Tag Archives: Migration-Invasion

Diary Blog, 6 September 2025

Morning music

Saturday quiz

Well, this week a narrow victory over political journalist John Rentoul, who scored 6/10. I scored 7/10, and did not know the answers to questions 3, 5, and 8.

More tweets seen

[Starmer-stein and Angela Rayner kneel in fealty to the black mobs of “Black Lives Matter” a few years ago, at Westminster. Both traitors to the British people]

Well over half the adult population of the UK get at least some of their income from social security “welfare” benefits. If you include state pensions in the definition, the figure must be over 60%. Attack people’s survival at your peril, Starmer-stein.

Yes, Farage, as a finance-capitalist promoter, also wants to reduce the “welfare bill”, but if Starmer thinks that the way to stop Reform UK is to say “they will do it too“, he is certainly very mistaken.

There is a necessity to move towards some kind of Basic Income system, once the connected immigration and migration-invasion issue is fully sorted-out.

I have already predicted that on the blog. Look at the House of Lords. Already over 800 members, and by 2029 could be 900 or more. Not one adheres to Reform UK. Farage could either abolish the Lords, or create 1,000 new peers. If he does neither, he may well find any radical legislation blocked.

Correction, Goodwin— 600 so far today. Probably 1,000 of the bastards by the close of play.

Options include sterilization, concentration, deportation, and elimination.

Britain has no need for any new housing at all. What it needs is fewer inhabitants. Fewer (no) migrant-invaders, more (none at present) remigration, more (not much happening at present) deportation, and (not happening at present) elimination of greedy developers.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Camp_of_the_Saints

“Small boat” arrivals are only about 5% of all arrivals by migrants. Concentrating on the “small boats” (however necessary that is) often misses the bigger problem, which is “legal” immigration, and also births to non-Europeans.

Andrew Marr personifies the overpaid BBC/Sky (etc) msm drone who is basically an enemy of the future of the UK. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Marr

The Kiev regime is losing 1,000-2,000 troops on the front-lines every single day. Therefore, the Kiev-regime’s press-gangs abduct potentially-suitable, if unwilling, “recruits” off the streets.

The “recruits” know that to be posted to the front-lines is an almost-guaranteed death sentence, so they fight their abductors, or try to flee. Most fail, and are carted away to be brutally subdued, then given a few weeks of rudimentary training before ending up in the squalid ranks of other impressed “soldiers” on those front-lines. Low or no pay, little food, and an open-ended commitment. No wonder that several hundred thousand have deserted in the past 3+ years.

Russia is winning this unpleasant war; it cannot afford to lose and will not lose, despite its army’s deficiencies.

Quite good, though I could have done without the howling.

See also:

More tweets seen

Meanwhile, the Jew-Zionists in the UK, such as that dead-eyed woman in Brighton who is very prolific on Twitter/X, say “oh, look, the ‘Pals’ say that we, the Jews, Israeli Jews, are literally starving to death children in Gaza, but here is one starved child in Gaza who may have died from a pre-existing rare medical condition! So the Palestinian Arabs in Gaza are lying!“…

I do not think that “they”, or most of them, even really see themselves, they are so indoctrinated.

…and what about the tens of thousands of Arab children killed by bombing, shooting (including deliberate and sadistic targeting) etc by the Israeli forces over the past 3 years alone?

It’s almost as if, er, “that man” (you know who) was right…

Iran is trying to produce viable nuclear weapons, and is pushing ahead with production of thousands, tens of thousands, of drones, as well as advanced medium to long-range rockets with high-grade conventional warheads in large numbers. When the time comes, the rockets will rain down on Israel. Israel is doomed.

There is a connection, unexplored by any msm “journalists”, connecting “antifascism” and “antifascists”, Zionist Jewish and pro-Israel loonies, and mental illness generally. I blogged about it years ago:

A Labour Friends of Israel member in a Labour Friends of Israel government. Join the dots…

Yvette Cooper and Keir Starmer (both active members of Labour Friends of Israel) listening with apparent respect to the Chief Rabbi of the UK (who was born in South Africa, lived for many years in Israel, and then in Ireland, before arriving in this country).

For a great deal more detail about the activities of “Mark Lewis Lawyer” (especially), Simon Myerson, Daniel Berke, and Beth Grossman (all Jewish solicitors or barristers), please use the search box on the blog.

Of course, Prime Minister’s Questions, invented in fairly recent times [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_Minister%27s_Questions] has become a meaningless ping-pong match and televised spectacle for the masses (in 10-second or 20-second extracts on TV news). It accomplishes little. From that understanding, it is but a step to recognizing the uselessness of Parliament itself.

Once Reform tries and fails to do more than, say, 10% of what is necessary (not just on migration invasion, but across the waterfront), real social nationalism can arise, for the first time since the 1930s.

Wall. Squad. End. (would have been the correct sentence).

Up against a wall.

Talking point

I am against killing, generally (and not just re. people), but “desperate times call for desperate measures“, as we shall see by the 2030s and 2040s.

Late tweets seen

The 2026 local elections, which will include parts of Solihull, will probably prove a wipe-out for both Lab and Con. It looks as though Reform’s time has come.

More Israeli war crimes, with yet more upcoming. What a horrible tribe.

I have seen replies to Goodwin’s tweet, those saying that Lucy Connolly would be disqualified from standing by reason of having been sentenced to, or detained for, more than one year. That is not so. Now that she has been released, there is no legal or constitutional bar on her standing for election as an MP.

It would just be brilliant were Lucy Connolly to stand against Yvette Cooper and win. I think it would be possible. Yvette Cooper got a 47.5% vote-share in 2024, with Reform in —fairly good— second place on 29.1%. The Con candidate was well behind on 15%. However, turnout was a mere 48.2%.

Bearing in mind Yvette Cooper’s incompetent showing as Home Secretary, the fall in support for Labour, and the collapse in support for the Conservative Party, it is not implausible to guess that, at the next General Election, the result in that constituency might be to return Lucy Connolly for Reform UK with maybe 50% of the vote, Yvette Cooper for Labour getting maybe 35%, and the Con candidate 5%.

Tactical voting might well play a part. A Con vote in that constituency is a wasted vote now. Also, as said, in 2024, fewer than half of the eligible voters even voted (48.2%), indicating extreme disenchantment with both Lab and Con, the previous main contenders there (in a differently-named constituency on somewhat different boundaries).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pontefract,Castleford_and_Knottingley(UK_Parliament_constituency)#Elections_in_the_2020s

Lucy Connolly might be able to do it, I think.

The world is not without kind people” [Russian saying]

Late music

Diary Blog, 3 September 2025

Morning music

Thoughts

The Second World War broke out on this day 86 years ago, when Britain and France declared war on National Socialist Germany.

The Second World War was disastrous in so many ways. The devastation of much of Europe and Russia (the latter taken as sui generis), the death and overall misery inflicted on millions of people, the advance of Stalinism into Central Europe, the destruction of the German Reich (the only European power almost free of Jewish influence and control). Then there was the economic damage across Europe. Six years of a war economy.

Beyond the above, the Second World War had consequences arguably even more disastrous. The fall of European rule, or slow abandonment of European imperial and quasi-imperial power over most of Africa, much of Asia, parts of Latin America etc. That led in turn to large-scale civil conflicts, regional wars by the newly-independent states (as with India-Pakistan), a huge increase in urbanization, enormous environmental damage, deforestation, extinction of wildlife etc.

Latterly, also the flooding of Europe with “refugees” and economic migrants from across the more backward parts of the world.

It just goes on.

Now, in 2025, 80 years after the end of that disastrous conflict, we see the possibility of a new “world war”. Siren voices in the UK, USA, France etc call for war with Russia, even with China, as well as against smaller states.

There are few “statesmen” around, certainly not in the West, but all political leaders and commentators should think twice and thrice before placing their weight on the scales in favour of war, particularly when the ostensible casus belli is the fake “state” of Kiev-regime Ukraine, a country under the control of a Jew-Zionist cabal which has banned elections indefinitely, banned opposition parties, banned trade unions, arrested or killed dissidents; the army of which is manned by ill-trained troops often abducted on the streets and forced to serve. A brutal, corrupt, and shambolic regime, ruling a “state” which did not even exist 35 years ago.

Of course, “world wars” are a misnomer. Large parts of the world were not directly affected by the Second World War while it was ongoing; the actual destruction was largely confined to parts of Europe, parts of Russia, parts of North Africa, parts of Asia. Vast areas of the world technically “at war” never saw a battle. Even in Europe, there were neutral countries which saw no actual fighting or bombing: Portugal, Spain, Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Sweden.

Today, though, we are in a world overshadowed by nuclear weapons. Still, it may be that, should the worst happen, life will eventually resume. Let us hope so.

In the meantime, let us also hope that the voices calling for war are silenced.

See also:

Tweets seen

As previously said on the blog, neither side should be directly targeting civilians.

That buffoon, Clarke, thinks that “Boris”-idiot is a “leader“. Well, no, he is not. He is just an over-entitled silver-(plated)-spoon psychopath who should have been locked in a box decades ago and kept there.

