Tag Archives: USA

Diary Blog, 18 June 2026

Morning music

[Roman Bozhkov, Morning Music]

Tweets seen

The patience of the Russian leadership with this increasingly-serious shadow-boxing with the Kiev regime must be wearing thin.

(ps. the “Ian” there is not me but another Ian).

I may not “support” “Tommy Robinson”, as such (because he is controlled or too-influenced by the Israel-lobby), but he has a point here, of course.

I hope so, and that that is not a smoke-and-mirrors job designed to keep massive non-European hordes in Europe.

In the present age, trains should be run by the State as a strategic part of the economy, and fares kept reasonably low. At present, in the UK, we are getting the worst of both worlds: high prices combined with poor services (often) and the taxpayers funding private profits.

Those ticket prices London-Wigan are just insane.

Labour ministers and “comms” drones imagine that winning the Makerfield by-election (assuming that they do) will effectively crush both Reform UK and Restore Britain. I doubt it, but even were that so, it will not crush the justified and growing anger of the British people (including, in coming years, those in Makerfield) at migration invasion, environmental collapse, falls in living standards (and all other standards) etc.

Incidentally, “GOTV” = “Get Out The Vote”. Labour is throwing everything at this by-election. Desperate.

As said…desperate…

A few drone strikes, however destructive, on Moscow or other cities, will not change the arithmetic in the overall battlefield space.

I see Russian tweets etc claiming capture of villages, small settlements etc; from the Ukrainian side, not even that. The claimed Ukrainian advances must be either over depopulated areas of farmland and woodland or, at least as likely, non-existent.

The elephant in the room, surely, is the fact that Putin and the Russian leadership are not using more than a few percent, maybe less than one percent, of their potential destructive power. Russia has 7,000 nuclear weapons.

Would seem to indicate, if typical, that Russia is losing only 1 soldier killed for every 15 Ukrainian soldiers.

[“Labour has no right to win Makerfield, by @bnhwalker.

If Labour wins in Makerfield it will have been down to one man: Andy Burnham. In the most recent local elections every one of the individual council wards in Makerfield went Reform’s way. Nigel Farage’s party secured 50 per cent of the vote compared to Labour’s 25 per cent. Labour has never done so badly in Wigan. Whatever the capacities of one candidate, Reform should be winning it. The Makerfield constituency polls put Andy Burnham ahead by between 5-12 points.”]

There are 650 constituencies in the UK and Northern Ireland. I do not believe that any Burnham Bounce will swing (even in 2026) more than 50 of them. In any case, once (if it happens) Burnham is “crowned” PM, he will be faced with the same issues as Starmer-stein. Will he have better answers, or outcomes? I very much doubt that.

By 2029, this country will be even angrier and/or more desperate.

[“People vote in extraordinary ways in by-elections. They’ll even vote tactically for a party they can’t stand if it achieves the goal of a bloody nose to the party they backed last time. Honestly the way Labour has flooded Makerfield and the shocking machinations of Simons & Burnham would have me moving from abstention to considering in the privacy of the ballot booth a way of holding my nose to deliver a bloody nose. And as an ex-Tory I’m prepared to give LDs or Labour a hearing, I’m much closer to them on a few things than any of the (very) right-wing parties, that speaks to my natural and growing Burnham antipathy. The Our Andy stuff has been insufferable even from a distance.”]

UK Government aggression towards Russia is veering into the territory of outright war. Supplying the Kiev regime with 150,000 drones (presumably funded by the British taxpayer, at that) is tantamount to the UK taking a very active and direct part in the war. Mad.

As said before, Britain has never had any substantial connection with Ukraine, not in the thousand years of Ukraine’s history as effectively part of Russia, and not in its mere 35 years as a corrupt and shambolic notionally independent state. None.

Now the anti-British “British” government is launching what amounts to a military campaign against Russia in order to support the corrupt and brutal Jew-Zionist/Ukrainian-thug regime in Kiev. People should be asking why…

Were I a resident of Kiev, I should be packing my bags. Frankly, if this continues, the same might be said of London.

Exactly.

Exactly.

As said, the absurd thing is that, if Labour wins the by-election, nothing in fact changes and, outside the Manchester area, I doubt that Burnham is much of a gamechanger electorally.

I just read the brief Iran-US agreement. It is 90% in Iran’s favour, if not 100%. After 60 days, fees chargeable by Iran to all other states’ shipping to ship through the Strait of Hormuz; Iran oil exports to start again; Iranian assets to be unfrozen worldwide; a USD $300 BILLION fund (payable presumably by the USA) for the reconstruction of Iran (after the American and Israeli bombing and missile attacks); an Iranian pledge not to develop nuclear weapons (a promise already in place before the war anyway).

The USA has learned a lesson. Do not let the Jews (whether in Israel or the USA itself) dictate your foreign policy. Do not let the tail wag the dog.

A strategic disaster for both the USA and Israel, and the fault for it lies with Netanyahu and Israel, and with Trump. A TV personality and speculative businessman does not a statesman nor a strategist make, in most cases.

F.O.! Hegseth, you idiot— and take your Jews and (now-demented) Trump with you.

Something that, as I have noticed this week, people across the political spectrum agree upon. A horrible crime even in a country of (now) often horrible crimes.

That case also makes it clear that children of any age should never be condemned to be adopted by gay men in performative “marriage” “cosplays” (same goes for crazed lesbian couples).

Our animal friends. It is good to see something natural and pure after so much human degeneracy.

All roads lead to Rome, but…yes.

…or Russian, for that matter.

(in fact, there was never a serious possibility of German forces invading the UK in or around 1940, and there is no possibility of Russia taking over the UK in 2026).

Apparently an AI fake.

[Update, later same day: some msm outlets are now saying it is genuine. If so, mad…].

Incidentally, that “Crewkerne Man” is none other than Joshua Bonehill, or Bonehill-Paine, who used to put himself forward, about a decade or so ago, as a coming sort-of “national socialist”-style “Fuhrer” of the UK.

Bonehill-Paine tried to organize anti-Jew marches and would-be semi-pogroms in Golders Green and Central London (I think that 6 or 7 idiots actually turned up).

Bonehill-Paine was then, after a number of both political and non-political criminal convictions, imprisoned for many months, over a year in fact. In prison, he turned, or was turned, or brainwashed (?), from “antisemitism” to Judaeo-philia.

“Bonehill-Paine first questioned his antisemitic views during his second year in prison, after reading the Bible, and enrolled on a deradicalisation course via his probation officer.[4]” [Wikipedia]

Q.E.D.

Now, recently filmed looking 30+ years older than he did only a decade ago, he is apparently a supporter of the washed-up “Conservative” Party, is ludicrously pro-Jew and pro-Israel, and is even promoted by Israeli media outlets (as seen on his Twitter/X banner).

Very very strange.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joshua_Bonehill-Paine

Crewkerne Man meets Manchurian Candidate?

Late tweets seen

Unbelievable.

Mirabile dictu! I actually agree with Ed Davey on something…

Incredible that a supposed “top businesswoman” (Deborah Meaden) can be so dim; there again, it is a common fallacy that the very wealthy (even those who inherited riches) must somehow be highly intelligent, and very knowledgeable. Often, not so.

As for multikulti “Conservative” drone Fraser Nelson, I have written about him on the blog in the past. Nothing he writes is worth reading.

The very terminology is outdated. “Working class” is almost as passé as what Ernest Bevin once called “the jolly old proletariat“.

As noted on the blog for several years, drones have changed the face of warfare, especially infantry warfare. This is only the start.

In the end, Burnham will be same-old, even if he runs Starmer out of town.

At the 2024 General Election, and in very rough figures, for every 20 eligible voters 8 did not vote at all; 4 out of the 20 voted Labour, 3 voted Conservative, 2 voted Reform, 2 voted LibDem, and 1 voted Green.

Starmer-Labour, as I blogged 2 years ago, only had the active electoral support of a third of those that actually voted in 2024, and a mere fifth of all of those eligible to vote.

Now? About half of the 2024 figures.

Opinion polling suggests that Labour, even under Burnham, would be the choice of only around 26% of voters were there a GE any time soon.

By 2029, Burnham-Labour, if Burnham does take over, will probably be running in the polls at around 20% at best. Will Labour try to change the rules, as they are presently doing in Manchester re. the mayoral by-election?

