Tag Archives: parasites

Alt-Right, daily blog, Defence, diary blog, environment, free speech, historical, historical revisionism, Ian Millard, immigration, Jewish lobby in UK, Matt Goodwin, MPs, Party Politics, rewilding, Russia and Russian relations, society, Starmer, The Great Replacement, the Great Reset, Uncategorized, wildlife, Yvette Cooper

Diary Blog, 8 August 2025, including what happens if the Gulf Stream stops, and James Wilson’s continuing legal battle with Jew-Zionist lawyers and perjurers including the notorious “Mark Lewis Lawyer”

26 Comments

Afternoon music

[Rivendell]

Tweets seen

I can think of one way…

See also:

When Reality Becomes Subjective

Who really are the 11% so stupid that they think the migrant-invaders “share the same values” as us? Or are they malicious? I rather think the latter.

Interesting report about the Gulf Stream

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-14982353/Gulf-Stream-weakening-300-YEARS.html

“The Gulf Stream has been getting weaker for much longer than we thought – and it could be on the verge of total collapse due to climate change. 

According to British scientists, the Gulf Stream – which is part of a much wider global system of ocean currents – moved northwards 300 years ago. 

This, they say, is a sign that it started slowing down then – before the Industrial Revolution and about 200 years earlier than previously believed.

And the ‘sensitive’ system could soon ‘cross a tipping point’ prior to its total collapse. 

The Gulf Stream is a major ocean current that moves warm surface water from Mexico northward across the Atlantic towards Europe.

It’s one of the most important natural weather systems, keeping northern and western Europe warm.

When it collapses, it could plummet Europe into a deep freeze reminiscent of the Hollywood film ‘The Day After Tomorrow’. 

In the 2004 movie, the Thames freezes over and the Houses of Parliament are smothered in a deep layer of snow.“

[Daily Mail]

See also:

The Tide is Coming In: Reflections on the Possible End of Our Present Civilization and What Might Follow

More tweets seen

There is a global…”problem”… of which this is merely part. You could even say “two global problems“.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oreshnik_(missile)

A warning to both Germany and Poland.

[“Vladimir Zelensky hopes to use the West’s help to force Russia to unconditionally stop the SMO, says Viktor Medvedchuk. “Zelensky needs Russia to end the conflict unconditionally, but he himself has no intention of ending it”, Medvedchuk stated. He called Zelensky a political clown who knows how to beg and whine but is completely incapable of solving political issues at any level.“]

Why should Russia freeze the situation, when it is steadily, albeit slowly, taking over the whole of Ukraine east of the Dnieper?

[“The decision about Ukraine is made exclusively by Putin. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky does not even have to come to the negotiations, because the terms of peace will be dictated exclusively by Russia — said American journalist Clayton Morris. “Zelensky decides nothing. He can send a letter or one of his subjects — it doesn’t matter, because all the cards are in Putin’s hands,” he said.“]

Sochi is scarcely a strategic or other military target. Why do the “Western” ((( msm))) not report on these crimes by the Zelensky regime?

Wall. Squad. End.

In the early 1930s, Germany faced problems almost as bad as (in some respects, worse than) the UK in the 2020s. National Socialism solved most of the more obvious challenges to decent ordered life, and was then able to look to the future. That the “you know who”-ridden outside world (finance-capitalist West, Stalinist/socialist East) turned on Germany from 1939 does not take away the immense achievements of 1933-1939, the years of peace.

That tweet refers to the aftermath of the libel case Wilson v. Mendelsohn, Newbon (deceased), and Cantor, which was launched by Northern academic James Wilson after a campaign of harassment by a pack of malicious Zionist Jews.

During the currency of the matter, the defendants’ Jewish solicitors (Daniel Berke of “3D Solicitors” of Manchester, and the notorious Mark Lewis of Patron Law, West London), and Counsel (Beth Grossman, of Doughty Street Chambers, London) appear in various degrees to have been incompetent and/or dishonest. The defendants’ (arguende, perjuring) Jewish/Zionist witnesses (every single one was a Jew) were simply not believed by the trial judge.