“Boris” Johnson was puffed to absurdity by a supine Press and TV over two decades and more, largely because he has always been connected to the Jewish lobby and Israel (and is himself part-Jew). The public were told what a great brain he was or is, how educated and informed he is or was, what a “leader” he was or is etc. All lies. Stupid schoolboy ideas at best (bridges over the Irish Sea, an island airport between Kent and Essex etc etc), no ideals at all, no ability to inspire or even administer, no honour, no honesty…just a big nothing. A kind of public entertainer.

“Boris”-idiot never had either the ability or the character to be a prime minister; he also lacked (and lacks) any useful or realistic ideas.

I shall add one thing, that I noticed, and noted on the blog, years ago: “Boris” Johnson is no strong-willed leader; in fact he is no kind of leader at all and, far from imposing his will on people, organizations, countries, events, is and was pushed around by all of those.

As for Clarke, he is a know-nothing who, until selected and elected as an MP in 2017, at age 32, had never really had a job. He lost his seat in 2024 and is now director of one of those Jewish-lobby-connected fake think-tanks, in this case called “Onward”: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_Clarke_(politician).

I suppose that Clarke thinks that he can regain his seat at Middlesbrough South and East Cleveland, lost to Labour in 2024 by only 214 votes. That seems unlikely to me, looking at the collapse of support for a —daily less credible— Conservative Party; also, the seemingly irresistible rise of Reform UK (which did not contest that seat in 2024).

One Zack Polanski, apparently. Are you surprised? I have little doubt that (((Polanski))) also supports the idea of the UK having “holocaust” “denial” heresy laws too, repressive laws similar to those in France, Germany, and elsewhere. So far we have managed to avoid such police-state nonsense, at least as far as examination of history is concerned.

At least Polanski has recognized the Gaza genocide for what it is: see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zack_Polanski.

Of course, the Greens in the UK are a joke party, supposedly environmentally-conscious yet supportive of the mass immigration which is trashing the environment.

The Greens are only about 10% in the polls; were Labour under Starmer-stein not such a shambles, the 10% would be about 5%, if that.

The moneygrubbing, and petty corruption, of this Labour Friends of Israel government were both evident from the start, of course.

More tweets

Farage is, of course, a bit “Marmite”; people mostly either love or hate him. I should say that my own feeling is closer to dislike than like, Farage being pro-Israel, pro-Jewish lobby etc, and a finance-capitalist to boot. Also, as many say, a “snake-oil salesman”. No argument. However, to destroy the main System parties, there must be a destroying force. Reform is that force.

If Reform makes it into government in 2028/2029, it will be blocked at every turn. It will fail to accomplish most of what it wants to achieve. That situation, in turn, will lead on to real social nationalism. Raise the banners!

I rarely repost anything from George Galloway, who is himself rather a “grifter”, and one who tweeted some silly and negative things about me some years ago but, in the Australian phrase, “fair do’s“. Angela Rayner deserves to be binned. I always hold the moral high ground…

As Galloway implies and indeed expresses, Angela Rayner’s political career, which has done nothing for the British people, has enriched the woman herself. In fact, she personifies the change in the demographic, as part of the working class or proletariat became, after the 1970s, the contemporary “chavscum” element (or latter-day British lumpenproletariat), with its grabbing of whatever is going free, its tattoos (even for women), its “vaping”, the underage pregnancies, and so on.

Galloway got his point across clearly without having to resort to the obvious (though true) comment that Angela Rayner and her colleagues are “filling their boots” while they can.

Next stop— the postponed local elections.

Wall. Squad. End.

Eventually, there will be only one way forward in this country, but we are “not allowed” to say it.

[“If you are asking “what’s happening to free speech in the UK?” the answer is it’s being eroded by a regime of censorship and control: -Orwellian ‘hate laws’ -‘non-crime hate incidents’ -expanded taboos like ‘far-right’ -claims of ‘misinformation’ -new ‘Islamophobia’ definition -membership of the ECHR -Communications Act 2003 -Online Safety Act 2023 -Equalities public duty All overseen by BOTH Labour and the Tories, all used to try and control the conversation and shut down public dissent.”]

Hey, Matt Goodwin! Don’t forget to mention that, in the UK (as in many other countries), it is the Jewish lobby, aka Israel lobby, that is behind almost all of the repression of free speech.

Sadly, Goodwin is very much in the pocket of the Jewish/Israel lobby, just like Farage, Tice, Toby Young, the Free Speech Union etc.

See also:

More tweets seen

The press-gangs of the Kiev regime will have to redouble their efforts on the streets of Kharkov, Odessa and, indeed, Kiev, if they want to replace the 1,300 men lost in one day (and the same or similar number every day now).

Israel is doomed.

Late tweets

Typical.

[“Hundreds of lawyers across the UK have been investigated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and Bar Standards Board after they speak out against Israel’s genocide of Palestinians, following demands made by the UK Lawyers for Israel and other Zionist lobby groups. The BSB is now invoking the deeply flawed UK Terrorism Act to prosecute barristers that provide legal analysis of the rights of organisations under international law to armed resistance to the genocidal @IDF, even in circumstances where the police have not taken action. This is a massive expansion of the deeply flawed Terrorism Act, leading the UK to extremely dangerous and authoritarian territory. One such case is Ousman Noor, who worked as a human rights and refugee law barrister and now faces prosecution by the Bar Standards Board after providing legal analysis of the rights of Hezbollah under international law to use military force against the IDF. He has instructed barrister Franck Magennis to defend this case in a way that causes maximum damage to the racist ideology of Zionism and apartheid state of Israel. Zionism, like all past colonial projects, will be defeated on the battlefield. But those of us not on the ground in Palestine can still do our part to damage Zionism and create more space for anti-genocide and anti-apartheid speech. Please donate to support this effort and help contribute to its victory. Link to crowdfunder: https://crowdjustice.com/case/stop-zionist-control-over-uk-legal-professions/ @barstandards @sra_solicitors“]

Well, not all of that meets with my favour, but there it is…

I already made that point (many times in general, and several times recently about the Green Party and its new Jewish leader).

Late music

[residential zone, Akademgorodok, Western Siberia]

Diary Blog, 29 August 2025, including a few thoughts about Paul Mason

Morning music

[Red Square, 1945]

Tweets seen

“The resistible rise of the chavscum MP”…

Talking point

A revolution without firing squads is not worth much” [Lenin]

[Lenin with cat, near Moscow, early 1920s]

More tweets

I agree with that position. Russia should rule all of Eastern Ukraine (Ukraine east of the Dnieper); also Crimea, and the littoral of the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov. Kiev and Odessa should either be standalone “free cities”, or run as condominia (between Russia and an independent and neutral Ukrainian state centred on Lvov).

More Israeli war crimes. An accursed tribe.

Israel does not stand alone, but has agents, co-opted supporters (not all Jews) and lobby groups all over the Western world. All guilty of facilitating what has been happening and continues to happen. The Jewish lobby and/or Israel lobby is also the primary lobby trying to shut down free speech in the UK, France etc.

Paris, London, Berlin (etc). Migration invasion. Clear the streets!

Well, I cannot speak as to any of those details, but right from the start I felt that there was something not quite right about Paul Mason. I have blogged about him previously, two or three years ago.

First of all, despite having trained as a musician, and worked as such, and also having lectured in musical studies at Loughborough (Leicestershire), Mason (a quarter-Jew, one of his grandparents having immigrated from Lithuania), never having had any formal financial or economics training, suddenly appears as a freelance financial journalist in London in 1991 at age 31 (after a “missing” three years). Then, from 2001, he is seen on shows such as Newsnight (as Business Editor), and his political persona at that time is a kind of semi-Marxist and semi-anarcho-syndicalist mixture, hard to pin down.

Look at what Wikipedia says: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Mason_(journalist)#Politics.

You can see from that piece how, over the years, Mason has veered from so-called “left-wing Communism” and Trotskyism to (he himself claims) “social democracy” and both Marxism and post-Marxism. At one point, he was writing in support of Jeremy Corbyn. More recently, Mason declared himself a supporter of Keir Starmer.

You see the point. Politically, for all his worn-on-the sleeve pseudo-radicalism, Mason is the political grey man, superficially at home here, there, and everywhere. He sort-of fits in almost anywhere in the (generally anti-British type of) political milieu, almost like a secret agent of some sort…

In one matter, Mason has always been consistent: he has always supported dictatorship and repression of opposing views and dissenting opinions:

In the New Statesman magazine in June 2018, Mason argued the case for state suppression of “fascists”, saying that he favoured a policy of using “the full panoply of security measures to deter and monitor” those he described as “racists” and added: “For clarity, unlike many on the left, that means I am in favour of state suppression of fascist groups.” He finished his article by saying that “The progressive half of Britain needs a narrative to overcome this threat: a narrative based on shared, historic values of democracy and tolerance”, and also “[to] stop pandering to right-wing nationalism and xenophobia and start fighting it.

[Wikipedia]

Martin Wolf characterised Mason’s views in the Financial Times as justifying a planned economy, quoting Mason saying in support of the UK A Green New Deal report “Labour wants to combat climate change through three mechanisms: state spending, state lending and the state direction of private finance.”[46]

[Wikipedia]

[“Mason confirmed his intention to apply for selection as the Labour candidate for [Islington North] in May 2024. Despite having previously supported him as Labour leader, Mason has been critical of Corbyn’s record on antisemitism, defence, and Brexit.