There is no “Parliamentary road” for us, but elections may yet be a peripheral part of the way forward.

Our animal friends.

Yes, foxes kill chickens, such is their nature, so just ensure your chickens etc are protected, that’s all. Good fences make good neighbours.

Late music

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nina_Makarova]
[Pushkin Boulevard, Donetsk]

Diary Blog, 17 June 2026

Morning music

[Lincoln’s Inn, London, with view of Chapel frontage]

Blast from the past

I happened to see and to re-read a blog post from exactly 2 years ago. I said, inter alia:

[“Khrushchev, in his memoirs, said that (putting it in the language of 2024) an office-bod or bureaucrat type of person (he was thinking of Malenkov) was the very last type who should ever be given power.

Starmer is exactly that type. A sterile black-letter legal type, beholden to the UK Jewish lobby and Israel lobby; probably a freemason too. He will soon be an “elected” dictator by default, purely because the “Conservative” misgovernment is simply incapable of governing at all.

Starmer and Labour, on their own merits, would struggle to get elected. That they are now superficially popular by default is just absurd. They are not at all popular, but there is nothing in their way now. Less than two and a half weeks to go before Election Day, and the Conservative Party will be lucky to retain 50 MPs, in my opinion (which has been my opinion on the blog for months). (The “experts” are still saying 100-200).

Starmer is about to institute a kind of tyranny, for the benefit of transnational finance-capitalism and, of course, (((the usual))) “cosmopolitan” interests.”]

See:

Well, if I say so myself, who shouldn’t, I was pretty much right in calling it. I concede to having been wrong in thinking that the Conservative Party MP-cadre might reduce from 372 to 50 (it reduced to 121); next time, perhaps.

I think that I have been proven right as to the rest, though.

Tweets seen

Ha ha! Brilliant! Brava! that woman!

See also:

Steady though very slow advance. Russia needs a sudden and devastating gamechanger.

[“IN THE NEXT DAYS (WEEK), UKRAINE WILL LOSE CONTROL OVER KONSTANTINOVKA, KUPYANSK, AND LYMAN
The Russians have liberated New Donbas – they have reached five kilometers from Dobropolje

With the capture of Dobropolje, Russian forces will be able to flank Druzhkovka from the southwest and approach the much larger and more important Kramatorsk.”]

If Russian forces can advance on and take Kramatorsk, that will be a significant marker or milestone.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kramatorsk

[Kramatorsk, main square]

How much can they be paying him to so besmirch not only his own honour, but also his own basic credibility?

Our animal friends.

The CPS is afraid of the various “ethnic” lobbies, in this case the Sikh lobby, but more usually the Muslim lobby and (most of all) the Jewish lobby: see

In 2021, Stephen Silverman of the malicious Jewish “Campaign Against Antisemitism” fake charity (ethno-political pressure group) made a quite deliberate and false allegation against me to the police (see the first of the three blog posts noted above), to the effect that I had “racially harassed” him.

Completely false. Indeed, all harassment has been in the other direction, for years. I had never contacted the bastard, never seen him/it, and did not even have his/its contact details, address etc.

I was never charged with the invented “crime”, but the police should have charged Silverman. He quite plainly committed an attempt to pervert the course of justice, as well as the lesser crime of wasting police time. Was never charged.

I blame myself in part. I should have made an official complaint to the police against Silverman in 2021 or 2022; I am just not the kind of person who is always “reporting” people (if “people” is the bon mot)…

“Multicultural” countries cannot survive as nations, and can only survive as enforced states, kept in one piece by severe laws restricting free speech, political activity, protest, dissidence etc. This is now where Britain is. Policing has become nakedly political, and that also applies to the prosecution of offences.

The monkey may be changed, but not the organ-grinder(((s))), nor the music played.

Translates to a Commons with about 325 Reform UK MPs (just short of a majority), 84 Cons (very weak official Opposition), 62 LibDems, 61 Lab, 45 SNP, 44 Greens [etc].

Once again, on those figures Starmer would lose his seat, as would any (?) Labour MP at Makerfield, the by-election for which is tomorrow.

Whoever this lady may vote for, anyone who has mixed-race grandchildren (or children) is, to that maybe small extent, helping those who are destroying Europe’s future.

Quite amusing to see the Twitter/X “antiracist” idiots replying to that brief clip. As usual, deploying the “thick as mince” and similar comments. They cannot see that they themselves, desperate (God knows why) to see Labour succeed at Makerfield), are the dim souls, thinking that more System Labour misrule is a good thing (and that yet more migration-invasion is somehow a good thing).

Well, that opinion poll may show a “Burnham Bounce” for Labour, but that is now. If the next GE is not until 2028 or 2029, the picture may have changed or changed back, after another year or more of Labour government.

Anyway, that poll seems to show that a GE today, but with Burnham as PM, would result in a Commons with about 276 Reform UK MPs (about 50 short of majority), Labour 194 (substantial Opposition), 62 LibDems, 37 Cons, 30 SNP, and 25 Greens [etc].

That would be a completely hung Parliament, and with a minority Reform government unable to find the 50+ extra votes needed to pass anything much.

Incidentally, on those figures, and with PM Burnham as MP for Makerfield, he might well lose his own seat unless able to buck the national trend…

Bear in mind, though, that Restore’s impact has not been much quantified yet.

Yvette Cooper, Angela Rayner, and Al Carns, all suggested/potential Labour leaders, would also lose their seats on those figures.

If Burnham wins tomorrow at Makerfield, he will therefore probably not call a GE but hang on until (?) 2029, probably getting less and less popular, but hoping that “something will turn up”. Meanwhile, nationalist and social-national resentment will build up a formidable head of steam in the country.

I suppose readers of the blog will expect me to make a prediction as to Makerfield.

A fool’s errand, really, but for what it may be worth, Labour does seem to be nailed on (maybe, though, not to the extent seen on the betting market, where Labour is now heavily odds-on at a fairly absurd 1/7).

I expect that there are many “secret” Reform (and Restore) voters, but whether there are enough to make a difference I do not know. It is said that 10%-15% of Makerfield voters remain uncertain or undecided.

I think that Reform are now unlikely to pull it off, partly by reason of the ad hominem attacks made on the Reform candidate, partly because Restore’s candidature has plainly split what would have been the Reform vote. A Reform victory, though, is still just about possible.

Well, in a day or so, we shall all know the result.

Late music

Diary Blog, 15 June 2026

Morning music

[The Angel of the North]
[The Wicker Man (1973)]

A stray thought out of season

I was just thinking about admirable scenes from films. One which shows a decision made by someone of real integrity is when “The Jackal”, played in the original film by Edward Fox (ignore the remakes), is told that the French security services have discovered his identity and the nature of his mission— “The Jackal is blown; repeat, the Jackal is blown“, and he therefore has the possibility of abandoning his mission and getting out, as well as keeping the half of his fee which has already been paid upfront. His car reaches a fork in the road on the Cote d’Azur. A signpost points left to Paris, right to Italy. After a momentary hesitation, he guns the engine and drives into France, to the fulfilment of his mission, despite the almost suicidal risk. That is integrity. Class.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Day_of_the_Jackal_(film)#Plot

Tweets seen

[“Cornell student Austin Franco was doxxed by Jewish business leaders after explaining that he “didn’t want to work for a Jew,” claiming his experiences with Jews were not “pleasant,” after a NYC startup he had applied to reached out to him three times.

After one of the cofounders, Gabe Einhorn, posted Franco’s reply with his last name blocked out, Franco was quickly identified.

Einhorn said he did not “want to ruin his life,” but wanted to “raise awareness” of antisemitism.

Franco, in a now-deleted post, said that in his personal and professional experiences, Jews were tribalistic and vengeful, and tended to ruin and bully others who opposed them.

Franco stated, “I am sure that if you indicated you didn’t want to work for someone who was White or Christian this would not have blown up…”

Franco claimed that the actions by Einhorn and the Jewish community, posting his reply, doxxing him, and then trying to investigate and uproot his personal life, vindicated his concerns that Jews do not work with others politely.“]

Never give in. Never “apologise” to them (they treat it as victory over you and will trample you all the more). Never delete honest and accurate material.

“Kiev”, not “Kyiv” (and certainly not the BBC’s “Keeev“).

In the Middle East, the die is cast.

