Category Archives: Andy Burnham

Diary Blog, 17 June 2026

Morning music

[Lincoln’s Inn, London, with view of Chapel frontage]

Blast from the past

I happened to see and to re-read a blog post from exactly 2 years ago. I said, inter alia:

[“Khrushchev, in his memoirs, said that (putting it in the language of 2024) an office-bod or bureaucrat type of person (he was thinking of Malenkov) was the very last type who should ever be given power.

Starmer is exactly that type. A sterile black-letter legal type, beholden to the UK Jewish lobby and Israel lobby; probably a freemason too. He will soon be an “elected” dictator by default, purely because the “Conservative” misgovernment is simply incapable of governing at all.

Starmer and Labour, on their own merits, would struggle to get elected. That they are now superficially popular by default is just absurd. They are not at all popular, but there is nothing in their way now. Less than two and a half weeks to go before Election Day, and the Conservative Party will be lucky to retain 50 MPs, in my opinion (which has been my opinion on the blog for months). (The “experts” are still saying 100-200).

Starmer is about to institute a kind of tyranny, for the benefit of transnational finance-capitalism and, of course, (((the usual))) “cosmopolitan” interests.”]

See:

Well, if I say so myself, who shouldn’t, I was pretty much right in calling it. I concede to having been wrong in thinking that the Conservative Party MP-cadre might reduce from 372 to 50 (it reduced to 121); next time, perhaps.

I think that I have been proven right as to the rest, though.

Tweets seen

Ha ha! Brilliant! Brava! that woman!

See also:

Steady though very slow advance. Russia needs a sudden and devastating gamechanger.

[“IN THE NEXT DAYS (WEEK), UKRAINE WILL LOSE CONTROL OVER KONSTANTINOVKA, KUPYANSK, AND LYMAN
The Russians have liberated New Donbas – they have reached five kilometers from Dobropolje

With the capture of Dobropolje, Russian forces will be able to flank Druzhkovka from the southwest and approach the much larger and more important Kramatorsk.”]

If Russian forces can advance on and take Kramatorsk, that will be a significant marker or milestone.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kramatorsk

[Kramatorsk, main square]

How much can they be paying him to so besmirch not only his own honour, but also his own basic credibility?

Our animal friends.

The CPS is afraid of the various “ethnic” lobbies, in this case the Sikh lobby, but more usually the Muslim lobby and (most of all) the Jewish lobby: see

In 2021, Stephen Silverman of the malicious Jewish “Campaign Against Antisemitism” fake charity (ethno-political pressure group) made a quite deliberate and false allegation against me to the police (see the first of the three blog posts noted above), to the effect that I had “racially harassed” him.

Completely false. Indeed, all harassment has been in the other direction, for years. I had never contacted the bastard, never seen him/it, and did not even have his/its contact details, address etc.

I was never charged with the invented “crime”, but the police should have charged Silverman. He quite plainly committed an attempt to pervert the course of justice, as well as the lesser crime of wasting police time. Was never charged.

I blame myself in part. I should have made an official complaint to the police against Silverman in 2021 or 2022; I am just not the kind of person who is always “reporting” people (if “people” is the bon mot)…

“Multicultural” countries cannot survive as nations, and can only survive as enforced states, kept in one piece by severe laws restricting free speech, political activity, protest, dissidence etc. This is now where Britain is. Policing has become nakedly political, and that also applies to the prosecution of offences.

The monkey may be changed, but not the organ-grinder(((s))), nor the music played.

Translates to a Commons with about 325 Reform UK MPs (just short of a majority), 84 Cons (very weak official Opposition), 62 LibDems, 61 Lab, 45 SNP, 44 Greens [etc].

Once again, on those figures Starmer would lose his seat, as would any (?) Labour MP at Makerfield, the by-election for which is tomorrow.

Whoever this lady may vote for, anyone who has mixed-race grandchildren (or children) is, to that maybe small extent, helping those who are destroying Europe’s future.

Quite amusing to see the Twitter/X “antiracist” idiots replying to that brief clip. As usual, deploying the “thick as mince” and similar comments. They cannot see that they themselves, desperate (God knows why) to see Labour succeed at Makerfield), are the dim souls, thinking that more System Labour misrule is a good thing (and that yet more migration-invasion is somehow a good thing).

Well, that opinion poll may show a “Burnham Bounce” for Labour, but that is now. If the next GE is not until 2028 or 2029, the picture may have changed or changed back, after another year or more of Labour government.

Anyway, that poll seems to show that a GE today, but with Burnham as PM, would result in a Commons with about 276 Reform UK MPs (about 50 short of majority), Labour 194 (substantial Opposition), 62 LibDems, 37 Cons, 30 SNP, and 25 Greens [etc].

That would be a completely hung Parliament, and with a minority Reform government unable to find the 50+ extra votes needed to pass anything much.

Incidentally, on those figures, and with PM Burnham as MP for Makerfield, he might well lose his own seat unless able to buck the national trend…

Bear in mind, though, that Restore’s impact has not been much quantified yet.

Yvette Cooper, Angela Rayner, and Al Carns, all suggested/potential Labour leaders, would also lose their seats on those figures.

If Burnham wins tomorrow at Makerfield, he will therefore probably not call a GE but hang on until (?) 2029, probably getting less and less popular, but hoping that “something will turn up”. Meanwhile, nationalist and social-national resentment will build up a formidable head of steam in the country.

I suppose readers of the blog will expect me to make a prediction as to Makerfield.

A fool’s errand, really, but for what it may be worth, Labour does seem to be nailed on (maybe, though, not to the extent seen on the betting market, where Labour is now heavily odds-on at a fairly absurd 1/7).

I expect that there are many “secret” Reform (and Restore) voters, but whether there are enough to make a difference I do not know. It is said that 10%-15% of Makerfield voters remain uncertain or undecided.

I think that Reform are now unlikely to pull it off, partly by reason of the ad hominem attacks made on the Reform candidate, partly because Restore’s candidature has plainly split what would have been the Reform vote. A Reform victory, though, is still just about possible.

Well, in a day or so, we shall all know the result.

Late music

Diary Blog,16 June 2026

Tweets seen

Amazing clips of film.

Woolwich Crown Court is high-security. Prisoners are brought to court via an underground tunnel from the nearby Belmarsh Prison. I once had a friend at the Bar who, in the 1990s, did quite a lot of “heavy” crime there, crimes such as security-van jobs and the like.

Craig Murray was H.M. Ambassador to Uzbekistan at one time: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Craig_Murray, and is now rather dissident.

As previously blogged, the Ukrainian Ambassador whom I accompanied sometime around 1995 to the UK’s biological warfare (etc) centre at Porton Down, Wiltshire, is now the director of a bio-lab in Ukraine: see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serhiy_Komisarenko.

If any reader wants more information on that, use the blog search box.

Well said. Political leadership is not the same as being an Army or Royal Marines officer (you cannot simply command people and events, and decisions have to be more nuanced). As the tweeter says, neither is political leadership similar to being a senior legal figure such as the DPP (you cannot simply lay down rules and regulations and/or threaten to use “the full force of the law” when people do not agree).

Come to that, political leadership is also unalike to being a top-level businessman, as Trump is proving to the world. Not everyone wants to “make a deal“. Some people will not “make a deal” under any circumstances, because they or their group, clan, or people are motivated not by a quantifiable outcome such as profit and loss, but by ideology, or religion, or even a wish for “death or (and/or) glory”. Such people often do not much care if they themselves end up worse off (objectively) without a so-called “deal”.

Talking point

People, years ago, thought that Starmer-stein would be a Prime Minister fairly dull but at least intelligent, reliable, respectful of the idea of “a society under law”, and not likely to go off the rails in any serious way.

Well…people got the dull Prime Minister, but they also got a power-mad former bureaucrat willing to have protesters imprisoned for years for doing such petty crimes or non-crimes such as posting “inflammatory” tweets that few read and by which none were “incited”; same goes for idiotic young or not-young men willing to throw a few plastic wheelie bins towards a line of riot police.

The British people got, not a dull but reliable (and ethical) Prime Minister, but a petty tyrant forcing the entire nation to give large amounts of personal information to Israeli and other companies before being “allowed” to post on, or even use and/or read, Twitter/X, Facebook, YouTube etc.

They also got a Prime Minister willing to light Jewish-supremacist candlesticks in the windows of 10, Downing Street and in Trafalgar Square, and one willing to throw away enormous amounts of money “supporting” the Jew-Zionist/Ukrainian-thug regime in Kiev, while British people struggle without help.

The British people also got a crazed Prime Minister presiding over a migration invasion of enormous proportions, one which he has no plan to stop, and no intention of stopping.

More tweets

[“Head of the armed forces Sir Richard Knighton today: “We will have to dial back our activities and our exercise and operational activity if the level of resource funding that is available to us does not increase.”

Speaking at the G7 today, Keir Starmer made clear there will be no more money forthcoming.

John Healey’s resignation speech in the Commons later should be box office.”]

Ah, yes…I remember that Knighton person “cosplaying” in camouflage gear in Kiev a year or so ago [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rich_Knighton].

In reality, any money spent on “defence” at present is money totally wasted. There is no threat from Russia or anywhere else to the UK, not in terms of ordinary warfare. The threats are all from the migration invasion or are from within the society— the demographic changes, the exploitative finance-capitalism tearing society apart, and the collapsing fake “democratic” political system.

Britain should not be getting involved in Ukraine, the Middle East, or the Indian Ocean. It is pathetic, anyway, now that our Empire is long-gone, given away by the LabCon traitors now all too ready to wave the flag around to “support” the thuggish and corrupt regime Ukraine, or the appalling Israeli state.

Indicates low enthusiasm for all existing parties. Translates to a Commons with about 284 Reform UK MPs (about 42 short of an overall majority), 93 Cons (weak official Opposition unless they make common cause with Reform, either coalition or other arrangement); Greens 68, LibDems 68, Lab 62, SNP 45 [etc].

