Well, this week I did not do so well. Only 4/10, one of my worst-ever scores. John Rentoul got 6/10. I did not know the answers to questions 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 10.
The police are now “too busy” (in their own minds, “too important”) to deal with the real crimes that matter to most people, just as most nurses are too busy or too important to deal with basic cleanliness of hospitals, (so cleaning has been outsourced to useless private companies).
The police, infested by Common Purpose etc, now seem more interested in censoring online or other opinion, and acting as a poundland KGB.
“Here is the Mattel company, with its new range of trouser-wearing, white-coated, stethoscoped ‘role model’ Barbies, frantically sucking up to the Spirit of the Age.
Not all of them are vaccine inventors like Dame Sarah. One is described as a ‘frontline worker’ who ‘joined forces with other Asian-American medics to fight racial bias in the pandemic’. Another is a psychiatrist who has ‘campaigned against systemic racism in the healthcare profession’.
And so once again we see a major corporation making its peace with the new regime. There is barely any company, institution, school, publication or church which has not done the same, or is not about to do it.
People who would have laughed at ‘loony Left’ councils 30 years ago now use language and follow rules which they once mocked when Ken Livingstone and his allies proposed them.
Those who claim to despise Jeremy Corbyn often follow the ideas he helped devise…
And it is not just that they join in. They are afraid to criticise. Huge areas of opinion are now closed off from discussion, for fear of cancellation, advertising boycotts, and generally being cast into the outer darkness.
With gathering speed and completeness, a total revolution in thought and morals is taking hold of Western societies, just at the moment when they should be girding themselves against pressure to become more like China.
The zero-Covid fanatics, ready to throttle our society in pursuit of an illusion of perfect safety, have greatly benefited from this. And in the weeks to come the zealots of man-made global warming will press their dogmatic agenda and their demands that we impoverish ourselves to save the planet (demands China refuses to follow).
If all this had happened in a few weeks, while Red Guards slouched on street corners and the leaders of the old regime were dragged off to the firing squad, we’d see it for what it is. But, as long as there are enough loo-rolls in the supermarket, and the electricity keeps flowing, most people will never notice the revolution raging all around them.” [Peter Hitchens, in the Mail on Sunday].
Hitchens’ column this week is also worth reading for comment about both the ever-shrinking British naval reach, and the facemask nonsense.
GB News
I have still not watched the doomed GB News “controlled opposition” TV station. I have watched a few clips on Twitter. Today I saw another grovelling interview of a character from the malicious Jew-Zionist pressure group and fake “charity” calling itself “Campaign Against Antisemitism”. This time it was CAA “Chief Executive” Gideon Falter.
The interviewer was one Michelle Dewberry [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelle_Dewberry], described (I think rather kindly) by Wikipedia as “businesswoman, politician, presenter, and media personality.“
The “businesswoman” bit seems to be based on two small businesses started 15-20 years ago, both of which seem to have bombed, though information seems limited.
As for “politician”, that seems to be founded on her two unsuccessful attempts to be elected as MP (once as Independent, once for Brexit Party).
As interviewer, I thought her grovellingly unwilling to challenge Falter. Other impressions? Semi-coherent, biased in presentation, and actually rather dull.
I do not suppose that Michelle Dewberry will find life tough once this TV station (pretending to be a media outlet for dissidence) collapses: she has a rather wealthy boyfriend [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_Jordan#Personal_life].
How long before GB News does collapse? At a guess, 6-12 months.
[Update, 7 August 2022: seems that I was premature in predicting that GB News would disappear within 12 months. It is still around, though I myself have still not seen it even once.
GB News’ most recent filed profit/loss, only up to May 2021, shows a loss of £2.7M.
Interesting, and reminiscent, in my view, of those Hindu pictures showing Krishna in the middle.
Breaking news: Cornish web radio host gets 32 months for 'hate speech'.
Having allowed his big mouth to get him into this mess, Hart pleaded guilty, grovelled & gave up. Utterly pointless & an object lesson in the dangers of big talk.#fedpost#gobshitehttps://t.co/d1L3KMTsyV
While I hear what Nick Griffin says, I think that it is wrong to kick someone who is down, particularly on these facts, and particularly when the individual concerned has been targeted by both the malicious “Campaign Against Antisemitism” [“CAA”] fake “charity” and the collusive NWO/ZOG police state.
Where I tend to agree with Griffin, if that is part of his point, is that broadcasting podcasts etc has only a limited utility because podcasts etc have only a limited reach. I myself had not heard of the defendant concerned until his arrest some months ago. I had not heard any of his material.
If I, someone interested in political and dissident matters, had heard nothing of that defendant (not even his name), how many members of the public generally will have heard of the man or his material? Few, it seems to me.
Of course, it is wrong that the defendant was ever prosecuted, and the sentence (for expressing opinions) savage (akin to what might happen in jurisdictions such as Belarus).
Freedom of expression on social, political and historical topics should be absolute. It is good news that the Law Commission has recommended the repeal of the very bad law known as Communications Act 2003, s.127, but that has not happened yet. Meanwhile, other repressive laws may soon be enacted, and the Zionist lobby continues its evil and malicious activity.
As I have frequently blogged, the self-describing “Left” (pseudo-socialist tendency) has nothing to say any more; nothing to say at all about ways to improve society, nothing to say to the British people. All that such one-time rebels and would-be revolutionaries now have is a farrago of nonsense based around “anti-racism”, “anti-sexism” and “anti-fascism”.
The result of the above is that their biggest joy is to see someone, labelled “Nazi” or “fascist”, “deplatformed”, i.e. expelled from Twitter or Facebook, or (best of all) sacked from a job or a professional status. To that end, the “socialists” laud to the skies the titans of contemporary capitalism: Google, YouTube, Twitter, Facebook etc, and loudly proclaim that the “deplatformed” have no right of appeal, because such organizations are private-enterprise bodies with “terms and conditions of service” that cannot be appealed against…
How pathetic is that?! The one-time world-shaking “socialists” etc have just become serfs of the New World Order and its mega-capitalism…
In some countries, at some times, a fraudster and exploiter of that sort would have been taken down, either by the State, or by others. Not now, not in 2021 Britain. Predatory criminals of that sort think (with reason) that they can get away with it. They are right. They can. So far.
They’ll break the NHS, the already broken housing will just collapse! Bankrupt the Country via benefits & terror watch list & you’ll have to lock up your children & barricade your doors in many locations plus curfews. Curtesy of @pritipate & @BorisJohnsonpic.twitter.com/qT7qOs3lDD
The world now needs only about 10% of its present population. That 10% should be entirely, or largely, composed of white Northern Europeans. That will provide a foundation for the future evolution of humanity, including, most importantly, the evolution of consciousness.
A very truncated blog post today (by reason of a computer connection problem), so I shall write a little tonight, then add more tomorrow.
Facemask nonsense
While running a few errands yesterday (in the American phrase), I saw quite a few silly people still wearing masks even outdoors, including several people wearing them while walking on a clifftop overlooking the Channel! In a strong breeze of at least 15 mph, at that! I saw one family, a man, woman and two small children, all masked on the clifftop! They must have noticed my gaze, or realized the absurdity of their behaviour, because I noticed that when they walked back 10 minutes later, only the woman was still wearing the mask.
Admittedly, most people were not wearing the masks outdoors, but in a Tesco supermarket about 6 miles from my home, more wearing masks than not. However, no-one looked oddly at unmasked me, let alone said some, or any, virtue-signalling nonsense.