I understood the paradox long ago: the USA has more military-destructive power than any empire or state in history, and can destroy any force, or whole country, designated as an enemy, yet cannot necessarily use that force without itself suffering mortal injury; also, it has not the ideological will to impose an imperium (not only military-political authority but also a continuing “way of life”) in the way done by the great empires of the past— Hellenic, Roman, Mughal, French, British, Russian/Soviet etc.

The USA should really make the (Israeli) Jews do what the USA requires, by cutting off arms and money, but of course the Israeli/Jewish element is embedded very strongly in Congress, as well as in the American mass media, influential think tanks, publishing, academia etc, as well as, obviously, business and finance.

[$$$ from US taxpayers to Israel, leading to corrupt payments of $$$ from Israel to American legislators. The Americans are therefore paying Israel to corrupt the Americans’ own supposed representatives…].

https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-15897997/unit-government-police-MI6-agent-racial-tensions.html

I admit that, at first, I discounted the various tweets seen a few days ago, which tweets were saying that the fake “communitarian” gobbledegook put out notionally by the family of the murdered boy, Henry Nowak, was in fact forced on that family by the police or others (“the authorities”), but it seems that I was wrong.

I had thought that the typical System language of that family’s communique was simply because some police or “community relations” drone had helped them express their thoughts. As all too often, I was too kind. Seems that the whole thing was a “nudge” unit operation.

It will be recalled that a “high-flying” Civil Service Jew set up the Downing Street “nudge” operation about a decade or so ago, and on the orders of David Cameron-Levita and George Osborne.

Very sinister.

Monkeyworld UK.

[“Online safety” laws and age verification mandates have absolutely NOTHING to do with protecting children.

You cannot stop under-16s from accessing a website without checking the age of everyone who visits it. And you cannot check everyone’s age without forcing them to prove who they are.

“Child safety” is the cheese in the mousetrap.

Laws sold under the banner of “child protection” constitute a Trojan horse for a system requiring every adult to verify their identity before they can speak, read, or post online. The child is merely an emotional shield. The adult is the real target.

And once that infrastructure exists, the pretext can be swapped out at will.

Today it is pornography, social media and “harmful content”. Tomorrow it is messaging apps and online banking. Soon after it is your ability to access the internet at all—each incremental step gated behind a digital ID you are required to keep in good standing.

It’s no accident that the exact same “online safety” agenda is being rolled out across the entire Western world simultaneously, with each national government reaching for a slightly different pretext to justify the same outcome—a verified digital identity standing between you and the open internet.

Different countries. Different pretexts. Same infrastructure.

They are not building a system to keep children safe. They are building the identity layer for a permission-based internet—orchestrated from the supranational level by people you never elected—where access to information itself becomes conditional on obedience.

The point is not to make the internet safer. The point is to make anonymous access impossible.

Because a person who can read, speak, organise and dissent anonymously is difficult to control. A person whose most intimate online activity is anchored to a state-monitored digital ID is not.

Once every account, search, post, payment, message and website visit is tied to a verified identity, the internet stops being a public square and becomes a monitored enclosure.

But the gate only closes if people accept “online safety” laws at face value”]

Starmer-stein and his Cabinet are tyrants. Historically, tyrants have often had to be removed by direct popular action.

She is right.

Does Andrew Neil really believe this has anything at all to do with “protecting children”? If so, he is less perspicacious than I had thought.

Many will have been headed to the UK; many more just like them are still en route. Backward migrant-invaders.

That was just one of them. Hundreds of thousands arrive every year now. To remove or eliminate them will be a Herculean and apocalyptic task.

I know what should happen, but cannot express it, not in our supposedly “free” country…

Question to Google AI about how the “under-16s” social media ban will affect adults in the UK

how will the new under-16 social media ban affect those above the age of 18?

The new under-16 social media ban will primarily affect adults by requiring them to undergo strict age-verification checks, such as uploading government IDs or submitting to facial age-estimation scans, to access their own accounts. Because the law forces tech companies to police the age limit under threat of massive fines, platforms must prove all active users are old enough to be there. [1, 2, 3, 4]

Mandatory Age Checks

Adults will no longer be able to simply check a box to state they are over 18. Platforms like TikTok, Instagram, and X are rolling out Highly Effective Age Assurance (HEAA) measures. To log in or keep an active account, adults must use methods like facial analysis scanning, uploading passports or driving licences, or verifying through a bank account. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Increased Privacy and Data Concerns [1]

Civil liberties groups and digital experts note that this creates a system where adults must continuously hand over sensitive personal data to big tech firms. This has sparked criticism that the ban functions as a “digital ID by the back door,” raising prominent concerns about how securely adult data will be stored, monitored, and protected. [1, 2]

[from Google AI]

Police state, by any other name…

Talking point

https://nickgriffin544956.substack.com/p/makerfield-and-the-politics-of-pressure

More tweets seen

[“IMPORTANT :

There seems to be some individuals under the illusion that Remigration won’t result in mass violence on the streets. This is extremely naive and shows lack of understanding in the situation.

Let’s be conservative and say we have 20 million foreigners in Britain – do you think these people will leave just because you asked nicely?

The idea of “friendly Remigration” is childish and shows that people aren’t ready for what’s coming.

I worked with a Sudanese fella before – he watched his entire family get murdered in front of him in the civil war. Do you think he’ll go home just because you asked nicely?

What about the radical Islamists who are here soley to take over? Will they abandon their beliefs because you want them to?

What about the communists who support our replacement, will they change their minds because you promised to do it nicely?

Remigration will cause violence in the streets and many will die on both sides.

This is not a game.

The NRP understands this which is why we are a militant based party, we understand the sacrifices and the suffering that lay ahead of us.

There’s a whole world of suffering coming our way. It’s time to grow up and accept it.

We need a radical government to do radical actions.“]

I believe that the “NRP” is the National Rebirth Party, led by a former soldier called Alek Yerbury:

https://nationalrebirthparty.org.uk

[“Journalists are absolute scum. They are vicious in punishing people who dare to speak out about the Great Replacement. They will literally try to destroy your life.

It doesn’t matter if you are a good person, honest, generous, kind, etc. Nothing matters but that you defied the system.

In extreme cases, they will plaster your face over the front page of their newspaper so that everyone will see you as a villain.

I was 33 when they did this to me. They have now done it to a 19 year-old.

Support Angloid.”]

Tell me about it!

As I have noted before, this is not a “debate”, it is a war, even if at present mainly a “cold war”.

Late tweets seen

George Foulkes, a horrible, corrupt, and utterly useless old bastard, a freeloader and fraudster who, in any decent society, would be, at very least, digging canals or something. The whole quite long tweet is worth reading.

Labour. It has outlived its usefulness, just like the equally-fake “Conservative” Party.

I shall be interested to see what the charge will be. On the face of it, looking at what is already in the public domain, the evidence might be sufficient to ground an attempted murder charge but will probably, in the end, be a lesser charge. Tweets seen are suggesting GBH.

All the “protect children“, “stop terrorism” rubbish pumped out by Labour Friends of Israel puppets such as Starmer-stein, Yvette Cooper, Jess Phillips etc was always a pack of lies, of course, just a way to bring in a total police state by the back door.

Deportations are one way. There are others.

[“This is possibly the worst crime in modern history.
Two men “adopted” a baby.

“A post mortem examination identified more than 30 external bruises, as well as internal bruising to his mouth and throat, internal bruising to his anus, bowel and bladder, lacerations to his anorectum, and a perforated bowel.”

“One medical expert gave evidence that a bruise on the baby’s bottom appeared to be a human bite mark.”

Think what this poor baby went through. The men who did this should be put to death.

Men should not be able to buy babies. I know that this will cause some anguish to good men who have good intentions, but it’s necessary to prevent this happening. This cannot happen again.“]

Poor child. What an appalling crime; in fact, an appalling series of crimes. Men generally, particularly male couples in some kind of performative fake “marriage” cosplay, should not be allowed to adopt children; same goes for most lesbian couples, incidentally.

As for the defendants in that case, it is too good for them really, but we must keep our hands clean, so a quick and clean execution by firing squad would be my order, were I in a position to make the decision. Just expunge them from society.