That would probably be good for social nationalism. A Reform or Reform/Con government would be a disaster but, as Lenin said “worse will be better“…

Once again, as in all polling for a long time, Starmer would lose his seat on those figures, as would any Labour MP in Makerfield (probably including Burnham, if he wins the upcoming by-election).

Very true, but that is where the vast bulk of the population is.

There may be oblique or indirect ways for people, whether as groups or as individuals (“lone wolves”), to sabotage and rebel.

Again, very true, but “prepping” in the UK is not the same, nor can it be, as prepping in the USA, Canada, Russia etc.

See also:

https://ianrobertmillard.org/category/prepping

See also:

Leaving aside the schools issue, one thing is clear: Labourite drone and careerist Bridget Phillipson knows little or no history, despite her mixed history/languages degree from Oxford.

The Gestapo did not march “hundreds of thousands” (of any types) anywhere. I presume that the idiotic woman is confusing or conflating the Gestapo with the S.S.

The Gestapo was a quite small organization, largely made up of former detectives from the Kripo (criminal police). Its job was to track down spies and saboteurs etc, which it did mainly by sifting through denunciations sent in by citizens.

In fact, 95% of the work of the Gestapo was to examine, then dismiss denunciations made by people either mistakenly or maliciously. There were usually only a few Gestapo officers in even quite sizeable towns.

The Gestapo operated almost invariably in civilian clothes, and did not march columns of prisoners anywhere.

Disappointing but certainly not surprising, these days, to find such ignorance in a woman who not only read History (period studied not known to me), but also is now Secretary of State for Education…

Incidentally, the only non-political jobs that woman ever had prior to getting in on the old MP racket were 2 years as an office worker at her local council, then for about 2 years as manager of a charity founded by her own mother: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bridget_Phillipson.

Another small settlement (500 inhabitants before the war, and now probably few, certainly not more than 100).

Russia needs a gamechanger. Urgently.

[“Starmer’s turning the UK into an authoritarian dictatorship, where people are too scared to speak out

Its planned social media ban is being sold as child protection. Look closer and it affects every adult too.

To keep under-16s off X, TikTok, YouTube and the rest, everyone has to prove they’re over 16. That means tying your ID to your accounts.

We’ve seen where this leads.

Under the existing Online Safety Act, sites like Imgur and several adult platforms simply blocked all UK users rather than handle the verification.

Civil liberties groups like the Open Rights Group are already warning about who holds that data and how it’s protected.

Set that against a country with a track record of arresting people over online posts, and the worry writes itself.

When your name is attached to everything you say, you start watching what you say.

It’s the oldest trick in the authoritarian playbook, the same instinct that kept people quiet under every communist regime of the last century.

Starmer calls it protecting children. Funny how the protection always seems to involve knowing exactly who said what.

And the people who do speak out and stand up, like Tommy Robinson? He was arrested under the Terrorism Act so police could seize his devices and see who he’s been communicating with.

The UK is slipping into tyranny, and the voices that can speak out will soon be silenced.“]

You have to bear in mind, also, that those tested were tested after having been prisoners for some time, on restricted diets and, in some cases (Streicher, in particular) subject to ill-treatment amounting to torture at the hands of Jews in American uniform.

I was tested in the 1980s at 156 or 155 (I forget, but think the former), but of course that was about 40 years ago. In any case, IQ is only one factor of importance. “EQ” is also very significant in terms of how the individual functions in society, for example.

Not as straightforward as often thought. Marilyn Monroe was (apparently) on or above the IQ level of Einstein. In the old phrase, “it makes one think“…

“Antifascist”/”antiracist” idiots usually do try the old “racists are knuckledraggers” (etc) line; a couple even tried to characterize me that way on Twitter, many years ago. Not worth discussing; certainly, there is no need for anyone on “our” side of the “argument” to self-validate or self-justify.

Get them out or get them gone. Whatever it takes.

There are several ethno-cultural “communities” in the UK that should be removed (and read that however you like), not just one.

Interesting point, and probably correct.

Like a box of Soviet chocolates: different shapes externally, but all with the same filling.

Those people (and those behind them) would have us at war, and entirely unnecessarily, and hugely devastatingly, with Russia. Healey even mentioned it in that speech (“…war with Russia within 5 years“…).

Russia has 6,000-7,000 nuclear weapons of various types, including massive missiles, some of which cannot be intercepted en route. Do those willing to fight Russia (and why? To support the corrupt, shambolic, and brutal Jew-Zionist/Ukrainian-thug regime in Kiev?) really want to risk these islands becoming a charred and radioactive wasteland?

No thank you.

Britain should leave NATO, cultivate better relations with Russia, take Russian oil and gas at cost price (I think that easily achievable in the right circumstances) and, in Russia, find a ready and huge market for British goods and services, including our people’s great overall skill-set.

Carns may well climb higher. Exceptional. However, from what I have seen and heard so far, possibly (and, in view of his support for Jo Cox and her activity, probably) ideologically unsound.

I am all in favour of the UK being, in Carns’ own words, “able to defend itself“, but that must be distinguished from fomenting entirely unnecessary wars which are likely to entirely destroy this country and its people.

I can see Carns being appealing to many voters, though.

Carns’ speech is wrong in its characterization of the Attlee government of the mid/late 1940s. That excellent historian, Correlli Barnett [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlli_Barnett] made the point in his several books that the UK tried to do three things after 1945 (retain a global military presence, re-tool British industry and commerce, establish or improve the Welfare State), but only had the wherewithal to do two of those properly, and thus did all three but inadequately.

Having said that, Carns made a pretty good speech there, objectively.

See also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Carns

I have seen, however, from Carns’ tweets and interviews on domestic matters, that he is very weak in areas outside his core comfort-zone of defence etc.

I am generally opposed to the death penalty, but there are exceptions. This is one such exception.

Only social nationalism can save this country now.

At the end of the day, Andy Burnham is really just another Labourite drone, with little or really nothing new to say, let alone do.

What a nice idea.

Israel, as a state, as a society, is no worse than most of the Arab/Muslim states in the region, in overall terms —indeed, in some respects better— but is the hub of worldwide Jewish power and influence. That is why I oppose it.

[“Iran has managed to survive the attacks and even bring Washington to its knees, writes the Ynet portal.

Iran withstood serious attacks and, relying on its remaining strength, managed to bring the United States to its knees,” the portal states.

“The problem lies with the United States. They have shown their weakness: their word is no longer their word, their power is no longer power, and their blockade is no longer a blockade.”

“These were supposed to be the best days of the United States as a world power,” but “the grand names of operations against Iran – the American ‘Epic Rage’ and the Israeli ‘Roaring Lion’ – have been shattered to pieces,” it adds.

According to Ynet, Israel has not seen such a consensus in society for a long time, between the left and the far right, that the American-Iranian agreement, expected to be signed on June 19, is a “strategic defeat” for Israel and a “failure” for the United States and moderate Sunni states in the region.

“Trump is determined to reach an agreement. Hardly any leader of a great power has ever shown such zeal, which is a sign of weakness,” Ynet believes, adding that even “the demonstration of power now boils down to Trump’s AI-generated videos portraying himself as a global superman.

“It’s hard to believe, but that’s exactly how it is: never before has such a powerful state shown such a terrifying weakness towards a country that was considered to have suffered a severe defeat,” the portal emphasizes.“]

Those who live will see“…

[“Zelensky keeps bragging online while frontline troubles mounting for Ukrainian army Fresh off the G7 summit, Zelensky once again tried to rattle President Putin and Russia with threats of a “harsh winter,” projecting an image that NATO’s latest tech upgrades had given him the strategic upper hand. But for all the polished optics flooding Ukrainian and Western media, the reality on the ground tells a very different story.“]

Late music

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gara_Garayev; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Beauties_(ballet)]

Diary Blog, 14 June 2026

Afternoon music

[Bauman Garden, Moscow]

Tweets seen

[symbol of The Woodlanders]

What a stupid —and basically performative— action. How many ships owned by UK-based companies sail under flags of convenience? Thousands. What if Russia starts to seize them? This kind of state piracy is not the right kind of thing at all. This is the 21st Century, not the 16th or 17th.

Don’t poke —or keep poking— the Bear.

Actually, not sure that £80K is such a good salary in the UK these days, especially when taxable, but the point stands.

Peter Murrell is now in prison on remand, and awaiting sentence, while his wife or ex-wife, Nicola Sturgeon, the self-important Scottish fake “nationalist”, would-be “world statesperson”, and probable lesbianka, is politically finished, and living in some sort of luxury rental in London (presumably hoping to become a mass media TV talking-head and newspaper scribbler), but the SNP itself staggers on.

In a sense, one can see why the SNP is still riding fairly high in the opinion polls. Labour is washed-up north of the border as well as in England and Wales, the LibDem default-vote joke party is only supported in a few niche and/or former Conservative areas, and few these days will vote fake “Conservative” in most of Scotland. So for whom do Scottish people vote? It is said that both Restore Britain and Reform UK are gaining support, but surely not enough to worry the SNP. There again, between a third and a half of Scottish people still think that they want notional “Independence” from the UK, so that does limit their choice of party.

In the end, the SNP is just another globalist System party; pro-Israel, pro-Jewish lobby, pro-EU, pro-immigration. Same-old, in short. However, at present, enough Scottish people are fooled sufficiently by the fake flag-waving of the SNP (despite it at one point having been led by a Pakistani!) to keep the SNP in play.

More music

[entrance gate to the former leadership residential compound of the East German communists at Wandlitz, near Berlin, aka “Bonzograd” and/or “Volvograd”; socialism has “mixed” benefits and detriments for most of the population of any country, but for the leadership, and the comfortable strata just below that, could be pretty good…]

More tweets

I agree.

Replacing the monkey will not change the music being played, nor the identity of the organ-grinder(s).

Reform could have smashed its way right through the politics of the UK, but Farage and Tice allowed the Jewish/Israel lobby to influence and control them, and also started to flood Reform with non-white candidates. That is why Restore, though also very flawed, is making ground.