[Wikipedia]


On 8 March 2018, The Jewish Chronicle reported that Mason had been a member of the Facebook group ‘Palestine Live’, in which antisemitic material was posted. He said that while he was a member of the group, he was added to it in 2014 without his knowledge by someone else, and that he does not read or endorse the content of all Facebook groups of which he is part. Mason suggested that the group should be closed and investigated if it contained antisemitism.[57]

[Wikipedia]

Again, hard to pin down.

Someone without any real anchored beliefs. He is also an atheist.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Mason_(journalist)

See also:

More music

The composer Rodion Shchedrin (R.K. Shchedrin) died yesterday, at the age of 92: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rodion_Shchedrin.

I like some of his music, not all, but he has been unjustly neglected in the UK and other Anglophone parts of the world. Most people have never heard of him.

More tweets seen

Not only men, thinking of a couple of women in Brighton…

Raise the banners!

The diplomatic hypocrisy of nations…

All the same, a good thing that even a gesture is being made, and this does go well beyond a gesture. The gradual ghetto-ization of Zionism, it might be said.

Putin negotiates with the EU, with the cat as Putin.

Alternatively, playing cards:

(with another ace in a hole, or silo, somewhere…).

So why does “military and strategy expert” and former Secretary of State for Defence, Ben Wallace (highest active military rank— captain in the Guards), not put on his steel or Kevlar helmet, shoulder his weapon, and join the ranks of the condemned on the front-line? His age is no bar; there are plenty of unfortunate Ukrainians aged 55+ serving on the crumbling front-lines of the Kiev regime.

In fact, Jewish dictator Zelensky would love to have even one overweight middle-aged drunk volunteer; hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian soldiers have deserted (apparently, about 200,000 in the past year or so), and about 800,000 Ukrainians are currently hiding from the draft (and the press-gangs) inside Ukraine. Not to mention the hundreds of thousands, if not millions, dodging the draft by staying outside Ukraine’s borders.

Go on, Wallace. Make the Scots Guards proud!

Already, many of those actually fighting for the Zelensky cabal are mercenaries from Asia, Africa, South America, and other poverty-stricken parts of the world.

Maximum range 280 miles (some only 120 miles), so not quite far enough to reach Moscow (or Petersburg) from the Ukrainian border. Moscow is about 300 miles north/northeast, Petersburg far further (about 530 miles due north of the nearest Ukrainian border). However, those missiles could reach smaller cities to the north, northeast, and east of Ukrainian territory.

Is that a brush-off for Zelensky? A warning to Putin? Hard to say.

Wall. Squad. End.

Wall. Squad. End.

(or parachute him into a large game park in Africa).

Clear the streets!

Part of the reason may be because so many British students are reading for Mickey Mouse “degrees” at “McUniversities”…

More research should be done about the whole issue. What are “degrees” (a mediaeval concept) for? What are universities for? What if anything should be the linkage between academic degrees and vocations (and jobs)?

…and I do not recall the same Marlon Solomon (or any other Jew entertainers) defending satirical singer-songwriter Alison Chabloz when organized Jew-Zionists, led by the malicious and evil “Campaign Against Antisemitism” (or “CAA”), had her “cancelled” from the Edinburgh Fringe quite a few years ago. The same cabal have also repeatedly harassed anti-Zionist Jew and jazz musician Gilad Atzmon, metaphysical speaker David Icke, and many others.

What goes around comes around…

[satirical singer Alison Chabloz]

The Kiev regime is being run into the ground. Russia cannot lose this war and will not lose it.

Late music

[Victor Ostrovsky, Rendezvous at Dawn]

Diary Blog, 22 August 2025, including news about the fanatical Jew-Zionist “Campaign Against Antisemitism” (“CAA”)

Morning music

Tweets seen

Those two fanatical Jew-Zionist organizations have largely-overlapping memberships, and work in concert.

I am unsure as to whether that tweet by one Fahad Ansari is true or not. I have been unable, at this time, to find any confirmation. Will clarify as and when.

Incidentally, the “CAA” tweet is itself mistaken, in that it describes Franck Magennis as “an officer of the court“. Magennis is, I now see (I think I was unaware of his existence until today or yesterday), a barrister: https://gardencourtchambers.co.uk/barrister/franck-magennis/.

Solicitors are, by statute, “officers of the court“; barristers are not. The distinction arises out of the historical background, going back hundreds of years, of the two main branches of the legal profession in England and Wales.

A few of my own experiences of “CAA” and “UKLFI” activity:

…and take a look at the case of Wilson v. Mendelsohn, Newbon (deceased) and Cantor (use the blog search box).

The now-washed-up self-promoting Jew-Zionist fanatic and solicitor, Mark Lewis, involved in James Wilson’s case, was and I think still is a prominent member or supporter of both the “CAA” and the “UKLFI”, at one time prominently featured on the website of the “CAA”.

Lewis is currently quite likely facing (not for the first time) both disciplinary action by the Solicitors’ Regulation Authority (SRA), and legal action by at least one former client (on grounds that may include professional negligence and civil fraud).

Simon Myerson, barrister based at Leeds, and briefly a Recorder (p/t judge), whose vituperative behaviour on social media led to his effective dismissal from the Bench after a few months, and who (I believe) may face action from the Bar Standards Board, is involved in or supportive of both UKLFI and the CAA, and was a witness (whose sworn testimony was disbelieved and/or given no weight by the trial judge) in the James Wilson defamation case. Again, for more about that, see the search box on the blog.

Having now read a little about that barrister, Magennis, it seems that he is very far from my viewpoint, ideologically, but we have both been attacked by the Jew-Zionist orgs “CAA” and “UKLFI”. Sadly, in this complex world, my enemy’s enemy is not necessarily my friend…

More tweets

https://twitter.com/wissamshabat/status/1958770361899892877

Victim of yet another Israeli war crime.

According to the “CAA” and other Jew-Zionist orgs, anything up to 96% of UK-resident Jews support Israel in anything it does.

Anyone giving support to Israel is, thereby, to some extent complicit in its crimes.

As police fly-on-wall TV show voiceovers always say, “it’s all kicking off“…

Quite likely, and the Labour Party still has about 300,000 members (though dropping rapidly), so that might add up to 75,000 or more people, which would be fairly significant; however, the 28% figure refers to members, not voters.

The Labour Party membership, especially the activists who are or were the core of that party, were always far more radical than Labour voters . A small number of people, really.

I still think that Corbyn will struggle to achieve a national vote (assuming that his new party can even fight many seats) above 5%.

Most English white people will not vote for Corbyn, who actually seems to want more migrant-invaders to arrive (and to give them even more than they currently get by way of housing, food, pocket-money, services).

It may be that some young English/Welsh/Scottish voters, as well as some ethnic minority voters, may be attracted by an anti-Israel message, as well as by a pro-Welfare State, pro-NHS etc message, and a generally pro-multikulti orientation. Some but (in my opinion) not enough to win many seats. Corbyn seems to be in George Galloway territory, more or less.

I think that Corbyn and his candidates may be able to win in a few particular seats, including that of Corbyn himself, but I doubt that the number of seats won would be more than three or four, if that.

Only a minority, a small minority, of seats look like remaining Labour anyway; maybe 150. Corbyn’s “sales pitch” would be to a fraction of that minority of seats. As said, probably far fewer than a dozen; quite likely, well under half a dozen.

In fact, it is an open question as to whether even Zara Sultana, Corbyn’s deputy, will retain her seat (at Coventry South). As a Labour candidate, she got over 47% of the vote in 2024, but next time that vote will be split between her and the new Labour candidate. Also, the Conservative vote in 2024 was nearly 24%, and the Reform UK vote over 13%. If the Con vote collapses further, Reform might get a vote, on that basis alone, of 30%+.

In 2019, the Con candidate got 42.5% of the vote, Labour (Ms. Sultana) only slightly more (43.4%). Brexit Party got 3%.

In both 2019 and 2024, the Con Party put up the same candidate, an Englishwoman, I believe. She nearly won in 2019.

Add to those factors the disaffected 2024 Lab voters deciding to cast their lot for Reform in 2028 or 2029, and one could easily see Reform getting over 40% at Coventry South, with official Labour and Ms. Sultana sharing 30%-40% between them. Exit Ms. Sultana?…

Talking point

[National Socialist poster from the 1920s: Die Bonzen im Speck, das Volk im Dreck“; literally, “the Bonzos [fat cats or bigwigs] in bacon” [i.e. in clover], the people in the dirt“].

National Socialism, Communism, and other radical movements did not, and do not, come out of nowhere.

Incidentally, note the facial features of the “Bonzos” there.

Actually, thinking about it, does that not bear at least a certain passing resemblance to the UK in 2025?