Pseudo-“Conservative” Fraser Nelson, always ready to support anything that deprives British people of a decent future, or that cheats them out of a decent life today. Of course, he is pro-Jewish lobby, pro-Israel, pro-globalism etc…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraser_Nelson

[Shishkin, Bee Families in the Forest]

Diary Blog, 11 June 2026

Afternoon music

[painting by Serge Marshennikov]

A thought out of season

I was just thinking about the Henry Nowak matter. I myself live only about 20 miles from that part of Southampton, though in a very different semi-rural area.

I was also thinking about the Belfast protests or small riots.

The Southampton protests seen on TV and online seem to have involved 50-100 people, I doubt many more. I suspect that either a high minority, or a majority, of people generally are angry or at least concerned by wider aspects of the Henry Nowak case, also the wider aspects of the appalling savagery of the Belfast incident, as well as the incidents themselves, yet all we can see, on the surface, talking about Southampton, is 50 or 100 people (did the crowd ever amount to as many as 150?) confronting and —pointlessly— taunting a police contingent which also seems to have been in the dozens or maybe 100-150 in number.

Southampton itself has a population of about a quarter of a million people. You cannot judge the public mood by the few willing to get involved in street stand-offs (I do not think we can call them “battles”), whether in Southampton, Belfast, or anywhere else. You cannot say that, just because only a couple of hundred people turn out for a street protest in a city with 250,000 inhabitants, that that represents an otherwise-quiescent public. Not at all.

People are getting very apprehensive/concerned/angry about the present migration invasion and its consequences.

Tweets seen

Our animal friends.

Thus making Labour strong favourite to win the by-election. On the surface, bad news, in that it strengthens Labour, whose national vote (however stupidly) may rise if Burnham takes over from Starmer-stein.

On the other hand, looking at the bigger picture, it means that well over a third of the people —37%— of that Makerfield area (a traditional Labour area) are now thinking in terms of nationalist politics, though not so many thinking yet in terms of social nationalism; more than are thinking of voting Labour, anyway —only 35%.

The direction of travel is toward national and even social-national politics, and away from the traditional System parties.

In any case, voting “democracy” is only part of the story. All roads lead to Rome, and only white Europeans should be allowed to vote in this country.

See also:

Look at the Russian Empire, the Soviet Union and, indeed, post-Soviet Russia. Dozens if not hundreds of ethnic groups and languages. Kept together by the knut, one way or another. To the extent that Russia has “democracy”, it is because the Russians constitute the large majority.

USA? Well, until the Second World War, the USA was large-majority white European, indeed —at one time just after the First World War— about 90% white European, albeit with a number of minority European cultures (and also a strong Jewish element in a few cities, but mainly in New York). Now, whites are just about the minority, maybe 48%, and look at how dictatorial the USA has already become.

UK? You decide…

Seems that the police in the county have appealed for information as to the identity of the nasty person who killed a seagull in St. Ives today. It may or may not be the person identified in the above tweet. The sweatshirt certainly looks very distinctive.

A silly little man, a Labourite political careerist, who had no background at all in defence until appointed by Starmer-stein. Ludicrously pro-“Ukraine” (Kiev regime), too. Incidentally, Healey has always been a member of Labour Friends of Israel. What a surprise…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Healey

Very true, though a few of the examples cited are ill-judged. For example, that Linehan slug joined in several times with the Jewish-lobby attacks on me after I was both wrongfully and unlawfully disbarred in 2016. Linehan is a complete tool of the Israel/Jew lobby, a nasty person through and through.

Like others (e.g. Allison Pearson, Toby Young etc), Linehan pretends to be for “free speech”, but in reality favours the “cancellation” and censorship of whomsoever is hated by the Jewish lobby.

Of course, both Linehan and Allison Pearson are within the msm milieu, so their incomes (I presume that Linehan still has an income of some sort) are dependent on not being targeted by the Jewish lobby; dimwitted Allison Pearson has even made common cause with the malicious liars and perjurers of the so-called Campaign Against Antisemitism”, the main activity of which is to whine and demand for less “free speech”.

Talking point

Saw that the following blog post from over 9 years ago, so one of the first, has had hits. I can still stand by it:

More tweets

[“The government said the Online Safety Act was about protecting children. We were called conspiracy theorists for saying it wasn’t!

Well er … Ofcom is writing to platforms about “crisis situations”, civil unrest and enhanced moderation measures. (Blocking posts they don’t like)

Children aren’t mentioned once. NOT ONCE.

The problem isn’t removing genuine incitement to violence. The real problem is that unelected regulators will pressure platforms to decide what millions of ADULTS can and cannot see whenever a “crisis” is declared.

many platforms will remove perfectly lawful content rather than risk the punishment of Ofcom.

Read the letter for yourself. Link in the thread.]”

The cartoon below was about that sort of situation in the USA, but fits perfectly with the repression of online freedom in the UK:

[“Bloody hell, I’ve been digging more into the government definition of ‘Crisis’ a bit more So… an unelected regulator is now operating within government where the meaning of “crisis” has become very stretched.

The Cabinet Office Amber Book says an emergency under the Civil Contingencies Act covers serious damage to human welfare, the environment or UK security. (fair enough) But then it has added … “For the purposes of this guidance, the terms emergency and crisis are used interchangeably.”… INTERCHANGEABLY?

It also says an emergency/crisis can include situations that have not yet been harmful but have the potential to be (they do not define ‘harmful’ This guidance has not been voted for or debated So let me explain why thats so important. it means that almost any situation the government believes could become a problem can now be treated as a ‘crisis’.

And under that broad language, Ofcom has been able to write to platforms about civil unrest, crisis situations and how they will need to beef up moderation, it isnt just about removing illegal content.

Anything could become a “crisis”, no one voted for the widening of the definition and no one had the opportunity to, because thats how government by guidance works…. hoping you won’t even notice.“]

The “Covid” scamdemic/panicdemic was the template.

[“Oh lookie here…. And now the pincer movement. The government wants …

A NATIONAL COUNTER DISINFORMATION CENTRE!

The foreign affairs committee says it’s about protecting against foreign interference (sensible) But …

the recommendations include cross-government coordination and closer working with private organisations and expanded powers to tackle ‘harmful’ narratives.

Who decides what counts as “disinformation”? Well erm … government regulators and approved experts will decide which narratives are acceptable.

The greatest threat to democracy is not the public discourse. It’s the state deciding what discourse is permitted.

Read my book!“]

The BBC has led the way, with a “BBC Verification” department which is itself actually just a System disinformation-broadcasting department.

Late tweets

Translates to a Commons with about 311 Reform UK MPs (about 15 short of an overall majority), 85 Cons (very weak official Opposition), 83 Greens, 67 LibDems, 45 SNP, 32 Labour [etc].

Those figures would mean that about 370 current Labour MPs would lose their seats, including Starmer and, notionally, any Labour MP at Makerfield.

31 current Conservative Party MPs would also lose their seats.

I think that the polling organizations are going to have to place Restore on the board, because the absence of Restore obviously skews the suggested results in terms of seats notionally won at the next GE.

To my mind, with the present System people in place, almost any money spent on defence is wasted, much of the background policy being predicated on the nation that Russia wants to or even intends to invade Eastern or Central Europe, or even Western Europe, and maybe even the UK. It’s all nonsense.

This country should not be wasting money on supporting “Ukraine” (the corrupt, brutal, and shambolic Jew-Zionist/Ukrainian thug regime in Kiev); neither should any money at all be spent on assisting the vicious Israeli regime.

As for those political parasites and chancers such as Daniel Hannan, suggesting that both State pension benefits such as the Triple Lock, and disability benefits for British people, should be slashed and the monies diverted to “defence”, forget it! Crazy, as well as being political suicide for any party entertaining it.

A million migrant-invaders are coming into the UK every year; others are being born here… Our country is quite rapidly now falling to pieces by reason, mainly, of migration invasion. Stop that, rather than building fantasy armies and navies to be deployed in fantasy scenarios about fighting Russia (and its 7,000 nuclear weapons).

On the contrary, Britain should leave NATO and cultivate good relations with Russia, thus ensuring cheap energy for our industries and domestic consumers, and also giving the UK a huge and valuable market in Russia, a market currently closed to the EU states by reason of their mad anti-Russia sanctions regime. It could all be ours.

…and a member, of course, of Labour Friends of Israel.

Like most former officers who become MPs, Jarvis has proven to be a big disappointment in every way (cf. Johnny Mercer— remember him?).

