara-ali.

I wonder why MPs are so unpopular?…

During the 2010-2015 parliament, Ali claimed a total of £674,982 in expenses.[29]

During the 2024 general election, she saw her 37,000-majority reduced to 1,700, and thus only narrowly avoided losing her seat to independent candidate Ajmal Masroor.[55] Death threats and voter intimidation left Ali needing police protection during her re-election campaign.[56]

[Wikipedia]

Basically, yet another moneygrasping ***; a waste of space.

That refers to incompetent, negligent, dishonest Jew lawyers, in particular “Mark Lewis Lawyer” of the small firm of solicitors, Patron Law, in West London; also, Jewish barrister Beth Grossman, of Doughty Street Chambers, London, who is or has been under investigation by the Bar Standards Board in relation to the case Wilson v. Mendelsohn, Newbon (deceased), and Cantor.

One of the surviving defendants who lost that case, a Jew called Cantor, may now lose his home by reason of the negligence of his lawyers, particularly the self-promoting know-nothing, Mark Lewis.

From outside (and I know little more than I have read or seen), it seems to me that the defendant Cantor is going to have to sue Mark Lewis and Patron Law at least, in negligence, or lose the equity value in his home.

Come on, Woody! Make a film about it!

Late music

[Chateau Frontenac, Quebec]

Diary Blog, 5 August 2025, including the latest news about university academic James Wilson and the Jews who were persecuting him (but tripped up)

Afternoon music

Latest about the James Wilson defamation case (which he won), and about dishonest and negligent solicitor “Mark Lewis Lawyer” and others

Both the Bar and the solicitors’ profession run scared of the Jew-Zionists these days. The Bar of England and Wales was once full of barristers of courage and principle. No more. Barristers are now almost all pathetic people. The Bar is now also, of course, riddled with the Jewish element.

“They” have killed the Bar as something worthwhile, just as they have killed off so much else in the UK and elsewhere.

Could she? More to the point, could he?

When Lewis was censured and fined by a Solicitors’ Disciplinary Tribunal in 2018 for abusing people online, including some Jews (he then fled, or pretended to flee, to Israel), his own (unpaid) Counsel told the Tribunal that Lewis should not be fined too much because his sole assets were his own clothes, a used mobility scooter, and a private pension worth £70 a week. The Tribunal reduced his fine accordingly (other Jews paid it).

Lewis is a total fake, a fraudster really, yet fanatical pro-Israel Jews are still to be seen on Twitter/X puffing his entirely invented reputation.

“They” worm their way into society, professions, universities, politics, the justice system, and destroy everything worthwhile in them.

As to Daniel Berke, “Berke by name and berk by nature”, in the old joke.

I should imagine that, after her own past and disappointing experiences using the services of “Mark Lewis Lawyer”, Rachel Riley will steer well clear!

If she “genuinely believed” that, she cannot be much of a journalist! See:

Lewis should have been struck off the solicitors’ roll years ago.

Not another fraudulent (((Patron Law))) lawyer?! What a surprise…

Why is that one also still in practice?

“Mark Lewis Lawyer” is both incompetent and totally dishonest (and now both mentally and physically incapable).

I should wager that now-washed-up one-time radio presenter and Z-list “celebrity”, Caroline Feraday, is thanking her lucky stars all the same that she dumped and divorced Lewis (the marriage lasted a year, back in or about 2013). Anyway, I believe that Lewis psychologically and physically abused her, so I expect she is glad to have got shot of the bastard after a short while.

Patron Law— just another pack of dishonest Jews. As to those named solicitors from the Mills and Reeve firm, I do not know, and have never heard of them.

If Berke trusted Lewis’s competence, then he can be no more competent than Lewis himself. Any potential clients of “3D Solicitors” take note…

See also:

See also:

More music

The air feels cleaner for that.

Slava!

[SS-Leibstandarte Adolf Hitler, at the Berghof]

Other tweets seen

Immigration is the most important issue, because it impacts every other issue, from housing, living standards, and the environment, to crime, women’s rights, culture, educational levels, even water supply.

