Afternoon music
Stray thought
We are hearing much about the murder of the Polish or Anglo-Polish student, Henry Nowak, killed by a non-white in Southampton a while ago. In particular, people are arguing about what are the wishes of his family now.
It seems to me, not that those wishes (whatever they really are) are unimportant, but that this whole matter goes beyond those wishes (whatever they are) and, indeed, beyond the murder itself.
The matters to be considered revolve around the mass immigration (and subsequent/consequent breeding) of vast non-Brit, non-European populations within the UK, and the wider consequences of all that.
I cannot think of a really multiracial/multicultural society that has lasted long. People talk about the USA, but at the end of the First World War, the USA was about 90% European-origined, and the present very multiracial, if not very “multicultural”, USA of recent decades is already falling into near civil war.
The Roman Empire? Mostly European, of various strands, and it is important to note that the vast bulk of the populations within the Roman Empire did not travel far, or at all.
The main issue is that the UK’s present society is crumbling wherever you look.
I was also thinking about the present wave of arrests and trials of those protesting about the Nowak matter. It seems to me that, as with the not-dissimilar 2024 Southport protests, the System is using the whole arrest and trial process as a “punishment before the punishment”. To put it another way, “the process is the punishment”.
Those protesters arrested (whether pleading Guilty or Not Guilty) have all, I believe, been remanded in custody. There is no proper reason for such remand in any of the cases of which I have read: see Bail Act 1976, as amended. It is obviously being done as a means of repressing further protest by others. Purely political, or socio-political. Improper.
Tweets seen
…and, more importantly, arguably, are almost all just mouthpieces of the Jewish/Israel lobby…
The untermensch will be in prison for the next 21+ years, but a wall, a squad, and an end would be a better outcome; more just, and less expensive for the British people.
I generally disfavour capital punishment, but there may be exceptions. In any case, I distinguish between ordinary judicial punishment, and executive action designed to protect the people.
I myself have been bothered by Hampshire police drones repeatedly (also, once, Essex Police, in 2017, and once by the Metropolitan Police) over the past 14 years, always at the behest of Jewish-lobby “activists” and/or Jewish loonies connected with the “Campaign Against Antisemitism” liars and perjurers.
I do not know to what extent, if at all, the Hampshire Police and Crime Commissioner was involved (in recent years) in all that; I suspect, perhaps so. We shall see.
In any event, Police and Crime Commissioners are being phased out in 2028. She may even have to get a job (I think for the first time in her life, as far as I have read anyway): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donna_Jones_(British_politician).
See also:
In fact, such more or less peaceful demonstrations probably accomplish more than the kind of slightly violent confrontations we saw recently and, nearly two years ago, at Southport. There is no point using force when you are too weak to take that to a successful or victorious conclusion.
Britain needs no defence against Russia.
Russia is not the pre-1991 Soviet Union, has no world-conquering ideology such as the old Marxism-Leninism, and no motive to try to rule Central or Western Europe.
Moreover, we can see that Russia is struggling even to subdue the corrupt and shambolic Jew-Zionist regime in Kiev, and so far has not managed to occupy most of Eastern Ukraine, i.e. Ukraine east of the Dnieper.
Another point is that, were the UK to leave NATO and stop confronting and provoking Russia in the Baltic and the Black Sea, Russia would supply the UK at cost price with oil and gas, and also provide us with a large market for British goods and services.
Late tweets seen
Assuming that Labour wins at Makerfield (which is quite possible and even probable), it makes no difference in big-picture terms. The Overton window is moving; the fast rise of relatively more radical Restore Britain proves that. More and more people want something at least approaching a social-national world view. Reform UK, with its black/brown candidates and its pro-Jewish lobby, pro-Israel mindset, is getting left behind.
It may be that, for GE 2029 (or anyway the next GE), Reform and Restore could form a limited-time alliance —call it “Reform-Restore”— to avoid splitting the vote. Were they to do that, the prize could be…Government.
Both Reform and Restore will eventually either give way to social nationalism, or will morph into that to a large extent. Eventually, the will of the awakened people will break through and triumph.
Monkeys-on-sticks like that purport to rule over us…
All roads lead to Rome, but of course there is no “Parliamentary road” to political power in the present rigged system.
Late thought
Earlier, I saw some manic Ukrainian woman, apparently the head of the “Ukraine Forum” at the System “think-tank”, Chatham House (Royal Institute for International Affairs) [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chatham_House].
Said Ukrainian woman, as expected, spouted her piece about how “Ukraine” (the Kiev regime) was “winning” but —wait for it— needs more money, arms, ammunition etc.
One of the problems with the conflict in Ukraine is that the UK mass media is simply giving one side of both news and opinion. All the reporting is from Kiev or the Kiev-regime side, and the Kiev regime’s policy and propaganda is rarely if ever questioned.
Conversely, there is simply no real reportage at all from Russia, Kiev-regime attacks on civilian targets are not covered at all, or only very briefly, and there are never interviews with pro-Russian persons in Russia or anywhere else.
The elephant in the room is that Russia has maybe as many as 7,000 nuclear weapons of various types. Ukraine has none. The whole reporting of the war is akin to a kind of shadow-boxing. Russia has x-troops, the Kiev regime has x-troops; Russia has this or that, but the Kiev regime also has this or that.
You never hear anyone say that, were the order to be given, Kiev and all major Ukrainian cities could be holes in the ground within the hour.
Russia does not want to devastate Kiev and other cities. Why? Because of a thousand years of mutual history, because Russia and Ukraine were effectively one state for most of that time, because they are almost one people ethnically and culturally, and because Russia wants to rule a productive and healthy Eastern Ukraine, not a radioactive wasteland.
However, the way things are going, it may be that Russian leaders feel forced to escalate, if not to a nuclear level —yet— but at least to a more destructive conventional level.
Russia has hundreds of ballistic missiles in its conventional arsenal, and could launch, realistically, in any one day, maybe as many as 100 up-to-date ones, bearing in mind logistical bottlenecks etc; Russian forces already have, since 2022, used up to 70 missiles, including older models, in a night, but not concentrated on a single city or other target area.
Russia produces over 100 new ballistic missiles per month.
Were Russia likely to seriously look as if it might “lose” this war, part of its nuclear arsenal could be used, for example on Kiev. A terrible war crime, true, and it has not happened yet, despite 4 years of warfare, but it could happen, and don’t tell me that NATO —or the USA alone— would take on Russia in a nuclear exchange on behalf of the Kiev regime.
Were Russia to destroy Kiev and Kharkov, that would be terrible and/but also would be the end of the war. It might just happen. If it does happen, the main thing is not to let that slide into a general East-West nuclear war.
Late music
Ian Robert Millard 