James Wilson won his case against the odds (and much dishonest Jewish chicanery) and now is actually trying to save defeated defendant Cantor from losing his house as a result of the negligence and dishonesty of Cantor’s fellow-Jews, and particularly “Mark Lewis Lawyer”.

I have to say that the successful claimant, Wilson, appears to be a great deal more forgiving than I would have been in his place. Wilson is now trying to save one of the Jews who targeted him, which Jew has been thrown to the wolves by his own Jewish lawyers and a number of other prominent Jew-Zionists who urged on the defence case against Wilson. Those other Jews, and the Jewish lawyers involved, have been trying to wash their hands of their default(s).

I have blogged extensively about the aftermath of this case, and about (in general, too) the self-promoting yet incompetent and dishonest Jew-Zionist solicitor, Mark Lewis. Use the search box on this blog for more.

As for the other losing defendants in that matter, I know little about Mendelsohn. As to Newbon (a vicious pro-Israel social media troll, whose own university, Northumbria, had to discipline him repeatedly), he killed himself rather than face up to the consequences of his badness.

At one time, Jews were not even allowed to become barristers in England and Wales (until the Jews Relief Act 1858 was passed, by which time the political influence bought by their money had permeated English society in the Victorian age).

Readers of the blog will be able to guess what my views on this subject are.

Incidentally, and while I am very rusty on the current law — I ceased active practice in 2008, and was wrongly and in fact unlawfully disbarred at the instigation of a connected packs of Jews —inc., in the shadows, “Mark Lewis Lawyer”— in 2016, my understanding is that legal professional privilege is not available against a barrister’s own client. Legal professional privilege, which protects confidential communications between a lawyer and client for the purpose of legal advice or litigation, is intended to benefit the client, not to shield the lawyer from disclosure to the client.

In this case, Cantor has (Wilson says) asked his former lawyers to disclose.

A few pertinent quotations, found here and there:

  • Purpose of the Exemption: Legal professional privilege exists to encourage open and honest communication between clients and their legal advisors, ensuring clients can fully disclose information relevant to their case without fear of that information being disclosed to others. 
  • Who Benefits? This privilege is solely for the benefit of the client, not the lawyer. A barrister cannot claim privilege to withhold information from their own client. 
  • Duty of Confidentiality: Barristers have a strict duty of confidentiality to their clients, but this duty is not absolute. It is subject to exceptions, such as where disclosure is required by law or where the client provides informed consent for disclosure. 
  • Client’s Right to Information: Clients have a right to access information held by their barrister relating to their case, including confidential communications, unless specific exemptions apply. 
  • Examples of Disclosure to Client: This includes, but is not limited to, the barrister’s advice, opinions of counsel, experts’ reports, and other documents relevant to the case. 

Incidentally, I have recently found AI (Artificial Intelligence) to be a wonderful resource in various areas of study or research. This, below, is what it has to say about Legal Professional Privilege:

“Legal professional privilege

LPP protects confidential communications between a client and their lawyer, including barristers, and is a right held by the client. There are two main types: 

  • Legal advice privilege: Covers confidential communications for the purpose of seeking or giving legal advice.
  • Litigation privilege: Covers confidential communications made for the dominant purpose of obtaining advice or evidence for existing or reasonably contemplated litigation. 

Exceptions where LPP does NOT apply

LPP has limited exceptions where a barrister might be required or permitted to disclose information, even to their own client: 

  • Iniquity Exception: LPP does not apply if the client seeks advice to further a crime, fraud, or similar conduct.
  • Waiver by the client: The client can waive privilege, either expressly or implicitly.
  • Disclosure required or permitted by law: Statutory or regulatory obligations may compel disclosure, such as reporting suspicions of money laundering.
  • Public Interest Immunity (PII): A court may order non-disclosure based on PII, where the public interest in withholding information outweighs the public interest in disclosure. 

In summary, while a barrister generally must protect client confidentiality and uphold LPP, exceptions exist when the client seeks advice to further a crime, or when disclosure is required by law or court order.”

It can be seen that at least one exception (Waiver) might well apply. to the Cantor/Wilson matter. Possibly “Iniquity Exception” and/or “Public Interest” as well.

Looks as though Beth Grossman is on a loser (again).

