Morning music
On this day a year ago
RAF
“The boss of RAF recruitment has said she is ‘unashamed’ of the force’s diversity targets, amid claims that it has effectively paused its recruitment of white men.”
[Daily Mail]
The RAF has become largely a pathetic joke. Incidentally, this is the “RAF senior officer” in question: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maria_Byford. A dentist by training…
One starts to wonder why the RAF (and Royal Navy, and even the Army) even exist.
Another cretinous “Conservative” MP
“A lot of people in the more depressed parts of my constituency often sadly smoke and cigarettes are £12 a packet.
‘And people find it difficult to stop smoking.
‘So there are other ways we can help people – through smoking cessation, helping people budget and also… giving people the skills to make simple, nutritious meals from basic ingredients.
‘Because if you are going to live on takeaways that is a very expensive way of feeding your family.‘”
[Robert Goodwill MP, quoted in the Daily Mail].
This is Robert Goodwill: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Goodwill. A proven expenses overclaimer, who also “employs” his wife via his MP expenses (she gets £30,000 a year for a part-time job, assuming that she does anything at all), he is a farmer of some kind, meaning that he inherited land and has been getting farming subsidies for that (for decades)..
The sort of nonsense that the ironically misnamed Goodwill is spouting (i.e. that the poor are only unable to live decently because they smoke, drink, buy takeaway food or the wrong kind of food, or otherwise waste money) has been around for a long time. It predates even Victorian ideology, and Orwell examined it in one or two of his 1930s essays.
Having said that, there is a grain of truth in that narrative about smoking, drinking, being unskilled in cooking etc, but —as Orwell noted— people living in poor circumstances want a little of what we might call comfort purchases .
The fact is that the cost of living has started to get out of control, a result of years of inflationary policies, some of which stem from the giveaways of Sunak during the “panicdemic”. Pay has not kept pace, State benefits even less so.
“Conservative” political drones and the corrupt msm are now starting to blame the poor (again) for their poverty, and suggesting everything from fasting to never heating homes to cooking classes, in fact everything except paying more to both workers and benefit recipients (and many people are both).
In fact, Goodwill is so dim that, despite having made it to junior minister several times, he has always been sacked before very long.
The fact is that the MPs we have now are mostly a very poor lot, a very decadent lot, a very stupid lot, and they have no interest in being better informed. They only understand one thing, but in our “free country” (as it used to be called) I am “not allowed” to mention it, or if I do, the poundland KGB (toytown police) will probably be at my door (again).
Hard questions
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-11126789/How-University-Challenge-questions-answer.html
I managed 16 out of the 30.
A thought out of season
Social media company: “We are going to cancel your account“
Target of social media company: “I am going to cancel YOU“…
MP: “Social nationalism must be cancelled and its message taken down“
Social national people: [fill in a suitable response]…
Tweets seen
“YOUTH SUPPORT FOR A REACTIONARY RIGHT PARTY
In order to test young people’s support for a
new radical or reactionary right political party,
we polled the same question in a specific poll
of 1,010 18-24-year-olds living in Britain between
15 and 19 April 2022 via Focaldata, weighted to
be representative of the national 18-24 year old
population.
Consistent with our findings of 18-24s from the
full nationally representative poll (37% supported),
35% of 18-24 year olds said they would be likely
to support a new party that says it wants to push
back against ‘woke’ culture, reduce Government
spending, reduce taxation, rule out any future
Covid lockdowns, privatise the BBC and Channel
4, challenge the ‘islamisation of the UK’ and
support unrestricted freedom of speech.
Support was much higher among young men
(43%) than young women (28%), and out of step
with national trends, graduates were more likely
to voice support for such a party (39%) than those
without a degree (32%).
We also asked those who said they would support
such a party (n=358) whether they would continue
to support such a party if critics accused this new
party of being far right, a characterisation the new
party strongly denied. Worryingly, an association
with the far right did not have an impact among
the majority of young supporters – as 46% said
they would continue to support this party, 31%
said they would not now support the party, and
23% remained undecided.
Unlike among the general population, where
violence and extreme views of populist and
radical right parties can be disrupted by exposing
associations with violence and extremism,
support for reactionary politics among young
people is unlikely to be easily unsettled by
allegations of being far-right.”