I get the impression that, now, the facemasks are less about any perceived (wrongly imagined) health benefits and more about saying “look, I am a member of the virtue-signallers’ tribe”…
Oddly, in view of the fact that most Jews (at least on Twitter) seem to be facemask zealots, I saw a horrible-looking Jewish woman unmasked; not at that supermarket, but in a large village somewhat inland; she was with not only three small children (one actually wearing one of those skullcaps…a yarmulka?), but also two even younger ones, pushed in a double pushchair. None were masked, in fact. An unpleasant sight all the same. An unusual thing to see in this part of the world.
Having said that, I wonder whether Israel can be eliminated within the next, say, 10 years? If so, the centre of the worldwide web would be gone. That would certainly be strategically-good news.
You tell the doctor, Petey! But I'd look him up before lecturing him too sternly on the subject. Amusingly, I'm sure you'd be among those telling *me* I'm not an expert.And I'm not. But here we have a risk manager instructing a UCL medical doctor and epidemiologist on masks. https://t.co/O5Gm6M3tWI
If Lloyds Bank can’t even sustain a branch 200 yards from Oxford Circus, how long before there are no bank branches at all? Closure notice, Upper Regent Street. pic.twitter.com/4unrahXMgA
Society is moving towards the individual becoming totally dependent on centralized control.
The abuse spans the period when the police in #Bradford & other northern towns were accusing complaining parents, and campaigning BNP activists, of 'racism' for daring to speak of this. They refused to lift a finger. Still, better late than never!https://t.co/BfnXRm1Of7
So did the late, great Christopher Booker. The campaign to restore our political independence was hijacked by a collection of Ultra-Thatcherite free trade buccaneers, who couldn't care less about this country's history and institutions. https://t.co/JKV2HNxjhJ
Also note in the Guantanamo *pictures* 20 years ago that the chained prisoners are in several cases wearing little blue cloth masks. Hard to see what purpose they serve – except to emphasise the submission and subservience of the captives. https://t.co/7yxY1EAkmc
Lest we forget. Please read this excellent, dispiriting article about the War on Freedom. DAVID ROSE reveals the savagery at Guantanamo Bay https://t.co/orPD4gaVko via @MailOnline
Now that Fiona Onasanya is no longer an MP, Claudia Webbe may be the flag-carrier for thick-as-two-short-planks non-white female MPs in the Commons. Painfully thick.
Ha. Quite. Seems that the holes in cloth masks are 500,000x the size of “Covid-19” particles. In other words, facemasks are all but pointless. The main reason millions of “rabbits” are still wearing them (many even outside!) is because those deluded people want to proclaim that they are members of the tribe and/or good compliant citizen-serfs.
A couple of days ago, I saw two teenage girls, maybe 16-17, talking on the high street of a small town. Strong sunshine, a fairly strong breeze, no people anywhere near them either, and they were both wearing facemasks! One black mask and one polka dot mask. The masks did not match their outer clothing, anyway! Why were they behaving like that? God knows. Social conditioning. MSM conditioning. Such people are beyond reach. I drove on, shaking my head…
The illicit purported “laws” are now in place. Should the government of clowns want to mandate facemasks again, say in November, or December, 2021, and on some spurious biosecurity ground, they will be able to do so, and millions of citizen-serfs will obey, at once.
1/2 Of course it is about whether masks work @mrssarahmurray. That was its stated purpose. And the study said there was no statistically significant difference for the infection outcomes between those who wore tham and those who didn't. https://t.co/y87FpwkQXO
Indeed @briwright70. The UK Department for Business and Enterprise used the wording 'the evidence of the benefit of using a face covering to protect others is weak and the effect is likley to be small' in many guides to businessmen in June 2020. Then masks were politicised. https://t.co/aN2o37uver
Israel doesn't murder children exclusively. Stats prove that. They focus on children whether it's live fire or administrative detention. Or wounding. Or multiple rounds into a soccer players foot denying them a future. Israel is one of the worst human rights abusers in the world.
“Bronco Bullfrog@BroncoBullfrog_·Replying to @jackscht and @MaierVivThis is the tiny memorial to honour the British men and women killed by Zionist terrorists in Palestine. It was funded by the families of those killed because the British government refused to pay for it.”
Peter Hitchens: "Brexit was designed to save the Conservative Party rather than the country…..and that's what it ended up doing….Instead of being dominated by Brussels we are now pushed around by China. I don't see that as much of a swap frankly."https://t.co/BOMs8ZyoX0
In the end, only a synthesis of old-style National Socialism with new social nationalism, the better aspects of old-style socialism, and the less raw aspects of private enterprise, all combined in a new way, can save Europe now.
Late music
[“Russia has no borders; it is wherever there are Russians”]
I have not watched GB News as such, but today saw an interview via Twitter. The interviewee was the sinister Jew-Zionist, Stephen Silverman, “Head of Investigations and Enforcement” at the fake “charity” known as “Campaign Against Antisemitism” or “CAA”.
The interview on GB News was not so much an interview, more the presenters allowing Silverman to make a long and dull statement whining about how Twitter had seen through the fake CAA “charity” and had then binned the CAA as a “partner organization” re. issues around supposed “antisemitism”.
Silverman also (as usual) promoted the idea that there should be even more repression of free speech in the UK.
At the end of the “interview”, the Halligan person thanked Silverman for coming on to the show, and expressed how welcome he was at GB News.
I suppose that the Halligan person was unaware that Silverman was (despite having hidden his identity behind fake names and multiple Twitter accounts) actually exposed in open court a few years ago as one of several connected Jewish-Zionist trolls, all connected with the CAA, and who harassed several people (mainly women) online as well as offline, e.g. by making false and malicious complaint to various police forces about people, some of whom (see my experience above) were actually asked to “voluntary” interviews with police before the matters were dropped.
As for Gloria de Piero, a typical “put a beggar on a horse and he/she rides it to death” careerist chancer, typical of Blair/Brown “Labour”.
I read, in the msm and elsewhere, that GB News is so lacking in viewers that some shows are at statistical zero in terms of audience or viewership. It seems to be another typical front for Jew-Zionism and the NWO, posing (sometimes) as a “free speech” and “conservative” TV station. It’s a fake. Bin it.
We're going to kill them with the horrible disease that's so very horrible, we don't even know we've got it and it hasn't killed us because it's just waiting to kill a vaccinated person because it can't be bothered making a non-vaccinated person even sneeze a bit.
2/2 Jonni Baby @jdportes … a huge pro-mask RCT failed to shift the existing position by one eighth of an inch.There was still no evidence masks were any use.Under the circs this *was*conclusive. That is why news of it was suppressed, and those who report it are attacked. QED https://t.co/ydEYMgGOPd
It would be interesting to know why Jews are almost all (apparently) in favour of facemask use. They probably think that it is because they are (in their own opinion) more intelligent than non-Jews, but experience has taught me and others a different lesson.
I am uninterested in *opinions* on experimental fact @punkopaque. The unique Danmask RCT wildly outclasses any other work on this, and even so fails to shift the status quo.Loose cloth masks are largely futile. https://t.co/OXqOzappkn
Exactly. Two people I know went down (if such be the bon mot) with “the virus”: my 20-something Australian niece (in London), who was told to drink water and take a few Paracetomol, and my then 99-y-o mother-in-law. The first recovered within a couple of weeks, the second never had any symptoms at all (routine testing in hospital discovered her supposed infection).
@martinbright I did in fact watch 'Official Secrets' this evening. It's a fine film. I'm especially puzzled as to why you, having gone through that, don't see any difficulty with the current enthusiasm for attacking Syria, and the similarity with the search for a pretext for it.