What English/British people really want, or rather need, is social nationalism, but most are so brainwashed by decades of Jewish-lobby propaganda on TV, in newspapers etc, and now also in schools, that they themselves are all but unaware of their own needs.

When “Boris”-idiot came out with his “high-skilled migrants” rubbish, I thought that what was really meant was, as I put it on the blog, “Indians that can work a computer“. It turns out that —not for the first time— I was too kind. Even I did not realize quite how low the bar would be set…

When captured— deportation, or sterilization, or whatever else it takes to save the future for British children.

Looks as though, whatever may be said about the recent events, the protesters in Northern Ireland have succeeded, at least in part, in getting rid of their problem…

Life is always surprising.

Talking point

That seems to capture a growing thought-trend in this country…

More tweets

[American version…]

Many are waking up to the fact that “our” government is actually our enemy…

Like many of my age-group (69), I am not hugely versed in computing etc, but from what I understand, the skills of the present-day teens are often very considerable, and may enable the under-16 generation to evade any such ban. Certainly, the similar law in Australia has been, or so I have read, a total failure.

Still, I do what I can with such skills as I do have…

Our animal friends.

All the suspicious activity in London, and those “Specials” (volunteer p/t police) chose whoever that is to question. Anyway, he may or may not be harmless. Many people wander around London aimlessly.

As to where it is, I think Soho Square, but am not 100% sure.

Talking point

As a general rule, landlord-parasitism should not be allowed to exist. This is a societal/political choice.

More tweets

I have blogged previously about how I accompanied the then Ukrainian Ambassador, one Kommissarenko, to a privatized part of the UK’s biological warfare laboratories at Porton Down in Wiltshire. That was in 1994 or 1995. Use the search box on the blog for more.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serhiy_Komisarenko

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porton_Down

That ambassador was himself from a biochemical or biological scientific background, and I believe is now director of such facilities in Ukraine. I wonder if he remembers our little trip to the Wiltshire countryside, 30+ years ago, in his handsome and fast (130+ mph) black Lexus limousine with its CD plates (enabling us to drive there from the then Ukrainian Embassy near Notting Hill in only about 40 minutes)?

[“Britain’s economic condition is far worse than many appreciate. Government debt has climbed above £3 trillion, exceeding 100% of GDP. Interest payments on that debt have become one of the largest items in the national budget. The tax burden is at its highest level in decades, yet the government still cannot balance the books.

Economic growth has been stagnant for years. Productivity growth has virtually disappeared. Manufacturing continues to shrink as a percentage of the economy while energy costs remain among the highest in the industrialized world. Britain now spends more servicing debt than it does on many essential public services.“]

National revolution. Then, social-national government. Creation of a European-race ethnostate. Strong links with Russia. Leave NATO. Ignore the EU if it is hostile. Eliminate the (((special-interest))) lobby or lobbies. Create an entirely new form of society but at the same time based on the best of the historical traditions.

Late tweets seen

Cornwall has plenty of (mostly 18thC/19thC) ruins and follies. My own (sadly only leased) house (2002-2004) near the Tamar, about 4 or 5 miles north of Launceston, had 4 acres of gardens, ornamental ponds, and Victorian grottos and, beyond that, about 80 acres of woodland (with black deer etc), and a small river. Hard to believe, now.

[driveway]

See also:

[“The wish “go lightlys” move into granny’s home.

An elderly woman in her 80s returned from visiting her 102-year-old friend to find a gang of Eastern European squatters had taken over her £590,000 home in Chingford.

They broke in while she was away, refused to leave, and are now living there like they own the place.

Police told her it’s a “civil matter” and refused to help.

She’s now effectively homeless with serious health issues.

Look at them in the photos — bold as brass, moving their stuff in and out of her house like it’s nothing.

This is what happens when we have open borders and a police force that won’t protect British people.

Our elderly worked their whole lives for this country. Now they’re being robbed in their own homes while the system shrugs.

Who’s going to get them out of HER home ?

Disgusting.

Protect our elderly. Deport the invaders.”]

They (again) look like Roma Gypsy types.

Were I to say what should happen to them, I should probably have the “woodentops” at my door (again), and that is pretty boring, especially when I end up having to explain to them what is the law and what are the limits of their lawful powers, so I leave it to the readers of the blog to use their own discretion.

Incidentally, I note that the untermenschen are driving a new-looking BMW X5, a car the cost of which (new) ranges from £90,000 to over £120,000. Assuming that the car is not stolen, from where did the untermenschen get the money?

We all know what has to happen eventually in this country; it is just a matter of time.

Also a good way, however, for police and security services to snoop on people. “Be as wise as serpents and as innocent as doves“…

Wall. Squad. End.

Late music

[Old Gagra, Abkhazia]

Diary Blog, 13 June 2026

Afternoon music

Saturday quiz

Well, this week 7/10 (two of which being “educated” guesses), thus trumping the 3/10 scored by political journalist John Rentoul. I did not know the answers to questions 4, 5, and 7.

Tweets seen

Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan. A global conspiracy.

[Kreisleitertagung auf der Ordensburg Vogelsang vom 22.-29.04.1937]
[girls of the BDM (Bund Deutscher Madel) riding in a German forest, 1930s]
[Hitler signs autographs for some young supporters near Berchtesgaden, 1930s]
[“The Fuhrer as friend of animals“]

Should read “...Muslims and Jews and the government“, of course…

Sophie Meaden. A young Valkyrie.

The bad-joke “Talk TV” online-only “television” channel, which not only crowed along with the malicious lying and perjuring Jews of the so-called “Campaign Against Antisemitism” after my 2023 free speech trial and subsequent 2024 sentencing, but tweeted (completely wrongly and, indeed, libellously) that I had been “imprisoned“. In fact the penalty imposed on me was both a financial one (amounting to over £700), and also a fairly brief (in the event) and not too onerous “community order”: see

“Talk TV” is an Israel-lobby front, and often invites the liar and perjurer Stephen Silverman, of the “Campaign Against Antisemitism” fake “charity”, a volunteer arm (some of them are paid, in fact) of the Israeli Embassy in London.

Reverting to the Reform/Restore situation, my attitude to Restore is not very different to how I see Reform, i.e. a useful tool in moving the overall Overton Window, meaning moving the general weight or bias of public opinion. Even if Reform or Restore were to win a general election, the (((usual fix))) is already in, certainly in Reform, and possibly soon in Restore.

What matters is not the next GE, or which party “wins”, but what happens when the party that wins that GE is unable to improve the degenerating situation in this country, and so loses both credibility and control. Then…

Good point(s).

More good points. See also:

More tweets

For over 30 years, living standards in the corrupt and shambolic Ukrainian fake state have been declining. Only now, and only in the regions under Russian rule, are they starting to improve.

[“NEW: Bloomberg Saturday read

— Andy Burnham is planning to move quickly after Makerfield to secure a coronation. His supporters think John Healey’s resignation kills off Keir Starmer’s chances of survival. They think Wes Streeting and Al Carns don’t have the numbers, and that Burnham can quickly get 250+ Labour MPs and most of the cabinet to back him.

— Starmer insists he’ll fight, but the question is what the cabinet does. Burnham’s supporters want them to tell the PM to agree a handover. Before Healey resigned, Starmer’s allies hoped he could battle on because most of the cabinet would back him to stay. Aides suggest the calculus is changing and Healey’s brutal exit makes it more likely they tell Starmer it’s over.

— Even Starmer loyalists are very critical of the PM. They wish he’d been bolder, found the defence money from welfare, net zero or elsewhere, and sacked Ed Miliband. Several allies say they can’t believe Miliband and Shabana Mahmood (who they say privately plotted with Burnham and Miliband to oust Starmer) are still in the cabinet, but Healey isn’t. One says that’s the final evidence of his lack of authority, political judgment and decision-making ability.

— Starmer’s relationship with Rachel Reeves has been tested to the limit. Her resistance led Starmer to renege on his Munich speech and overrule Healey and Jonathan Powell. She effectively buried his survival strategy of focusing on security. Reeves allies argue it’s her job to make the numbers add up and if Starmer wanted more money for defence he could have imposed more departmental cuts but was unwilling.

— Burnham will not keep Reeves on as his chancellor, despite her allies pitching her to stay. Reappointing her would not be the change he’s promising, one Burnham supporter says. They say they spoke to Reeves around the locals and came away believing she would help them persuade Starmer to go, but she didn’t follow through.

— The turmoil is rattling UK allies. European diplomats contacted British counterparts in recent days complaining about the uncertainty over the UK’s defence spending plans, the slow pace of the uplift and Healey’s departure. They’ve also asked for information about Burnham’s plans for foreign policy and defence but got no answer.

— If Burnham does become PM he’ll face the same problems. His critics say he’s never uttered a word of substance on defence or foreign policy, shows no interest in it and has no plan. It is not impossible that in the next few months the British PM has to join negotiations with Putin over Ukraine. “Can you imagine Burnham doing that?” asks one official, especially with Powell likely to leave with Starmer.

— Starmer’s chaos also distracted from what might otherwise have been a bad week for Burnham. He got away with his WASPI gaffe thanks to Healey. Labour MPs are also critical of his plans on immigration. One aide said his proposal to end asylum hotel contracts and move responsibility for housing migrants to local authorities is amateurish and toxic.

— It all leaves Labour MPs in a state of total despair. Starmer looks finished but Burnham has no obvious plan and keeps making basic mistakes that foreshadow another troubled premiership, one said. If Burnham loses Makerfield, Labour appears to have no other options.“]

Interesting, but fails to make the point that any money spent on “defence” at this point is simply money thrown away.

The “threats” to our country and society do not come from Russia, not at all (that’s just msm propaganda nonsense) but from demographic change, the change from being a relatively civilized white European society to a multikulti dystopian mess, an approaching near-anarchy made worse by falling living standards and migration invasion.

Our animal friends.

Ed Miliband. That crazy Jew.