From a report (in my view, very biased in its premises anyway) by or for the mainly Jewish “Hope not Hate” crowd.
Who says that a new party would do all of these? “Push
back against ‘woke’ culture, reduce Government
spending, reduce taxation, rule out any future
Covid lockdowns, privatise the BBC and Channel
4, challenge the ‘islamisation of the UK’ and
support unrestricted freedom of speech.“
Social nationalism would not “reduce Government spending“, nor necessarily reduce taxation. As for “unrestricted freedom of speech“, that is a naive and stupidly uninformed way of putting it. Direct personal threats should be and always have been unlawful in the UK, certainly in modern history.
The issue is free speech on social, political, religious and historical topics. One should be able to speak freely about Jews, blacks etc, and about Judaism, Islam, Christianity etc, inter alia, including the now-ludicrous “holocaust” farrago.
In any case, a real social national party would do a great deal more than the above quotation says. As was said nearly a century ago, “neither Revolution nor Reaction“.
As to this so-called “Hope not Hate” crowd, I wonder where the money comes from to fund this self-describing “anti-hate” yet entirely hateful organization with its full-time paid staff? A Swedish billionaire heiress and her Jewish husband were apparently donating huge amounts, and may still be. I do not know. How much, if any, comes from Israeli sources? I do not know.
Other tweets seen today
The “EternalEnglish” Twitter account is now being heavily censored by Twitter itself. See the account on Twitter. Not all of his tweets can now be copied and pasted. The (((you know who))) element has been trying to get him closed down.
Stop pushing Russia. Ukraine is not any kind of security interest for the peoples of Western Europe (or the Americas).
What we are seeing is a “New World Order” [NWO] attempt to paint Russia into a corner. It has already resulted in the Russian invasion of Ukraine, and may result in far worse. Don’t do it. Don’t go there.
Late tweets seen
“Scamdemic”…
…and now we are all going to pay the price for the majority who went along with the “panicdemic” without thinking— with the shutdown lockdowns, the facemask nonsense, the “social distancing” rubbish, the “furlough” payments, the business “loans” to fraudsters and others, the £38 BILLION thrown away on useless “test and trace”, the vast amounts wasted on “PPE” in hospitals, the never-used “Nightingale” fake “hospitals” etc etc etc…
Is this how Western civilization will end, not with heroic or bloody battles, but with hordes of non-whites and riff-raff looting convenience stores, as everything runs out?
…and see what posted that anti-white diatribe— “DAVE COHEN“…
Every. Single. Time…
…and compulsory microchipping.
After the “gas chambers” part of the WW2 “holocaust” narrative, the bulk of the “Covid” narrative, and within that the “vaccination” scam, must be the biggest hoax ever.
Late thoughts
I was watching a powerful film apparently based loosely on actual events: K-19: the Widowmaker [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K-19:_The_Widowmaker]. That led me to some troubled thoughts.
I grow increasingly pessimistic about the international situation.
The only chance that the Kiev regime of the Jew Zelensky has to survive in power there is to continue to get more (and better) arms from the NATO bloc. That, and to provoke a wider conflict.
We see that, in the past 24 hours, a series of Ukrainian (?) attacks on Crimea (where 90%+ of the population is Russian) and on Russian territory itself.
The Russian advance has slowed to a crawl.
Putin is not going to withdraw from either Crimea or the Donbass, yet he is not in a position to deal the Kiev a knockout blow conventionally, as things stand.
Tactical nuclear weapons offer the Russian side a potential edge. The Ukrainians have none. A very horrific possibility, because it might mean large urban areas being destroyed, with all the pain and hurt that would entail. In such a scenario, NATO might take the opportunity to assist the Kiev side directly.
Who was “to blame” for WW2? To say “Germany”, is trite and simplistic. What about WW1?
If WW3 starts out of this Ukraine situation, it might be that Russia’s finger will be on the trigger first, but that, again, is a simplistic way of looking at a complex situation.
Can it really be that we are looking at the possibility that much of civilized Europe will be destroyed for really nothing, that “nothing” being because the NWO cabals want both to encroach upon Russia, and also to support the corrupt, shambolic, failed “state” of Ukraine? Horrifying.
Late music
Ian Robert Millard 