Reply to Martin Bright, of “Index on Censorship”…now headed by Ruth Smeeth, the half-Jew/Zionist pro-Israel propagandist, former Labour MP, and former “strictly protected” confidential contact of the US Embassy…https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruth_Smeeth.
As I have blogged before, there is a large bloc of people in the UK who basically want to be controlled, told what to do, what to wear, what to think. Many are “Remainers”, many are (self-proclaimed) “antifascists”, and those on Twitter are often the (usually) idiotic who say that they are “FBPE” etc.
@djbradshaw64. Gosh that is convenient. So there'll never be any actual hard evidence, but we'll have to be told what to do anyway. Silly old Danes, eh? https://t.co/tr0c1HLYbK
Citations are never more necessary than when one is disputing conventional wisdom and presumption, or we'd still think the sun went round the earth @lauramblumberg. Those who dislike scepticism have no idea how science works. https://t.co/IvHLgGQYv3
1/3 @brianco48405777 I left school at 15, and joined the International Socilaists at 17. I was a Trotskyist when left-wing sympathies were far less widespread than now, and though I now regard the position as mistaken and wrong, it required thought and a willingness to dissent. https://t.co/iqJllodvo5
Not sure that I agree with Hitchens here. The few Trotskyists and similar “Leftists” I knew at and immediately after school were all pedestrian in mentality. Some claimed to be both Communist and anarchist! Trotskyism —a dummy intellectuality for the mediocre. Surprisingly (?), many Trotskyists have always been Jew or part-Jew (as, latter, is Hitchens).
I am also not in agreement with Hitchens when he refers to “Left wing” sympathies having been less popular in the (?) 1970s or late 1960s. I myself never use the terms “Left” and “Right” as meaningful, but certainly socialism of the old sort is just passe now, nicht wahr?
MPs whine about living conditions of economic migrants, but say nothing about the fact that huge numbers of British families live in far worse conditions.#homelesshttps://t.co/fcxcobyLxx
Why is the country having Holocaust memorial shoved down their throats when it’s sinister Zionists who incite hatred who need educating? https://t.co/8mrBVbTKzq
Baroness Altmann keeps going on about being a minority… so what’s the ratio of peerages within the Zionist Jewish community compared with the non-Zionist Jewish community? #newsnight
The above tweet typifies not only the view of John Rentoul, but also of the “New Labour” type of System commentator (and politician) generally. They think that politicians should —mainly— find out the public/msm view (via polling, focus groups etc) then do whatever that research suggests in order to be going with the popular tide; to be “electable”. I disagree. Leaders must lead, must make judgments based on their own views and assessments.
In 1928, Hitler and the NSDAP were very definitely not popular. They got only 2.8% of the popular vote. However, their integrity and vision impressed that same fickle public when, after the collapse of the world finance-capitalist economy in 1929, the vision of a German renaissance was held out. The NSDAP scored 33% in 1932 and, with Hitler as Chancellor, 44% in 1933.
Dominic Cummings. What a very odd little man. How did someone like that attach himself to the very top of government in the UK? On the other hand, the same might be asked of Boris Johnson.
I am SO pleased to see that the lead comment piece in @thetimes today is Matthew Parris on prisoners serving IPP sentences. It’s an issue which the public need to understand and be outraged by.https://t.co/qDgX3OqSoc
The sort of issue which happens when a superficially “liberal” regime (such as under the “Labour”-label governments from 1997-2010) passes kneejerk laws “for public protection”, but which scarcely protect the public while at the same time trashing the true rule of law and civil rights. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imprisonment_for_public_protection.
There have been other such laws, such as the very bad law known as Communications Act 2003, s.127, under whch jokers, satirists, socio-political commentators, and those discussing the fakery around the “holocaust” narrative have been harassed and even imprisoned. Singer-songwriter Alison Chabloz for one.
Section 127 of the Communications Act 2003 may now face repeal, following the recent report by the Law Commission, but there are a number of other “kneejerk” laws still standing, such as that by which almost all firearms were criminalized in 1997. As usual emotion led thought: only three “gun massacres” have occurred in British civil history, of which two were pre-1997 (Dunblane and Hungerford).
As a result of politicians wanting to get public approbation for “doing something”, privately held pistols were effectively banned, even if held by clubs. Has that stopped “gun crime”? No. There was a later “spree shooting” (in 2011) by someone using licensed shotguns and rifles, and there have been innumerable shootings by criminal gangs and individuals.
More tweets
Just a reminder that #lockdown has been a far from victimless crime. The cruelty of the #GreatReset is only just beginning, but the consequences will be suffered by all if us.https://t.co/Pkuyeu1N7C
A couple of rounds costs about £1. Cheap at the price.
‘As if Rotherham, Rochdale, Telford and other places were not enough, last week we had another local authority child sex abuse scandal, this time from Lambeth.’
Priti Patel is not only as thick as two short planks, she is also a proven colluder with (agent of, more or less) the Israeli state and the Jewish lobby (which is 99% pro-migration-invasion); further, she is herself, effectively, a migrant-invader, who would have been serving behind the counter of a Kampala grocery store had her parents not come to the UK.
Apsana Begum
Where does one start? First of all (obviously), she is not of English or British origins: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apsana_Begum. Secondly, she has (of course) never had a real job, just political agitation and the usual “diversity” and “anti-racism” bs.
““In response to allegations that the ex-Mayor Lutfur Rahman was behind her political career, Begum told Eastlondonlines: “It is grossly insulting, as well as being rooted in racism and misogyny, to assume that I have no agency of my own and that I must be a ‘proxy’ or ‘stooge’ for a man I have not spoken to for six years.” [Wikipedia]
Strangely enough, her defence at her recent fraud trial was quite or almost the reverse: that she had been coerced into doing things by her estranged husband…
I presume that Apsana Begum is still living in her council flat. While, in principle, I have no objection to an MP living in a council flat, MPs do get paid about £85,000 a year (plus fairly generous expenses), so it does seem unfair on the poor and homeless of Tower Hamlets that she continues to occupy a cheap flat when she could afford a better private one (or to buy one on a mortgage), and bearing in mind that Limehouse and Tower Hamlets is a safe Labour seat (and near-rotten borough), so she can probably expect to be the MP for a long long time (unless a national revolution occurs, please God).
In England, it is unlawful for newspapers or others to enquire about the detailed composition or views of members of a jury during or even after a trial, so we do not know the racial and/or religious composition of that acquitting jury. Pity…
No doubt, after any denouement, the new System MP for Batley and Spen, Kim Leadbeater, will say a few appropriate weasel words…
'Whichever way they turn, in the hope of finding some sort of rescue from lawlessness and disorder, those who once hoped for these things from the Tory Party see nothing but surrender and weakness'.https://t.co/KFBmurQi1h via @MailOnline
I have heard a number of well-authenticated stories about well-known msm “celebrities” and MPs. The UK needs a very wideranging cultural, political, and social purge, on a scale rivalling those of the 20thC dictatorships. Evil and decadence must be rooted out. Ausrotten!…
Signed copies of my book 'The Cameron Delusion' in which I explain the Blairite takeover of the Tories, the death of our adversarial Parliament and the subjugation of most political reporting to Downing Street, available now from Blackwells bookshop in Oxford 01865 792792 pic.twitter.com/tafjcT2KS8
Of all the countries in the world, the one I would have thought, years ago, would be least likely to turn into an NWO/ZOG “woke” dictatorship or tyranny would have been Australia, where I myself was at school for three years in the late 1960s (Middle Harbour PS and North Sydney Boys’ High).