Incidentally, I have never found an answer as to where the family money came from. I have tried to analyze it on the blog previously. We are told that the Miliband father arrived in the UK during the early stages of WW2, young and as a “penniless” “refugee” who had lost his family wealth by reason of the “Nazis”. However, not long after WW2, in the 1950s, certainly by the early 1960s, the family (mother was also supposedly a “refugee”) was in a house in expensive Primrose Hill, and then in —really?— The Boltons, Kensington, one of the most expensive addresses in the country.

Did the Milibands, like so many Jews, have money secreted overseas/offshore? We do not know. What about today, in 2026?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ralph_Miliband

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marion_Kozak

I remember that, sometime around 2010 or 2012, Jeremy Paxman interviewed Ed Miliband, and made an oblique reference to the Miliband family wealth, but Miliband deflected and tried to laugh it off.

Many of Britain’s ultra-wealthy have considerable funds offshore.

Actually, on a personal and not directly-related point, I remember being told, prior to a flying visit to Liechtenstein in 2002, that the person I was flying out to see (you have to fly to Zurich and then drive to Vaduz, which takes another ~2-hours), a quintessentially-English-named Mr. Jeeves, who was in the offshore industry and was also the Honorary Consul (British Consul) in Liechtenstein, was also an agent of, or at least source for, SIS.

Mr. Jeeves apparently dealt with large amounts of offshore (i.e. tax-avoiding) monies on behalf of some very or ultra-wealthy British people, including the then Queen (Elizabeth II) and Mick Jagger. So I was told, anyway.

Looking up today, online, the global Jeeves Group, though, I notice that the person I went to see in 2002 is not now directly involved in operating the organization; he and his brother were at least in their sixties, I should imagine, and may well be deceased, 24 years after I met one of them.

Wouldn’t those “antifa” cretins get a massive shock if [REDACTED BY REASON OF UK POLICE-STATE CENSORSHIP]…

[“The British People are fully on board with deporting all illegal migrants. Good.

Now it’s time to turn to the reality that legal migration is the far bigger problem.

There are approx 14 million third-world descent migrants in Great Britain.

If we do not urgently reverse legal migration, we will soon become a minority in our homeland. We are already a minority in a quarter of schools.

Some might say that remigration is extreme, but I would argue that being willing to give up our only homeland is far, far more extreme.

Without the Native British People, there is no Britain.“]

Losing“? That boat sailed long ago, Goodwin. A major factor has been the promotion of mass immigration for 80+ years (mostly, though not entirely, by the Jewish element in politics, law, and the mainstream media).

Only wading through very unpleasant swamps will now save the British people, and I doubt that Reform UK is up to what may need to be done.

[“What’s living in the UK like? I’ll tell you. In the last week alone we have had to process:

-an attempted beheading by an illegal migrant from Sudan in Belfast
-while still trying to make sense of a boy, Henry Nowak, being stabbed to death while police were more anxious about allegations of “racism” than trying to save his life

-then we learn children in Scotland were assaulted by Bulgarians while the police didn’t believe them either
-while reading that a vulnerable 18-year-old was rped by an asylum-seeker from Pakistan -while an asylum-seeker from Iraq got only 6 years for rpe
-while an Iraqi national, was found guilty of eight counts of r*pe and grooming children as young as 12
-and his friend from Iran who arrived illegally skipped bail and is on the run
-and now we learn that a teenage girl has been stabbed in the neck by no doubt “a local man” in Burnley.

That’s one week in the UK. Oh, and the Left say talking about all this is “divisive”, they blame social media and Elon Musk, and local councils have told us not to fly our national flag because it might “intimidate” migrants. One week. The UK.”]

A couple of point: first, the “Bulgarians” mentioned were almost certainly Gypsies from Bulgaria, not ethnic Bulgarians. Bulgarians, like Romanians, are often tarred, very wrongly, with the brush that should be reserved for the Gypsy element from both countries.

Second, why does Goodwin never mention the fact that Jews such as now-dismissed p/t judge, barrister Simon Myerson of Leeds, have actually set up “charities” to import more Afghans etc?

In fact, Goodwin always avoids criticism of Israel and of any Jews (with the exception of the Green Party leader, Zack Polanski, but Polanski is one of those Jews other Jews love to hate).

In my view, one element that really does need to be addressed, urgently, by Government in the UK is not black or brown (etc)— the nasty Irish-origined tinker/”traveller” element. In fact, properly “addressing” that problem might encourage some of the blacks and browns (etc) to depart “voluntarily”.

Apocalypse Now

Saw a long recording of the final director’s cut of the famous film, Apocalypse Now. More than impressive, and makes much more sense than the usual much-cut-down version that I have seen in the past.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apocalypse_Now

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apocalypse_Now#Apocalypse_Now_Final_Cut

Quite many films have been butchered; to what extent, you only understand once you see fuller versions: The Wicker Man (1973) is far far better in the rather longer versions. I once had a copy of the Director’s Cut version.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wicker_Man

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wicker_Man#Director’s_cut

Same goes for Taxi Driver:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taxi_Driver

One film that I thought only just made sense when I first saw it in France is Les Rivieres pourpres. I read later that the director had cut out a high proportion of the film as originally made; as far as I know, no longer cut exists in the public domain.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Crimson_Rivers

A great pity.

Late tweets

Look at them. As I suspected, not “Bulgarians” but Gypsies from Bulgaria.

Now, those little Scottish girls have been vindicated, the Gypsies convicted, and Police Scotland (and Humza Yusaf) shamed (yet again).

All the msm etc are talking about the Makerfield by-election as if the whole future of the UK rests on it. No, because even if Burnham wins, which is now probable though not certain, he has, and Labour has, nothing much in the tank. Same-old, really.

Good point.

People are getting desperate for a real Britain and a real British political vehicle. Unconsciously, they want social nationalism but are, by reason of a century of mostly Jewish anti-“Nazi” propaganda, mostly completely unaware of that.

I believe the graph. When I was in the Caribbean, I was told that, if a local (i.e. black) man marries a woman with existing teenage or even pre-teen daughters, it is almost expected that the girls come with their mother as a kind of sexual package deal for the man.

Incidentally, why do so many “woke” cretins not understand “per capita“? Must be an educational failure.

Not hard to believe at all. It is simply that Starmer-stein has outlived his usefulness by reason of not only his own incompetence but also that of his entire Labour Friends of Israel Cabinet.

By reason of Starmer’s failing credibility, the organ-grinders need a new monkey to draw in the punters…Arise, Andy Burnham…

Oh, I see that System mouthpiece and “asset” Paul Mason is there too. What a surprise…(use the search box on the blog to see my assessments of Mason).

Always. The “Campaign Against Antisemitism”, for example, has repeated “form” for claiming thousands on the streets at their events, when the true number has, at times, been no more than 100 or even 50.

I repost that tweet despite the individual in question having repeatedly tweeted against me a decade ago. #MoralHighGround.

Late music

Diary Blog, 11 June 2026

Afternoon music

[painting by Serge Marshennikov]

A thought out of season

I was just thinking about the Henry Nowak matter. I myself live only about 20 miles from that part of Southampton, though in a very different semi-rural area.

I was also thinking about the Belfast protests or small riots.

The Southampton protests seen on TV and online seem to have involved 50-100 people, I doubt many more. I suspect that either a high minority, or a majority, of people generally are angry or at least concerned by wider aspects of the Henry Nowak case, also the wider aspects of the appalling savagery of the Belfast incident, as well as the incidents themselves, yet all we can see, on the surface, talking about Southampton, is 50 or 100 people (did the crowd ever amount to as many as 150?) confronting and —pointlessly— taunting a police contingent which also seems to have been in the dozens or maybe 100-150 in number.

Southampton itself has a population of about a quarter of a million people. You cannot judge the public mood by the few willing to get involved in street stand-offs (I do not think we can call them “battles”), whether in Southampton, Belfast, or anywhere else. You cannot say that, just because only a couple of hundred people turn out for a street protest in a city with 250,000 inhabitants, that that represents an otherwise-quiescent public. Not at all.

People are getting very apprehensive/concerned/angry about the present migration invasion and its consequences.

Tweets seen

Our animal friends.

Thus making Labour strong favourite to win the by-election. On the surface, bad news, in that it strengthens Labour, whose national vote (however stupidly) may rise if Burnham takes over from Starmer-stein.

On the other hand, looking at the bigger picture, it means that well over a third of the people —37%— of that Makerfield area (a traditional Labour area) are now thinking in terms of nationalist politics, though not so many thinking yet in terms of social nationalism; more than are thinking of voting Labour, anyway —only 35%.

The direction of travel is toward national and even social-national politics, and away from the traditional System parties.

In any case, voting “democracy” is only part of the story. All roads lead to Rome, and only white Europeans should be allowed to vote in this country.

See also:

Look at the Russian Empire, the Soviet Union and, indeed, post-Soviet Russia. Dozens if not hundreds of ethnic groups and languages. Kept together by the knut, one way or another. To the extent that Russia has “democracy”, it is because the Russians constitute the large majority.

USA? Well, until the Second World War, the USA was large-majority white European, indeed —at one time just after the First World War— about 90% white European, albeit with a number of minority European cultures (and also a strong Jewish element in a few cities, but mainly in New York). Now, whites are just about the minority, maybe 48%, and look at how dictatorial the USA has already become.

UK? You decide…

Seems that the police in the county have appealed for information as to the identity of the nasty person who killed a seagull in St. Ives today. It may or may not be the person identified in the above tweet. The sweatshirt certainly looks very distinctive.

A silly little man, a Labourite political careerist, who had no background at all in defence until appointed by Starmer-stein. Ludicrously pro-“Ukraine” (Kiev regime), too. Incidentally, Healey has always been a member of Labour Friends of Israel. What a surprise…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Healey

Very true, though a few of the examples cited are ill-judged. For example, that Linehan slug joined in several times with the Jewish-lobby attacks on me after I was both wrongfully and unlawfully disbarred in 2016. Linehan is a complete tool of the Israel/Jew lobby, a nasty person through and through.

Like others (e.g. Allison Pearson, Toby Young etc), Linehan pretends to be for “free speech”, but in reality favours the “cancellation” and censorship of whomsoever is hated by the Jewish lobby.