Beth Grossman and “Mark Lewis Lawyer” must both be squirming.

I think that he should.

If Beth Grossman is going to take an absurdly bad point of the sort mooted by her chambers, Doughty Street Chambers, then it says something about her, arguende…

The two surviving Jew defendants may eventually sue “Mark Lewis Lawyer” and the other defence solicitors and Counsel. We shall see.

Lewis has no or significant assets within the jurisdiction (England and Wales), though he is believed to own a flat in Eilat, Israel, a fact which was concealed from the Solicitors’ Disciplinary Tribunal. When Lewis was found guilty by the that Tribunal in 2018, his own (unpaid) Counsel said to the Tribunal that “Lewis has no assets except his own clothes, a used mobility scooter, and a private pension worth £70 a week”…so much for the supposed great defamation lawyer!

So Lewis can only be (effectively) sued jointly and severally with others, notably his fellow partners in the Patron Law firm. Presumably, he has professional indemnity insurance, though.

When I was a practising barrister, I had indemnity insurance, as all barristers are expected to carry. I was never sued anyway, but when I was instructed or “briefed” by a London law firm to draft contracts for the transhipment and sale of oil, my insurance had to be very radically increased, because even one shipment was worth tens of millions of U.S. dollars.

Late tweets seen

[“Pakistani Tariq Islam kidnapped a 12-year-old British schoolgirl on the pretext of playing. He forced her to take drugs and alcohol. He r*ped her several times and invited three more Pakistani friends. The 12-year-old girl was tortured and overdosed on drugs, leaving her with permanent brain and body damage. The perverts who appeared in court said they had no regrets. This happened in Leeds, UK. We urgently need mass deportations.“]

In this case, though, not deportation but a wall, a squad, and an end (to the untermenschen).

Parasites, as well as traitors.

Refer to previous comment.

Landlordism is parasitism. That is not, as such, a political statement, but one that is simply an expression of reality.

[“Zelensky admitted that Ukraine cannot retake the territories occupied by the Russian army by military means, and it is necessary to resort to diplomatic options This was reported by the British The Telegraph, claiming that Ukraine is ready for a ceasefire without recognizing Russia’s control over the new Russian territories, referring to the constitution of Ukraine. At the same time, the British publication does not report Ukraine’s readiness to withdraw the Armed Forces of Ukraine from the Donetsk People’s Republic and the Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions.“]

Late music

Alt-Right, Angela Rayner, Boris Johnson, Brexit, by-elections, Campaign Against AntiSemitism, daily blog, Defence, diary blog, elections, free speech, historical, historical revisionism, Ian Millard, immigration, Jewish lobby in UK, Kemi Badenoch, Labour Friends of Israel, Liz Kendall, MPs, Party Politics, Rachel Reeves, Rishi Sunak, Russia and Russian relations, society, Starmer, The Great Replacement, Uncategorized, Yvette Cooper

Diary Blog, 1 August 2025

36 Comments

Afternoon music

Latest Labour nonsense

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/aug/01/new-uk-civil-service-internship-scheme-only-open-to-working-class-students

“A new civil service internship scheme will be open only to working-class students as part of a drive to make Whitehall better reflect the country, the government has said.

The programme will give students from lower-income backgrounds the chance to apply for paid government placements. The definition of working class will be based on what jobs were held by their parents when the applicant was 14 and replaces an existing programme open to all.

The Cabinet Office minister Pat McFadden said the action was being taken because applicants from lower socioeconomic backgrounds were less likely to get a place on the so-called fast stream.“

[Guardian]

As with several of the policies unveiled by Starmer-stein’s government, one can only shake the head at the sheer wrongheadedness of it.

It is a wrongful policy for several reasons, one of which is that it is likely to encourage blacks and browns to rule, probably incompetently, over the UK.

Tweets seen

…and, more than that, because the government of this country decided to close down the economy almost completely, then partly, for two years (2020-2022) in the name of a virus which actually killed relatively few people (and the “lockdowns” did not “save” any of those anyway; quite the contrary).

The “majority” there is “working majority”, of course, not bare majority.

Straws in the wind.

Walls. Squads. End(s).

Neither side should be targeting civilians.