Seems that times have changed, to put it tritely.
I was friendly, in 1996-97, with the Australian Ambassador to Kazakhstan, and his lady ambassadress. He updated me, when he and his wife were my guests at dinner (at my favourite small Georgian restaurant, where I and guests were usually the only diners) on the demographic changes since the 1960s, in particular the huge increase of both population and built area (especially in and around Sydney, where I had been as a child, living in Mosman and then Cremorne).
That population explosion and suburban expansion has continued.
In the late 1960s, Sydney had about 2.5M inhabitants; now it is 5.5M. Australia as a whole had about 12M people; now about 25M.
The dried out bush breaks off from its roots, travelling along barren landscapes, far and wide so seedlings can flourish without competition from other plants.
Jews selling organs of poor people, for use mainly in Israel…
If you’ve been vaccinated against measles, whooping cough, Flu, Polio etc, would you refuse to go on a cruise or plane unless all other passengers were also vaccinated against those things? I bet it’s never even crossed your mind.
Did you know that if you type 'vaccinate' into twitter, they've programmed the system to add a V-for-Victory salute? Or perhaps it means 'fuck you, peasants'. Here, I'll show you; take a look at how the elite brainwashing programme is relentless…#vaccinate#BigLiepic.twitter.com/kuwL55hTlK
“A woman who shielded for nine months was killed on her first day out after being hit by a lorry while searching for a face mask in her handbag.Sarah Lewis was struck by the vehicle on November 16, 2020 after stepping into its blind spot while untangling a face covering from her belongings.” [Daily Telegraph] https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/07/21/woman-killed-lorry-first-day-shielding-nine-months/.
I myself have saved not only reckless pheasant and pigeons (not to mention a number of cats) from certain death on the road recently, but several equally-reckless human persons, including one old lady and one young girl, both of whom insisted on stepping in front of my car while muzzled, and also engrossed in what I took to be mobile telephones.
Look at that Patel bitch! Smirking…Well, of course she is smirking! Instead of spending her life serving behind the counter of a Kampala grocery shop, she is a “British” Cabinet minister! She may be rubbish at her job, she may be thick as two short planks, but there she is… sitting there…(and dragging down a few hundred thousand a year as well).
So 50 men in designer clothes carried this through Calais and no-one noticed? pic.twitter.com/qojB8lYwyd
So it now looks like I'm losing my job of 23 years as a gardener at the same care home cos I don't want an experimental jab that may or may not help 🤬🤬🤬
At a time when the British state is using coercion against its citizens to take the vaccine, where are the so-called human rights groups and activists in the UK who have not shown the slightest bit of concern about the most severe infringement on the civil liberties of Britons?
— Dr. Marcus Papadopoulos (@DrMarcusP) July 19, 2021
I myself have heard verified accounts of how some people with serious conditions are now effectively barred from getting necessary scans and/or treatments because unwilling to have the painful and intrusive “Covid tests” before being allowed into the precincts of the therapeutic clinics.
Tweets seen
He talks so much rubbish and he never feels compelled to substantiate or delineate his reasoning behind any of his grandiose pronouncements and conclusions. And once he leaves the sinking ship HMS Starmer people on the left will welcome him back with open arms. https://t.co/DJzSjWduRd
I have blogged about Paul Mason previously. When he writes about economics, he can be interesting, but when he writes or speaks about politics, he is ludicrous. His political viewpoint seems to be a kind of anarcho-syndicalist/Trotskyist/general “Leftist” mixture which leaves both history and good sense far behind.
Why does Mason support Jewish-lobby puppet, Keir Starmer? Well, that is an open question. Mason is part-Jew, like Owen Jones and other msm talking heads, so that may be part of it. There again, it may be that Mason thinks that “mainstream” Labour is still the only political game in town apart from the equally-misnamed Conservative Party. He may therefore imagine that he can perhaps influence Starmer-Labour, and so rescue himself from being a fringe commentator.
For all I know, Mason may even harbour ambitions to become a Labour MP and then something more, such as, in time, a major Labour Party figure. Who knows?
That may seem to be absurd, but perhaps less so than “Boris” becoming a Cabinet minister and then Prime Minister…if one political bad joke can rise high, why not another? After all, it happened not only to “Boris” but to Priti Patel, Sajid Javid, Grant Shapps, Matt Hancock etc. A similar case: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yanis_Varoufakis.
Never say never…
This not a particularly good piece on the fanatic running the #Assange prosecution. But it is a rare one. Mark that the "free" US press has blacked out the #Assange case, yet no serious journalist is safe if this extremist wins.https://t.co/bI3fsjQMpC
The prosecutor? “Gordon Kromberg“. Every. Single. Time.
A friend just got a 24 hour #facebook ban for this. Even if you believe in the elite narrative on the #pandemic, that level of censorship & manipulation of public opinion by a giant corporation should worry you. "First they came for the …." pic.twitter.com/jBu0Jn1xf0
They never give up . Full page propaganda advertisement today. Mask-wearers, in my experience, need no encouragement. So what’s the aim? pic.twitter.com/09uU08HICQ
An excellent riposte here to another person mindlessly expounding the silly view that ‘scientist’ means ‘wise person who cannot possibly be wrong or have his opinion questioned’. https://t.co/QtTaWXLNNy
Another myth is that a scientist is, ipso facto, honest. We have seen enough fakery around the “climate change” narrative to have a different view. For example, that scientist (whose name I forget) at the UN IPCC (and University of East Anglia) who colluded with the Indian at the IPCC to falsify data, so that the public would believe the “climate change” narrative more readily.
That was about 13 years ago, about the same time as said Indian claimed that the Himalayan glaciers would cease to exist by about 2015, leading to the Ganges, Brahmaputra, Indus and other rivers running dry. Not yet, anyway.
Many will recall the Al Gore film, An Inconvenient Truth, with its claims that, inter alia, “climate change” caused the Aral Sea to dry up (no, it was caused by the mad diversion of rivers in order to support cotton production: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aral_Sea).
That is without even starting on certain “historical” untruths…scientists are not necessarily any more credible than historians, when they depend on certain “narratives” for their careers, publishing etc.
I was last on Question Time in March 2018 @pbfromdevon. As I had been on pretty much every year since 1996, it can't have been because I was no good. My own view is that the pictures got smaller. https://t.co/XN380C4aoY
Mr. Hitchens, a journalist, is obsessed with the largest current event since 9/11. So very strange.
— Lucius Sergius Catilina (@CatilinaSergius) July 22, 2021
A year from now, you will wish you had acted to stop the legalisation of e-scooters, bone-breaking menaces which, if legalised, will mean the safety of pavements, paths and parks will be a distant memory. Please, write now to your MP It is quick and easy. https://t.co/NvqnYvAbQphttps://t.co/cFKc4Nn4SA
Peter Hitchens has an almost touching faith in the efficacy of writing to MPs. That is one rather big delusion (though I like much of what he writes). I do not know what might change the mind of the clowns now posing as MPs. Not letters, anyway…
Those once-fine old English/British institutions such as the RSPB, RNLI, National Trust etc have all been taken over by the enemy, the fake communitarians of Common Purpose, “BLM” etc. The enemy thus gets well-paid while subverting both the institution in question and the general society. A general purge is needed.
Personally ,I can't understand them !..They have been in Lockdown for over 16 months all that revenue gone,now they are turning custom away,why ?
— Janner1952.. First account .. 2006.. May 9 1952 (@Janner19521952) July 22, 2021
The sort of rabbits that go around wearing facemasks are really the weak-minded who do what they think the mob wants. “Everybody” does it, think they. In fact, I would go so far as to say that if you see someone masked or muzzled when the law does not mandate it, that person can probably be written off as a free or independent thinker.