Of course, both Linehan and Allison Pearson are within the msm milieu, so their incomes (I presume that Linehan still has an income of some sort) are dependent on not being targeted by the Jewish lobby; dimwitted Allison Pearson has even made common cause with the malicious liars and perjurers of the so-called Campaign Against Antisemitism”, the main activity of which is to whine and demand for less “free speech”.

Talking point

Saw that the following blog post from over 9 years ago, so one of the first, has had hits. I can still stand by it:

More tweets

[“The government said the Online Safety Act was about protecting children. We were called conspiracy theorists for saying it wasn’t!

Well er … Ofcom is writing to platforms about “crisis situations”, civil unrest and enhanced moderation measures. (Blocking posts they don’t like)

Children aren’t mentioned once. NOT ONCE.

The problem isn’t removing genuine incitement to violence. The real problem is that unelected regulators will pressure platforms to decide what millions of ADULTS can and cannot see whenever a “crisis” is declared.

many platforms will remove perfectly lawful content rather than risk the punishment of Ofcom.

Read the letter for yourself. Link in the thread.]”

The cartoon below was about that sort of situation in the USA, but fits perfectly with the repression of online freedom in the UK:

[“Bloody hell, I’ve been digging more into the government definition of ‘Crisis’ a bit more So… an unelected regulator is now operating within government where the meaning of “crisis” has become very stretched.

The Cabinet Office Amber Book says an emergency under the Civil Contingencies Act covers serious damage to human welfare, the environment or UK security. (fair enough) But then it has added … “For the purposes of this guidance, the terms emergency and crisis are used interchangeably.”… INTERCHANGEABLY?

It also says an emergency/crisis can include situations that have not yet been harmful but have the potential to be (they do not define ‘harmful’ This guidance has not been voted for or debated So let me explain why thats so important. it means that almost any situation the government believes could become a problem can now be treated as a ‘crisis’.

And under that broad language, Ofcom has been able to write to platforms about civil unrest, crisis situations and how they will need to beef up moderation, it isnt just about removing illegal content.

Anything could become a “crisis”, no one voted for the widening of the definition and no one had the opportunity to, because thats how government by guidance works…. hoping you won’t even notice.“]

The “Covid” scamdemic/panicdemic was the template.

[“Oh lookie here…. And now the pincer movement. The government wants …

A NATIONAL COUNTER DISINFORMATION CENTRE!

The foreign affairs committee says it’s about protecting against foreign interference (sensible) But …

the recommendations include cross-government coordination and closer working with private organisations and expanded powers to tackle ‘harmful’ narratives.

Who decides what counts as “disinformation”? Well erm … government regulators and approved experts will decide which narratives are acceptable.

The greatest threat to democracy is not the public discourse. It’s the state deciding what discourse is permitted.

Read my book!“]

The BBC has led the way, with a “BBC Verification” department which is itself actually just a System disinformation-broadcasting department.

Late tweets

Translates to a Commons with about 311 Reform UK MPs (about 15 short of an overall majority), 85 Cons (very weak official Opposition), 83 Greens, 67 LibDems, 45 SNP, 32 Labour [etc].

Those figures would mean that about 370 current Labour MPs would lose their seats, including Starmer and, notionally, any Labour MP at Makerfield.

31 current Conservative Party MPs would also lose their seats.

I think that the polling organizations are going to have to place Restore on the board, because the absence of Restore obviously skews the suggested results in terms of seats notionally won at the next GE.

To my mind, with the present System people in place, almost any money spent on defence is wasted, much of the background policy being predicated on the nation that Russia wants to or even intends to invade Eastern or Central Europe, or even Western Europe, and maybe even the UK. It’s all nonsense.

This country should not be wasting money on supporting “Ukraine” (the corrupt, brutal, and shambolic Jew-Zionist/Ukrainian thug regime in Kiev); neither should any money at all be spent on assisting the vicious Israeli regime.

As for those political parasites and chancers such as Daniel Hannan, suggesting that both State pension benefits such as the Triple Lock, and disability benefits for British people, should be slashed and the monies diverted to “defence”, forget it! Crazy, as well as being political suicide for any party entertaining it.

A million migrant-invaders are coming into the UK every year; others are being born here… Our country is quite rapidly now falling to pieces by reason, mainly, of migration invasion. Stop that, rather than building fantasy armies and navies to be deployed in fantasy scenarios about fighting Russia (and its 7,000 nuclear weapons).

On the contrary, Britain should leave NATO and cultivate good relations with Russia, thus ensuring cheap energy for our industries and domestic consumers, and also giving the UK a huge and valuable market in Russia, a market currently closed to the EU states by reason of their mad anti-Russia sanctions regime. It could all be ours.

…and a member, of course, of Labour Friends of Israel.

Like most former officers who become MPs, Jarvis has proven to be a big disappointment in every way (cf. Johnny Mercer— remember him?).

Ah, another resignation. Al Carns looks good on paper (i.e. his background), but I reserve “judgment” (assessment) until more is known.

Seems to be pro the Kiev regime, so I am not too hopeful, but we shall see.

Wall. Squad. End.

Again more villages or hamlets. Russia needs a gamechanger in Ukraine.

A proper social-national government would change course, radically.

Our animal friends.

Late music

Diary Blog, 9 June 2026

Morning music

Tweets seen

The pages of history are turning.

Talking point

[“THE DOSSIER #8: Andy Burnham MP – The Corpse of the North

Born Liverpool 1970. Father a BT engineer. Mother a GP receptionist. Then Fitzwilliam College, Cambridge. The elite’s finishing school. You have never worked outside politics. Not one day. Researcher for Tessa Jowell. MP for Leigh 2001-2017. Secretary of State for Health.

You failed at every level. You failed upward. You always do. You lost your seat in 2017. The working-class town rejected you. The “man of the people” too posh for his own people. Now Mayor of Greater Manchester. The “King of the North.” The man who would be Prime Minister. You want the Labour leadership? You have tried twice. 2010. You came fourth. Eliminated with ten percent. 2015.

You launched your bid in an accountancy firm linked to tax avoidance. You attacked the mansion tax as “spiteful.” You abstained on Tory benefit cuts. You lost to Jeremy Corbyn. You cannot even win your own party.

You slammed “indefensible” waste on NHS consultants in opposition. Then you tripled spending to £27 million per year as Mayor.

While working-class girls were raped, tortured, murdered. While they were called prostitutes by the authorities you controlled. While they begged for help. You spent millions on consultants. You lent public money to a property tycoon. No full checks. He built luxury apartments. Working-class families slept on streets. You promised to end such arrangements. You lied. You always lie.

But here is your extinction. Here is what ends you forever. Mid Staffordshire. You were Health Secretary when the scandal broke. Hundreds dead. Patients drinking water from vases. Left unwashed in their own filth. You resisted a full public inquiry. You delayed. You obfuscated. Whistleblower Julie Bailey called you “grossly unsuitable.” She said you were “incompetent or negligent.” The Francis Report exposed the rot on your watch.

Maggie Oliver. The whistleblower who exposed the Rochdale grooming gangs. She came to you. She warned you. She gave you the evidence. Industrial-scale rape. Torture. Trafficking. Working-class girls, twelve years old, called prostitutes by Greater Manchester Police. Raped repeatedly. Tortured. Murdered. Their families ignored. Evidence destroyed. Complaints buried. Maggie Oliver said you “turned away” from victims. She said you “did not grasp the nettle.” She resigned over your handling of the Oldham inquiry. You had the evidence. You had the warnings. You did nothing. The girls suffered. The girls died.

You were Mayor. Under your watch, Greater Manchester Police abandoned one in five reported offences. Domestic abuse victims. Working-class women. No investigations. No safeguarding. No justice. They called for help. You were too busy being King. Too busy planning your PM bid. Too busy spending £27 million on consultants while children were raped.

You preach about the NHS while your Labour government started the privatization. Section 75. Competitive tendering. The market devouring public health. You built the machine you now pretend to oppose.

The hypocrisy is surgical. You want to be Prime Minister. Labour blocked your MP bid. You called it “an insult to people’s intelligence.” The insult, Andy, is you. The Cambridge-educated “man of the people” who failed the people. The King of the North who could not protect the North’s daughters. Who turned away. Who did nothing. Who spent millions on consultants while children were raped.

You have no seat. No hiding place. No sanctuary. You gambled that we would forget the girls called prostitutes while they suffered. You gambled that time would erase your cowardice. You lost. You are not a king. You are a caretaker of carnage. You are not a leader. You are a liability. You are not the future of Labour. You are its shame. You are its corpse. Your reputation is ash. Your conscience is a void. Your ambition is grotesque. Your career is over. Your betrayal of Britain is now complete. Permanent exile awaits. Congratulations. You are The Dossier.”]

An excoriating polemic.

Is this really someone the people of Makerfield want as their MP? Or as Prime Minister? I would have thought not.

I was actually unaware that Burnham started off, if that is correct, as “gopher” to freeloading/corrupt Blairite MP, Labour Friends of Israel member and, effectively, agent of influence for Israel, Tessa Jowell.

Incidentally, Tessa Jowell, now deceased, was also the minister responsible for the Communications Act 2003, under the appalling s.127 of which many people —including me— have been targeted by the Jewish/Israel lobby.

Seems to me that Burnham is being pushed and promoted by the (((msm))), and that is always a bad sign, as we have seen in the past, e.g. with Stermer-stein, “Boris”-idiot etc.

Burnham has nothing in the tank. Nothing new, and nothing interesting. A typical Blair-Brown era machine-Labour political careerist.

More tweets

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arkady_Volozh

Britain has to be cleaned out. The whole Western world needs to be cleaned out.

Translates to a Commons with about 300 Reform UK MPs (about 26 short of an overall majority), 88 Cons (very weak official Opposition, but this is the first time for quite a while that the Cons have come second in the opinion polling), 64 LibDems and 64 Greens, 60 Lab, and 45 SNP [etc].

Restore Britain are still not yet on most of the polling questionnaires. If they were, that would make a difference even were they to reach only 5%-10%; a recent poll in Makerfield had them on 19% in that part of the world.