Without Western aid, “Ukraine” (the Kiev-regime state) could not even exist. US/EU/UK aid not only supplies arms, ammunition, armoured transport etc, but also pays for the ordinary (if shambolic) quasi-state administration (and, of course, vast sums stashed by Zelensky’s cabal offshore).

Meanwhile, US, EU, and UK taxpayers suffer because huge sums are being diverted to the Kiev regime.

Huckster Huckabee is just another bought and paid-for American political mouthpiece for Israel and the Jewish lobby.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Huckabee#Israel_and_Palestine

Huckabee also strikes me as rather stupid.

“Baroness” Deech, a Jew-Zionist academic now elevated to the House of Lords, headed the Bar Standards Board, or BSB, when “UK Lawyers for Israel” [“UKLFI”], of which she was also a member, complained about my socio-political views, in or about 2014.

The “baroness” was still, I believe, the head of the BSB when the decision was taken to haul me before a Bar Disciplinary Tribunal, though by the time the “trial” took place, in 2016, she had been replaced by another mouthpiece for Israel and the Jewish lobby, a retired diplomat who had been involved in recovering property allegedly confiscated from Jews in mainland Europe in the 1930s and 1940s.

In other words, the Jewish/pro-Jewish influence on the BSB meant that the decision to “prosecute” me was flawed ab initio, being totally unobjective; biased.

I made those points at my Tribunal hearing in late 2016, but the chairman of the panel, a retired circuit judge, refused to take them as particularly significant, though he described my overall “case” as “unprecedented.”

Incidentally, the malicious Jewish cabal known as “Campaign Against Antisemitism” [“CAA”] was also involved in conspiring to get me disbarred, behind the scenes, though the actual complaint was formally signed off by yet another “UKLFI” (etc) Jewish barrister (of whom I had never heard), one Goldberg, now about 80 and apparently once Counsel for, inter alia, the infamous part-Jew gangsters, the Krays.

“Baroness” Deech is or was also a leading member or supporter of the “Campaign Against Antisemitism”…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruth_Deech,_Baroness_Deech#Early_life,_family_and_education

See also:

The Slide of the English Bar and UK Society Continues and Accelerates

We have, in this country, a fifth column (in fact, several).

An evil old hag, in short.

Lord Sumption, though, has stood up in recent years for the rights and freedoms of British people, and for civilized society, and is to be commended.

The (((usual))) influence riddles all UK mass media organizations to a greater or lesser extent. “They” are often employed in such organizations, not infrequently at a high, i.e. decision-making, level.

[“Surely the key thing here is to raise awareness of what the civil service is and does rather than restricting who applies. I can’t say I had a clue about it until I worked in politics with and along side it. Got the vague gist from Yes Minister and that was about it. It wasn’t touched on once in any of my history lessons or even a history degree. Ridiculous when you think about it. Also ridiculous is the idea that the civil service doesn’t “get it” – it very much does, it’s politicians who don’t and Parliament is still too full of over-privileged twits.“]

The key thing is, in fact, whether, in the American black argot, “it do de job“. Same goes for doctors, lawyers, judges, politicians and all other occupations. Questions of “fairness” etc (either way), still less “diversity” etc are, at best, secondary.

Everything in this country must “do de job” properly.

Brava!

I have to admit that I like the lady’s spirit, despite disagreeing with her on various matters (especially re. the continuing migration-invasion of the UK).

As to Israel-puppet, drunk, drug-abuser, and general deviant, Gove, my referring to him about a decade or more ago (and entirely accurately) as an expenses cheat, and puppet of Israel and the Jew lobby (I did not know then about his drug and alcohol abuse), was one of the five “grossly offensive” tweets (yes, just 5, out of over 150,000 tweets and retweets posted since 2011) that got me disbarred at the instigation of the Jew-Zionists in 2016.

“Only for Jews and/or Israelis”

https://www.thejc.com/news/uk/oxford-college-launches-tikvah-scholarship-to-support-jewish-and-israeli-undergraduate-students-tvsivyrj

“Former principal of St Anne’s, Baroness Deech said she ‘welcomed’ the support for a group that has suffered ‘hardship’ in recent times.