Glad to see that I am not the only person awake! Ouspensky [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P._D._Ouspensky] once had an experience in the street in which he perceived that all others in that street were actually asleep, not really awake…
I was in Australia for 3 years in the late 1960s, and attended school there (Middle Harbour PS and North Sydney Boys’ High). I have come to understand that basically Anglo countries such as Australia and the UK are held back by their basic philistinism; in other words, by their prioritizing of mass spectator sport and mass TV rubbish over thinking freely.
Thus, the System can easily impose a biosecurity police state, or import millions of backward people from Africa, Asia, Caribbean, without the slightest serious challenge from the people, because what matters to the (so far) majority white population is not spirituality, philosophy, history, good government, even logic, but winning some televised sporting pleb-fest on the other side of the world.
Legal action cannot usually be taken against a bankrupt, but the issuance of proceedings for legal action in this case preceded the bankruptcy petition.
It will be recalled that I blogged prolifically about the supposed legal action (in harassment, I think) being taken a couple of years ago by Twitter twit, “antifa” cheerleader and mental case Mike Stuchbery against Tommy Robinson. It never was likely to happen, as I said from the start. Now, it cannot. A bankrupt cannot usually be sued, as noted. Also, there would be no point in suing “Tommy Robinson” now, even if it could be done.
I suppose that that one will have to be filed with Stuchbery’s other fantasy libel actions (against stray Twitter users, a number of Danes who laughed at him, and against me!). He loves the idea that he might “clean them out”…
Never mind, he can also send me (yet another— he sent a couple in the past when he forgot to take his medication) would-be intimidating comment on my blog comments page. They made me laugh (which is “the best medicine”, it is said; not that I need any).
Stuchbery, with “Resisting Hate” Twitter troll Roanna Carleton Taylor (“@witchofpeace”, aka “@antifashwitch” and now “@oilpaintwitch”) launched a GoFundMe appeal to pay for action against “Robinson”. A Pakistani one-man solicitor firm was supposedly going to issue proceedings. As I guessed would prove to be the case, from the beginning, it never happened.
I still sometimes idly wonder what Roanna Carleton Taylor, Stuchbery, and the Pakistani did with the nearly £12,000 they were given (by a total of nearly 700 “antifascist” mugs). It certainly was not spent on legal work. It seems that the Pakistani drafted only one very short and very poor “letter before action” to Stephen Yaxley-Lennon (Tommy Robinson’s real name), which letter may not even have been delivered.
'pingdemic' is fucking peak twee english trivialisation. infuriating that editors continue to confront the reality: it's unmitigated infection not the app that is massively disrupting everyone's lives, livelihoods, health and sanity.
Possibly yet another Twitter user with mental health problems. I do not know. The “virus” infects many people, but only a tiny number have any symptoms; only a few (an even smaller proportion) need any medical help at all. A tiny tiny number die from or “with” this virus.
My 99-y-o mother-in-law only knew she had it after having been routinely tested while in hospital for a fracture; oh, and she contracted it in hospital, where all patients were constantly masked, an indictment of both the appallingly-poor hygiene in NHS hospitals and the uselessness of facemasks; she was discharged weeks later, still without symptoms.
My 20-something Australian niece (working in London) contracted the virus last year, but only required a few paracetomol tablets and a few weeks of rest. I know of no-one else at all who has knowingly contracted “Covid-19”.
One is not supposed to insult America by discussing Banks or France by discussing duelling; why should the Jews be the only people who refuse to be talked about intelligently?
The sooner all those Gulf micro-states bite the dust, the better.
-why do you talk about jews so much?
-because it’s extremely relevant to the situation at hand. When you’re being punched in the face, you don’t focus exclusively on the fist and try and rationalize it being swung at you independent of the person it’s attached to
As it happened: More than 600,000 people told to isolate by app – BBC News https://t.co/uDfWSF1LbL
— TheEndOfEverything (@EternalEnglish) July 22, 2021
The, so to speak, killer question…
I went into a supermarket, here in Devon, today. It was my first visit to one in over a year. Only saw one other chap not wearing a mask and there were lots of empty shelves. What a bloody depressing experience!
— TheEndOfEverything (@EternalEnglish) July 22, 2021
The British answer to the society of The Handmaid’s Tale…
And @peterfrot27, I shall leave you to get on with it. Your choice. Accusations of selfishness surely require hard material, experimental@and falsifiable evidence. Have you any? https://t.co/hhnP5i0Dwd
Egregious political chancer George Galloway saying that he is not “antisemitic” because, inter alia, when he was working undercover as a pro-ANC agent in South Africa in the 1980s, Jews were those who provided him with cars, overnight accommodation (and cash?) etc.
At that time, Galloway was General Secretary of War on Want, a supposed charity partly funded (then, though not now, I think) by the British taxpayer. It gets EU monies as well.
Galloway got into trouble over his expenses. He was cleared of actually stealing (embezzling), apparently, but all the same had to repay nearly £2,000 (worth maybe £10,000-£20,000 now). He never sued over allegations in the Daily Mirror that he had been enjoying “a life of luxury” at the expense of War on Want’s donors: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Galloway#War_on_Want.
The point Nick Griffin is making, and justly so, is that Jews are always behind any attacks on white Northern European culture and politics. There they were in South Africa, the Jews, making money, living in large numbers in the most expensive parts of Cape Town and Johannesburg (to the extent that white people in Africa used to call “Jo’burg”, “Jewburg“!), yet at the same time undermining the whole foundation of that society.
Now look at the UK, France, Germany, Scandinavia, USA, Canada, Australia etc…
As for Galloway, how pathetic is it that he, and many like him who are self-describing “Left” or “socialist” types, oppose Jewish hegemony and supremacism in Palestine, yet pay lip-service to Jews and the Jewish “community” in the UK, France etc? Truly pathetic.
On the pseudo-nationalist side of UK politics (as in the USA) you get people, especially those trying to make a living out of their activities, who loudly proclaim their (usually unwanted) allegiance to the Jews and Israel: Katie Hopkins, Breitbart, “Prison Planet” Watson, “Tommy Robinson” (Stephen Yaxley-Lennon), Anne Marie Waters, Jayda Fransen, “Sargon of Akkad” (Carl Benjamin) and others.
Politically-speaking, and in fact usually in general, foolish people. They are political nullities, dependent for their income —and such prominence as they have— on their social media profile. If that is taken away, they have nothing left.
More tweets seen
'Britain WILL defy Beijing by sending warships though disputed waters.' Better to station them off Dover to defend our shores than have them poking their noses into China's back yard. https://t.co/yfsnZ60nOj
Before the political midgets currently “ruling” the UK “defy” China in the South China Sea, they should take a look (Wikipedia has overviews) at the relative strengths of the Royal Navy of the UK, as against the Chinese navy. Britain has about 2 or 3 dozen large ships and submarines, and about 170 naval aircraft. The Chinese have some 600 ships and a similar number of naval aircraft. I suppose the idea is that the UK will be a poodle for American power, again…
The absurd irony is that, while Britain is undertaking gestures of the above sort, Chine people are flooding into the UK. Take a look at any British city. Boris-idiot has also invited up to 6 MILLION Hong Kong Chinese to live here.
Yes, they may be, some of them, anti-Peking. Don’t place too much reliance on that. Anyway, the numbers are huge, and will change our whole society.