Very open, overall, but it is clear that people want a real change from the same-old, and LibLabCon cannot provide that, even if (in my view, especially if) Andy Burnham takes over Labour.

Incidentally, on those figures, were Reform able to climb from 25% to 27%, that alone would give them a small overall Commons majority.

Also incidentally, I see tweets from a couple of loonie women to the effect that Yvette Cooper would transform Labour Party fortunes were she to become leader. Hardy-ha-ha. I very much doubt it.

For one thing, Yvette Cooper and her husband, Ed Balls, were both fraudsters and expenses cheats prior to 2010, and were exposed as such even if never prosecuted. Yes, over 15 years ago now, but it goes to character. She is still moneygrasping and moneygrubbing.

Also, Yvette Cooper is a died-in-the-wool pro-Jewish lobby and pro-Israel drone, completely under “their” thumb. She is also pro-migration invasion and the hopeless and degraded multikulti society. A would-be dictator and total careerist; power-mad, and bitter towards those standing up for Europe’s, including Britain’s, future.

Nein danke.

Until I saw those tweets, I was unaware that yet another “chimp-out” of some kind had occurred in the UK.

Don’t forget which “community” is, at root, behind the causes of all that, such as the importation into Europe of vast numbers of non-Europeans.

Look below the surface of events.

Talking point

I happened to see a blog post from well over 6 years ago, and which has had a few recent hits. The issues raised in 2019 are, most of them, still almost exactly the same as they now are:

More tweets seen

I think we have to start to understand, as a people, that quite a number of MPs, “journalist” scribblers, TV and radio talking-heads etc, are actually traitors; traitors to us, to our future as a people. Not just as a label, or as a word to put in a tweet, but in a real sense.

The Hilary Benn type of System politicians are enemies of this country, while sitting in a privileged position within it. Benn himself is, of course, the son of now-deceased idiot-“socialist” Labour MP, Tony Benn, a total hypocrite, as well as being completely wrongheaded on almost (?) every issue.

[“A white man sent out 300 job applications with his real name — zero responses.
He changed his last name to “Singh” on his résumé — and suddenly got callbacks.
This is not a coincidence. This is anti-white discrimination, enabled by DEI policies that openly discriminate against native Europeans and Americans.
While politicians import millions from India and lecture us about “diversity,” qualified white applicants are passed over for less qualified foreigners who game the system.
Merit is dead. Tribalism has replaced it.
End DEI. Deport the invaders. Hire based on ability, not skin colour or foreign name.
“]

Same in the UK. Even those institutions and employers not infested or contaminated with “woke-ism” etc are afraid that, if they ignore the non-whites, they will be on the end of a “discrimination” suit before long.

Monkeyworld UK, brought to you by the Benns, the Blairs, the Gordon Browns, the David Cameron-Levitas and George Osbornes, the Theresa Mays, the Starmer-steins, the “Boris”-idiots, and the Ed Daveys (etc) of this world.

I am unable to add what I think should happen to the enemies of civilization and culture, because we no longer live in anything even approaching a “free country” (as people used to say, long ago), and having politically-correct poundland Stasi police employees at my door (as has happened several times over the past decade or so) is very very boring.

Jenrick is also corrupt, tied-in with Jewish property-speculators etc. He should have been prosecuted.

Also, Jenrick decided to intervene in favour of building the proposed ugly concrete “holocaust” propaganda centre by the Palace of Westminster (not yet built, thankfully), over-ruling all opposition from the local council, environmental groups, and patriotic groups.

Even some in academia are awakening.

The full tweet by David Betz:

[“It is pointless trying to understand the contemporary British media complex as ‘media’ in the conventional sense—journalism, reporting, or even opinion. The correct frame is propaganda: mood and sentiment management, with its sharpest tool today being crisis communications.

The dominant technique, visible daily if you still watch, is inversion—systematic reversal. It flips reality: victim into perpetrator, aggressor into defender, truth into falsehood, good into evil. It constructs Walter Lippmann’s ‘pseudo-environment’, an alternate reality in which the public is meant to dwell.

A key subtype is projection, or ‘accusation in a mirror’, neatly summarised by a Rwandan Hutu propagandist in a 1990s manual: impute to your enemies exactly what you and your own side are planning or doing.

When a genuine crisis erupts—such as the racially aggravated murder of Henry Nowak—the first imperative of the machine is to stall, dampen, and defeat the natural eruption of public outrage.

Call it ‘restoring calm’ if you like the euphemism. In practice, it means herding people back into anaesthetised normality so that inversion can resume.

Once the majority has been shamed, distracted, or bullied into silence, the remnant still angry can be ridiculed by the usual chorus—eye-rolling panellists on Have I Got News for You, columnists sneering at those ‘harping on’, and accusations of crypto-racism or worse.

Thus, the brutal stabbing of an unarmed 18-year-old student, the false cry of racism by his killer, and the police reportedly handcuffing the dying boy as he bled out on a Southampton street is repackaged as another ‘knife crime’ tragedy (note Shaban Mahmood’s flaccid parliamentary statement this afternoon)—preferably illustrated with a generic white face in the style of the BBC’s so-called reality-based drama ‘Adolescence’ or the more recent but equally putridly manipulative ‘The Capture’.

Real patterns (grooming gangs, crime disparities, two-tier policing) are airbrushed. This is projection at work: the actual sources of predation and institutional failure are recast, while legitimate grievance is pathologized.

The truth? The system enabled both the attack and the immediate inversion of its aftermath and that stands exposed to anyone with eyes and functioning brain by the video evidence. That’s the problem, your own ‘lying eyes’, that crisis communications has to handle before there can be a return to normal levels of public mood management can be restored.

This is precisely what Dan Hodges is performing when he labels people demanding we talk about the murder ‘scum’ for refusing to respect the family’s wish that their son’s death not be politicised. It is phase-one grunt work in the inversion protocol: shame the angry back into silence so the pseudo-environment can be restored.

Smart enough to know his role, malleable enough to perform it willingly—exactly as Noam Chomsky described the filtering process that keeps the right sort of voice prominent in the system.

The technique still works on some. But it is wearing thin. Every overplayed inversion, every scummy dismissal of raw public grief, prepares the ground for sharper identities and clearer grievances against the system itself. Normal people do not remain moderate forever when the machine insists their reality is the problem.“]

Exactly. One of the best expositions I have seen recently.

Late tweets

[“If a migrant comes to our country and attempts to saw a man’s head off in the street, a Restore Britain Government will not deport.

With the British people’s approval, that savage will be put to death.

But that is not enough – these atrocities will keep happening. The barbarians are already inside the gates.

Immigration will end from countries that are proven to supply us with these monsters.

Third world migrants who hate our way of life will be removed from our country. Restore Britain will deport millions.

I have had enough. The British people have had enough.

We do not have to live like this – there is another way.

Death penalty, mass deportations, end mass immigration.

That is what Restore Britain will do.“]

Late music

[Levitan, Evening Bells]

Diary Blog, 30 May 2026

Morning music

Saturday quiz

Well, this week a clear victory over political journalist John Rentoul; he scored 3/10, but I trumped that with 6/10. I did not know the answers to questions 5, 8, 9, and 10.

Talking point

Utter barbarity.

Talking point

Tweets seen

How is this “news”? It has been obvious to all for weeks.

When I had a Twitter account (the Jew-Zionist lobby had me expelled in 2018 after a long and conspiratorial campaign), I found that practically all the “hate” directed against me came from Israel-fanatic Jews, together with a few non-Jew but vicious and/or mentally unstable types such as fake “doctor” Louise Raw, a loonie from Manchester calling himself “DaveAFAF” and a half-crazy part-Jew psychiatrist called Tim G. Stevens of Essex (Epping Forest area), most of whom were also pro the Jewish lobby and Israel.

One especially egregious one was minor Jewish academic Ben Gidley, who was obsessed with me, my views, my Twitter account etc, and set up a number of pseudonymous Twitter accounts (“BobfromBrockley”, “IntheSoupAgain”, “AntiNazisUnited” etc) in order to troll night and day. Eventually, I worked out his real identity, as did, not long afterward, others such as the journalist Peter Hitchens. Gidley had to shut up and go away after that.

Most, in fact almost all, of the vitriol came from Jews, several of which have now, however, died.

See also:

One has to ask why Jews have been expelled, historically, from over 100 states and territories.

Wall. Squad. End.

Numberplate Enthusiasts’ Club

More tweets seen

See also:

[“The Fuhrer as friend of animals“]

Upsetting to think that some (I hope only a small minority of backward) Americans hurt these lovely creatures.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opossum

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia_opossum

I have commented previously on the fact that in the UK we are now moving rapidly to a non-civic society, i.e. one where people vote (whether in elections or when on juries) according to racial and cultural loyalties. Call it the “O.J. Simpson syndrome” if you like.

I fully support the jury system, in principle, and was myself a practising barrister for a number of years (1992-2008, based in London and later Exeter when not overseas), but the jury system falls to pieces in a “multicultural” society. The same is true of voting “democracy”, and a police force that can be relied upon.

Talking point

At various times in history, states have promulgated “sumptuary laws”, defined by Wikipedia as follows:

Sumptuary laws (from Latin sūmptuāriae lēgēs) are laws that regulate consumption.[1] Black’s Law Dictionary defines them as “Laws made for the purpose of restraining luxury or extravagance, particularly against inordinate expenditures for apparel, food, furniture, or shoes, etc.”[2] Historically, they were intended to regulate and reinforce social hierarchies and morals through restrictions on clothing, food, and luxury expenditures, often depending on a person’s social rank.

Societies have employed sumptuary laws for various purposes. They were used to try to regulate the balance of trade by limiting the market for expensive imported goods. They made it easy to identify social status and privilege, and as such could be used for social discrimination and to stabilize social hierarchies.[3][1] They could also be used to prevent, or at least reduce, opportunities for political bribery and corruption.