[“Former high-ranking Mossad officer:

Iran is different from all the countries surrounding us. It is fundamentally unlike any state we have ever dealt with.

Iranians know how to learn from events, analyze why something happened, and draw conclusions. They are already replacing their air defense systems.

I get the feeling that in Israel there is increasing recognition that the operation did not achieve its goal.

Iran’s potential to produce nuclear weapons has not been completely destroyed. They have dispersed fissile materials across different parts of the country.“]

Israel has had its shot. Now it is Iran’s turn…

I am glad (for several reasons) that I do not live in Israel…

Farage’s statements are not “lies“, just a pro-Brit point of view instead of the anti-white anti-British points of view put forward by such as O’Brien on, in this case, the (Jewish-owned) LBC radio propaganda platform.

I don’t care if “only” 4% or 5% are “illegal” immigrants. That is still 500-1,500 per day.

Turn it around. What it means is that, bad as the “illegal” migration-invasion is, the real picture is 20x or 25x worse!

That utter traitor loudmouth, O’Brien, thinks it “hilarious” that this country is being flooded with immigrants, straining everything from water resources to housing resources to police resources. It has to stop. Facilitators and propagandists such as O’Brien also have to be stopped.

Jess Phillips binned? Blessed be…

Late tweets seen

[“Israeli commander: “The show is over, we are no longer able to fight” A field commander of the Israel regime’s army, in an urgent letter addressed to the General Staff of the army, warned of a critical situation in the Gaza Strip and demanded a radical revision of military policy. The letter, published by the newspaper “Yedioth Ahronoth,” further revealed the depth of the crisis within the ranks of the occupying army.“]

Over to you, Woody Allen. Make a film about them.

We need to go much further than that.

Neither do I. Nor do I want fanatical Jew-Zionists in the UK (or the rest of Europe).

Or, indeed, a “holocaust”.

This is what the fanatical Jew-Zionists in the UK, such as those of the small (((but well-funded))) “Campaign Against Antisemitism”, a volunteer unofficial arm of Israel and of the Israeli Embassy in London, are supporting, promoting, and excusing.

Late music

[reconstructed Dnieper Dam, 1947]

Diary Blog, 2 August 2025

Afternoon music

Honourable men, honourable soldiers

I happened to read the Wikipedia piece about Hermann-Eberhard Wildermuth: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermann-Eberhard_Wildermuth.

On 12 August 1944 Wildermuth became “Fortress Commandant” of Le Havre in France. This came as a disappointment; he had hoped for a corps. Before taking his new command, however, he swore the ‘customary oath’ to Hitler: to defend the fortress to the last man, and only to surrender with the authorisation of his superiors.[3] This oath to Hitler was, broadly speaking, respected by Wildermuth. At his interrogation by the British in January 1945, he stated that his aim had been to deny the Allies the use of the port, and to tie down as many Allied troops as possible, and that this had been achieved to his own satisfaction, since two British infantry divisions and about 150 tanks were assigned to the siege of Le Havre for almost fourteen days. Furthermore, while Wildermuth personally surrendered to British troops on 12 September, after being wounded in the thigh, he refused to order the surrender of the garrison on the ground that as a prisoner of war he no longer had any authority to do so.[4]

Prior to the early September launch of the British-led Operation Astonia to take the port city Wildermuth had requested that French citizens be evacuated before heavy pre-assault naval and air bombardment commenced. His offer was rebuffed by Lt-General John Crocker, in command of the 1st British Corps which had laid siege to the city. Crocker would later argue that if Wildermuth cared about the civilian population, he could have surrendered the garrison before the bombing began, and that acceding to Wildermuth’s request would have served only the German interest, by gaining time and removing potentially disruptive French civilians from the defended fortress.[5]

[Wikipedia]

Another, but far more junior officer, Lieutenant William Douglas-Home (whose elder brother later became a Conservative Party prime minister), was also at Le Havre at the material time:

Despite his opposition to the policy of requiring the unconditional surrender of Nazi Germany he was conscripted into the Army in July 1940 and joined the Buffs (Royal East Kent Regiment).[7] He went to 161 Officer Cadet Training Unit (161 OCTU) in the buildings of the Royal Military College, Sandhurst, where one of his colleagues was David Fraser. At Sandhurst, he was critical of the war, which he said had been unnecessary.[8] Douglas-Home was commissioned in the Buffs in March 1941.[9] While an officer he stood in the three parliamentary by-elections.