1/2 @rupertmyers. Why is it bizarre? Are journalists not supposed to campaign against what they regard as policy errors, and to be alert to dangers before others? Why is it a 'fixation'? I have many other interests & concerns.The use of the term is little short of personal abuse. https://t.co/6RuP9sPnF1
2/2 @rupertmyers . Do you support the legalising of e-scooters? Then please say why. If not, why is my opposition to this measure 'tiresome'? I am at a loss to see what is 'myopic' about it. You are supposed to be a lawyer, yet you do little more than name-calling. https://t.co/6RuP9sPnF1
“The new “harm-based” communications offence 1.33 The offence that we recommend should replace section 127(1) of the CA 2003 and the MCA 1988 is an offence based on a communication’s potential for harm rather than on its content fitting within a proscribed category (such as “grossly offensive” or “indecent” content). Specifically, we recommend that it should be an offence for a person to send or post a communication (letter, electronic communication, or “article”, in the sense of “object”) that is likely to cause harm to a likely audience, intending that harm be caused to that likely audience. “Harm” for this purpose is defined as psychological harm amounting to at least serious distress.
1.34 This moves the focus away from broad categories of wrongful content, as we see in the current offences, to a more context-specific analysis: given those who were likely to see the communication, was harm likely or not likely? This formulation therefore ensures that, first, communications that are genuinely harmful do not escape criminal sanction merely because they cannot fit within one of the proscribed categories. Secondly, communications that lack the potential for harm are not criminalised merely because they might be described as grossly offensive or indecent etc.
1.36 The fault element for our recommended offence is set at a higher level of culpability than is the case under the current law: the defendant must intend to cause serious distress. Under section 127(1) CA 2003, the defendant need only have intended to have sent the communication of the proscribed character (ie they need not have intended any particular result). The MCA 1988 offence requires proof that the defendant intended to cause alarm or distress, which is the same fault element as harassment (but, notably, harassment requires a course of conduct, whereas the communications offence is complete at the point of sending a single communication). Our threshold is higher; it requires proof that the defendant intended to cause psychological harm amounting at least to serious distress.” [Law Commission report]
I have not yet read the full report, but what I have read so far seems to be (and could hardly not be) an improvement on the existing Communications Act 2003, s.127, which has been abused for years by Jew-Zionist cabals. notably the “Campaign Against Antisemitism” (fake charity) crowd.
I contributed (as a member of the public) to that report. What effect (if any) my contribution had, I have no idea. No matter. “The stars in their courses fight on the side of the just” [Chinese proverb].
I have noticed the same phenomena, more or less, at the Waitrose (the only fairly close local supermarket), a mile or two from my home. I was there yesterday. No-one wearing latex gloves, but 90% or more masked, and I even saw one idiot wearing a helmet with a visor, as though Ebola virus was about, rather than Covid-19 (which has killed about one in every thousand people in the UK, and a far smaller proportion where I live). Different ages, but the vast majority at least of retirement age, reflecting the age-demographic locally (and especially true of local Waitrose shoppers).
My grandfather’s pre-1914 encyclopaedia. Mention of ‘Tsarigrad’ reminds me that we secretly promised the Tsar he could have Constantinople in, I think, 1915, in return for help against the Germans. pic.twitter.com/PYc72eXXY4
The history of the middle and late 20thC would have been very different had that come to pass.
Amazing how few know that Ernest Marples, the man who destroyed much of our rail network, fled the country (by train) to avoid paying a huge tax bill. A scandal far bigger than Profumo, but almost wholly forgotten . Scroll down https://t.co/k9SFdsjSyehttps://t.co/M3sgiE6PV0
@pillarsofdust. Actually Marples packed all his portable property on to the Night Ferry to Paris – one rail connection he didn't close down – and skipped the country to avoid the taxman. A huge scandal, bigger than Profumo, almost unknown. https://t.co/wksnbYE0MV
@jshepmmu My politics have nothing in common with those of the Blair creature, and very little in common with those of Lady Fox. I am not a neo-con (far from it) nor 'centre right'. You'd have to know more about it to understand it. Try https://t.co/ZlYmwTZQeH
Let us hope so, though now that government has arrogated to itself the power to enforce facemask-wearing, the “requirement” can be re-imposed almost at will in the future.
I'm old enough to remember when Sweden was attacked for following the pandemic response guidelines espoused by the WHO prior to Covid. They never locked down, didn't mandate masks and kept schools opened. We don't hear about Sweden anymore. Wonder why? pic.twitter.com/K4hsPwi06j
— Citizen Journalists (@citizenjournos_) July 5, 2021
She said that people who won’t wear masks didn’t care about other people. When I challenged that, I got this. A great example of illiberal liberalism. No other viewpoints allowed. pic.twitter.com/NRKIyVGM6u
If I recall aright, when I had a Twitter account (before a pack of Jews had me expelled in 2018), that idiotic and unpleasant woman blocked me too. after tweeting rudely and wrongly about me.
Exactly. Anna Soubry, once MP for some boring Midlands constituency (should have been “Plymouth and Angostura”!), is a hugely irritating, once hugely overrated nuisance, who is so pickled that she has little chance of being infected.
As to tweeter @SaraThornton1, whoever she is, the clue to her psychology is in that line “he knows I’m upset but couldn’t care less“, meaning “I am a social Stasi operative; I get angry and frustrated when someone does not obey my demand that he complies with what I want him to do…“
In any case, it is now known (from a large-scale study in 2020) that someone would have to travel 11,000 times on railway journeys to be likely to contract the dreaded virus. Any risk (of contracting something (something which is harmless anyway to the vast majority) is minimal.
What strikes me is the politeness, not of tweeter @SaraThornton1 (who strikes me as the sort of rude presumptuous bitch who, in the First World War, would approach young men not in uniform and insult them while giving them white feathers), but of the train passenger that she harassed. Pity that she did not get a sharper and more direct rebuttal.
Some people are breaking down at the thought of losing the masks. They can’t handle it – they’ve become institutionalised. This is what mass propaganda does. Well done to the govt/SAGE, the media & all the despicable ‘scientists’ who ramped up the fear.
The Labour Party @UKLabour has lost the plot big time. They don’t want life ever to get back to normal. Wearing masks on public transport is not normal. https://t.co/a6BT2ofU5u
Regular readers will know that I regard the Labour Party as now having no real purpose, function, identity, or belief. A niche party for the blacks and browns (though the Muslims are now following the white English in jumping ship), and for some public service workers, Twitter twits etc. The marginal victory of Labour at the Batley and Spen by-election (procured by shameless dishonesty and —possibly—interference with the ballot papers), changes nothing. Labour is still doomed.
As those regular readers of my blog will also know, I have little time for the misnamed “Conservatives” either, but it occurs to me that if Boris-idiot were inclined to gamble on a general election now or soon, between now and mid-September would be a very good time to hold one. Labour would probably lose half its MPs.
25 June 2020, nailing it on @HighWireTalk I was on fire. If reason and science mattered, then masks should have died, to never surface again.https://t.co/smQr7clwyK
It seems the #WearAMask nutters have gone absolutely through the roof at the suggestion masks might end in 2 weeks, and they know that most people won't wear them to "show they care" because in truth almost everyone hates them. My advice is #TakeOffYourMask now, not on 19th July.
When I saw the government scientist, Chris Whitty, accosted recently by protesters, I was uneasy, but now that I see that the bastard is still pushing the facemask nonsense, alongside the extreme-Communist woman, Michie, any sympathy that I might have felt has been…muted. Very muted. Bin these idiots. Their interference in Britain’s society and economy will probably never be totally remedied.