Talking point

The reality of 1930s Germany. Very different from the usual (((propaganda))) seen in the “Western” msm…

More tweets seen

In fact, here I stand somewhere in the middle. As society is now, not in 1800, or 1900, or 1960, there is a problem with —usually quite mediocre, at best— people inheriting, in some cases, tens of millions, in some cases hundreds or even thousands of millions. We all know the more newsworthy names— McCartney, Beckham, Jagger etc, but there are many others not so prominent in the gossip columns or even the financial pages. Some have wealth far beyond that bestowed upon popular music people, footballers etc, and/or their offspring.

Personally, I think it acceptable for people to inherit a modest amount, arguably up to £1M, but not £10M, certainly not £100M, £1BN or more.

This is a difficult and complex question once you get beyond simple cases. There are knotty questions of landed estates, trusts, tax avoidance offshore etc. A near-confiscatory tax regime is hard to enforce in anything approaching a free society. What I do not agree with is the out-of-hand dismissal seen in Matt Goodwin’s tweeted comment. The question or questions should be addressed.

There are, at present, only two serious contenders re. the next UK general election—Reform UK and Labour.

[“Several generations have perished”: a horrifying number of losses of the Armed Forces of Ukraine revealed From a recent leak of military documents, it became known that the Armed Forces of Ukraine have lost more than 1.7 million people since the start of the full-scale conflict with Russia, writes MWM. The death rate of Ukrainian conscripts is very high, and in areas with intense combat, the life expectancy of servicemen sometimes amounts to only four hours. The Armed Forces of Ukraine suffered especially heavy losses during the invasion of the Kursk region, as they were encircled by Russian troops who attacked from several sides simultaneously. Against the backdrop of this news, more and more supporters of the regime in Kyiv are saying that Ukraine is on the verge of complete military defeat.]

Late music

[painting by Victor Ostrovsky]

Diary Blog, 21 August 2025

Afternoon music

[painting by Volegov]

Tweets seen

As always, “they” seek control…

The recent Israeli attack on Iran has no doubt convinced any waverers in Iran that the only meaningful defence against Israeli aggression is to match the Israeli Jews in nuclear capability. Israel has created its own nemesis, as in a Greek tragedy.

One could also imagine Iran employing fleets of drones to exhaust the Israeli air defence shield, then using hundreds, even —in a future year— thousands of powerful conventional-warhead missiles, to overwhelm the remaining Israeli defences and to level the Dimona nuclear site, the Ben-Gurion airport, and Tel Aviv itself, without even having to use nuclear weapons.

Of course, Iran is a long way from Israel (at least 1,200 miles border to border), far beyond the flying distance of most drones at present, though some of the most advanced ones being used in the Ukraine war can reach about 600 miles.

Time will tell, but I think that Israel is doomed.

Not so sure about that. The protests may be at present mostly “peaceful” but the pressure on government comes from the fear that they may well become not-“peaceful”.

In any case, even if all the hotels are closed, the migrant-invaders will not be eliminated but will simply be hidden in the multikulti trash “communities” which now scar much of Britain. The taxpayers will pay out for either social housing or expensive private housing for the invaders.

Most if not all of those cities are already ghastly; God knows what they will be like in 5, 10, 20 years’ time.

[“Liberal commentators like Nelson and Finkelstein are guilty of what philosophers call the moralistic fallacy – the belief that something *cannot* be true simply because it would be morally undesirable if it were. Let’s take their objections one by one: (1) No one is claiming that every illegal migrant is a sex offender. The debate concerns specific cohorts of young men from particular countries and the *higher* statistical risks they bring, not blanket slurs on every individual. Pretending otherwise is a cheap straw man. (2) The phrase “whipping up protest mobs” is dishonest and demagogic. Protest is a democratic right, and the anti-migrant hotel demonstrators are overwhelmingly decent, peaceful, and diverse in background. If anything, these protests are moral, given that successive governments have refused to repeal the Human Rights Act or reopen detention centres… the very measures needed to deliver on their own manifesto promises. (3) No one is “thrilled” by the prospect of ethnic violence. Quite the opposite. The idea fills many of us – myself included, and academics like David Betz – with dread. It is not something we want to happen. But intellectual honesty demands that we take the risk seriously rather than banish it to the realm of taboo. (4) The claim that white Britons face harsher treatment in the courts is a subject that needs proper academic inquiry. But the grooming gangs scandal already provide enough evidence to suggest a form of two-tier justice exists. Columnists like Finkelstein just can’t adapt to the demographic and political realities staring them in the face. They’re stuck in a New Labour/Cameron-era timewarp, clinging to scripts the public has long since stopped buying. They remind me of that tragicomic band Crème Brulee from The League of Gentlemen – especially Les McQueen, forever trapped in nostalgia, boring anyone within earshot with tales of his glory days.”]

We know what may have to happen in the end, but are “not allowed” to discuss it publicly, or to post analysis or comments about it.

In any case, the “rubber boats” invasion is only about 5% of the overall migration problem, which consists of cross-Channel rubber-boat invaders, “students”, “fiancees”, “family members”, fake “tourists”, “key workers” (mostly low-pay employees) and, last but not least, births (to immigrant mothers, to mothers whose parents were immigrants, and to white British women who have been impregnated by non-whites).

Eventually, the future will have to be faced; mass immigration and migration invasion is not the whole of it, though an important part of it. It is also cultural, social, and economic.

I agree. The judge who allowed himself to be “nod-and-wink” told to pass a truly Draconian sentence, as Starmer-stein and Yvette Cooper wanted, thus showed himself unfit to sit in the seat of judgment.

On the blog yesterday, I highlighted the case of two South London thugs convicted a day or two ago of (in one incident) serious theft, grievous or actual (I forget) bodily harm using fists, feet, and a baseball bat, and serious criminal damage (wrecking a car), the victims being a man in his 50s and a pregnant woman.

Incredibly, the judge in that London case gave the defendants (one having serious previous convictions) a suspended sentence, plus a bit of unpaid picking up of litter etc, and rather modest compensation (probably will never be paid). Why? Mainly because (the judge said) the prisons are full to bursting; also because the defendants might be able to access some kind of anger-management bs.

Incidentally, Lucy Connolly may now be “free”, and able to return to her unwell husband and two small children, but will still have to undergo the boredom and silliness of being under probation supervision bs for another 22 months!

One more untermensch to be captured and put on the one-way train…

After Reform— the deluge (real social nationalism).

Incidentally, that poll would translate into a Commons with no less than 434 Reform MPs, 68 Labour, 51 LibDems, 42 SNP and 25 Cons (etc). As near to an electoral revolution as anything.

More music

More tweets

That refers to the GI Bill brought into law by F.D. Roosevelt. It gives those who have served in the U.S. armed forces free university education, free medical services etc.

In its original form, it did not extend those benefits to those who served in the armed forces of other countries. Seems that Israel has had its puppets in Congress make yet another pro-Jewish-lobby “exception”.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G.I._Bill

Russian forces continue to advance steadily, if slowly. The Kiev-regime forces are now incapable of mounting anything beyond a static “hedgehog” defence line, and are incapable of mounting any serious counter-attack, let alone a counter-offensive.

Well, who could have foreseen that?…

Well, I had better not post anything…inflammatory…lest I end up being unjustly imprisoned as Lucy Connolly was…

Anyway, as often noted on the blog, “rubber boat” migration invasion and the consequent “asylum hotel” aspect is only about 5% of the overall problem (even less if you take into account births).

[“India Pakistan Philippines Nigeria Kyrgyzstan Australia United States Zimbabwe Ghana Bangladesh Uzbekistan Sri Lanka Kazakhstan China Tajikistan France Canada Japan Kenya South Africa“]

Israel is doomed.

What forces are behind Macron? What indeed?…((( ))).

Late music

[painting by Victory Ostrovsky]

Diary Blog, 9 August 2025, including even more on the very questionable activity by “Mark Lewis Lawyer” (fanatical Jew-Zionist solicitor now based in Israel), and Beth Grossman (Jewish barrister, of Doughty Street Chambers, London)

Morning music

[Akademgorodok, Western Siberia]

Saturday quiz

Well, this week a clear victory over political journalist John Rentoul. Rentoul scored a very modest 2/10 as against my 7/10. I did not know the answers to questions 5, 6, and 8.

Tweets seen

See also:

Epstein has gone up the chimney. May all such exploiters go the same way.

Soon, Russia will be able to launch not hundreds but thousands of attack drones daily; huge fleets of drones will take to the air. Unstoppable. Once they have exhausted air defences, missiles will follow.

Why should Russia give up any territory at all? It is winning this ghastly and terrible war, and should take all of Eastern Ukraine (the territories east of the Dnieper).

Israel is doomed.

Zelensky can go to Israel, or to southern Florida, in (((some))) respects not dissimilar.

Even more about incompetent and dishonest solicitor “Mark Lewis Lawyer”, of Israel (and Patron Law, West London), and Beth Grossman, barrister (of Doughty Street Chambers, London)

Regular readers will be aware of the matter to which this refers. Anyone wanting more information can use the search box on the blog. Just type in “Mark Lewis”, “Beth Grossman”, “Patron Law”, “James Wilson” etc.

Both sides of the legal profession run scared of the Jew-Zionist lobby, as I found when I was wrongfully and (it later turned out) unlawfully disbarred in 2016:

In fact, that applies to the UK more generally at present:

Mark Lewis should have been struck off the solicitors’ roll many years ago.