Douglas-Home was assigned to the 7th Battalion of the Buffs, which was converted to tanks as the 141 Regiment Royal Armoured Corps (141 RAC). In the Normandy campaign, 141 RAC was assigned to I Corps, a British formation within the First Canadian Army. In August, First Canadian Army was directed to mop up the German forces cut off in various sea ports in Normandy and Pas de Calais. In the first week of September 1944, the Allies moved against the port of Le Havre. A German garrison under Colonel Hermann-Eberhard Wildermuth was dug in on the hill overlooking the city. Wildermuth had been ordered by Hitler to defend Fortress Le Havre to the last man, and not to surrender.

When the Allied forces invested the city in advance of the planned aerial bombardment and subsequent assault, Wildermuth asked the British commander if the French civilians could be evacuated from the city, but that request was refused. Lieutenant (acting Captain) Douglas-Home was near Le Havre, awaiting the completion of the aerial bombardment. He was to serve as a liaison officer in Operation Astonia, the Allied attack on Le Havre. On the second day after the aerial bombardment had started, he learned of the German request to evacuate the civilians and the Allied refusal. The consequences of the bombardment were apparent to the waiting Allied forces and Douglas-Home refused to participate in the attack. He gave two reasons:[citation needed]

  • The unconditional surrender policy, which he thought compelled the enemy to fight to the end.
  • The refusal of civilian evacuation was morally unacceptable to him.

which created a moral obligation for Douglas-Home and he declined to participate.

The aerial bombardment of Le Havre lasted four nights, killed over 2,000 French civilians, 19 German soldiers and levelled the city. The Germans surrendered after two-days’ fighting and I Corps moved on to Boulogne, which was also subjected to a heavy aerial bombardment. At that time Douglas-Home, who had been placed under supervision (he did not consider himself at that time to have been “arrested”) wrote to the Maidenhead Advertiser and the publication of his letter in the newspaper prompted his formal arrest and detention.

Because of the article in the Maidenhead Advertiser, the Allied forces besieging Calais allowed the civilians to be evacuated from the town before it was subjected to a heavy aerial bombardment and final assault. Dunkirk was allowed to remain in German hands, with the besieged force bottled up, until Germany surrendered on 8 May 1945. In the wake of the publication, the British became sensitive to indiscriminate bombing of occupied cities and towns, although that consideration was not extended to towns and cities in Germany.

[Douglas-Home] served 8 months, initially in Wormwood Scrubs, then completing his term in Wakefield Prison.[11]

Captain Andrew Wilson, M.C. also served in 141 RAC. In his autobiography Flame Thrower, published in 1956, he recounts this incident and its consequences. Wilson wrote his story deliberately in the third person:

Even when he sailed with the regiment to Normandy, William had continued his private war-against-war. While headquarters were near Bayeux, he had written to the newspapers about some German ambulances shot up by British fighters. And what he had written was true. Wilson had seen the ambulances, riddled with bullets on the Tilly road.”

[Wikipedia]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Douglas_Home

Worth remembering at the present time.

Saturday quiz

Well, not so good this week: 3/10 (or 3 “and a third” out of 10 if using the same calculation as political journalist John Rentoul, who claims 2 “and a third”). I knew the answers only to questions 4, 8, and 10 and (like Rentoul) also guessed one word of no. 1. On a few other questions, I came close “but no cigar”…

The policy even fails on its own terms, because of problems of definition and determination.

Good God. Even worse than I had thought. Equivalent to Hiroshima, Dresden etc in WW2. The (Israeli) Jews, as well as (((those))) in the UK, USA etc supporting the devastation/genocide/ethnic cleansing, surely stand guilty of war crimes by any reasonable definition.

Wall. Squad. End.