More tweets
Stunning photos by my Inquirer colleague Jessica Griffin of the march through Philadelphia by the far-right-extremist group Patriot Front — right near Independence Hall on the eve of July 4 https://t.co/Opvvcwr1yD
A rather odd woman, who worked as an NHS doctor for only a few years, and who makes her pre-school-age children wear facemasks even when going for open-air walks. Cruel, in my opinion.
Why are people still wearing masks at all? Why did they ever do so? Before governments and health quangoes embraced the loose cloth mask as a symbol of their policy, there was no good medical or scientific case for them. https://t.co/UvpLUGNaJD
What this https://t.co/Px97P0Yvew actually says is that loose cloth masks are of little use. 'these masks are relatively flimsy and loose-fitting and are not meant to screen out infectious aerosols' But that's not how it was reported. Why?
My feeling was that Labour would lose, and quite possibly come third. I was not correct. Labour won narrowly or, as they say on the racecourse, “by a neck, cleverly”.
Labour got a vote-share of 35.3%. The Conservative candidate got 34.4%. George Galloway, under the banner of the Workers’ Party, did better than many expected (21.9%); I got that right, at least.
All other candidates, 13 in number, lost their deposits: LibDems 3.3%; Yorkshire Party 2.2%; 10 of the other 11 received vote-shares below half of one percent each. UKIP, on 0.4%, just beat the Monster Raving Loony (0.3%).
The English Democrats, whose candidate, Therese Hirst, wrote to my blog comments page to request a mention on this blog, came 6th, with 0.55%.
The small and supposedly “nationalist” parties were, as expected, an embarrassment.
The For Britain party leader, Anne Marie Waters, got 0.3% (97 votes). Jayda Fransen did even worse, though (like Ms. Waters) on a par with her previous forays into doomed electioneering: 0.1% (50 votes). [nb. percentages approximate].
So where to start? Firstly, by noting that the Labour Party’s winning candidate, on 35.3%, not only did worse than any previous Labour candidate in the constituency but also worse than the winning Conservative Party candidate in the first election held for the seat, in 1983 (39.6%).
Leaving aside the rigged 2016 by-election, Labour has gone down steadily in the constituency since 2017: 55.5%, 42.7%, 35.3%.
This does not somehow “save Labour”. The present Government still has a Commons majority of 80, and could in theory be in place until December 2024. Labour still has very little likelihood of being able to form even a minority government after that time. If Scotland were to pull away from the UK, Labour would be in permanent and declining Opposition; even without that, Labour has no future as a party of government.
Other points: Labour and Kim Leadbeater ran a very dishonest campaign, even delivering contradictory leaflets to different streets (depending on the race/nationality of the inhabitants). She evaded the issue of the schoolteacher driven from his home and job by Islamist zealots, for example.
The new MP is already on BBC Radio 4 Today Programme yapping about “people living side by side“, diversity etc etc. Another puppet MP. Useless for the people who elected her.
As for Batley’s chances of getting central government assistance now, forget it. The locals must be a pretty stupid lot. They have elected a communitarian drone whose economic knowledge stops at spouting nonsense about “magic money trees”…
The Conservatives ran a lily-livered campaign, which seemed cunning but ultimately fell flat. The candidate deliberately shunned publicity (I thought, though I am judging from hundreds of miles away). The noise was all about Kim Leadbeater and George Galloway.
I thought that Galloway might get more than 20%, and I was right in that. 21.9%. He must be pleased with such a result.
As far as social nationalism is concerned, there was no social-national candidate, just absurd one-trick-pony candidates playing at politics. Anne Marie Waters and, even less credible, Jayda Fransen.
Labour continues to be the party of, mainly, the blacks and browns, publicly-paid employees and a few other groups. It is less than ever the party of (most of) the white English.
Other points? Well, the pathetic LibDem result was par for the course. Since the 2010 upsurge, the LibDems have lost their deposits in all Westminster elections contested by them at Batley and Spen.
Turnout, at 47.6%, was not especially low for a by-election.
About 73% of those who voted, voted for a System party. Over half of those eligible to vote abstained from voting. So about two-thirds of the entire eligible electorate either voted non-System, or decided not to vote at all.
A tweet which shows not only how out of touch many Twitter-twits are (where has she been since 2010? Was she in outer space in 2019?), but how mutually-isolated are different socio-political “tribes” in the UK.
Batley was won by "none of the above" on 52% because the Boundary Commission has abolished the seat and replaced it with 2 safe Tory seats which is why the Tory vote stayed at home and did not get involved in this embarrassing internal Labour war
Good point. Until the seat is abolished, the Batley and Spen electorate will be represented at Parliament by a communitarian System drone with not an interesting or original thought in her head, dragging down £200,000 p.a. in pay and expenses, and accomplishing nothing, while the voters of Batley moulder in poverty and despair.
More on #BatleyAndSpen – the combined votes of all the far right candidates was risible. The British fash leaders are basically rival grifters for Russian/American cash, self-obsessed and electorally useless … the danger lurks online and in the terror networks
Political joke Paul Mason opines…in fact, he is right about the two “leaders” that he mentions in his tweet. Social nationalism in terms of electoral politics is scarcely even a bad joke; The two ladies together got only 147 votes at the Batley and Spen by-election, scarcely 0.3% of the total vote. One vote for about every 300 cast. Embarrassing.
Mason is not right about “terror networks” of what he would call, no doubt, “the far right”. They do not even exist, as far as I know anyway. Young men buying samurai swords, young women having swastika-shaped cookie-cutters, and people talking big in pubs, do not constitute a “terror threat”…
As for Mason’s “danger…online“, what he means is that people might be able to persuade other people to a certain viewpoint online. Mason hates free speech, so calls that a “danger”…
“John Smith” gives an accurate, if ungrammatical, riposte to sex pest communitarian grasper Brendan Cox, who thinks that it is worth trashing the UK if a few blacks become England-team footballers.
More tweets seen
I don’t know. If so, where are the figures on outcomes @rosscomq? Anyway, you speak of ‘patients’ and ‘recovery’ as if it’s a given that the person testing positive is ill. How do you know this? https://t.co/DnCyIOEiYa
The “panicdemic” is such an exercise in applied psychology that dictators, oppressive political regimes, and academic scribblers will probably be using its lessons for decades, and maybe for hundreds of years, rather like the 20thC Chinese techniques called (I believe) hsi nao, or “wash brain”, taken up by the West since the Korean War as “brainwashing”: see the 1963 book, Techniques of Persuasion, by J.A.C. Brown. I once had a copy, bought by me at my school book fair in, I think, 1971.
[the first paperback edition]
Such techniques were intriguing to film-makers, and have continued to be. Early examples would include The Manchurian Candidate and The Ipcress File.
Those films focussed on individual subjects, but there is of course “brainwashing” or, more accurately, “conditioning”, of whole masses of people, whether at schools (Eton might be a good example), or during Army training, to take two obvious situations.
Recent studies have concluded that, if people are exposed to fear propaganda for months, they lose the ability to resist it even if logical, rational and credible counter-messages are then delivered to them. Put simply, emotion trumps thought, usually.
Think back to the initial panic about “the virus”, in early Spring, 2020. TV news showing shuttered towns in Italy and elsewhere, the population only allowed to take walks alone or as couples, not interacting with others at all. Curfews. Harsh methods of enforcement (particularly in the part of China where the virus supposedly just appeared as if out of nowhere).
In the UK, we have seen how even the shambolic government regime presided over by Boris-idiot applied ever-stricter laws, “rules”, “guidance” etc (which the police enforced as if all had the force of law).