Ah, another resignation. Al Carns looks good on paper (i.e. his background), but I reserve “judgment” (assessment) until more is known.

Seems to be pro the Kiev regime, so I am not too hopeful, but we shall see.

Wall. Squad. End.

Again more villages or hamlets. Russia needs a gamechanger in Ukraine.

A proper social-national government would change course, radically.

Our animal friends.

Late music

Diary Blog, 9 June 2026

Morning music

Tweets seen

The pages of history are turning.

Talking point

[“THE DOSSIER #8: Andy Burnham MP – The Corpse of the North

Born Liverpool 1970. Father a BT engineer. Mother a GP receptionist. Then Fitzwilliam College, Cambridge. The elite’s finishing school. You have never worked outside politics. Not one day. Researcher for Tessa Jowell. MP for Leigh 2001-2017. Secretary of State for Health.

You failed at every level. You failed upward. You always do. You lost your seat in 2017. The working-class town rejected you. The “man of the people” too posh for his own people. Now Mayor of Greater Manchester. The “King of the North.” The man who would be Prime Minister. You want the Labour leadership? You have tried twice. 2010. You came fourth. Eliminated with ten percent. 2015.

You launched your bid in an accountancy firm linked to tax avoidance. You attacked the mansion tax as “spiteful.” You abstained on Tory benefit cuts. You lost to Jeremy Corbyn. You cannot even win your own party.

You slammed “indefensible” waste on NHS consultants in opposition. Then you tripled spending to £27 million per year as Mayor.

While working-class girls were raped, tortured, murdered. While they were called prostitutes by the authorities you controlled. While they begged for help. You spent millions on consultants. You lent public money to a property tycoon. No full checks. He built luxury apartments. Working-class families slept on streets. You promised to end such arrangements. You lied. You always lie.

But here is your extinction. Here is what ends you forever. Mid Staffordshire. You were Health Secretary when the scandal broke. Hundreds dead. Patients drinking water from vases. Left unwashed in their own filth. You resisted a full public inquiry. You delayed. You obfuscated. Whistleblower Julie Bailey called you “grossly unsuitable.” She said you were “incompetent or negligent.” The Francis Report exposed the rot on your watch.

Maggie Oliver. The whistleblower who exposed the Rochdale grooming gangs. She came to you. She warned you. She gave you the evidence. Industrial-scale rape. Torture. Trafficking. Working-class girls, twelve years old, called prostitutes by Greater Manchester Police. Raped repeatedly. Tortured. Murdered. Their families ignored. Evidence destroyed. Complaints buried. Maggie Oliver said you “turned away” from victims. She said you “did not grasp the nettle.” She resigned over your handling of the Oldham inquiry. You had the evidence. You had the warnings. You did nothing. The girls suffered. The girls died.

You were Mayor. Under your watch, Greater Manchester Police abandoned one in five reported offences. Domestic abuse victims. Working-class women. No investigations. No safeguarding. No justice. They called for help. You were too busy being King. Too busy planning your PM bid. Too busy spending £27 million on consultants while children were raped.

You preach about the NHS while your Labour government started the privatization. Section 75. Competitive tendering. The market devouring public health. You built the machine you now pretend to oppose.

The hypocrisy is surgical. You want to be Prime Minister. Labour blocked your MP bid. You called it “an insult to people’s intelligence.” The insult, Andy, is you. The Cambridge-educated “man of the people” who failed the people. The King of the North who could not protect the North’s daughters. Who turned away. Who did nothing. Who spent millions on consultants while children were raped.

You have no seat. No hiding place. No sanctuary. You gambled that we would forget the girls called prostitutes while they suffered. You gambled that time would erase your cowardice. You lost. You are not a king. You are a caretaker of carnage. You are not a leader. You are a liability. You are not the future of Labour. You are its shame. You are its corpse. Your reputation is ash. Your conscience is a void. Your ambition is grotesque. Your career is over. Your betrayal of Britain is now complete. Permanent exile awaits. Congratulations. You are The Dossier.”]

An excoriating polemic.

Is this really someone the people of Makerfield want as their MP? Or as Prime Minister? I would have thought not.

I was actually unaware that Burnham started off, if that is correct, as “gopher” to freeloading/corrupt Blairite MP, Labour Friends of Israel member and, effectively, agent of influence for Israel, Tessa Jowell.

Incidentally, Tessa Jowell, now deceased, was also the minister responsible for the Communications Act 2003, under the appalling s.127 of which many people —including me— have been targeted by the Jewish/Israel lobby.

Seems to me that Burnham is being pushed and promoted by the (((msm))), and that is always a bad sign, as we have seen in the past, e.g. with Stermer-stein, “Boris”-idiot etc.

Burnham has nothing in the tank. Nothing new, and nothing interesting. A typical Blair-Brown era machine-Labour political careerist.

More tweets

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arkady_Volozh

Britain has to be cleaned out. The whole Western world needs to be cleaned out.

Translates to a Commons with about 300 Reform UK MPs (about 26 short of an overall majority), 88 Cons (very weak official Opposition, but this is the first time for quite a while that the Cons have come second in the opinion polling), 64 LibDems and 64 Greens, 60 Lab, and 45 SNP [etc].

Restore Britain are still not yet on most of the polling questionnaires. If they were, that would make a difference even were they to reach only 5%-10%; a recent poll in Makerfield had them on 19% in that part of the world.

Very open, overall, but it is clear that people want a real change from the same-old, and LibLabCon cannot provide that, even if (in my view, especially if) Andy Burnham takes over Labour.

Incidentally, on those figures, were Reform able to climb from 25% to 27%, that alone would give them a small overall Commons majority.

Also incidentally, I see tweets from a couple of loonie women to the effect that Yvette Cooper would transform Labour Party fortunes were she to become leader. Hardy-ha-ha. I very much doubt it.

For one thing, Yvette Cooper and her husband, Ed Balls, were both fraudsters and expenses cheats prior to 2010, and were exposed as such even if never prosecuted. Yes, over 15 years ago now, but it goes to character. She is still moneygrasping and moneygrubbing.

Also, Yvette Cooper is a died-in-the-wool pro-Jewish lobby and pro-Israel drone, completely under “their” thumb. She is also pro-migration invasion and the hopeless and degraded multikulti society. A would-be dictator and total careerist; power-mad, and bitter towards those standing up for Europe’s, including Britain’s, future.

Nein danke.

Until I saw those tweets, I was unaware that yet another “chimp-out” of some kind had occurred in the UK.

Don’t forget which “community” is, at root, behind the causes of all that, such as the importation into Europe of vast numbers of non-Europeans.

Look below the surface of events.

Talking point

I happened to see a blog post from well over 6 years ago, and which has had a few recent hits. The issues raised in 2019 are, most of them, still almost exactly the same as they now are:

More tweets seen

I think we have to start to understand, as a people, that quite a number of MPs, “journalist” scribblers, TV and radio talking-heads etc, are actually traitors; traitors to us, to our future as a people. Not just as a label, or as a word to put in a tweet, but in a real sense.

The Hilary Benn type of System politicians are enemies of this country, while sitting in a privileged position within it. Benn himself is, of course, the son of now-deceased idiot-“socialist” Labour MP, Tony Benn, a total hypocrite, as well as being completely wrongheaded on almost (?) every issue.

[“A white man sent out 300 job applications with his real name — zero responses.
He changed his last name to “Singh” on his résumé — and suddenly got callbacks.
This is not a coincidence. This is anti-white discrimination, enabled by DEI policies that openly discriminate against native Europeans and Americans.
While politicians import millions from India and lecture us about “diversity,” qualified white applicants are passed over for less qualified foreigners who game the system.
Merit is dead. Tribalism has replaced it.
End DEI. Deport the invaders. Hire based on ability, not skin colour or foreign name.
“]

Same in the UK. Even those institutions and employers not infested or contaminated with “woke-ism” etc are afraid that, if they ignore the non-whites, they will be on the end of a “discrimination” suit before long.

Monkeyworld UK, brought to you by the Benns, the Blairs, the Gordon Browns, the David Cameron-Levitas and George Osbornes, the Theresa Mays, the Starmer-steins, the “Boris”-idiots, and the Ed Daveys (etc) of this world.

I am unable to add what I think should happen to the enemies of civilization and culture, because we no longer live in anything even approaching a “free country” (as people used to say, long ago), and having politically-correct poundland Stasi police employees at my door (as has happened several times over the past decade or so) is very very boring.