More tweets seen

It is a misuse of the laws permitting proscription of supposedly “terrorist” organizations to label ordinary protesters “terrorist“. In fact, it makes a mockery of the whole thing.

This is what happens when (as with the present pathetic Labour Friends of Israel “government” of utter clowns), politicians act as puppets for the Jewish/Israel lobby.

Meanwhile, real crime continues unimpeded in the swamp that used to be our capital city.

Israeli-Jew war crimes continue.

More about the matter involving James Wilson, “Mark Lewis Lawyer”, Daniel Berke, Beth Grossman etc

Interesting. I knew that barrister and (sacked) part-time judge, Simon Myerson (of Leeds and Manchester) had been a witness in the case, and that the trial judge disbelieved his evidence (or discounted it as having been worthless) but had no idea that he was one of what looks now like a conspiratorial gaggle of Jews who apparently were “advising” the three losing defendants.

Newbon, of course, killed himself when he realized that his family home was on the line for having lost the libel case. He had concealed everything from his wife, too.

Sounds as though Myerson should probably be reported to the Bar Standards Board (not for the first time, I believe).

More tweets seen

Keeps the people off the streets…

Banana republic, but without any bananas. Just as well. Cleverly would probably try to claim for some, for his food supply.

Well, you know who is behind that nonsense…the “you-know-who” element…

…and that is why I am hoping that Reform do well in the next few years; because when they form a government, and it fails because (it will be) too pro-Jewish lobby, too pro-Israel, and not nearly radical or social-national enough, then a real social-national movement can arise and, the “Overton Window” having shifted, take the people with it.

Much of a muchness with other recent polls. Reform with 375-400 MPs and a large Commons majority, Labour with about 122 MPs, and the Con Party left utterly irrelevant with about 27 MPs, making it only the 4th, possibly 5th-largest, party (after Reform, Lab, LibDems, and possibly the SNP).

I suppose some tyrannical leaders might be tempted to covertly eliminate them.

It seems that, not satisfied with having seized, or tricked the Arab Palestinians into giving up, 97% of the land of pre-1947 Palestine, the Jews now want the remaining 3% for Jewish Lebensraum.

Late music

[Levitan, Great Road; Avenue of Birches]

Diary Blog, 8 August 2025, including what happens if the Gulf Stream stops, and James Wilson’s continuing legal battle with Jew-Zionist lawyers and perjurers including the notorious “Mark Lewis Lawyer”

Afternoon music

[Rivendell]

Tweets seen

I can think of one way…

See also:

Who really are the 11% so stupid that they think the migrant-invaders “share the same values” as us? Or are they malicious? I rather think the latter.

Interesting report about the Gulf Stream

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-14982353/Gulf-Stream-weakening-300-YEARS.html

The Gulf Stream has been getting weaker for much longer than we thought – and it could be on the verge of total collapse due to climate change

According to British scientists, the Gulf Stream – which is part of a much wider global system of ocean currents – moved northwards 300 years ago. 

This, they say, is a sign that it started slowing down then – before the Industrial Revolution and about 200 years earlier than previously believed.

And the ‘sensitive’ system could soon ‘cross a tipping point’ prior to its total collapse. 

The Gulf Stream is a major ocean current that moves warm surface water from Mexico northward across the Atlantic towards Europe.

It’s one of the most important natural weather systems, keeping northern and western Europe warm.

When it collapses, it could plummet Europe into a deep freeze reminiscent of the Hollywood film ‘The Day After Tomorrow’. 

In the 2004 movie, the Thames freezes over and the Houses of Parliament are smothered in a deep layer of snow.

[Daily Mail]

See also:

More tweets seen

There is a global…”problem”… of which this is merely part. You could even say “two global problems“.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oreshnik_(missile)

A warning to both Germany and Poland.

[“Vladimir Zelensky hopes to use the West’s help to force Russia to unconditionally stop the SMO, says Viktor Medvedchuk. “Zelensky needs Russia to end the conflict unconditionally, but he himself has no intention of ending it”, Medvedchuk stated. He called Zelensky a political clown who knows how to beg and whine but is completely incapable of solving political issues at any level.“]

Why should Russia freeze the situation, when it is steadily, albeit slowly, taking over the whole of Ukraine east of the Dnieper?

[“The decision about Ukraine is made exclusively by Putin. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky does not even have to come to the negotiations, because the terms of peace will be dictated exclusively by Russia — said American journalist Clayton Morris. “Zelensky decides nothing. He can send a letter or one of his subjects — it doesn’t matter, because all the cards are in Putin’s hands,” he said.“]

Sochi is scarcely a strategic or other military target. Why do the “Western” ((( msm))) not report on these crimes by the Zelensky regime?

Wall. Squad. End.

In the early 1930s, Germany faced problems almost as bad as (in some respects, worse than) the UK in the 2020s. National Socialism solved most of the more obvious challenges to decent ordered life, and was then able to look to the future. That the “you know who”-ridden outside world (finance-capitalist West, Stalinist/socialist East) turned on Germany from 1939 does not take away the immense achievements of 1933-1939, the years of peace.

That tweet refers to the aftermath of the libel case Wilson v. Mendelsohn, Newbon (deceased), and Cantor, which was launched by Northern academic James Wilson after a campaign of harassment by a pack of malicious Zionist Jews.

During the currency of the matter, the defendants’ Jewish solicitors (Daniel Berke of “3D Solicitors” of Manchester, and the notorious Mark Lewis of Patron Law, West London), and Counsel (Beth Grossman, of Doughty Street Chambers, London) appear in various degrees to have been incompetent and/or dishonest. The defendants’ (arguende, perjuring) Jewish/Zionist witnesses (every single one was a Jew) were simply not believed by the trial judge.

James Wilson won his case against the odds (and much dishonest Jewish chicanery) and now is actually trying to save defeated defendant Cantor from losing his house as a result of the negligence and dishonesty of Cantor’s fellow-Jews, and particularly “Mark Lewis Lawyer”.

I have to say that the successful claimant, Wilson, appears to be a great deal more forgiving than I would have been in his place. Wilson is now trying to save one of the Jews who targeted him, which Jew has been thrown to the wolves by his own Jewish lawyers and a number of other prominent Jew-Zionists who urged on the defence case against Wilson. Those other Jews, and the Jewish lawyers involved, have been trying to wash their hands of their default(s).

I have blogged extensively about the aftermath of this case, and about (in general, too) the self-promoting yet incompetent and dishonest Jew-Zionist solicitor, Mark Lewis. Use the search box on this blog for more.

As for the other losing defendants in that matter, I know little about Mendelsohn. As to Newbon (a vicious pro-Israel social media troll, whose own university, Northumbria, had to discipline him repeatedly), he killed himself rather than face up to the consequences of his badness.

At one time, Jews were not even allowed to become barristers in England and Wales (until the Jews Relief Act 1858 was passed, by which time the political influence bought by their money had permeated English society in the Victorian age).

Readers of the blog will be able to guess what my views on this subject are.

Incidentally, and while I am very rusty on the current law — I ceased active practice in 2008, and was wrongly and in fact unlawfully disbarred at the instigation of a connected packs of Jews —inc., in the shadows, “Mark Lewis Lawyer”— in 2016, my understanding is that legal professional privilege is not available against a barrister’s own client. Legal professional privilege, which protects confidential communications between a lawyer and client for the purpose of legal advice or litigation, is intended to benefit the client, not to shield the lawyer from disclosure to the client.

In this case, Cantor has (Wilson says) asked his former lawyers to disclose.

A few pertinent quotations, found here and there:

  • Purpose of the Exemption: Legal professional privilege exists to encourage open and honest communication between clients and their legal advisors, ensuring clients can fully disclose information relevant to their case without fear of that information being disclosed to others. 
  • Who Benefits? This privilege is solely for the benefit of the client, not the lawyer. A barrister cannot claim privilege to withhold information from their own client. 
  • Duty of Confidentiality: Barristers have a strict duty of confidentiality to their clients, but this duty is not absolute. It is subject to exceptions, such as where disclosure is required by law or where the client provides informed consent for disclosure. 
  • Client’s Right to Information: Clients have a right to access information held by their barrister relating to their case, including confidential communications, unless specific exemptions apply. 
  • Examples of Disclosure to Client: This includes, but is not limited to, the barrister’s advice, opinions of counsel, experts’ reports, and other documents relevant to the case. 

Incidentally, I have recently found AI (Artificial Intelligence) to be a wonderful resource in various areas of study or research. This, below, is what it has to say about Legal Professional Privilege:

Legal professional privilege

LPP protects confidential communications between a client and their lawyer, including barristers, and is a right held by the client. There are two main types: 

  • Legal advice privilege: Covers confidential communications for the purpose of seeking or giving legal advice.
  • Litigation privilege: Covers confidential communications made for the dominant purpose of obtaining advice or evidence for existing or reasonably contemplated litigation. 