Police chiefs wanting to check people’s shopping to see whether the items had been “reasonable” purchases! That caused a kefuffle because the regime had tried to impose such repression too early, before the fear propaganda had fully taken hold.
Other examples included police vandalizing beauty spots in the Peak District lest people walk to them, other police (the hopeless police of Derbyshire were arguably the worst) using drones and loudhailers to bully elderly couples walking on the hills, miles from anywhere; in Wales, some farmer and his wife, hysterical (and again calling police) because two people from elsewhere were camping overnight on a nearby hill! “They might spread Covid!“, the pathetic idiots cried and whined (to the newspaper and TV reporters who were, unmolested, also there!).
Shops and other businesses were closed down for months, the employees’ anger largely forestalled or bought off by “furlough” payments. Result: the UK has spent £300 BILLION.
It is said “no matter, interest rates are almost zero”. In that case, why did the UK governments of the part-Jews David Cameron-Levita, Theresa May, and “Boris” Johnson apply so-called “austerity” for a decade, causing a huge amount of misery, in order to “save” far less than the sums now wasted for no good reason? Why was a huge investment in infrastructure not undertaken? Instead, vast amounts have been spent on paying the population to sit at home eating delivered pizza, watching TV, and drinking.
Then came the facemask nonsense. Large-scale trials which showed that facemasks (except the kind used in laboratories) were of minimal utility (and also caused other health problems) were ignored. The Government mandated facemasks (often little more than cloth muzzles or quasi-scarfs) in shops etc. Mandated them on pain of a heavy fine.
At first, up to mid-2020, both the UK Government and the World Health Organization [WHO] disparaged the use of facemasks, but later came under political pressure to change their advice, which is what happened.
The World Economic Forum [WEF] openly proclaimed how wonderful the “panicdemic” was as a driver to start a “Great Reset” of the world.
Well, now we are 18 months on, and the UK public, at least the majority, have shown themselves to be malleable pawns, without any regard for the freedoms won over centuries. One sees many wearing their facemasks even in their own cars, or while walking on windswept clifftops etc. Do they know that they have been brainwashed? Do they even care?
I think that it was the popular music group, Pink Floyd, in the early 1970s, maybe on Dark Side of the Moon, who had a track in which they sang that “…quiet desperation is the English way“. That might have to be changed, these days, to something like “spineless compliance, and apathy, is the English way”…
Meanwhile, we hear that 50,000 or 60,000 people have died in the UK “within 28 days of a positive test” (until recently, it was “from Covid”…), though (what a shock…) apparently no-one at all has died of flu for 18 months in the UK! Incidentally, if someone “tests positive” (often because the tests are flawed), even if having no symptoms, then weeks later dies in a car crash…yes, that’s right…that person “dies within 28 days of a positive test”!
The brainwashed nature of the population can be seen in the relative lack of anger or even questioning at the incongruity. Suddenly, instead of tens of thousands of deaths from influenza etc, there is substituted “deaths from Covid”, but most people are still, even now, obeying the so-called “laws”, “rules” etc. Even though their rational minds must know that this is a kind of scam on a vast scale.
Again, every day now we are seeing such as “today, 20,000 people tested positive”, followed by “and three people died within 28 days…(etc)”
In the UK, the msm has been totally compliant to the wishes of the State. In the msm and the “corridors of power”, only a few independent minds have stood up against the propaganda lies. Peter Hitchens [on Twitter as @clarkemicah] was one. Former Law Lord, Jonathan Sumption, was another. See https://twitter.com/SumptionUpdates.
About 1 out of 1,000 in the UK has died supposedly “of” or “with” or “within 28 days of a test”. Some people claim, speciously, 1 out of 500. Even so, this was never a nation-breaking pandemic. In the wider world, about 1 person has died out of every 4,000 people.
Inmates at the American concentration camp at Guantanamo were forced to wear facemasks nearly 20 years ago. To break them, not to save them from infection. Think about it.
[prisoners at the United States concentration camp, Guantanamo Bay, with female guard]
[muzzled prisoners at US concentration camp, Guantanamo Bay, forced by American concentration camp guards to kneel, heavily-clothed, in tropical heat; the true face of NWO/ZOG]
We are facing an attempt, starting in 2022, to implement a new stage of the New World Order conspiracy. Various campaigns are part of that: Covid-19 “measures”, “Black Lives Matter” nonsense, fake “environmental” measures, “anti-racism” campaigns etc.
Afternoon music
[colonnade at Karlovy Vary —former Carlsbad—, Czech Republic]
It’s very obvious that a lot of the fury and abuse coming my way is from people who thought Keir Starmer and his politics would be an obvious success, and despite an easy media ride and most Labour MP backing him, it’s all fallen apart, so they want someone, anyone to blame
Yes, I misread a tweet, why would I keep saying I would always vote Labour including in Batley over and over again and then suddenly say I wouldn’t, it makes zero sense https://t.co/Y1KKHdD0VS
Labour is fading. This is one of the worst governments ever in the UK, led by some of the worst people, yet Labour is flailing and failing. Reason? It has no identity now, no real principles (except those most English people oppose, such as “anti-racism” hysteria), and no vision. Oh, and no real leadership (Keir Starmer is just a Jewish-lobby puppet).
As for opinion polls, they are inherently unreliable because they always add up to between 85% and 100%, as in the poll featured in the tweet above (93%), the remainder presmably being “Don’t Know”, yet in actual elections the turnout is rarely above 80%, typically only around 70%, and sometimes (especially in by-elections) far below that. The rigged 2016 by-election in Batley and Spen had a turnout of only 25%.
Not that that means that, in 2016, the other, non-voting, 75% at Batley and Spen supported the dissident who assassinated the previous MP, Jo Cox, but it may be that those non-voters did not support either Labour or any of the small parties that did stand. Tracy Brabin was voted in by 85% of those who did vote, but that means only by about 21% of the entire eligible electorate.
Voters, particularly though not exclusively white English voters, at present have no party for which to wholeheartedly vote. I accept that elections are a no-win situation for social nationalists now, in the urban areas where white people struggle to be a majority. All the same, if a tightly-controlled party could get a solid 10% or even 5% of the popular vote, a number of avenues might open.
The sort of “nationalist” candidates seen at Batley and Spen, however, are just a kind of not very interesting political bad joke.
More tweets
Really nice to see the lovely old guy in my documentary get recognition in the press https://t.co/hniQumhecA.
Poor stupid old guy…no doubt well-meaning, but that is hardly enough…
I wonder whether the families of the thousands of “groomed” (abused) girls agree with him? I doubt it. The same might be said of the schoolteacher recently driven from his home and position by Islamist fanatics.
That “Dr. Julia” pontificates about Coronavirus etc, but apparently neither virology nor epidemiology are her specialist fields. She tweets about how she makes her small children wear facemasks even outdoors. She’s a bit of a crank, in other words.
In any case, never trust a “political doctor”: David Owen, Hastings Banda, Papa Doc Duvalier, Liam Fox, that ghastly woman who was the MP for Totnes for a while (etc)…
I have blogged about Jew-Zionist pest and Twitter/Internet troll Ben Gidley in the past (see, eg, my blog post of yesterday’s date). @bengidley is or was not only @bobfrombrockley but also @inthesoupagain (“suspended”, i.e. expelled) and @antinazisunited (frozen; last tweet was in 2019).
Why Gidley uses the photo of Johnny Cash, God knows. There is no physical resemblance.
It is, I believe, against the rules laid down by Twitter to have multiple and/or trolling accounts in that way, but he has been doing that for at least 9 years if not longer.
Ian Robert Millard 