The laws often prevented commoners from imitating the appearance of aristocrats and could be used to stigmatize disfavoured groups. In cities of the Late Middle Ages, sumptuary laws were instituted as a way for the nobility to limit the conspicuous consumption of the prosperous bourgeoisie. Bourgeois subjects as wealthy as or wealthier than the nobility could undermine the latter’s presentation as powerful and legitimate rulers. This could call into question their ability to control and defend their fiefs, thus inspiring traitors and rebels. Such laws continued to be used for these purposes well into the 17th century.”

[Wikipedia]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sumptuary_law

I think there are cogent arguments for similar laws in the UK at present. Let’s stamp on the nouveaux riches types (indeed, all of the excessively-rich) and those aping them and their lifestyles, including “influencers” and “celebrities” of one kind and another.

Society needs calm and reason, and a less-materialistic ethos.

Plain living and high thinking.

More tweets

[“BREAKING: its been revealed that Andy Burnham snapped up an ex council flat in Kennington for just £215,000 in 2005 while serving as an MP.

He then happily billed taxpayers for the mortgage interest payments because the rules let him get away with it.

That same flat is now worth 480000 to 500000 pounds and he rents it out while insisting the income barely covers his costs and he makes no profit.

Yet this is the same man demanding rent freezes council housing takeovers and lower rents for ordinary people.

Pure hypocrisy from a classic Westminster grifter feathering his own nest on the back of the system he loves to lecture everyone else about.“]

They destroy everything.

Monkeyworld UK. It really is time to recognize that most of them not only cannot create anything worthwhile, and certainly not a better society, but cannot even live in our existing society (even as parasites). Pests. Unwanted pests.

I had heard previously of how cruel some of the Israeli Jews are to donkeys. Arabs in Egypt can also be callous towards donkeys, if not actively cruel and, as early as 1914, British people set up charities such as the Brooke Hospital to care for the donkeys of the Middle East; the Arabs either could not or would not. However, there is that perversity in the Jews which we see in other areas, such as their cowardly sadism towards children and other defenceless people in Gaza and elsewhere.

Donkeys are, after cats, my favourite animals. Hard to understand why some lower types would harm them, but that is something one learns with life experience(s)— people are not created equal, in any sense.

Talking point

That was first posted by me about 10 years ago, on Twitter (the Jewish lobby goblins had me expelled from Twitter in 2018).

10,000, too! There are “only” 18,000 active barristers in England and Wales anyway, and that is about 3x the number of 50 years ago. “More will mean worse“, as they say…

Incidentally, re that tendentious “Readers added context” note, it all depends on what is “officially” called a “hate crime”…

[“Living in the UK is now incredibly radicalising. This is what we have seen in the last two weeks alone: a gang of Afghans who entered the country illegally on small boats and lorries have been charged with 40 child sex offences: two Muslim men who visibly assaulted police officers have been let off from a further trial; a small boat migrant living in a taxpayer-funded hotel was found guilty of sexually assaulting two women outside nightclubs; an Islamist terrorist who plotted to blow up an army base is being released early; a white British boy was handcuffed by police and bled to death while saying “I can’t breathe” after the Sikh boy who murdered him claimed the white boy was “racist”; a Muslim man who called to “behead the Jews” was released on bail while white British people who tweeted their complaints about immigration have been jailed; a group of [“traveller” Irish tinker] boys who gang-r*ped and filmed two girls escaped jail and were given fines of £26; a new study found that for every ONE young British person who is hired in Britain TWENTY-SEVEN young migrants from outside Europe; Islamic prayers are now routinely used to open local councils; another 1,000 illegals arrived on small boats in one weekend; it was revealed the First Lady of Sierra Leone owns a council flat in London while 1.3 million people wait on the social housing list; new data revealed that last year alone 800,000 migrants arrived in Britain while 246,000 British people left, half of whom are aged 16-34 years old; the country’s birth-rate collapsed to a new low of 1.39 while politicians refuse to even talk about how to support British families; a grooming gang in Dewsbury was jailed for nearly 300 years combined after assaulting children as young as 12. Oh, and the entire political class had a nervous breakdown when the British people decided to peacefully protest over what is happening to their country on the streets of their capital city. As I say, radicalising.“]

Late music

Diary Blog, 25 May 2026

Morning music

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miriam_Hyde]
[painting by Joyce Norwood]

Tweets seen

I do not “support” Reform UK (or Restore Britain) as such, but what matters now is that Labour loses at Makerfield, and that cannot happen if the anti-Labour vote is split in any substantial way. I fear that, as things are developing, that may happen, and that Jewish-lobby System puppet Andy Burnham will “blag” his way to an unmerited by-election victory.

14 words.

Talking point

I was just looking at a blog post from about 9 years ago. I still think the same.

More tweets

Yes, but what if the surrounding state is so hostile that it uses violence or the law (in the sense of fossilized state violence expressed as “lawfare”) against that white-northern-European community? What then?

Berg“? That must be an “antisemitic trope” (or the truth…).

See also:

Wall. Squad. End.

The NHS needs radical reform, just like much of UK society. Ring-fenced funding from taxation, but also a cull of the bureaucracy and the “woke”/”anti-racist” and other propaganda, and a clear hierarchy.

Our animal friends.

Even Lenin liked cats.

[Lenin with cat, Moscow region, early 1920s]
[Lenin and cat in the Kremlin in 1920; also Krupskaya, and Lincoln Eyre, an American journalist]
[library cat]

More tweets

[“The Fuhrer as friend of animals“]

I agree with her.

That first tweeter, “Angloid” seems to believe that if only “nationalists” never “offended” anyone (Jews, blacks/browns/Muslims, “antifa” loonies and cretins, bien-pensant “normies” etc) then the mass of “normal” Brits would inevitably see the light and the “nationalist” side would triumph almost without having to struggle (no doubt at a “free and fair” general election before which the msm would present the “nationalist” case completely fairly on TV and in the Press)…

They want not only their daily bread but also their daily illusion“, as Hitler said in the late 1920s.

Well, that tweeter, “Angloid” is apparently 19. When I was 19, I also had some wrongheaded ideas (as well as some correct ones), so I should not wish to be too censorious but, when one is 69, as I now am, such naive thinking has or should have given way to a more realistic outlook, as St. Paul noted.

In an animated cartoon, a bell would, at this point, sound in or above someone’s head…

I am not someone who immediately sees a conspiracy in every situation, but I am inclined to think that both Restore and Reform are “controlled opposition”; however—in the absence of open revolution, or invasion by another state– the existing System parties can only be reduced to unimportance by the rise of a new party, or new parties.

Of course, two parties with (as it might be) 30%-40% of the popular vote split 2 ways are far less powerful a challenge to the System than one party with 30%-40% of that same vote.

Also, yes, that party or those parties may morph into System parties, as I predicted quite long ago would happen to Reform UK, but a Reform triumph (or Restore triumph) would still be far better than a continuation of the old “two/three main parties” scam, because Lab and Con would go, and with them much of the stability of the System.

I hear what Hodges is saying, but I see no evidence that System puppet Andy Burnham actually has any of the supposed great popularity anyway. Burnham may be more popular than both Starmer-stein and Kemi Badenoch, but that is not so difficult, after all. Also, Burnham has been effectively absent from public exposure (at least, for anyone more than 50 miles out of Manchester), so familiarity has not bred contempt…yet.

It does highlight how poorly the UK is provided with socio-political vision, though, that a mediocre fellow such as Andy Burnham is presented (by the msm and/or System) as some kind of Great White Hope.

Both of those tweets have a point.

I thought that that clip was a parody for a brief moment.

That character in the red jacket is a not-atypical kneejerk Labourite, the type to be found, even now, all over the North of England and, at least until a decade ago, in Scotland (I believe).

Look at him! Lives in a rubbish area, wears cheap rubbish clothes, may or may not even have a job, and has probably voted Labour at each and every opportunity.

Makerfield has had a Labour MP uninterruptedly for 43 years, since the seat was created. For 15 of those years, it has also had a Labour government, yet what good has that done for that long-haired “anti-fascist”? He’s still living in a rubbish area, still wearing the cheap shoddy clothing, still probably penniless… (and, voting Labour, probably has a n*****r for a neighbour!)…

Late tweets

Late music

[Victor Ostrovsky, Moment of Truth]

Diary Blog, 24 May 2026

Morning music

[Regis Bouvier de Cachard, View of Tower Bridge]

Talking point

Bouvier de Cachard, by Colin Wilson

https://johnkersey.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/bouvier-de-cachard.pdf.

Worth reading.

[Regis Bouvier de Cachard, Fleurs sur le Port St. Tropez]

Tweets seen

As often said on the blog, neither side should be directly targeting civilians.

I not only agree, but also have always said so, both on the blog and generally.

As regular readers of the blog will know, I have little time for Reform UK ideologically, but see it as the only game in town in terms of destroying Lab and Con by 2029. To that end, I think that people in this by-election —specifically— should hold their noses and vote Reform.

A split anti-immigration (etc) vote at the Makerfield by-election will just let in fake-Labour Jewish-lobby puppet Andy Burnham, and that would substantially reduce the chance of Labour getting near-wiped out whenever the next GE is held (in or before 2029).

This country is so screwed…absolutely unbelievable.

The traitor-politicians of the System have imported millions of untermenschen trash of that sort. They should all be put up against a wall.

Please also refer to previous comment.

Stray thought

Just watched a very short Twitter/X clip of Andy Burnham, and had an immediate and unexpected feeling that, if he wins the Makerfield by-election, and if he then takes over the Labour Party, that…Labour will be finished.

I have no logic behind that; I have to admit as much; it was just a feeling, though undeniable.

[will work it out logically another time].

I suppose the fact is that Labour is washed up whichever careerist clown becomes its leader.

Talking point

Nihil novi sub sole

[Ecclesiastes 1:9]

More tweets

[“I created a parliamentary petition to stop the Holocaust Memorial and Learning Centre being built in the beautiful British Victoria Tower Gardens—located within a UNESCO World Heritage Site.

It was rejected.