Exceptions where LPP does NOT apply

LPP has limited exceptions where a barrister might be required or permitted to disclose information, even to their own client: 

  • Iniquity Exception: LPP does not apply if the client seeks advice to further a crime, fraud, or similar conduct.
  • Waiver by the client: The client can waive privilege, either expressly or implicitly.
  • Disclosure required or permitted by law: Statutory or regulatory obligations may compel disclosure, such as reporting suspicions of money laundering.
  • Public Interest Immunity (PII): A court may order non-disclosure based on PII, where the public interest in withholding information outweighs the public interest in disclosure. 

In summary, while a barrister generally must protect client confidentiality and uphold LPP, exceptions exist when the client seeks advice to further a crime, or when disclosure is required by law or court order.”

It can be seen that at least one exception (Waiver) might well apply. to the Cantor/Wilson matter. Possibly “Iniquity Exception” and/or “Public Interest” as well.

Looks as though Beth Grossman is on a loser (again).

Beth Grossman and “Mark Lewis Lawyer” must both be squirming.

I think that he should.

If Beth Grossman is going to take an absurdly bad point of the sort mooted by her chambers, Doughty Street Chambers, then it says something about her, arguende

The two surviving Jew defendants may eventually sue “Mark Lewis Lawyer” and the other defence solicitors and Counsel. We shall see.

Lewis has no or significant assets within the jurisdiction (England and Wales), though he is believed to own a flat in Eilat, Israel, a fact which was concealed from the Solicitors’ Disciplinary Tribunal. When Lewis was found guilty by the that Tribunal in 2018, his own (unpaid) Counsel said to the Tribunal that “Lewis has no assets except his own clothes, a used mobility scooter, and a private pension worth £70 a week”…so much for the supposed great defamation lawyer!

So Lewis can only be (effectively) sued jointly and severally with others, notably his fellow partners in the Patron Law firm. Presumably, he has professional indemnity insurance, though.

When I was a practising barrister, I had indemnity insurance, as all barristers are expected to carry. I was never sued anyway, but when I was instructed or “briefed” by a London law firm to draft contracts for the transhipment and sale of oil, my insurance had to be very radically increased, because even one shipment was worth tens of millions of U.S. dollars.

Late tweets seen

[“Pakistani Tariq Islam kidnapped a 12-year-old British schoolgirl on the pretext of playing. He forced her to take drugs and alcohol. He r*ped her several times and invited three more Pakistani friends. The 12-year-old girl was tortured and overdosed on drugs, leaving her with permanent brain and body damage. The perverts who appeared in court said they had no regrets. This happened in Leeds, UK. We urgently need mass deportations.“]

In this case, though, not deportation but a wall, a squad, and an end (to the untermenschen).

Parasites, as well as traitors.

Refer to previous comment.

Landlordism is parasitism. That is not, as such, a political statement, but one that is simply an expression of reality.

[“Zelensky admitted that Ukraine cannot retake the territories occupied by the Russian army by military means, and it is necessary to resort to diplomatic options This was reported by the British The Telegraph, claiming that Ukraine is ready for a ceasefire without recognizing Russia’s control over the new Russian territories, referring to the constitution of Ukraine. At the same time, the British publication does not report Ukraine’s readiness to withdraw the Armed Forces of Ukraine from the Donetsk People’s Republic and the Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions.“]

Late music

Diary Blog, 5 August 2025, including the latest news about university academic James Wilson and the Jews who were persecuting him (but tripped up)

Afternoon music

Latest about the James Wilson defamation case (which he won), and about dishonest and negligent solicitor “Mark Lewis Lawyer” and others

Both the Bar and the solicitors’ profession run scared of the Jew-Zionists these days. The Bar of England and Wales was once full of barristers of courage and principle. No more. Barristers are now almost all pathetic people. The Bar is now also, of course, riddled with the Jewish element.

“They” have killed the Bar as something worthwhile, just as they have killed off so much else in the UK and elsewhere.

Could she? More to the point, could he?

When Lewis was censured and fined by a Solicitors’ Disciplinary Tribunal in 2018 for abusing people online, including some Jews (he then fled, or pretended to flee, to Israel), his own (unpaid) Counsel told the Tribunal that Lewis should not be fined too much because his sole assets were his own clothes, a used mobility scooter, and a private pension worth £70 a week. The Tribunal reduced his fine accordingly (other Jews paid it).

Lewis is a total fake, a fraudster really, yet fanatical pro-Israel Jews are still to be seen on Twitter/X puffing his entirely invented reputation.

“They” worm their way into society, professions, universities, politics, the justice system, and destroy everything worthwhile in them.

As to Daniel Berke, “Berke by name and berk by nature”, in the old joke.

I should imagine that, after her own past and disappointing experiences using the services of “Mark Lewis Lawyer”, Rachel Riley will steer well clear!

If she “genuinely believed” that, she cannot be much of a journalist! See:

Lewis should have been struck off the solicitors’ roll years ago.

Not another fraudulent (((Patron Law))) lawyer?! What a surprise…

Why is that one also still in practice?

“Mark Lewis Lawyer” is both incompetent and totally dishonest (and now both mentally and physically incapable).

I should wager that now-washed-up one-time radio presenter and Z-list “celebrity”, Caroline Feraday, is thanking her lucky stars all the same that she dumped and divorced Lewis (the marriage lasted a year, back in or about 2013). Anyway, I believe that Lewis psychologically and physically abused her, so I expect she is glad to have got shot of the bastard after a short while.

Patron Law— just another pack of dishonest Jews. As to those named solicitors from the Mills and Reeve firm, I do not know, and have never heard of them.

If Berke trusted Lewis’s competence, then he can be no more competent than Lewis himself. Any potential clients of “3D Solicitors” take note…

See also:

See also:

More music

The air feels cleaner for that.

Slava!

[SS-Leibstandarte Adolf Hitler, at the Berghof]

Other tweets seen

Immigration is the most important issue, because it impacts every other issue, from housing, living standards, and the environment, to crime, women’s rights, culture, educational levels, even water supply.

[“Former high-ranking Mossad officer:

Iran is different from all the countries surrounding us. It is fundamentally unlike any state we have ever dealt with.

Iranians know how to learn from events, analyze why something happened, and draw conclusions. They are already replacing their air defense systems.

I get the feeling that in Israel there is increasing recognition that the operation did not achieve its goal.

Iran’s potential to produce nuclear weapons has not been completely destroyed. They have dispersed fissile materials across different parts of the country.“]

Israel has had its shot. Now it is Iran’s turn…

I am glad (for several reasons) that I do not live in Israel…

Farage’s statements are not “lies“, just a pro-Brit point of view instead of the anti-white anti-British points of view put forward by such as O’Brien on, in this case, the (Jewish-owned) LBC radio propaganda platform.

I don’t care if “only” 4% or 5% are “illegal” immigrants. That is still 500-1,500 per day.

Turn it around. What it means is that, bad as the “illegal” migration-invasion is, the real picture is 20x or 25x worse!

That utter traitor loudmouth, O’Brien, thinks it “hilarious” that this country is being flooded with immigrants, straining everything from water resources to housing resources to police resources. It has to stop. Facilitators and propagandists such as O’Brien also have to be stopped.

Jess Phillips binned? Blessed be…

Late tweets seen

[“Israeli commander: “The show is over, we are no longer able to fight” A field commander of the Israel regime’s army, in an urgent letter addressed to the General Staff of the army, warned of a critical situation in the Gaza Strip and demanded a radical revision of military policy. The letter, published by the newspaper “Yedioth Ahronoth,” further revealed the depth of the crisis within the ranks of the occupying army.“]

Over to you, Woody Allen. Make a film about them.

We need to go much further than that.

Neither do I. Nor do I want fanatical Jew-Zionists in the UK (or the rest of Europe).

Or, indeed, a “holocaust”.

This is what the fanatical Jew-Zionists in the UK, such as those of the small (((but well-funded))) “Campaign Against Antisemitism”, a volunteer unofficial arm of Israel and of the Israeli Embassy in London, are supporting, promoting, and excusing.

Late music

[reconstructed Dnieper Dam, 1947]

Diary Blog, 2 August 2025

Afternoon music

Honourable men, honourable soldiers

I happened to read the Wikipedia piece about Hermann-Eberhard Wildermuth: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermann-Eberhard_Wildermuth.

