Afternoon music
Saturday quiz
Well, only 4/10 this week, but enough to beat political journalist John Rentoul (again). He only scored 1/10.
I knew the answers to questions 3, 4, 5, and 6.
General knowledge is not everything, but it is disturbing to see John Rentoul’s consistently low scores as he continues to opine on war and peace, geopolitics, grand strategy etc; disturbing, too, that many seem to take him seriously. A scribbler/talking head, and always parroting the NWO/ZOG line.
Tweets seen
The very idea that Britain could “win” a war against Russia is just laughable, or would be, were it not the case that such a war would result in this country being turned into a smoking, irradiated ruin.
Russia has over 6,000 nuclear weapons. Britain has 200-300.
Yes, Britain, acting alone, could probably land 50-100 nuclear missiles on major Russian cities and military bases. Russia, however, in essence, would survive. Could Britain survive if all major cities and towns were to be destroyed? (Britain not being big enough to locate ports and air bases away from major population centres).
Of course, back in 1972, the British people had more self-confidence. Britain had not, not to the extent of today, been swamped by migrant-invaders, and could still justifiably think of itself as a world power, albeit not a superpower.
[“John Rentoul’s statement claims Britain could win a war against Russia, emphasizing UK’s economic edge (GDP ~$4T vs Russia’s $2.5T) for long-term deterrence. However, military analyses from Global Firepower, IISS, and BBC show Russia vastly superior in manpower (1.3M vs 108K), aircraft, tanks, and nukes. A solo UK win is implausible. Delusion rating: 8/10.”]
I was unable to read Rentoul’s article because you have to pay, and I will not pay to read (evident) nonsense. If he means that Britain could somehow defeat Russia using conventional arms, in the Baltic, that would be equally crazed. Britain’s army is only about 70,000-strong now, and mostly rear-echelon, with perhaps as few as 15,000 truly battle-ready.
Even if Rentoul is suggesting that Britain is capable of defeating Russia in collaboration with France, Germany, Poland etc, that still comes up against the little problem of those 6,000+ nuclear weapons…
In any case, does Rentoul think that now-puny Britain, even with allies, could occupy Russia? Mad. Napoleon failed. Hitler failed. Look at their strength of will, and their massive and previously-successful armies, yet still they both failed, comprehensively so.
Rentoul needs to look again at history if he imagines that even an economically-booming Britain (of which there is no sign anyway) could somehow overwhelm Russia. History teaches, time and again, that economically prosperous and developed peoples are often defeated by relatively poor but militarily-strong peoples.
Of course, Starmer-stein has no chance of creating a wealthy, high-defence-spending UK anyway. The UK is importing a million blacks and browns each year; most are, at best, parasites, and many are actively criminal and/or hostile to us. That alone…
Apart from that, only deluded people would even want to fight for Britain as it now is. Many of the more gung-ho, if one reads newspaper comment columns, seem to be people aged 50+ or 60+ who, most of them, have never even served in a mobile laundry unit, let alone at the cutting edge or spearhead.
Finally, what makes Rentoul (and similar System drones) think that it is even necessary to confront, let alone fight with, Russia? Russia has no wish to to take on the burden of ruling Western Europe (which should be our only serious concern). Russia no longer has Marxist-Leninist ideology, or any wish for the world to go socialist/communist. Russia itself has moved from that over the past 30-40 years.
Britain should sort itself out, not try to create an unnecessary war with Russia, particularly around the corrupt, brutal Jew-Zionist dictatorship of Zelensky and his cronies in Kiev.
…and who is invading Britain? Not Russia!…
In a single day…
I think that I can claim that this blog (actually, before the blog, my Twitter/X account, which was closed down in 2018 at the instigation of a pack of Jew-Zionists) was the first to use the terms “migration invasion” and “migrant invaders“.
…and who is invading France? Not Russia!…
[“*Trump expels illegal migrants and protects his borders*
EU: Fascism!
*France sends armoured vehicles against its own population on the orders of unelected EU bureaucrats*
EU: Democracy and freedom!“
Billions for Ukraine… Billions for migrants… Crumbs, regulations, and armored vehicles for the farmers who feed us… It disgusts me…“]
If I were to say “rats leaving the sinking ship“, it would sound disrespectful to them, and the majority of the Poles in the UK are quite decent people, but the fact is that they, and quite rightly, see the writing on the wall here.
Poland, of course, has itself changed out of all recognition since I made several visits there in the late 1980s. Completely different.
Incidentally, in the past 20 years, and in real terms, the typical pay of a British employee has remained static; in the same period, the average or typical take-home pay of Polish people in Poland, in real terms, has quadrupled.
Yes. Football rubbish, “X Factor“/Eurovision/Strictly Come Dancing rubbish etc.
An interview with Nick Griffin
https://nickgriffin544956.substack.com/p/when-enoch-powell-nearly-killed-nick
Well worth watching.
More tweets
That is what “they” do to suppress freedom of expression, free speech, and free examination of —and also revision of— what we call “history”.
All very clever but, as noted before on the blog, while people play these anachronistic spy games, Europe, including the UK, has actually been and is still being invaded, and quite literally raped and pillaged, but not by the big bad Russians…
Of course, Bill Browder is a part-Jew carpetbagger, one of a whole host of such individuals who drained Russia dry in the 1990s: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Browder; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Browder#Family_background; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Browder#Career_and_citizenship.
Late tweets seen
A polite man compared to most msm types. He tweeted once or twice to me many years ago.
What a shock— one of “them” being a negative and degenerate influence…(wake up, Goodwin).
The Green Party has very little in it now that is really “green”.
See also:
9 out of 10 “public inquiries” are a complete waste of time and money, and are the British way of kicking a can down the road (and giving millions in fees to overpaid legal types).
Translates to a Commons with about 394 Reform MPs (very big overall majority), 71 Lab, 56 LibDems, 44 SNP, 35 Cons, and 14 Greens [etc].
One of the aspects of the Reform upsurge that I like the best is the shattered dreams of the little Con and Lab, (but especially Con) careerists. I think that I am often an affable sort of chap but, well, not always. Don’t rely on it.
See also:
[“We haven’t lived in a just society in decades. I’d rather besmirch my name for advocating for what I believe in and not be employable until a fair government for the natives is placed in parliament. I have a lot less to lose financially speaking up than others which is why I’m doing this. I just want a homogenous society of mainly ethnically English/British and Europeans. I believe the White race is the only way our society can thrive and democracy to be effective. We are currently 8% of the global population. We are dying out. Our race is more important than my future career currently.“]
Brava!
Brava!
Late music
Ian Robert Millard 