The reason being that: ‘it requests action at a local level.’ The current status of the memorial: In January, the ‘UK Holocaust Memorial Act 2026’ became law and:

– Disapplied section 8 of the London County Council (Improvements) Act 1900 which legally required the park to be kept strictly as a public garden.

– Formally granted the government the power to use public funds to construct and operate the memorial and underground learning centre (estimated around £147m–£150m).

Important information: The applicant for the project is the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government: Steve Reed. – Steve Reed: • Member of Labour Friends of ‘israel’ (LFI) • 2 funded trips to ‘israel’ • £155,200 from pro-‘israel’ billionaire Lisbet Rausing • £1,800 from pro-‘israel’ jewish billionaire Trevor Chinn.

Reed works closely with the UK Holocaust Memorial Foundation (UKHMF) as the expert advisory board appointed by the government to steer the project. The UKHMF is formed from ‘The Prime Minister’s Holocaust Commission’—launched in January 2014 by then-Prime Minister David Cameron.

The UKHMF is led by two Co-Chairs: The Rt Hon Lord Eric Pickles and The Rt Hon Ed Balls. – Eric Pickles: • Current Chairman of the Conservative Friends of ‘israel’ in the House of Lords. – Ed Balls: • Was an active, long-standing member of LFI throughout his time as a Member of Parliament and Shadow Chancellor.

Other members of the board include the following zionist jews: – Chief Rabbi (Genocide) Ephraim Mirvis Incorporates religious zionism into his official leadership role. – Sir Gerald Ronson CBE Major donor to prominent zionist charities. – The Rt Hon the Lord Feldman of Elstree Closely aligned with Conservative Friends of ‘israel’ (CFI). – Sir Lloyd Dorfman CBE Funds major institutional and cultural projects in ‘israel’. – Lord David Alliance Maintains extensive business and philanthropic ties with ‘israeli’ institutions.

Since the ‘government’ is the applicant, the next step is for a designated Minister to make the ‘independent planning decision’. That minister is: Samantha Dixon MBE MP, the Minister for Building Safety, Fire and Democracy.

Dixon can make one of the following decisions: 1. Approval with Conditions: Granting permission but imposing strict requirements (e.g., specific building materials). 2. Refusal: Denying the planning permission entirely, forcing the government to find an alternative site or fundamentally alter the project. 3. Call for a New Public Inquiry: If new evidence or massive public interest demands it, ordering a fresh, formal public inquiry before making a final determination.

What we can do next:

1. I am resubmitting a national petition The first was rejected as a ‘local’ issue. The new petition will demand national action: calling on the Government to halt public funding for the project and order a fresh, independent Public Inquiry. I will post the link as soon as it is live.

2. Object directly to the decision-maker Minister Samantha Dixon is legally required to review public objections before making her planning decision. Anyone can submit an objection: • Where to write: Email the Planning Casework Unit at MHCLG (pcu@communities.gov.uk). • What to say: Focus on valid ‘material planning considerations’ so it cannot be ignored. Cite the loss of Grade II-listed public green space, visual disruption to the UNESCO Westminster World Heritage Site, and crowd security risks next to Parliament.

3. Demand a Public Paper Petition from your MP If you collect physical signatures on a paper petition and hand it to your local MP, they can present it on the floor of the House of Commons. This legally forces the government to issue a formal, written ministerial response to our concerns. Victoria Gardens is one of Europe’s ‘Most Endangered’ heritage sites Spread the word. Protect the gardens.“]

Even some Jews, indeed even some Zionist Jews, oppose the building of this ugly piece of degraded architecture, an expression of Jew-Zionist supremacism, which will look like a cross between a public loo and a subterranean car park, and many also oppose its being built on the Gardens right next to the Palace of Westminster.

The project shouts out “Look! We are here! We rule! We own this country!

Notice how “they” use non-Jews as figureheads: corrupt politicians and ex-MPs— Pickles. Balls. A few years ago, that corrupt little pissant Robert Jenrick, too.

See also: https://chuffed.org/project/dr-rahmeh-vs-the-lobby-and-the-state

More tweets seen

https://twitter.com/warfareanalysis/status/2058249788047470831

[“If a non-jewish British citizen said that the pro-‘israel’ jewish lobby controls the police, government, media, national agenda, policies, and law—they are doxed, fired, and arrested.

Yet Campaign Against ‘Antisemitism’ boasts about it openly. And raises £1 million for it.

CAA is a de facto enforcement arm for ‘israel’ on British soil. And it does so while being granted charitable status. Receiving tax breaks. Gift Aid.

Meaning British taxpayers subsidise CAA’s activities.

Our money literally funds their lobbying and legal action against us.

This is how emboldened these zionist political militias are in Britain.

This is why British sovereignty, national independence, and civil liberties are contingent upon shutting down the pro-‘israel’ lobby.“]

Exactly.

Also note how, at a time when many, maybe most, real British people are struggling financially, “they” are able to give, whether as individuals or as families, untold thousands of pounds, adding up to half a million pounds, to support the malicious and perjuring “CAA” Jewish sub-terrorists.

Erratum: the above cartoon was drawn with the US in mind; in the UK, the figures would be about “...80% of billionaires are despite being <0.5% of the population“, so the situation is even more pronounced in this country.

See also:

More tweets

Oddly, some may think, I agree with much of that, even though it is obvious that the lady’s “Moderates” fantasy political party does not exist and, even if it did, would get nowhere. I suspect that the only members she has are the bottles or empties in her cellar or kitchen.

The Triple Lock is a matter of survival for many over-65s. To want to remove it is not only harsh, even cruel, but also political suicide. Surprising that the ex-wife of a former Conservative MP cannot see that.

Late tweets

See also:

Late music

[Victor Ostrovsky, Mystery. She seems strangely familiar…]

Diary Blog, 23 May 2026

Morning music

[Harriet Lawless, End of a Summer’s Day in St. James’s Park]

Saturday quiz

Well, a modest 4/10 this week, the same as political journalist John Rentoul. I knew only the answers to questions 1,2, 3, and 8.

Tweets seen

From the blog, a year ago

Today, I happened to see, from almost exactly a year ago, a blog post dated 24 May 2025, and referring to a Dunkirk commemoration :

“…Ironic. The System politicians and msm recently lined up to mention the possibility that Britain might have been invaded in 1940, yet pretended not to notice a real invasion that is happening right under their noses, and literally under the noses of the spectators of that Dunkirk tribute show.

As to why Britain was never actually under real threat of invasion in 1940, there were numerous reasons. First of all, Hitler wanted to rule much of the world in alliance with the British Empire; he did not want war with Britain; Britain, i.e. Neville Chamberlain’s Cabinet, declared war on Germany in 1939 and, after mid-1940, his successor, Churchill, was unwilling to consider an armistice.

Hitler was weighing what became the invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941. He did not wan t a two-front war.

Hitler allowed most of the British Army soldiers in the Dunkirk area to escape (my own maternal grandfather one of them). Hitler refused to allow the Luftwaffe and tank columns to destroy that army, the remnants of the British Expeditionary Force or BEF. German ground forces were halted outside Dunkirk by Hitler’s own order (Fuhrerbefehl).

Secondly, the Germans never had enough barge and ship capacity to ferry an army of sufficient size across the Channel.

Thirdly, the Luftwaffe could not guarantee air superiority; neither could the Luftwaffe and Kriegsmarine much defend any forces ferried across.

Reverting to today’s real invasion, it continues, day after day, and nothing of importance is being done to stop, or even slow, the flow.

If only Britain had been in loose alliance with the Reich. We would have been, today, the rulers of much of the world, and that world would have been a better and happier place by reason of it. The usual evil (((influence))) prevented it from happening. Instead, we sit on our small and beleaguered island, invaded daily by trash from all over the world, we are individually poorer with every passing day and, with every passing day, our society falls apart, more and more.

I wonder how long it will be before there is little that is worthwhile left. At the age of 68, I may not see the ultimate depths of the degradation of Britain, thank God, and I am doing what little I presently can, in my present situation, to avoid the catastrophe, but see around me a society running around like a headless chicken, scarcely aware that it is already, in effect, dead, or at least mortally wounded.

I may, by Grace of God, be able to do more. We shall see. That is a matter of Fate. If the existing society cannot be saved, it may be that seeds can be planted in the rotting corruption, seeds which may germinate at a later time in history.

[from this blog, a post dated 24 May 2023: https://ianrobertmillard.org/2025/05/24/diary-blog-24-may-2025-including-thoughts-about-israel-antisemitism-and-the-continuing-israeli-war-crimes-in-gaza/]

The System commends the planned resistance to an invasion that never happened (in 1940), but deplores even verbal resistance to the gradual invasion of our day, invasion by “small boats”, by “legal” influxes, and by births to non-Europeans already in the UK.

Late tweets

That man did not expressly mention the “JQ”, but how could he, in the climate of self-censorship the Jew-Zionists have imposed on the UK via monkeys-on-sticks political puppets such as Starmer-stein?

Burnham is just a marginally less compromised version of all the fake-Labour politicos, nothing more, nothing really genuine. As Hodges said, Reform would still win this easily, were it not for the Restore candidature.

What I take away from that poll is that, in that constituency, in 2026, about 47% of the voters are at least conservative-national, even if not social-national. At a guess, though, about 30%-40% of the voters are social-national, and would support a social-national government whether it won elections or simply seized power some other way. Another ~10%, maybe more, would also play ball.

Unfortunately, the usual (((poison))) has already been injected into Reform, and the same, at a lower dosage, into Restore. Neither are the answer to the country’s problems.

It is almost funny. The security organs —the police, MI5, SIS counter-espionage etc— put out huge efforts to catch “Russian agents” in a kind of Cold War “cosplay”, and put out more huge effort trying to identify and catch potential “terrorists”, those who might set off a bomb somewhere or other, or stab people in the street, yet all the time, in the background, the migration-invasion is changing the UK day by day, over time completely, and it is happening via “legal immigration”, illegal “small boat” invasion, and via invasion by births.

Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan. The naval and para-naval forces of the System are ferrying in the untermenschen. This is a conspiracy, and one operating in plain view.