On 12 August 1944 Wildermuth became “Fortress Commandant” of Le Havre in France. This came as a disappointment; he had hoped for a corps. Before taking his new command, however, he swore the ‘customary oath’ to Hitler: to defend the fortress to the last man, and only to surrender with the authorisation of his superiors.[3] This oath to Hitler was, broadly speaking, respected by Wildermuth. At his interrogation by the British in January 1945, he stated that his aim had been to deny the Allies the use of the port, and to tie down as many Allied troops as possible, and that this had been achieved to his own satisfaction, since two British infantry divisions and about 150 tanks were assigned to the siege of Le Havre for almost fourteen days. Furthermore, while Wildermuth personally surrendered to British troops on 12 September, after being wounded in the thigh, he refused to order the surrender of the garrison on the ground that as a prisoner of war he no longer had any authority to do so.[4]

Prior to the early September launch of the British-led Operation Astonia to take the port city Wildermuth had requested that French citizens be evacuated before heavy pre-assault naval and air bombardment commenced. His offer was rebuffed by Lt-General John Crocker, in command of the 1st British Corps which had laid siege to the city. Crocker would later argue that if Wildermuth cared about the civilian population, he could have surrendered the garrison before the bombing began, and that acceding to Wildermuth’s request would have served only the German interest, by gaining time and removing potentially disruptive French civilians from the defended fortress.[5]

[Wikipedia]

Another, but far more junior officer, Lieutenant William Douglas-Home (whose elder brother later became a Conservative Party prime minister), was also at Le Havre at the material time:

Despite his opposition to the policy of requiring the unconditional surrender of Nazi Germany he was conscripted into the Army in July 1940 and joined the Buffs (Royal East Kent Regiment).[7] He went to 161 Officer Cadet Training Unit (161 OCTU) in the buildings of the Royal Military College, Sandhurst, where one of his colleagues was David Fraser. At Sandhurst, he was critical of the war, which he said had been unnecessary.[8] Douglas-Home was commissioned in the Buffs in March 1941.[9] While an officer he stood in the three parliamentary by-elections.

Douglas-Home was assigned to the 7th Battalion of the Buffs, which was converted to tanks as the 141 Regiment Royal Armoured Corps (141 RAC). In the Normandy campaign, 141 RAC was assigned to I Corps, a British formation within the First Canadian Army. In August, First Canadian Army was directed to mop up the German forces cut off in various sea ports in Normandy and Pas de Calais. In the first week of September 1944, the Allies moved against the port of Le Havre. A German garrison under Colonel Hermann-Eberhard Wildermuth was dug in on the hill overlooking the city. Wildermuth had been ordered by Hitler to defend Fortress Le Havre to the last man, and not to surrender.

When the Allied forces invested the city in advance of the planned aerial bombardment and subsequent assault, Wildermuth asked the British commander if the French civilians could be evacuated from the city, but that request was refused. Lieutenant (acting Captain) Douglas-Home was near Le Havre, awaiting the completion of the aerial bombardment. He was to serve as a liaison officer in Operation Astonia, the Allied attack on Le Havre. On the second day after the aerial bombardment had started, he learned of the German request to evacuate the civilians and the Allied refusal. The consequences of the bombardment were apparent to the waiting Allied forces and Douglas-Home refused to participate in the attack. He gave two reasons:[citation needed]

  • The unconditional surrender policy, which he thought compelled the enemy to fight to the end.
  • The refusal of civilian evacuation was morally unacceptable to him.

which created a moral obligation for Douglas-Home and he declined to participate.

The aerial bombardment of Le Havre lasted four nights, killed over 2,000 French civilians, 19 German soldiers and levelled the city. The Germans surrendered after two-days’ fighting and I Corps moved on to Boulogne, which was also subjected to a heavy aerial bombardment. At that time Douglas-Home, who had been placed under supervision (he did not consider himself at that time to have been “arrested”) wrote to the Maidenhead Advertiser and the publication of his letter in the newspaper prompted his formal arrest and detention.

Because of the article in the Maidenhead Advertiser, the Allied forces besieging Calais allowed the civilians to be evacuated from the town before it was subjected to a heavy aerial bombardment and final assault. Dunkirk was allowed to remain in German hands, with the besieged force bottled up, until Germany surrendered on 8 May 1945. In the wake of the publication, the British became sensitive to indiscriminate bombing of occupied cities and towns, although that consideration was not extended to towns and cities in Germany.

[Douglas-Home] served 8 months, initially in Wormwood Scrubs, then completing his term in Wakefield Prison.[11]

Captain Andrew Wilson, M.C. also served in 141 RAC. In his autobiography Flame Thrower, published in 1956, he recounts this incident and its consequences. Wilson wrote his story deliberately in the third person:

Even when he sailed with the regiment to Normandy, William had continued his private war-against-war. While headquarters were near Bayeux, he had written to the newspapers about some German ambulances shot up by British fighters. And what he had written was true. Wilson had seen the ambulances, riddled with bullets on the Tilly road.”

[Wikipedia]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Douglas_Home

Worth remembering at the present time.

Saturday quiz

Well, not so good this week: 3/10 (or 3 “and a third” out of 10 if using the same calculation as political journalist John Rentoul, who claims 2 “and a third”). I knew the answers only to questions 4, 8, and 10 and (like Rentoul) also guessed one word of no. 1. On a few other questions, I came close “but no cigar”…

The policy even fails on its own terms, because of problems of definition and determination.

Good God. Even worse than I had thought. Equivalent to Hiroshima, Dresden etc in WW2. The (Israeli) Jews, as well as (((those))) in the UK, USA etc supporting the devastation/genocide/ethnic cleansing, surely stand guilty of war crimes by any reasonable definition.

Wall. Squad. End.

[“NEW PIECE In my latest essay in @TheSun I ask –what holds a civilisation together? In Ancient Greece, Pericles warned they only survive if leaders maintain the trust of the people In Ancient Rome, Cicero warned states will soon collapse if they don’t put their own people first In Britain today? We are witnessing the very opposite of all this. An out-of-touch ruling class that’s imposing an extreme policy of mass uncontrolled immigration and broken borders on everybody else, prioritising foreigners and pushing its own citizens to openly revolt.”]

Only lunatics are now volunteering to be sent to the crumbling front-lines of the Kiev regime. A death sentence.

…and the half-Jewess and Israeli agent Ghislaine “Maxwell” has apparently been moved from a high-security prison to a “Club Fed” in Texas. Is that the prelude to a Presidential pardon? Looks as if the (((usual))) fix is in.

See also:

More about Jew-Zionist fanatic “Mark Lewis Lawyer”, Patron Law, Jewish barrister Beth Grossman etc

A pack of Jews, abusing the English legal system (yet again).

For background about previous Mark Lewis defaults, see also:

Lewis is both incompetent and dishonest. Anyone who employs him as a solicitor (if anyone still does) is an idiot.

Incidentally, and for those unaware of the matter, the above tweets refer mostly to the libel case Wilson v. Mendelsohn, Newbon (deceased), and Cantor. Wilson, an academic from the North of England, won his case despite a whole battery of Jews giving, in effect, perjured or tainted testimony. The witnesses (all Jews, all Israel fanatics) disbelieved by the trial judge included vituperative barrister Simon Myerson (dismissed, in effect, as part-time judge in 2024, because he was unable or unwilling to stop harassing people online), Daily Star scribbler Adam Cailler, one Joanne Bell (prolific on Twitter/X as “@jobellerina”), and Nathan Comiskey (another keyboard “warrior” for Israel) as well as the defendants.

Pete Newbon, one of the defendants, a sadistic and crazed Israel fanatic who trolled people mercilessly online, as well as committing various (other) crimes (his employer, a university, had already disciplined him for his appalling behaviour), committed suicide during the trial because he had not told his wife that their house was on the line. It appears that Mark Lewis and/or other Jewish lawyers had misled one or more of the defendants as to their downside risk. Dishonest, or simply incompetent? The Solicitors’ Regulation Authority is going to pronounce upon that soon.

Now, it seems that “Mark Lewis Lawyer” (solicitor) and Beth Grossman (Counsel, of Doughty Street Chambers in London) are refusing to disclose evidence about their behaviour during the course of the proceedings. It could lead to serious consequences for them, though Lewis is so washed-up now that it might not make much difference to him. Well, time will tell.

See also:

Something really has to be done about “the situation” in this country.

Late tweets seen

Order must be restored.

[“In case you’re not from the UK, this weekend there are yet more public protests against broken borders and mass immigration —in Islington, Manchester, Newcastle, Cannock, Portsmouth, Southampton. The mainstream media barely report on them. Politicians ignore them. But such is the level of public disillusionment with what is happening to our country that these protests are now becoming a persistent feature of our national life, which in itself shows both how out-of-touch the political system, and how febrile our once unified and stable society, have become.“]

[“Bookmark this tweet. And trust me. What Labour are about to do is approve ALL asylum claims so they can make it look like they are dealing with the backlog, while taking illegal migrants out of hotels and putting them in private housing to try and hide the costs. This is not dealing with the backlog. It will only incentivise many more to come. It will end up being a total disaster, much like their hapless “smash the gangs” strategy which I said in May 2024 would also be a total disaster.“]

As I have been predicting for a couple of years now on the blog…

As if that ridiculous monkey knows anything. Still, for once he is right, probably. The war may continue for another year. The Kiev-regime frontlines may last out that long, but in the end will crumble and collapse. Russia can take and should take all of Ukraine east of the Dnieper.

Historical video with music

[Marshal Zhukov inspects the ruins of the Reichstag in 1945 Berlin— don’t allow the Zelensky Jewish cabal, or American adventurists, to drag you into a similar situation]

Late talking point

Late music

[“Bitter is my native land“]
[Levitan, 1882, Vladimirka]
[“Let’s say goodbye, even if it hurts…”]
[painting by Victor Ostrovsky]

Diary Blog, 1 August 2025

Afternoon music

Latest Labour nonsense

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/aug/01/new-uk-civil-service-internship-scheme-only-open-to-working-class-students

“A new civil service internship scheme will be open only to working-class students as part of a drive to make Whitehall better reflect the country, the government has said.