Jenrick is also corrupt, tied-in with Jewish property-speculators etc. He should have been prosecuted.

Also, Jenrick decided to intervene in favour of building the proposed ugly concrete “holocaust” propaganda centre by the Palace of Westminster (not yet built, thankfully), over-ruling all opposition from the local council, environmental groups, and patriotic groups.

Even some in academia are awakening.

The full tweet by David Betz:

[“It is pointless trying to understand the contemporary British media complex as ‘media’ in the conventional sense—journalism, reporting, or even opinion. The correct frame is propaganda: mood and sentiment management, with its sharpest tool today being crisis communications.

The dominant technique, visible daily if you still watch, is inversion—systematic reversal. It flips reality: victim into perpetrator, aggressor into defender, truth into falsehood, good into evil. It constructs Walter Lippmann’s ‘pseudo-environment’, an alternate reality in which the public is meant to dwell.

A key subtype is projection, or ‘accusation in a mirror’, neatly summarised by a Rwandan Hutu propagandist in a 1990s manual: impute to your enemies exactly what you and your own side are planning or doing.

When a genuine crisis erupts—such as the racially aggravated murder of Henry Nowak—the first imperative of the machine is to stall, dampen, and defeat the natural eruption of public outrage.

Call it ‘restoring calm’ if you like the euphemism. In practice, it means herding people back into anaesthetised normality so that inversion can resume.

Once the majority has been shamed, distracted, or bullied into silence, the remnant still angry can be ridiculed by the usual chorus—eye-rolling panellists on Have I Got News for You, columnists sneering at those ‘harping on’, and accusations of crypto-racism or worse.

Thus, the brutal stabbing of an unarmed 18-year-old student, the false cry of racism by his killer, and the police reportedly handcuffing the dying boy as he bled out on a Southampton street is repackaged as another ‘knife crime’ tragedy (note Shaban Mahmood’s flaccid parliamentary statement this afternoon)—preferably illustrated with a generic white face in the style of the BBC’s so-called reality-based drama ‘Adolescence’ or the more recent but equally putridly manipulative ‘The Capture’.

Real patterns (grooming gangs, crime disparities, two-tier policing) are airbrushed. This is projection at work: the actual sources of predation and institutional failure are recast, while legitimate grievance is pathologized.

The truth? The system enabled both the attack and the immediate inversion of its aftermath and that stands exposed to anyone with eyes and functioning brain by the video evidence. That’s the problem, your own ‘lying eyes’, that crisis communications has to handle before there can be a return to normal levels of public mood management can be restored.

This is precisely what Dan Hodges is performing when he labels people demanding we talk about the murder ‘scum’ for refusing to respect the family’s wish that their son’s death not be politicised. It is phase-one grunt work in the inversion protocol: shame the angry back into silence so the pseudo-environment can be restored.

Smart enough to know his role, malleable enough to perform it willingly—exactly as Noam Chomsky described the filtering process that keeps the right sort of voice prominent in the system.

The technique still works on some. But it is wearing thin. Every overplayed inversion, every scummy dismissal of raw public grief, prepares the ground for sharper identities and clearer grievances against the system itself. Normal people do not remain moderate forever when the machine insists their reality is the problem.“]

Exactly. One of the best expositions I have seen recently.

Late tweets

[“If a migrant comes to our country and attempts to saw a man’s head off in the street, a Restore Britain Government will not deport.

With the British people’s approval, that savage will be put to death.

But that is not enough – these atrocities will keep happening. The barbarians are already inside the gates.

Immigration will end from countries that are proven to supply us with these monsters.

Third world migrants who hate our way of life will be removed from our country. Restore Britain will deport millions.

I have had enough. The British people have had enough.

We do not have to live like this – there is another way.

Death penalty, mass deportations, end mass immigration.

That is what Restore Britain will do.“]

Late music

[Levitan, Evening Bells]

Diary Blog, 7 June 2026

Afternoon music

[American special forces operative deploying from Hercules aircraft over Germany, 2015]

Stray thought

We are hearing much about the murder of the Polish or Anglo-Polish student, Henry Nowak, killed by a non-white in Southampton a while ago. In particular, people are arguing about what are the wishes of his family now.

It seems to me, not that those wishes (whatever they really are) are unimportant, but that this whole matter goes beyond those wishes (whatever they are) and, indeed, beyond the murder itself.

The matters to be considered revolve around the mass immigration (and subsequent/consequent breeding) of vast non-Brit, non-European populations within the UK, and the wider consequences of all that.

I cannot think of a really multiracial/multicultural society that has lasted long. People talk about the USA, but at the end of the First World War, the USA was about 90% European-origined, and the present very multiracial, if not very “multicultural”, USA of recent decades is already falling into near civil war.

The Roman Empire? Mostly European, of various strands, and it is important to note that the vast bulk of the populations within the Roman Empire did not travel far, or at all.

The main issue is that the UK’s present society is crumbling wherever you look.

I was also thinking about the present wave of arrests and trials of those protesting about the Nowak matter. It seems to me that, as with the not-dissimilar 2024 Southport protests, the System is using the whole arrest and trial process as a “punishment before the punishment”. To put it another way, “the process is the punishment”.

Those protesters arrested (whether pleading Guilty or Not Guilty) have all, I believe, been remanded in custody. There is no proper reason for such remand in any of the cases of which I have read: see Bail Act 1976, as amended. It is obviously being done as a means of repressing further protest by others. Purely political, or socio-political. Improper.

Tweets seen

…and, more importantly, arguably, are almost all just mouthpieces of the Jewish/Israel lobby…

The untermensch will be in prison for the next 21+ years, but a wall, a squad, and an end would be a better outcome; more just, and less expensive for the British people.

I generally disfavour capital punishment, but there may be exceptions. In any case, I distinguish between ordinary judicial punishment, and executive action designed to protect the people.

I myself have been bothered by Hampshire police drones repeatedly (also, once, Essex Police, in 2017, and once by the Metropolitan Police) over the past 14 years, always at the behest of Jewish-lobby “activists” and/or Jewish loonies connected with the “Campaign Against Antisemitism” liars and perjurers.

I do not know to what extent, if at all, the Hampshire Police and Crime Commissioner was involved (in recent years) in all that; I suspect, perhaps so. We shall see.

In any event, Police and Crime Commissioners are being phased out in 2028. She may even have to get a job (I think for the first time in her life, as far as I have read anyway): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donna_Jones_(British_politician).

See also:

In fact, such more or less peaceful demonstrations probably accomplish more than the kind of slightly violent confrontations we saw recently and, nearly two years ago, at Southport. There is no point using force when you are too weak to take that to a successful or victorious conclusion.

Britain needs no defence against Russia.

Russia is not the pre-1991 Soviet Union, has no world-conquering ideology such as the old Marxism-Leninism, and no motive to try to rule Central or Western Europe.

Moreover, we can see that Russia is struggling even to subdue the corrupt and shambolic Jew-Zionist regime in Kiev, and so far has not managed to occupy most of Eastern Ukraine, i.e. Ukraine east of the Dnieper.

Another point is that, were the UK to leave NATO and stop confronting and provoking Russia in the Baltic and the Black Sea, Russia would supply the UK at cost price with oil and gas, and also provide us with a large market for British goods and services.

Late tweets seen

Assuming that Labour wins at Makerfield (which is quite possible and even probable), it makes no difference in big-picture terms. The Overton window is moving; the fast rise of relatively more radical Restore Britain proves that. More and more people want something at least approaching a social-national world view. Reform UK, with its black/brown candidates and its pro-Jewish lobby, pro-Israel mindset, is getting left behind.

It may be that, for GE 2029 (or anyway the next GE), Reform and Restore could form a limited-time alliance —call it “Reform-Restore”— to avoid splitting the vote. Were they to do that, the prize could be…Government.

Both Reform and Restore will eventually either give way to social nationalism, or will morph into that to a large extent. Eventually, the will of the awakened people will break through and triumph.

Monkeys-on-sticks like that purport to rule over us…

All roads lead to Rome, but of course there is no “Parliamentary road” to political power in the present rigged system.

Late thought

Earlier, I saw some manic Ukrainian woman, apparently the head of the “Ukraine Forum” at the System “think-tank”, Chatham House (Royal Institute for International Affairs) [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chatham_House].