[“NEW PIECE In my latest essay in @TheSun I ask –what holds a civilisation together? In Ancient Greece, Pericles warned they only survive if leaders maintain the trust of the people In Ancient Rome, Cicero warned states will soon collapse if they don’t put their own people first In Britain today? We are witnessing the very opposite of all this. An out-of-touch ruling class that’s imposing an extreme policy of mass uncontrolled immigration and broken borders on everybody else, prioritising foreigners and pushing its own citizens to openly revolt.”]

Only lunatics are now volunteering to be sent to the crumbling front-lines of the Kiev regime. A death sentence.

…and the half-Jewess and Israeli agent Ghislaine “Maxwell” has apparently been moved from a high-security prison to a “Club Fed” in Texas. Is that the prelude to a Presidential pardon? Looks as if the (((usual))) fix is in.

See also:

More about Jew-Zionist fanatic “Mark Lewis Lawyer”, Patron Law, Jewish barrister Beth Grossman etc

A pack of Jews, abusing the English legal system (yet again).

For background about previous Mark Lewis defaults, see also:

Lewis is both incompetent and dishonest. Anyone who employs him as a solicitor (if anyone still does) is an idiot.

Incidentally, and for those unaware of the matter, the above tweets refer mostly to the libel case Wilson v. Mendelsohn, Newbon (deceased), and Cantor. Wilson, an academic from the North of England, won his case despite a whole battery of Jews giving, in effect, perjured or tainted testimony. The witnesses (all Jews, all Israel fanatics) disbelieved by the trial judge included vituperative barrister Simon Myerson (dismissed, in effect, as part-time judge in 2024, because he was unable or unwilling to stop harassing people online), Daily Star scribbler Adam Cailler, one Joanne Bell (prolific on Twitter/X as “@jobellerina”), and Nathan Comiskey (another keyboard “warrior” for Israel) as well as the defendants.

Pete Newbon, one of the defendants, a sadistic and crazed Israel fanatic who trolled people mercilessly online, as well as committing various (other) crimes (his employer, a university, had already disciplined him for his appalling behaviour), committed suicide during the trial because he had not told his wife that their house was on the line. It appears that Mark Lewis and/or other Jewish lawyers had misled one or more of the defendants as to their downside risk. Dishonest, or simply incompetent? The Solicitors’ Regulation Authority is going to pronounce upon that soon.

Now, it seems that “Mark Lewis Lawyer” (solicitor) and Beth Grossman (Counsel, of Doughty Street Chambers in London) are refusing to disclose evidence about their behaviour during the course of the proceedings. It could lead to serious consequences for them, though Lewis is so washed-up now that it might not make much difference to him. Well, time will tell.

See also:

Something really has to be done about “the situation” in this country.

Late tweets seen

Order must be restored.

[“In case you’re not from the UK, this weekend there are yet more public protests against broken borders and mass immigration —in Islington, Manchester, Newcastle, Cannock, Portsmouth, Southampton. The mainstream media barely report on them. Politicians ignore them. But such is the level of public disillusionment with what is happening to our country that these protests are now becoming a persistent feature of our national life, which in itself shows both how out-of-touch the political system, and how febrile our once unified and stable society, have become.“]

[“Bookmark this tweet. And trust me. What Labour are about to do is approve ALL asylum claims so they can make it look like they are dealing with the backlog, while taking illegal migrants out of hotels and putting them in private housing to try and hide the costs. This is not dealing with the backlog. It will only incentivise many more to come. It will end up being a total disaster, much like their hapless “smash the gangs” strategy which I said in May 2024 would also be a total disaster.“]

As I have been predicting for a couple of years now on the blog…

As if that ridiculous monkey knows anything. Still, for once he is right, probably. The war may continue for another year. The Kiev-regime frontlines may last out that long, but in the end will crumble and collapse. Russia can take and should take all of Ukraine east of the Dnieper.

Historical video with music

[Marshal Zhukov inspects the ruins of the Reichstag in 1945 Berlin— don’t allow the Zelensky Jewish cabal, or American adventurists, to drag you into a similar situation]

Late talking point

Late music

[“Bitter is my native land“]
[Levitan, 1882, Vladimirka]
[“Let’s say goodbye, even if it hurts…”]
[painting by Victor Ostrovsky]