One of the most prestigious Oxford colleges, St Anne’s,has for the first time ever launched a scholarship specifically for Jewish and Israeli undergraduate students.“

[Jewish Chronicle]

Needless to add, no such scholarships exist for “white Northern European British only” undergraduates…

Had not previously heard of that one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Rankin.

Possibly Jewish, but that is as yet unconfirmed.

Windsor has been Conservative for most of its existence since the Conservative Party emerged in the 1830s, certainly since the 1840s. The last non-Conservative elected there was a Liberal, elected in 1868.

In more recent years, 2005-2024, Windsor was represented by a “dodgy” businessman, Adam Afriyie (half-English, half-African) [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Afriyie. Afriyie’s vote was at or above 60% for most of his tenure, perhaps surprisingly in view of his clear and proven dishonesty: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Afriyie#Parliamentary_career.

The Afriyie legacy, as well as the unpopularity of the Sunak government, may have been part of the reason Rankin, though able to take the seat in 2024, only received 36.4% of the vote: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windsor_(UK_Parliament_constituency)#Elections_in_the_2020s.

Rankin’s tenure as MP for Windsor may be short. The next election must have Reform UK as a likely contender (got about 10% in 2024), and both Lab and Con are likely to prove unpopular choices next time.

More about UK Lawyers for Israel and the “Campaign Against Antisemitism”

[“BREAKING: The UK Charity Commission is now investigating the charitable wing of UK Lawyers for Israel (UKLFI), following a complaint from CAGE International. CAGE submitted the complaint last month against both UKLFI and the Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA). The Charity Commission confirmed the investigation last week. The complaint detailed how UKLFI and CAA have helped egitimise Israel’s racist, apartheid and genocidal policies. It also states both groups have been making malicious complaints to universities, employers, and regulatory bodies to silence pro-Palestinian voices. These actions have caused serious harm to individuals. The Charity Commission must end the charity cover used to provide an advocacy infrastructure in support of genocide. To find out more about UKLFI and CAA, read our report Britain’s Apartheid Apologists: https://cage.ngo/product/report-britain-s-apartheid-apologists.“]

Those Jews are abusing English laws for political reasons; also, there is nothing at all charitable about either of them.

The “Maxwells” (fake name, of course) are all just another pack of Jewish liars, fraudsters, and spies.

Having noted the utter chaos in Louisiana when Hurricane Katrina came, and when both State and Federal Government did nothing for weeks afterward, I wonder what would happen if America’s top 50 cities were to be incinerated…

Don’t go there…

Invasion does not arrive only on rubber boats or landing-craft.

Anyone, of any ideology, who supports or facilitates the invasion of this country by non-Europeans, is a traitor and/or enemy.

Ah. “Abrams“… Wouldn’t you just know? Every. Single. Time.

Translates to about 382 Reform MPs, 126 Labour, 58 LibDems, 29 Cons, 26 SNP (etc).

Reform is already semi-System. If Reform can all but kill off the old LibLabCon parties, but then be unable or unwilling to take necessary measures as a government, the way will be open for social nationalism. Farage and his Reform UK might be the last despairing throw of the dice for the British people. After that, anything is possible.

The “experts” and many others laughed at Hitler, they laughed at Lenin…eventually, they stopped laughing.

The Kiev-regime front is already crumbling; soon it will collapse completely.

[“The administration of US President Donald Trump may withdraw support for Ukraine, said University of Chicago professor John Mearsheimer. “Let’s imagine we are Trump. We have made an agreement with Vladimir Putin which, if accepted by others, could end the conflict. Moreover, we have made it clear to Ukraine and Europe that if they do not accept it, we will withdraw. However, sooner or later the situation on the battlefield will develop so that they will have no choice but to accept peace with the Russians” he added.“]

Quite. Russia is not only winning on the battlefield, but winning decisively, if slowly. There may be a massive breakthrough soon.

That is exactly what the (Israeli) Jews want, and what their actions are quite deliberately causing. Ethnic cleansing, and Lebensraum.

Whatever criticisms can be levelled at the Chinese government and Chinese society, it has to be admitted that their achievements over the past 40 years have been incredible.

Late music

[Great Wall of China]