Said Ukrainian woman, as expected, spouted her piece about how “Ukraine” (the Kiev regime) was “winning” but —wait for it— needs more money, arms, ammunition etc.

One of the problems with the conflict in Ukraine is that the UK mass media is simply giving one side of both news and opinion. All the reporting is from Kiev or the Kiev-regime side, and the Kiev regime’s policy and propaganda is rarely if ever questioned.

Conversely, there is simply no real reportage at all from Russia, Kiev-regime attacks on civilian targets are not covered at all, or only very briefly, and there are never interviews with pro-Russian persons in Russia or anywhere else.

The elephant in the room is that Russia has maybe as many as 7,000 nuclear weapons of various types. Ukraine has none. The whole reporting of the war is akin to a kind of shadow-boxing. Russia has x-troops, the Kiev regime has x-troops; Russia has this or that, but the Kiev regime also has this or that.

You never hear anyone say that, were the order to be given, Kiev and all major Ukrainian cities could be holes in the ground within the hour.

Russia does not want to devastate Kiev and other cities. Why? Because of a thousand years of mutual history, because Russia and Ukraine were effectively one state for most of that time, because they are almost one people ethnically and culturally, and because Russia wants to rule a productive and healthy Eastern Ukraine, not a radioactive wasteland.

However, the way things are going, it may be that Russian leaders feel forced to escalate, if not to a nuclear level —yet— but at least to a more destructive conventional level.

Russia has hundreds of ballistic missiles in its conventional arsenal, and could launch, realistically, in any one day, maybe as many as 100 up-to-date ones, bearing in mind logistical bottlenecks etc; Russian forces already have, since 2022, used up to 70 missiles, including older models, in a night, but not concentrated on a single city or other target area.

Russia produces over 100 new ballistic missiles per month.

Were Russia likely to seriously look as if it might “lose” this war, part of its nuclear arsenal could be used, for example on Kiev. A terrible war crime, true, and it has not happened yet, despite 4 years of warfare, but it could happen, and don’t tell me that NATO —or the USA alone— would take on Russia in a nuclear exchange on behalf of the Kiev regime.

Were Russia to destroy Kiev and Kharkov, that would be terrible and/but also would be the end of the war. It might just happen. If it does happen, the main thing is not to let that slide into a general East-West nuclear war.

Late music

Diary Blog, 23 May 2026

Morning music

[Harriet Lawless, End of a Summer’s Day in St. James’s Park]

Saturday quiz

Well, a modest 4/10 this week, the same as political journalist John Rentoul. I knew only the answers to questions 1,2, 3, and 8.

Tweets seen

From the blog, a year ago

Today, I happened to see, from almost exactly a year ago, a blog post dated 24 May 2025, and referring to a Dunkirk commemoration :

“…Ironic. The System politicians and msm recently lined up to mention the possibility that Britain might have been invaded in 1940, yet pretended not to notice a real invasion that is happening right under their noses, and literally under the noses of the spectators of that Dunkirk tribute show.

As to why Britain was never actually under real threat of invasion in 1940, there were numerous reasons. First of all, Hitler wanted to rule much of the world in alliance with the British Empire; he did not want war with Britain; Britain, i.e. Neville Chamberlain’s Cabinet, declared war on Germany in 1939 and, after mid-1940, his successor, Churchill, was unwilling to consider an armistice.

Hitler was weighing what became the invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941. He did not wan t a two-front war.

Hitler allowed most of the British Army soldiers in the Dunkirk area to escape (my own maternal grandfather one of them). Hitler refused to allow the Luftwaffe and tank columns to destroy that army, the remnants of the British Expeditionary Force or BEF. German ground forces were halted outside Dunkirk by Hitler’s own order (Fuhrerbefehl).

Secondly, the Germans never had enough barge and ship capacity to ferry an army of sufficient size across the Channel.

Thirdly, the Luftwaffe could not guarantee air superiority; neither could the Luftwaffe and Kriegsmarine much defend any forces ferried across.

Reverting to today’s real invasion, it continues, day after day, and nothing of importance is being done to stop, or even slow, the flow.

If only Britain had been in loose alliance with the Reich. We would have been, today, the rulers of much of the world, and that world would have been a better and happier place by reason of it. The usual evil (((influence))) prevented it from happening. Instead, we sit on our small and beleaguered island, invaded daily by trash from all over the world, we are individually poorer with every passing day and, with every passing day, our society falls apart, more and more.

I wonder how long it will be before there is little that is worthwhile left. At the age of 68, I may not see the ultimate depths of the degradation of Britain, thank God, and I am doing what little I presently can, in my present situation, to avoid the catastrophe, but see around me a society running around like a headless chicken, scarcely aware that it is already, in effect, dead, or at least mortally wounded.

I may, by Grace of God, be able to do more. We shall see. That is a matter of Fate. If the existing society cannot be saved, it may be that seeds can be planted in the rotting corruption, seeds which may germinate at a later time in history.

[from this blog, a post dated 24 May 2023: https://ianrobertmillard.org/2025/05/24/diary-blog-24-may-2025-including-thoughts-about-israel-antisemitism-and-the-continuing-israeli-war-crimes-in-gaza/]

The System commends the planned resistance to an invasion that never happened (in 1940), but deplores even verbal resistance to the gradual invasion of our day, invasion by “small boats”, by “legal” influxes, and by births to non-Europeans already in the UK.

Late tweets

That man did not expressly mention the “JQ”, but how could he, in the climate of self-censorship the Jew-Zionists have imposed on the UK via monkeys-on-sticks political puppets such as Starmer-stein?

Burnham is just a marginally less compromised version of all the fake-Labour politicos, nothing more, nothing really genuine. As Hodges said, Reform would still win this easily, were it not for the Restore candidature.

What I take away from that poll is that, in that constituency, in 2026, about 47% of the voters are at least conservative-national, even if not social-national. At a guess, though, about 30%-40% of the voters are social-national, and would support a social-national government whether it won elections or simply seized power some other way. Another ~10%, maybe more, would also play ball.

Unfortunately, the usual (((poison))) has already been injected into Reform, and the same, at a lower dosage, into Restore. Neither are the answer to the country’s problems.

It is almost funny. The security organs —the police, MI5, SIS counter-espionage etc— put out huge efforts to catch “Russian agents” in a kind of Cold War “cosplay”, and put out more huge effort trying to identify and catch potential “terrorists”, those who might set off a bomb somewhere or other, or stab people in the street, yet all the time, in the background, the migration-invasion is changing the UK day by day, over time completely, and it is happening via “legal immigration”, illegal “small boat” invasion, and via invasion by births.

Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan. The naval and para-naval forces of the System are ferrying in the untermenschen. This is a conspiracy, and one operating in plain view.

Diary Blog, 19 May 2026

Morning music

Tweets seen

Our animal friends.

Unsurprising (part-Jew; possibly half-Jew): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katie_Lam

In any case, most of the benefit in those situations of technical economic improvement goes to 1% of the population.

Burnham may be marginally less of a clown than the other contenders for Starmer-stein’s purple, but he is still an oddly-“entitled”, and probably useless, chancer, like the rest.

Talking about useless chancers, here is Lammy again making a fool of himself…

Monkey-on-a-stick. Idiot.

We shall soon see.

See also:

Late music

[Moscow Kremlin wall]

Diary Blog, 15 May 2026

Afternoon music

[public statuary by Arno Breker; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arno_Breker]

Tweets seen

Our unconquerable children!

[“No, Ayesha. Spare us the condescending history lesson from someone whose family rode the post-war immigration wave into a nation your ancestors could never have built.

This is our island.

The English, the British peoples forged it through blood, genius and endurance.

Your smug “adapt and cope” is the language of replacement, not coexistence. We built this; we will reclaim it.

Your hospital anecdote is peak immigrant entitlement.

Yes, the NHS has around 21% non-British staff, one in five, with doctors at 36% and nurses at 30% foreign.

That’s not proof of British inadequacy. It’s proof of catastrophic policy failure: chronic under-training of our own people, welfare dependency that keeps native working-class youth out of rigorous professions, and an open-door policy that floods the system with cheaper imported labour while British graduates face debt and delays.

The NHS Long-term Workforce Plan admits over-reliance on overseas recruitment leaves us exposed – exactly as we warned.