The programme will give students from lower-income backgrounds the chance to apply for paid government placements. The definition of working class will be based on what jobs were held by their parents when the applicant was 14 and replaces an existing programme open to all.

The Cabinet Office minister Pat McFadden said the action was being taken because applicants from lower socioeconomic backgrounds were less likely to get a place on the so-called fast stream.

[Guardian]

As with several of the policies unveiled by Starmer-stein’s government, one can only shake the head at the sheer wrongheadedness of it.

It is a wrongful policy for several reasons, one of which is that it is likely to encourage blacks and browns to rule, probably incompetently, over the UK.

Tweets seen

…and, more than that, because the government of this country decided to close down the economy almost completely, then partly, for two years (2020-2022) in the name of a virus which actually killed relatively few people (and the “lockdowns” did not “save” any of those anyway; quite the contrary).

The “majority” there is “working majority”, of course, not bare majority.

Straws in the wind.

Walls. Squads. End(s).

Neither side should be targeting civilians.

Without Western aid, “Ukraine” (the Kiev-regime state) could not even exist. US/EU/UK aid not only supplies arms, ammunition, armoured transport etc, but also pays for the ordinary (if shambolic) quasi-state administration (and, of course, vast sums stashed by Zelensky’s cabal offshore).

Meanwhile, US, EU, and UK taxpayers suffer because huge sums are being diverted to the Kiev regime.

Huckster Huckabee is just another bought and paid-for American political mouthpiece for Israel and the Jewish lobby.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Huckabee#Israel_and_Palestine

Huckabee also strikes me as rather stupid.

“Baroness” Deech, a Jew-Zionist academic now elevated to the House of Lords, headed the Bar Standards Board, or BSB, when “UK Lawyers for Israel” [“UKLFI”], of which she was also a member, complained about my socio-political views, in or about 2014.

The “baroness” was still, I believe, the head of the BSB when the decision was taken to haul me before a Bar Disciplinary Tribunal, though by the time the “trial” took place, in 2016, she had been replaced by another mouthpiece for Israel and the Jewish lobby, a retired diplomat who had been involved in recovering property allegedly confiscated from Jews in mainland Europe in the 1930s and 1940s.

In other words, the Jewish/pro-Jewish influence on the BSB meant that the decision to “prosecute” me was flawed ab initio, being totally unobjective; biased.

I made those points at my Tribunal hearing in late 2016, but the chairman of the panel, a retired circuit judge, refused to take them as particularly significant, though he described my overall “case” as “unprecedented.”

Incidentally, the malicious Jewish cabal known as “Campaign Against Antisemitism” [“CAA”] was also involved in conspiring to get me disbarred, behind the scenes, though the actual complaint was formally signed off by yet another “UKLFI” (etc) Jewish barrister (of whom I had never heard), one Goldberg, now about 80 and apparently once Counsel for, inter alia, the infamous part-Jew gangsters, the Krays.

“Baroness” Deech is or was also a leading member or supporter of the “Campaign Against Antisemitism”…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruth_Deech,_Baroness_Deech#Early_life,_family_and_education

See also:

We have, in this country, a fifth column (in fact, several).

An evil old hag, in short.

Lord Sumption, though, has stood up in recent years for the rights and freedoms of British people, and for civilized society, and is to be commended.

The (((usual))) influence riddles all UK mass media organizations to a greater or lesser extent. “They” are often employed in such organizations, not infrequently at a high, i.e. decision-making, level.

[“Surely the key thing here is to raise awareness of what the civil service is and does rather than restricting who applies. I can’t say I had a clue about it until I worked in politics with and along side it. Got the vague gist from Yes Minister and that was about it. It wasn’t touched on once in any of my history lessons or even a history degree. Ridiculous when you think about it. Also ridiculous is the idea that the civil service doesn’t “get it” – it very much does, it’s politicians who don’t and Parliament is still too full of over-privileged twits.“]

The key thing is, in fact, whether, in the American black argot, “it do de job“. Same goes for doctors, lawyers, judges, politicians and all other occupations. Questions of “fairness” etc (either way), still less “diversity” etc are, at best, secondary.

Everything in this country must “do de job” properly.

Brava!

I have to admit that I like the lady’s spirit, despite disagreeing with her on various matters (especially re. the continuing migration-invasion of the UK).

As to Israel-puppet, drunk, drug-abuser, and general deviant, Gove, my referring to him about a decade or more ago (and entirely accurately) as an expenses cheat, and puppet of Israel and the Jew lobby (I did not know then about his drug and alcohol abuse), was one of the five “grossly offensive” tweets (yes, just 5, out of over 150,000 tweets and retweets posted since 2011) that got me disbarred at the instigation of the Jew-Zionists in 2016.

“Only for Jews and/or Israelis”

https://www.thejc.com/news/uk/oxford-college-launches-tikvah-scholarship-to-support-jewish-and-israeli-undergraduate-students-tvsivyrj

“Former principal of St Anne’s, Baroness Deech said she ‘welcomed’ the support for a group that has suffered ‘hardship’ in recent times.

One of the most prestigious Oxford colleges, St Anne’s,has for the first time ever launched a scholarship specifically for Jewish and Israeli undergraduate students.

[Jewish Chronicle]

Needless to add, no such scholarships exist for “white Northern European British only” undergraduates…

Had not previously heard of that one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Rankin.

Possibly Jewish, but that is as yet unconfirmed.

Windsor has been Conservative for most of its existence since the Conservative Party emerged in the 1830s, certainly since the 1840s. The last non-Conservative elected there was a Liberal, elected in 1868.

In more recent years, 2005-2024, Windsor was represented by a “dodgy” businessman, Adam Afriyie (half-English, half-African) [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Afriyie. Afriyie’s vote was at or above 60% for most of his tenure, perhaps surprisingly in view of his clear and proven dishonesty: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Afriyie#Parliamentary_career.

The Afriyie legacy, as well as the unpopularity of the Sunak government, may have been part of the reason Rankin, though able to take the seat in 2024, only received 36.4% of the vote: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windsor_(UK_Parliament_constituency)#Elections_in_the_2020s.

Rankin’s tenure as MP for Windsor may be short. The next election must have Reform UK as a likely contender (got about 10% in 2024), and both Lab and Con are likely to prove unpopular choices next time.

More about UK Lawyers for Israel and the “Campaign Against Antisemitism”

[“BREAKING: The UK Charity Commission is now investigating the charitable wing of UK Lawyers for Israel (UKLFI), following a complaint from CAGE International. CAGE submitted the complaint last month against both UKLFI and the Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA). The Charity Commission confirmed the investigation last week. The complaint detailed how UKLFI and CAA have helped egitimise Israel’s racist, apartheid and genocidal policies. It also states both groups have been making malicious complaints to universities, employers, and regulatory bodies to silence pro-Palestinian voices. These actions have caused serious harm to individuals. The Charity Commission must end the charity cover used to provide an advocacy infrastructure in support of genocide. To find out more about UKLFI and CAA, read our report Britain’s Apartheid Apologists: https://cage.ngo/product/report-britain-s-apartheid-apologists.“]

Those Jews are abusing English laws for political reasons; also, there is nothing at all charitable about either of them.

The “Maxwells” (fake name, of course) are all just another pack of Jewish liars, fraudsters, and spies.

Having noted the utter chaos in Louisiana when Hurricane Katrina came, and when both State and Federal Government did nothing for weeks afterward, I wonder what would happen if America’s top 50 cities were to be incinerated…

Don’t go there…

Invasion does not arrive only on rubber boats or landing-craft.

Anyone, of any ideology, who supports or facilitates the invasion of this country by non-Europeans, is a traitor and/or enemy.

Ah. “Abrams“… Wouldn’t you just know? Every. Single. Time.

Translates to about 382 Reform MPs, 126 Labour, 58 LibDems, 29 Cons, 26 SNP (etc).

Reform is already semi-System. If Reform can all but kill off the old LibLabCon parties, but then be unable or unwilling to take necessary measures as a government, the way will be open for social nationalism. Farage and his Reform UK might be the last despairing throw of the dice for the British people. After that, anything is possible.

The “experts” and many others laughed at Hitler, they laughed at Lenin…eventually, they stopped laughing.

The Kiev-regime front is already crumbling; soon it will collapse completely.

[“The administration of US President Donald Trump may withdraw support for Ukraine, said University of Chicago professor John Mearsheimer. “Let’s imagine we are Trump. We have made an agreement with Vladimir Putin which, if accepted by others, could end the conflict. Moreover, we have made it clear to Ukraine and Europe that if they do not accept it, we will withdraw. However, sooner or later the situation on the battlefield will develop so that they will have no choice but to accept peace with the Russians” he added.“]

Quite. Russia is not only winning on the battlefield, but winning decisively, if slowly. There may be a massive breakthrough soon.

That is exactly what the (Israeli) Jews want, and what their actions are quite deliberately causing. Ethnic cleansing, and Lebensraum.

Whatever criticisms can be levelled at the Chinese government and Chinese society, it has to be admitted that their achievements over the past 40 years have been incredible.

Late music

[Great Wall of China]