Britain ran hospitals before mass immigration.

We invented modern medicine and public health.

We can staff them again by prioritising our own: expand medical school places, reform welfare to incentivise native work, and stop importing the world’s problems.

Britain a “tiny island” that “couldn’t manage on its own”? Laughable revisionism.

This “tiny island” led the Industrial Revolution, dominated global trade, and created the modern world with predominantly native ingenuity.

The Empire wasn’t plunder, it was a civilising force that spread law, language, infrastructure, abolition of slavery (while your Islamic forebears were still trading slaves), and prosperity to places that lag to this day.

India’s railways, administration, and parliamentary model? British. Pakistan’s very existence as a modern state? Carved from British India.

We gave more than we took, and colonies volunteered in both world wars because the alternative, Axis domination, was worse.

WW2? Britain stood alone in 1940 against the Nazi onslaught while your part of the world sat it out or collaborated.

Empire troops were vital auxiliaries Indian Army magnificent, no doubt but the strategy, navy, air force, intelligence, and industrial backbone were British.

We invented radar, broke Enigma, held the Atlantic, and led D-Day.

Without us, the Empire contribution wouldn’t have existed.

Don’t rewrite victory as dependency.

Manufacturing decline? Not because “we don’t want to work.”

It’s globalisation, cheap foreign competition, EU regulations, unions, energy costs, and yes – mass low-skilled immigration that suppressed wages, discouraged training apprenticeships, and let businesses avoid investing in British workers.

Cheap Pakistani and Indian factory labour in the 50s-70s papered over cracks instead of modernising.

Result: hollowed-out heartlands, welfare underclass, and now you lecture us for noticing.

High immigration hasn’t revived manufacturing; it’s correlated with stagnation, housing crisis, and strained services.

Your people’s “future generations” aren’t “resented for not being subservient.”

They’re resented for forming parallel societies, demanding sharia, delivering grooming gangs on an industrial scale in Rotherham and beyond, and polling consistently higher support for Islamic law, jihad sympathy, and rejection of British norms.

UK-born Muslims are growing fast – higher fertility, chain migration – projected to reshape our demographics while native birth rates collapse.

That’s not enrichment; it’s conquest by womb and welfare.

Half UK-born now, yet integration metrics on free speech, women’s rights, apostasy, and loyalty remain dire. You don’t assimilate, you expand.

The time for your entitlement is over.

Britain owes you nothing beyond the rule of law your forebears never extended to dhimmis.

We owe our children a secure homeland.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.”]

Do not agree with all of that, but can agree with 90% or more.

Wall. Squad. End.

More music

More tweets seen

Electoral politics may, after 2029, be over, but national revolutionary politics will then rise up to exterminate evil.

Deport?” He should be put up against a wall. In public.

[“We’ve had free speech in the UK for a very very long time”. That’s what Keir Starmer said to President Trump. But now look at what just happened in the UK in the last 48 hours alone.

Starmer’s government is pushing ahead with plans to scrap jury trials that will trash our ancient traditions, despite these never appearing in the Labour manifesto.

Starmer’s government is pushing ahead with plans to impose Digital ID – a naked power grab – despite this also never appearing in the Labour manifesto.

Starmer’s government is pushing ahead with plans to impose EU single market rules and laws which will cost the people billions of pounds while stripping us of our sovereignty, going against the democratic Brexit vote, and leaving us unable to influence EU decisions.

And Starmer’s government just BANNED conservatives from entering Britain on the grounds they are “not conducive to the public good”…As I explain in my newsletter below, contrary to what Keir Starmer tells you this is all happening. We face a sustained attack on our freedoms. And so the quicker not just Keir Starmer but this authoritarian Labour government is removed from power the better. They’ve never understood the British people. They’ve never understood our ancient traditions. And they’ve never understood our country.“]

The [Israeli] Jews (with support from the worldwide web of Jews in other parts of the world) did that, but “what goes around comes around“.

Late tweets seen

See also:

[“Professor Mearsheimer of the University of Chicago – on the fact that there is no doubt about Russia’s victory now:

I think there’s no doubt that the Russians took a pause. And I think there’s no doubt that the Ukrainians recaptured a tiny part of the territory, but that doesn’t matter in the big picture. And the Russians are now advancing again. It’s absolutely obvious. And although they’re not capturing territory as I think we expected two or three years ago, largely due to the presence of a huge number of drones and problems, there’s no doubt that they’re moving forward.

And I believe that in the near future they will eventually capture Donbass. Who will win this war? I think the Russians will win. They will get 20% of Ukraine and a frozen conflict. So I think there’s no hope that Ukraine will regain all the territory it lost in the eastern part of its country. It’s just not going to happen.
So the only interesting question at the moment is – how big a victory will Russia achieve? Will it capture all the territory in these four regions that it annexed? Or will it capture only a part of this territory?
“]

Well done!

[“Kirill Budanov stated that the volunteers in Ukraine have run out, and now there are only millions of draft evaders left. According to him, it’s impossible to completely stop mobilization, as it’s unrealistic to fully staff the army without it.

The only thing that can be attempted to reform is the manifestations of inhumane treatment during forced conscription. Not the act of conscription itself, he emphasized.

At the same time, over the past 3–4 months, the number of TCK( military hunters) groups has increased by 40%, and their staff has been expanded. The groups work daily according to orders and have the right to conduct notifications on public transport, in the streets, and at work and residence places.“]

It may be the world may, and sooner than we may think, be reduced to a tenth, or even a hundredth, of its present population. Even if that surviving population were a thousandth of the present population, and even if white Northern Europeans were only a thousand of that thousandth (i.e. ~8,000 people), so long as those ~8,000 people were the right type, in every respect, we should be able to build a new order and a new world on the skulls and bones of the old.

See also:

[The Wicker Man (1973)]

DNA studies prove that most of the present population of Europe is descended from only three men (and possibly many more women) of the Bronze Age, and that about half of the present echt-European population may be descended from only one man (but probably many women). Makes one think…

The stars in their courses fight on the side of the just” [ancient Chinese proverb].

Late music

[Russia has no borders; it is wherever there are Russians“]

Diary Blog, 13 May 2026

Morning music

[painting by Serge Marshennikov]

Tweets seen

Sooner or later, the USA will get back everything it has been handing out for the past 85 years.

That idiot has something wrong with his arithmetic; in fact, there is something wrong with him in general.

See also (from 2019):

Talking point

https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/44272/the-road-not-taken

More music

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhiannon

More tweets seen

[“What if all of the following are true:

Britain is no longer a democracy, it’s a credential-weighted compliance system.
Real power flows through the Treasury, regulators, and courts because they own risk.

The state doesn’t govern, it processes risk.
Policy is downstream of risk frameworks, not ideology or voter preference.

Parliament is a signalling layer, not a decision layer.
MPs signal moral alignment, launder system decisions into narratives, and absorb public anger.

Britain is governed by inherited assumptions that cannot be named.
Growth must not visibly benefit natives; legibility to international systems outranks domestic coherence.

Immigration was never a policy choice, it was a structural output.
Rather than adapt institutions to declining native compliance, the system imported populations less able to contest authority.

The real constitution is statistical, not written.
Bond yields, ratings, and legal harmonisation constrain action more than elections.

The collapse already happened, it looked like stability without purpose.

Britain isn’t misgoverned.
It’s being governed exactly as a late-stage administrative system must.
“]

The buildings of Westminster are as ramshackle as the “democracy” within.

Embarrassing but, these days, unsurprising that the Westminster Correspondent of the Yorkshire Post cannot spell “Mein Kampf“.

Starmer-stein and his cronies should be put on trial by a people’s court and, after fair examination of the evidence, put up against a wall.

At some point soon, voting “democracy” in the UK will become so rigged and twisted that the vanguard of the British people will have to depose the tyrannical pseudo-democratic tyrants by other means.

Incidentally, that poll translates to a Commons with 368 Reform UK MPs (solid majority), 74 Lab (very weak official Opposition), 62 LibDems, 44 Cons, 44 SNP, 32 Greens [etc].

Once again, Starmer would lose his own seat.

The sheer ignorance of many of the pro-immigration scribblers and talking heads is beyond belief at times. Blacks and browns did not build this country, they just flooded into it and started to breed.

Is there a big reward?…

Late talking point

Late music